Title: From User to Citizen
1From User to Citizen
- 16 years of experience in Norway with the
dismantling of disabling barriers
2Can we learn from the Norwegian experience?
- Demographic similarities to Ireland
- Relatively small population (4 ½ million)
- 4 cities (population more than 100,000)
- Majority of towns have a population of less than
5,000 - Strong ideology on supporting autonomous local
government and decentralisation of services - Strong culture of normalisation and equality for
all citizens - 1st January 1991 a total reform of the care
people with learning disability
3The vision From service user to citizen
NO MORE SEGREGATED SERVICES
- All institutions to close by December 1995
- People with intellectual disability should access
mainstream services - Mainstream services must change in order to
accommodate ALL Norwegian citizens - whether or
not they have a disability.
4Pre-school
- Children with disabilities should be given
priority to places in their local pre-schools - Special grants were to be made available to
existing pre-schools to make any necessary
accommodations for the child - All new pre-schools must be fully accessible to
everyone, both indoors and outdoors, so that as
far as possible, there is no need for special
adaptation for special needs
5School
- All schools must provide education suited to the
individual child (IEP) This applies to ALL
children, with or without disability - Extra teachers and classroom assistants are
provided as needed - Special education (from specially qualified
teachers) within the mainstream school should be
available to children with special needs
6Housing
- Adults with intellectual disability should own or
rent their own home - The homes should be in their local communities
and of the same standard and form as any typical
home in that community - Support services should be linked to the
individual, not the accommodation - Staff do not sleep or have offices in the
persons home
7Work
- Since the 1990s Norwegian employment politics
focused on the work line. This meant that
everyone should work to the best of their ability
in ordinary paid jobs. This goal included people
with intellectual disability - The government put several strategies in place
for overcoming barriers to work for people with
disabilities (including supported employment)
8Recreation
- People with intellectual disability should have
the same cultural and recreational opportunities
as anyone else - Cultural and recreational activities should be
integrated with already existing activities in
the community
9Transport
- Access to transport is essential for access to
recreational activities, education, work, and
daily activities such as shopping, going to the
dentist, etc. - A goal of the reform was to ensure
- accessible public transport to enable all to live
an active life - Taxi services for individuals who cannot use
public transport (or where public transport is
not developed enough) - Part of the ordinary taxi service although booked
separately and state subsidised - Pay public transport rates (2)
- Escorts (paid, friends or family) travel with you
for free
10Health services
- People with intellectual disabilities should
access their local health/clinical services using
the same routes as anyone else - Local health services can refer to secondary or
tertiary medical services in the same way as for
any other members of the population. - At county level, habilitation teams were set up.
These teams were to provide a consultancy service
to individuals with learning disability, their
families and staff.
11The start (1988 - 1991)
- Development of habilitation plans for every
individual with learning disability (over 13,000
individuals registered) - Social services set up responsibility groups
around each individual consisting of the
individual, family members, staff, clinicians - These groups were responsible for supporting
individuals to - Choose habilitation goals
- Identify individual needs and preferences in all
areas of life - Identify the types of services they would need
- Identify the levels of support needed
- Identify the need for interagency co-ordination
- Draw up plans for implementation
12Results after 10 years (2001)(The Norwegian
Council of Research)
- General improvement in standard of living and
opportunities for a normal life - Many people were now living in their own homes
- Children were attending local playschools and
schools - Adults were in jobs or taking part in activities
in their local communities and living in their
own homes - Services were provided from the local community
HoweverStudies of health before and after the
reform did not show any improvement
13Results 16 years after the reform
- Report from the Directorate of social welfare and
Health We want to, we want to, but are we able
to? (June, 2007) - Hearing conference organised by the State
Authority for People with Disability (September,
2007) at the request of the Minister of Work and
Inclusion
14Outcomes - preschool
Children with disabilities are included in their
local pre-schools
- Concerns
- Clustering
- Some pre-schools have staff that are specifically
trained to work with children with special needs.
There is a tendency that children with
intellectual disability go to these pre-schools.
15Outcomes - preschool
Every child with a learning disability has a
place in mainstream school
- Concerns
- Clustering
- The number of children in segregated classes
within the school is increasing - Growing numbers of children are being sent to
schools for special diagnosis groups (ADHD,
Autism, Blind, Deaf, Speech Impediments) - Standard of education not better than in special
schools - Few third level education opportunities
16Outcomes - Housing (Norwegian Institute for Town
and Regional Research)
78 of adults with learning disability live in
their own accommodation by 20 years of age
- Concerns
- Clustering
- 79 rent from the social services
- 1/3 of those live with others
- 1/3 live in homes that are clustered
17When social services provide housing they tend to
- Build bigger houses for larger groups
- Build houses close to houses for people with
intellectual disability and/or other minority
groups - Build houses that look different from ordinary
homes - Link support staff to houses, not to individuals
which means that 30 40 part-time staff can be
linked to one house - Change their priorities they are now focusing
on accommodation for the elderly and people with
mental health issues and waiting lists for people
with learning disability are starting to appear
18Outcomes - work
The number of people with intellectual disability
in work is higher now than before the reform
- CONCERNS
- Only 1300 people with intellectual disability are
employed in the open labour market - 80 who work are in some form of sheltered work
- Only 4 of people with intellectual disability
were included in government schemes to integrate
them into ordinary jobs
19Outcomes - recreation
10, 500 people have social supporters (paid
friends) and a total of 165 recreational
assistants are employed full time across the
country
- CONCERNS
- Overall participation in cultural and
recreational activities has decreased - People with high level support needs seldom have
a holiday away
20Outcomes - Transport
- Improvement in accessibility of public transport
but not consistent - Taxi service for people with disabilities can be
used for recreational activities, going to shops,
banks, official offices BUT not for getting to
and from work!
21Health services research results
- 1995 increase in physical problems, psychiatric
illness and challenging behaviour after the
reform - 2006 in 44 of 59 local communities audited,
restraint was being used illegally - 2007 Increase in the use of antipsychotic
medication often prescribed for challenging
behaviour without any clear indications of
psychotic symptoms
22Why the negative trends?
- Shift of political focus to next big reform
- Funding used for other needy groups
- No legislation to ensure rights
- Lack of competence in community services
- Loss of qualified professionals
- Lack of transparency in community services
- Poor overseeing/auditing of services
- A natural tendency towards clustering
23Avoiding the pitfalls
- Appoint personal co-ordinators/managers who are
responsible for developing plans for individuals
that describe the optimum life situation for that
person in terms of goals and support - Develop legislation that ensures
- that individual plans are implemented
- that individuals have rights to services and
resources of certain standard - that housing people in groups, to save
money/resources is not permitted
24Avoiding pitfalls (contd.)
- Strengthen skills of staff
- Strengthening of competence/qualifications of
staff/service providers/health practitioners in
all life arenas - Develop local support services for staff that can
give ongoing advice, support, training and
feedback to frontline staff on their daily work
(more than a consultancy service for problem
behaviour) - Set up systems to ensure transparency and
accountability of services with regular
evaluations and audits - Have a holistic focus, on all life arenas for
each individual from day one