Civil Liberties - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Civil Liberties

Description:

and the First Amendment ' ... The First Amendment states: 'Congress shall make no law... Testing the Limits to the First Amendment's Guarantee of Free Speech ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: sobekCo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Civil Liberties


1
Civil Liberties
PSCI 110120 Sept 2007
  • Contemporary concerns
  • Civil liberties vs. civil rights
  • Personal rights and the First
  • Amendment

2
Civil Liberties vs. Civil Rights
  • Civil liberties Freedom from. The freedoms
    enjoyed by individuals. Civil liberties define
    what government cannot do to people negative
    rights.
  • Civil rights Freedom to. Clarifies that civil
    liberties apply to all. Civil rights specify
    what government should do to avoid discriminatory
    application of civil liberties positive rights.

3
Theoretical Concepts UnderlyingCivil Rights and
Liberties
  • 1. Equality
  • Individual dignity
  • Freedom Maximize individual choice
  • Freedoms are in conflict
  • Limit freedom to protect the rights of others

4
Personal Rightsand the First Amendment
  • Congress shall make no law respecting an
    establishment of religion, or prohibiting the
    free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom
    of speech, or of the press or the right of the
    people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the
    Government for a redress of grievances.

5
Freedom of Speech
  • The First Amendment states Congress shall make
    no law abridging the freedom of speech
  • But, rights are relative.

6
Freedom of Speech
  • The First Amendment states Congress shall make
    no law abridging the freedom of speech
  • But, rights are relative.
  • The courts have addressed free speech issues by
    making a distinction between
  • pure speech
  • conduct

7

Pure Speech
Conduct
Where do you draw the line??
  • Pure speech is Constitutionally protected.
    Conduct, however, is not necessarily protected.

8
DeJonge v. Oregon (1937)The Supreme Court
declared that DeJonge should be set free because
he was entitled to peaceably discuss the issues
of the day.
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes (1929)
If there is any principle of the Constitution
that more imperatively calls for attachment than
any other it is the principle of free thought
not free thought for those who agree with us but
freedom for the thought that we hate.
1st Amendment, Free Speech Case
9
Testing the Limits to the First Amendments
Guarantee of Free Speech
  • Tests devised by the Supreme Court
  • Clear and present danger test
  • Balancing of the interest test (including
    application of the preferred position doctrine)
  • Gravity of the evil test
  • Incitation test, distinguishing between
  • advocacy in the abstract and
  • advocacy designed to incite immediate illegal
    action
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com