Corporate Finance: Capital Budgeting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Corporate Finance: Capital Budgeting

Description:

If Dell introduces the new line, it will have decreased sales of Pentium computers. ... with 5 years to maturity, 10% annual coupons, and a market price of $980. The ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:129
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: scotth66
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Corporate Finance: Capital Budgeting


1
Corporate FinanceCapital Budgeting
  • Professor Scott Hoover
  • Management 221

2
  • The Importance of Capital Budgeting
  • definition A capital budget is a long-term
    plan that describes the use of long-term assets
    (capital) and details expected future cash
    inflows and outflows (budget).
  • How are projects created?
  • someone identifies a potential market
  • marketing personnel determine the market size
    (sales projections, etc.)
  • engineers, cost accountants, and management
    personnel estimate production costs
  • finance personnel take projected costs and
    revenues and decide whether or not to accept the
    project

3
  • verify that the projected cash flows are all the
    incremental cash flows for the project
  • incremental cash flows include any impacts that
    the project may have on firm cash flows
  • identify cost of capital
  • calculate NPV, IRR
  • decide whether or not to accept the project.
  • finance personnel acquire financing for the
    project
  • issue securities (stock, bonds, preferred stock)
    if necessary

4
  • Project Evaluation Techniques
  • Net Present Value (NPV)
  • NPV ? the present value of all cash flows
    (including the initial investment) evaluated at
    the company's cost of capital.
  • We will define cost of capital in more detail
    later. For now, think of it as the interest rate
    desired by company investors.
  • Example A firm is considering a project with
    projected cash flows as follows.
  • Should the project be accepted?

5
  • Suppose that the firm has a cost of capital of
    10. The NPV of the project is calculated as
    followsNPV - 100,000 20,000/1.1
    25,000/1.12 30,000/1.13
    35,000/1.14 35,000/1.15 7,020
  • The NPV rule Companies should accept any and
    all projects that have positive NPVs and should
    reject any and all projects that have negative
    NPVs.
  • Intuition If the NPV is positive, then the
    project is expected to pay more than enough money
    to give investors the return they desire.
  • Internal Rate of Return (IRR)
  • IRR ? the implied interest rate on the project.
    Said differently, the IRR is the interest rate
    that makes the NPV equal to zero.

6
  • NPV 0 - 100,000 20,000/(1IRR)
    25,000/(1IRR)2 30,000/(1IRR)3
    35,000/(1IRR)4 35,000/(1IRR)5
  • Solving for the IRR (by trial and error or
    financial calculator) gives IRR 12.4534
  • The IRR rule If a company's cost of capital is
    lower than the IRR, then the company should
    accept the project. If the cost of capital is
    higher than the IRR, then the project should be
    rejected.
  • Note This rule may not work if the project has
    unusual cash flows. For example, if the sign (
    or -) of the expected cash flows changes more
    than once, there may be more than one IRR. In
    our example, there is one sign change, so there
    can only be one IRR.
  • In our example, the firm has a cost of capital of
    10. The project should be accepted because the
    project will create more profits than are needed
    to pay interest on the borrowing.

7
  • Note that the NPV Rule and the IRR Rule are
    consistent as long as we have typical cash flow
    structures.
  • To see this, consider the following.
  • We accept the project if and only if the cost of
    capital is below the IRR. Notice that this
    region corresponds to NPVgt0.

8
  • Example Suppose that two projects are mutually
    exclusive. This means that the firm may choose
    only one of the two projects. The expected cash
    flows are as follows.
  • If the cost of borrowing is 10, which project
    should be chosen?
  • NPVA -100,000,000 111,100,000 / 1.1
    1,000,000
  • NPVB -1,000,000 2,200,000 / 1.1 999,999
  • The NPV of Project A is higher, so we should take
    it
  • or should we?

9
  • Suppose our cash flow estimates turn out to be
    too high by, say, 2.
  • The cash flows would be.
  • NPVA -100,000,000 108,878,000 / 1.1
    -1,020,000
  • NPVB -1,000,000 2,155,999 / 1.1 959,999

10
  • Notice that the NPV of A is now negative, while
    the NPV of B is still large and positive. This
    suggests that we should take Project B.
  • Why?
  • There is more room for error in our estimates
    with Project B.
  • Notice also that the IRR for Project B is much
    higher than the IRR for Project A
  • IRRA (111,100,000 - 100,000,000) /
    100,000,000 11.1
  • IRRB (2,199,999 - 1,000,000) / 1,000,000
    119.99 !!
  • This illustrates why that we should always look
    at the IRR on projects in addition to the NPV.

11
  • The NPV always gives the correct decision when
    projects are independent (meaning that we can
    take any or all of them).
  • When projects are mutually exclusive, the NPV
    rule may give an incorrect decision. In those
    cases, we need to come to some subjective
    conclusion based on all the evidence.
  • Why might projects be mutually exclusive?
  • capital constraints
  • management constraints
  • resource constraints

12
  • What cash flows are relevant to the project
    decision?
  • example Suppose that you have spent 1,000,000
    on a project already. If you abandon the project
    right now, you will get nothing. If you spend an
    additional 200,000, you will get a payoff on the
    project of 1,100,000. The cost of capital is
    10. What should you do?
  • Argument 1 NPV -1,200,000 1,100,000/1.1
    -200,000
  • Reject (abandon) the project.
  • Argument 2 NPV -200,000 1,100,000/1.1
    800,000
  • Continue the project
  • Which is correct?
  • Intuitively, we know that we should continue.
    Implication Any cost that has already been
    spent/committed should be ignored in NPV
    analysis.
  • These costs are irrelevant and are called sunk
    costs.

13
  • The bottom line on relevant cash flows is the
    following.
  • Any cash flow that is different if the firm takes
    the project than if the firm rejects the project
    is a relevant cash flow.
  • These cash flows are called the incremental cash
    flows for the project.
  • example Suppose that a firm is considering a
    project. If the project is accepted, the firm
    will sell some of its old equipment for
    2,500,000. The equipment has a book value of
    1,400,000. If the firms marginal tax rate is
    30, what is the cash flow for the sale?
  • Is the cash flow relevant? yes.
  • Cash flow Sale Price - Profits ? Tax Rate
    Market Value - (Market Value - Book
    Value) ? Tax Rate 2,500,000 - (2,500,000
    - 1,400,000) ? 0.3 2,170,000
  • This type of cash flow is called a salvage cash
    flow.

14
  • example Suppose that a firm owns land that has a
    market value of 5,000,000. The firm is
    considering a project that will require the use
    of the land. What is the relevant cash flow for
    the land?
  • Is the cash flow relevant? YES!
  • If the firm accepts the projects, it gives up the
    ability to sell the land or do something else
    with it.
  • The incremental cash flow here is the value of
    the best alternative use of the land.
  • Assuming the best use is to sell it, the firm
    incurs an incremental cash flow of -5,000,000 if
    the project is accepted.
  • Note we would also include any tax effect on
    the sale.

15
  • example Suppose that your firm is considering a
    project. If the project is accepted, the firm
    will have to create a cash account of 200,000 to
    handle net working capital requirements. The
    project will last for 6 years.
  • Are there relevant cash flows here? yes
  • The firm will have to "deposit" 200,000 at the
    beginning of the project, so there will be a cash
    outflow of 200,000 at that time.
  • At the end of the project, the firm will be able
    to close the account, so there will be a cash
    inflow of 200,000 at that time.
  • Any impacts on net working capital accounts
    (current assets and current liabilities) are
    considered relevant cash flows.
  • Notice that we recover the net working capital
    at the end of the project. When the project is
    over, we will no longer need the net working
    capital, so we are able to use the funds for
    other purposes

16
  • example Suppose that Dell Computer is
    considering a project in which it will introduce
    a new line of computers. These computers will be
    in direct competition with Dell's current line of
    Pentium computers. As a result, Dell expects
    decreased profits (after-tax) of 54,000,000 per
    year.
  • Are there relevant cash flows here? yes
  • If Dell introduces the new line, it will have
    decreased sales of Pentium computers. If it
    doesn't introduce the line, sales of Pentium
    computers will not decrease.
  • Relevant cash flow -54,000,000 per year.
  • This type of cash flow is called an externality.
    If an externality results in decreased sales for
    other products, the externality is called
    cannibalization.

17
  • Accounting Numbers vs. Relevant Cash Flows
  • example Suppose that a company has the
    following income statement.
  • What is the relevant cash flow?

18
  • What are the relevant cash flows?

19
  • Total Cash flow 400,000 - 275,000 - 10,000
    115,000
  • The taxes are calculated as (Sales - Costs -
    Depreciation) ? Tax Rate, so we calculated the
    total cash flow as CF S - C - (S - C - D) ? T.
    Rearranging this, we get CF (S - C) ? (1-T)
    D ? T
  • This cash flow called the operating cash flow.
  • Notes
  • Sales do not, in general, equal receipts from
    sales (since some sales are made on accounts
    receivable).
  • Cost of Goods Sold does not, in general, equal
    the disbursement for projects (since some
    purchases are made on accounts payable).
  • Fortunately, the adjustments for those
    discrepancies are taken care of when we include
    the change in net working capital as a cash flow.

20
  • The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
  • definition the cost of capital is the firm's
    marginal cost (as a percentage) of acquiring
    capital, given that the firm maintains its
    current debt/equity/preferred stock
    distribution.
  • Cost of Equity (or.the Cost of Retained
    Earnings)
  • Suppose that a firm is all-equity and that the
    firm intends to stay that way. What is the
    firm's cost of borrowing money?
  • Investors will demand an interest rate (in
    expectation) that compensates them for the
    non-diversifiable risk they face.

21
  • Diversifiable (unsystematic or irrelevant) risk
    vs. Non-diversifiable (market or systematic or
    relevant) risk
  • Important point Investors will only be
    compensated for the risk that they would face
    given that they reduce it as much as possible.
    If they do not choose to diversify, they will not
    be compensated for the extra risk they have
    voluntarily chosen to take.
  • The risk that remains after it has been reduced
    as much as possible is called non-diversifiable
    risk.
  • risk associated with macroeconomic conditions
    such as inflation, changes in taxation, changes
    in trade policies, etc.
  • The risk that has been taken away is called
    diversifiable risk.
  • risk associated with only the firm, such as
    chance of a manufacturing plant fire, chance of e
    coli in food products, etc.
  • Why is this diversifiable risk?

22
  • The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
  • KE Rf ?(Rm-Rf)
  • ? measure of the non-diversifiable risk of the
    stock.
  • ? 1..investment has the same non-diversifiable
    risk as the market.
  • ? 0.investment has no non-diversifiable risk
    (Treasury bills, for instance).
  • ? lt 0.investment is negatively correlated with
    the market (gold perhaps). These can be very
    useful for diversification.
  • 0 lt ? lt 1.investment has less non-diversifiable
    risk than the market.
  • ? gt 1.investment has more non-diversifiable risk
    than the market.

23
  • Cost of Debt
  • What is the firm's interest rate on debt?
  • easy to measure because we can readily observe
    the yield on existing debt
  • must adjust the cost for the interest tax
    deduction
  • cost of debt ? KD
  • after-tax cost of debt KD(1-t), where t is the
    company's tax rate
  • Example Suppose a company has bonds outstanding
    with 5 years to maturity, 10 annual coupons, and
    a market price of 980. The company's marginal
    tax rate is 40.
  • What is the cost of debt? KD 10.53
  • What is the after-tax cost of debt? KD (1-t)
    10.53 (1-0.4) 6.32
  • Notice that because of the tax advantage, it is
    typically fairly cheap to borrow by issuing debt.

24
  • Cost of Preferred Stock
  • There is no tax advantage (typically) on
    preferred stock.
  • easy to calculate because preferred stock is
    really just a perpetual bond
  • Example Suppose that a company has preferred
    stock that currently sells (on the open market)
    for 34 per share. The promised dividend is 4
    per year. What is the cost of the company's
    preferred stock?
  • KPS DPS / P 4/34 0.1176 11.76

25
  • Weighted Average Cost of Capital
  • Notice that D, E, PS, and TA (which is DEPS)
    should be included as market values.
  • Why?
  • The WACC is the appropriate discount rate to use
    for projects because it gives us the firm's
    average cost of borrowing.
  • Said differently, it is the amount of money that
    must be paid out of firm profits to satisfy all
    the firms investors.

26
  • example Suppose that a firm is financed with
    40M debt, 10M preferred stock, and 50M common
    equity. What is the WACC? Further information
  • debt currently, the firm has an 8 annual
    coupon, 10 year bond that sells for 1000.
  • preferred stock currently the firm has
    preferred shares outstanding that sell for
    27.50. The promised dividend is 3.
  • common equity The company has a beta of 1 and
    the expected market return is 11.25.
  • marginal tax rate 38
  • What is the firm's WACC if the firm plans to
    finance with new issues?
  • KD 8 (since the bonds sell at par)
  • KPS D1/P 3/27.50 10.909
  • KE 11.25 (since the beta is 1)
  • WACC 0.4 (8) (1-0.38) 0.1(10.909) 0.5
    (11.25) 8.7

27
  • Questions
  • What if the company is not publicly-traded?
  • What is the project under consideration differs
    from the companys current projects?
  • In theory, the WACC should be the interest rate
    that compensates investors for the level of
    non-diversifiable risk associated with the
    project. We can use the companys WACC only if
    the project under consideration is similar in
    risk to the rest of the company. If not, we use
    what is called the pure play approach.
  • Pure Play Approach
  • 1. Identify public companies that work in the
    line of business we are considering.
  • 2. Estimate the WACCs for those companies.
  • 3. Use those estimates to find the appropriate
    discount rate for the project.

28
  • Equivalent Annual Annuities
  • Example A company is considering two projects,
    but may only choose one of them. The companys
    WACC is 9. The expected cash flows of those
    projects are as follows.
  • Which project should the company choose?
  • NPVA 749,806 NPVB 1,058,561

29
  • It appears that B is the better project, but
    notice that B ties up the firm for 5 years, while
    A ties it up for 3 years. An advantage of A is
    that the firm might be able to earn additional
    profits in years 4 and 5. How can we take that
    into account?
  • Equivalent Annual Annuity ? the annuity payment
    over the life of the project that would give the
    same NPV as the project itself.
  • Project A
  • C/1.09 C/1.092 C/1.093 749,806 ? C
    296,215
  • Project B
  • C/1.09 C/1.092 C/1.093 C/1.094 C/1.095
    1,058,561 ? C 272,148
  • So, project A provides more value per year and
    therefore is preferred to project B.

30
  • Other measures of value
  • payback
  • discounted payback
  • adjusted net present value
  • economic value added (EVA)
  • The Importance of Sensitivity Analysis
  • Examples
  • see handout

31
  • 1 A company is considering a project that
    requires an initial investment of 24M to build a
    new plant and purchase equipment. The investment
    will be depreciated as a MACRS 7-year class (see
    p. 21 in the text) asset. The new plant will be
    built on some of the company's land which has a
    current, after-tax market value of 4.3M. The
    company will produce units at a cost of 130 each
    and will sell them for 420 each. There are
    annual fixed costs of 0.5M. Unit sales are
    expected to be 150,000 each year for the next 6
    years, at which time the project will be
    abandoned. At that time, the plant and equipment
    is expected to be worth 8M (before tax) and the
    land is expected to be worth 5.4M (after tax).
    To supplement the production process, the company
    will need to purchase 1M worth of inventory.
    That inventory will be depleted during the final
    year of the project. The company has 100M of
    debt outstanding with a yield-to-maturity of 8,
    and has 150M of equity outstanding with a beta
    of 0.9. The expected market return is 13 and
    the risk-free rate is 5. The company's marginal
    tax rate is 40. Should the project be
    accepted?

32
  • Solution to 1
  • WACC
  • wD 100M / 250M 0.4
  • kD 8wE 150M / 250M 0.6
  • kE 5 0.9?(13 - 5) 12.2
  • ? WACC 0.4?8?(1-0.4) 0.6?12.2 9.24
  • Capital Expenditure
  • -24M at date 0

33
(No Transcript)
34
  • Salvage cash flow of new equipment in 6 years
  • Salvage CF 8M - 0.4?(8M - 3.212M) 6.085M
  • Change in Net Working Capital
  • -1M at date 0 1M at date 6
  • Operating Cash Flows
  • Sales 150,000 ? 420 63,000,000
  • Costs 150,000 ? 130 0.5M 20,000,000
  • OCF (S - C) ? (1-0.4) D ? 0.4
    25,800,000D?0.4

35
  • Other Relevant Cash Flows Land
  • The 4.3M is an opportunity cost and must be
    included at date 0.
  • If the project is accepted, however, the land can
    be sold in 6 years for 5.4M. Is this an
    incremental cash flow? Yes, because we wouldn't
    be selling it then if we reject the project.
  • Putting all this together gives us the total
    expected incremental cash flows for the project

36
(No Transcript)
37
  • NPV -29.3 27.172/ 1.0924 39.141/1.09246
    99.37M gt 0IRR 92.53 gt 9.24
  • ? Accept the project
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com