DISPUTE RESOLUTION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Description:

DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Collie Edgar Norman. Interim Program Director. Office of Dispute Resolution ... Ancillary Forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution. Dispute ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1150
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: Cou5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DISPUTE RESOLUTION


1
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
  • Collie Edgar Norman
  • Interim Program Director
  • Office of Dispute Resolution

2
EXAMINATION
  • countdown

3
What are we going to talk about?
  • WHEN?
  • HOW?
  • WHY?
  • WHAT?
  • WHICH?

4
WHY
  • 750,000 cases
  • lt 5
  • lt 1 Civil

5
What isDispute Resolution?
6
Dispute Resolution Act 13-22-301 et seq.
  • Any Court of Record
  • Any Case
  • Mediation Services
  • Dispute Resolution Programs
  • Ancillary Forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution

7
Dispute Resolution Many Different Roads
8
FORMS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
  • Mediation
  • Settlement Conference
  • Arbitration
  • Med-arb
  • Early Neutral Evaluation

9
FORMS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTION
  • Fact Finding
  • Mini-trial
  • Special Master
  • Summary Jury Trial
  • Multi-door Courthouse

10
Mediation
  • Intervention
  • Dispute Negotiations
  • Trained
  • Neutral
  • Third Party
  • Assist
  • Own Solutions

11
Settlement Conference
  • Informal Assessment and Negotiation Session
  • Legal professional
  • Hears both sides
  • May advise
  • Law and Precedent
  • May suggest settlement

12
Arbitration
  • One or More Neutral Third Parties
  • Decision
  • Based on Evidence and Testimony

13
Med-Arb
  • Mediation
  • Settlement Failed
  • Same Neutral Third Party
  • Arbitrator

14
Early Neutral Evaluation
  • Early Intervention
  • Court Appointed Evaluator
  • Narrow, Eliminate and Simplify Issues
  • Assist in Case Planning and Management
  • Settlement May Occur

15
Fact Finding
  • Investigation
  • Public or Private Body
  • Examines Issues and Facts
  • May or May Not Recommend
  • Settlement Procedures

16
Mini-Trial
  • Structured Settlement Process
  • Principles Meet at Hearing
  • Neutral Advisor
  • Merits Presented
  • Settlement Discussions

17
Special Master
  • Court-Appointed
  • Magistrate, Auditor or Examiner
  • Court Order Defines Scope
  • Regulate Proceedings and Hearings
  • Do All Acts Take All Measures
  • Compliance with Courts Order

18
Summary Jury Trial
  • Summary Presentations
  • Complex Case
  • Jury
  • May or May Not Be Binding

19
Multi-Door Courthouse
  • Parties Select
  • Any Combination
  • Problem Solving Methods
  • Effective Resolution

20
Case Screening Which Cases to Refer to ADR
  • Need SPEEDY Resolution
  • Need LESS COSTLY Process
  • Need PERSONALIZED OUTCOMES
  • Neutral 3rd PARTY INPUT helpful
  • RELATIONSHIP is on-going
  • Potential for INTEGRATIVE SOLUTIONS
  • NON-LEGAL ISSUES
  • Court Decision WILL NOT RESOLVE Issues
  • Need to PREVENT FUTURE DISPUTES
  • PARTIES WILLING to try non-traditional approach

21
Case Screening Which Cases Not to Refer to ADR
  • CAUTION - Maybe Not
  • Need CONSISTENT outcomes
  • Need full PUBLIC RECORD
  • Significant GOVERNMENT POLICY
  • Outcome affects PERSONS NOT AT PROCEEDING
  • DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
  • DO NOT SEND
  • Ø Need to set a PRECEDENT
  • Ø DOMESTIC VIOLENCE and Party(ies) UNWILLING

22
Timing of referrals to ADROptions
  • Front end
  • Early in the case, e.g.
  • Within 120 days of case at issue (civil)
  • At 30 days (dom rel)
  • At case management conference
  • Referral by FCF
  • Order by judge or magistrate
  • Back end
  • E.g. 80 days before trial (civil)

23
Timing of referrals to ADRConsiderations
  • Benefits of Early Referral
  • Increased possibility of resolution
  • Earlier resolution
  • More savings for parties and the court
  • Parties may be less positional
  • Benefits of Later Referral
  • More information available
  • More time for parties to settle without 3rd party
    intervention
  • Parties may be more motivated
  • Parties may be less emotional

24
WHY?Case Management Benefits
  • Faster resolution
  • More stipulations
  • Fewer motions
  • Fewer continuances
  • Less court trial/hearing time
  • Fewer post-judgment/post-decree filings
  • Higher compliance rates
  • More predictable dockets

25
WHY?Additional Benefits
  • High party satisfaction
  • Increased satisfaction with the justice system
  • High or higher quality resolutions
  • Preservation of relationships
  • More effective communication
  • Closure

26
CASE ASSESSMENT
  • Refer to ADR?
  • Why?
  • Which?
  • When?
  • How?

27
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
For More Information, visit www.ColoradoODR.org
  • Collie Edgar Norman
  • Interim Program Director
  • Office of Dispute Resolution
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com