Ubiquitous Computing at Seton Hall University

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Ubiquitous Computing at Seton Hall University

Description:

Future Considerations: What kind of computing is sufficient for 'ubiquitous computing' ... handheld devices, cell phones, iPods, etc.? Is the 'minimum standard' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:55
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: setonhallu
Learn more at: http://pirate.shu.edu

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ubiquitous Computing at Seton Hall University


1
Ubiquitous Computing at Seton Hall University
Presented to TLT Group April 18, 2006
Stephen G. Landry CIO
2
Key Ideas
  • There is a rich array of excellent teaching and
    learning resources available online
  • To take full advantage of these resources,
    institutions need to ensure universal access to
    those resources
  • Access to the technology is necessary but not
    sufficient to use these resources to improve
    teaching and learning support, particularly
    support for technology enabled redesign of
    teaching and learning, is needed
  • Access to the technology has become much more
    attainable in the last ten years, to the point
    where this is a tractable issue for most
    institutions

3
Seton Hall University
  • Mid-Sized private Catholic-affiliated research
    intensive University located in suburban NJ,
    approx. 15 miles from NYC
  • Main campus in South Orange NJ
  • Law School in Newark, NJ
  • 4,400 full time undergraduate students
  • 50 live on campus / 50 commute
  • 400 full time faculty

4
Strategic Planning at SHU
  • Following 1994 Middle States accreditation, SHU
    embarked on an intensive strategic planning
    effort resulting in the Universitys 1996
    strategic plan
  • Increased undergraduate enrollment target from
    900 per year to 1200 per year
  • Increased scholarships / tuition discount
  • Launched new schools of Diplomacy and Graduate
    Medical Education launched SetonWorldWide, the
    Universitys online university with seven wholly
    online degree programs
  • Built new library and new academic building
  • Made a substantial commitment to technology
  • GOAL To provide a technologically advanced
    learning environment for our students and faculty

5
Implementation of Ubiquitous Computing
  • During planning in 1994-96, faculty saw the
    potential of online resources to improve student
    learning but saw access and support as
    impediments to their taking advantage of these
    resources in their own teaching
  • University launched its Mobile Computing Program,
    aimed at providing access, services, and support
  • First pilot in 1995 with twelve faculty in
    Business and AS and twenty Business Honors
    students
  • Mandatory for all incoming first year Business
    Majors in 1997
  • Mandatory for all incoming first year students in
    1998

6
Mobile Computing Program
  • Seton Hall Universitys Mobile Computing Program
    is an innovative academic program involving three
    components
  • Access The University licenses the use of a
    laptop computer to students as part of their
    tuition and fees
  • Curricular Integration The University provides
    support and incentives to faculty to use
    technology in innovative ways to enhance teaching
    and learning
  • Network and Support Services The University
    provides the infrastructure and support services
    that enable the effective use of technology in
    teaching and learning

7
Impact on Learning Environment
  • Mobile Computing Assessment Program demonstrates
    that the program has had a positive impact on TL
  • Benefits have come primarily through the
    sustained support for using technology to improve
    TL
  • Teaching, Learning, and Technology Center
  • Internal Grants to Promote / Support Effective
    Faculty Use
  • Focus on Technology-Enabled Redesign of Large
    Enrollment Courses (along lines of PEW LCR
    Project)
  • Examples English / Psychology / Precalculus
    Mathematics / Oral Communications / First Year
    Experience (Freshman Studies)
  • Adoption of ePortfolios in Education / English /
    Psychology / First Year Experience (Freshman
    Studies)

8
Implementing Ubiquitous Computing
  • Models of Ubiquitous Computing
  • Student Ownership vs. Institutional Ownership
  • Standardization vs. User Choice With Minimum
    Specifications
  • Examples
  • Institutional Ownership / Standardization
  • Wake Forest University, Seton Hall University,
    Ontario University Institute of Technology
  • Student Ownership / Standardization
  • University of North Carolina / Chapel Hill,
    University of Vermont
  • Student Ownership / Minimum Specifications
  • Sonoma State University, Dartmouth University, RPI

9
Implementing Ubiquitous Computing (cont.)
  • Ubiquitous Computing has become more attainable
    in the past ten years
  • Hardware costs for laptops have come down (e.g.,
    2800 in 1996 vs. 1400 in 2006)
  • Costs of network hardware and bandwidth have come
    down (e.g., vs. 500 / mbs in 1996 vs. 50 / mbs
    in 2006)
  • Software has become more stable and supportable
    (e.g., MS Windows 98 vs. MS Windows XP, better
    virus protection / antispyware, better network
    and computer management software, etc.), reducing
    the cost of technical support
  • Wide variety of instructional software and
    content now available (e.g., Blackboard, Moodle,
    MyMathLab, etc.)

10
Implementing Ubiquitous Computing (cont.)
  • Points to Consider
  • Access
  • many campuses have nearly all students with
    laptops but arent acknowledging / supporting
    ubiquitous computing
  • some campuses have access issues and need to
    develop plans to ensure their students have
    appropriate access to technology
  • But access is only one part of using technology
    resources to improve student learning other
    parts include
  • Support Services
  • Faculty Adoption / Faculty Engagement
  • Technology-enabled redesign of courses and
    curricula

11
Future Considerations
  • What kind of computing is sufficient for
    ubiquitous computing? What about handheld
    devices, cell phones, iPods, etc.? Is the
    minimum standard access to a Java-enabled Web
    browser and a reasonably fast Internet
    connection?
  • If we extrapolate Moores Law, what will the
    ubiquitous computing environment be like in ten
    years? In twenty? How will colleges and their
    faculty respond to teaching in an environment
    where all students have a very small, discrete,
    always on computing device with essentially
    unlimited storage and bandwidth and the resources
    of a future Google providing a wealth of
    information and applications?
  • What kinds of privacy and access to we value in
    our current computing environment that we dont
    want to loose in the future?

12
For More Information Contact
  • Stephen Landry
  • Seton Hall University
  • landryst_at_shu.edu
  • www.shu.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)