In response to the paradigma shift FROM SURVIVAL TO QUALITY OF LIFE the greatest ever : a progressiv - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

In response to the paradigma shift FROM SURVIVAL TO QUALITY OF LIFE the greatest ever : a progressiv

Description:

Alternatives to the great discourses? Grotesque worldviews (fundamentalisms, New Age... Maslow's Pyramid of Human Needs. How do we live? A political ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:69
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 69
Provided by: janber
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: In response to the paradigma shift FROM SURVIVAL TO QUALITY OF LIFE the greatest ever : a progressiv


1
In response to the paradigma shift FROM
SURVIVAL TO QUALITY OF LIFE (the greatest ever)
a progressive evolutionary worldview
  • ECCO Jan. 25th 2007
  • Jan Bernheim
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel
  • jan.bernheim_at_vub.ac.be

2
A poorly prepared project takes three times as
long as planned
  • A well prepared project takes twice as long as
    planned

3
Abraham Maslows Pyramid of Human needs
4
The greatest paradigma shift ever FROM SURVIVAL
TO QUALITY OF LIFE
5
Suffering as the default state of the human
condition
  • Nature is indifferent to suffering only survival
    matters
  • Examples spider wasps, predators
  • ? Escapisms renunciation (oriental philosophies)
    or metaphysical transcendency (religions,
    mysticism, the eternal life of the soul)

6
Challenges 1/4
  • The old discourses, religions and communism, for
    example, are discredited.
  • Richard Dawkins (The Delusion of Religion, 2006)
    religions are pernicious because
  • - Fallacious
  • - Calamitous
  • - Obstructive for progress

7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
President Bush says God talks to him. If he had
said it was through his hairdryer, there would
have been a national emergency. I for one dont
see what the hairdryer adds to the ridicule of
the situation Sam
Harris In Letter to a Christian Nation
2006
10
Pros and cons of religions
  • Good people do good things and bad people do bad
    things. But for good people tot do bad things, it
    takes religion.
  • Stephen
    Weinberg
  • And for bad people to do good things also that
    takes religion.
  • Freeman Dyson

11
CHALLENGES 2/4
  • The old discourses filled needs. Their discredit
    leaves voids
  • Believers are happier, give more to charities
  • Unbelievers know better what they dont believe
    than what they do believe.
  • A world without God is cold and gloomy, without
    transcendence.
  • Can one replace religions by a scientific
    worldview that would be at least as satisfying?

12
Challenges 3/4Alternatives to the great
discourses?
  • Grotesque worldviews (fundamentalisms, New Age)?
  • Relativisms?
  • Consumerism and Postmodernism vacuity as a
    worldview.

13
(No Transcript)
14
Challenge 4/4
  • From heteronomous (communitarianisms,
    authoritarianisms), humans have become autonomous
  • (? individualism).
  • (Also according to modern christians, e.g. Roger
    Lenaerts S.J. De droom van Nebuchadnezar,
    Lannoo, 2004)

15
What after the grand discourses?
16
What to expect from a worldview help in
confronting the big questions
  • What exists? an ontology
  • Where do things come from? an ontogenesis
  • The purpose of life? an axiology
  • Where are we going? a futurology
  • Truth and un-truth? an epistemology
  • How to live in uncertainty? a life praxis
  • An explanation of behaviours? a praxeology
  • Good and bad? an ethics
  • A rational framework for emotions and mysteries

17
Objective
  • Can we, following Leo Apostel, construct a
    contemporary worldview based on the sciences and
    multidisciplinarity?
  • Lets rise to the challenge the Darwinian (
    matter) and historical ( time) perspectives lead
    to a
  • progressive evolutionary worldview

18
(No Transcript)
19
Evolutionary Theory short instructions for the
user 1/3
  • 1) variation and ?2) selection of better fit
    variants
  • Evolution is both conservative and progressive
    what works well persists and what works better is
    selected.
  • It obtains for both genes (units of biological
    transmission) and for memes (units of cultural
    transmission)
  • Fitness for what? For capacity of survival and
    procreation

20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
Evolutionary Theory short instructions for the
user 2/3
  • The two imperatives of de existence areSURVIVAL
    and PROCREATION
  • In a competitive world, with limited resources,
    the two survival strategies for which we were
    selected are
  • - agression - egoism
  • and
  • - co-operation - altruism

23
Avatars of Aggressivity
  • violence,
  • elimination,
  • appropriation,
  • submission,
  • exclusion,
  • exploitation of nature and humans
  • ....

24
Avatars of co-operation
  • Kindness, friendship, love (in that order),
  • solidarity, compassion, care (in that order),
  • benevolence, helpfulness
  • credibility,
  • justice
  • ? in short what we call the VIRTUES, a universal
    ethics, secular humanism, the inter-religious
    common language proposed by the catholic ethicist
    Tristram Engelhardt MD.

25
What to expect from a worldview help in
confronting the big questions
  • What exists? an ontology
  • Where do things come from? an ontogenesis
  • The purpose of life? an axiology
  • Where are we going? a futurology
  • Truth and un-truth? an epistemology
  • How to live in uncertainty? a life praxis
  • An explanation of behaviours? a praxeology
  • Good and bad? an ethics
  • A rational framework for emotions and mysteries

26
Agression and co-operation as survival strategies
  • A mix of both strategies is necessary for
    survival.
  • Problem Our genes by and large are those of the
    hunters- gatherers of 10.000 years ago, selected
    for what THEN was the best mix of agression and
    co-operation were misfits, poorly adapted to
    the present world, which is far more complex.

27
An ETHICS
Behavioural mix adapted to society
AGGRESSION
CO-OPERATION
Time, Complexity
28
CONSEQUENCES OF INCREASING COMPLEXITY
  • The more complex a society, the more opportunity
    for aggression co-operation,
  • More interactions more feedback
  • ? aggression inhibited
  • ? co-operation rewarded

29
An ETHICS
  • Time, Complexity

Behavioural mix adapted to society
Acceleration
AGGRESSION
CO-OPERATION
30
How do we cope with our genetic misfitness?
  • We compensate for our obsolete genes by memes
    horizontally and vertically transmissible
    cultural factors, such as
  • behaviours, judeo-christian norms et laws or
    secular humanistic principles ...
  • ? Civilisation is a means to cope with our
    obsolete genes.

31
An ETHICS
  • Time,
    Complexity

Behavioural mix adapted to society
AGRESSION
Genetic mix
CO-OPERATION
32
An ETHICS
  • Time,
    Complexity

Behavioural mix adapted for society
AGRESSION
CULTUREL AJUSTMENT NEEDS
Genetic mix
CO-OPERATION
33
What to expect from a worldview help in
confronting the big questions
  • What exists? an ontology
  • Where do things come from? an ontogenesis
  • The purpose of life? an axiology
  • Where are we going? a futurology
  • Truth and un-truth? an epistemology
  • How to live in uncertainty? a life praxis
  • An explanation of behaviours? a praxeology
  • Good and bad? an ethics
  • A rational framework for emotions and mysteries

34
An ONTOGENESIS where do we come from?
  • Ontogenesis repeats phylogenesis / development
    re-iterates history (Haeckels law)
  • For anatomy
  • In the mental and behavioral realm developmental
    psychology
  • For societies and civilisations modernity
  • versus
  • the anteriority (not inferiority!) of
    alternative societal models

35
What to expect from a worldview help in
confronting the big questions
  • What exists? an ontology
  • Where do things come from? an ontogenesis
  • The purpose of life? an axiology
  • Where are we going? a futurology
  • Truth and un-truth? an epistemology
  • How to live in uncertainty? a life praxis
  • An explanation of behaviours? a praxeology
  • Good and bad? an ethics
  • A rational framework for emotions and mysteries

36
The purpose of life? an AXIOLOGY
  • From survival to QOL the greatest revolution
    ever
  • Its utilitarian ethics, suffering and enjoyment
    as the measure of all things (JS Mill, J.
    Bentham, Peter Singer, ) also provides the
    purpose of life maximising the ratio of
    enjoyment and suffering

37
Definitions of Happiness
  • Relativistic, from Aristotle to postmodernism
  • Escapistic
  • Evolutionary sustainable pleasure, i.e . the
    feeling one has when the indicators for
    satisfaction of needs are favourable food,
    shelter, love, growth and (Maslow!)
    self-actualisation

38
A tall order to measure subjective
well-being, the perception quality of lifei.e.
  • To quantify what is qualitative
  • To make objective what is subjective

39
Mesurer ce qui est mesurable, et rendre mesurable
ce qui ne l est pas.
René Descartes
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
Conventional question versus Anamnestic
Comparative Self Assessment (ACSA). Which global
question is better suited?
OR
43
Examples of sequential ACSA measures during
disease
  • Bernheim, J.L., and M. Buyse 1984, J.
    Psychosoc. Oncol. 1. 25-38

44
Discrimination (inter-group comparisons)
Sensitivity to objective change (after life- and
QOL-saving transplantation in End-Stage-Liver
Disease )
45
The distribution of happiness in the world
46
(No Transcript)
47
This was a snapshot.
  • Next question
  • does happiness progress?

48
OBJECTIVE indicators of (SUBJECTIVE) happiness
  • Health
  • Wealth
  • Security
  • Liberties
  • Equality
  • Tolerance
  • Information, knowledge
  • In short
  • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)

49
Are these indicators - stable?- in
regression?- in progress?
50
(No Transcript)
51
(No Transcript)
52
(No Transcript)
53
(No Transcript)
54
(No Transcript)
55
Liberties, Self-determination and Control
  • Over death palliative care and euthanasia.

56
(No Transcript)
57
Liberties, Self-determination and Control
  • Over death palliative care and euthanasia.
  • Over procreation.
  • Over sex life.
  • Over partner choice.

58
CONCLUSION
  • Yes, if
  • Happiness is the highest good,
  • And the evolution of the objective conditions for
    happiness is the indicator of progress,
  • then there is objective progress.

59
What to expect from a worldview help in
confronting the big questions
  • What exists? an ontology
  • Where do things come from? an ontogenesis
  • The purpose of life? an axiology
  • Where are we going? a futurology
  • Truth and un-truth? an epistemology
  • How to live in uncertainty? a life praxis
  • An explanation of behaviours? a praxeology
  • Good and bad? an ethics
  • A rational framework for emotions and mysteries

60
Maslows Pyramid of Human Needs
61
How do we live? A political-economical PRAXEOLOGY
  • The Universal Declaration of Human Rights
    condition of happiness
  • NEW phenomena
  • -gt the entrance of ethics in Realpolitik
  • -gt intolerance for unhappiness
  • -gt the extinction of generation conflicts

62
What to expect from a worldview help in
confronting the big questions
  • What exists? an ontology
  • Where do things come from? an ontogenesis
  • The purpose of life? an axiology
  • Where are we going? a futurology
  • Truth and un-truth? an epistemology
  • How to live in uncertainty? a life praxis
  • An explanation of behaviours? a praxeology
  • Good and bad? an ethics
  • A rational framework for emotions and mysteries

63
What to expect from a worldview help in
confronting the big questions
  • What exists? an ontology
  • Where do things come from? an ontogenesis
  • The purpose of life? an axiology
  • Where are we going? a futurology
  • Truth and un-truth? an epistemology
  • How to live in uncertainty? a life praxis
  • An explanation of behaviours? a praxeology
  • Good and bad? an ethics
  • A rational framework for emotions and mysteries

64
The progressive evolutionary worldview in
everyday life a LIFE PRAXIS
  • Good deeds in complex systems, small actions
    may have great consequences.
  • Hope is a rationel use of probability / Risk
    acceptation
  • It is highly irrationnal not to take emotions
    into account

65
What to expect from a worldview help in
confronting the big questions
  • What exists? an ontology
  • Where do things come from? an ontogenesis
  • The purpose of life? an axiology
  • Where are we going? a futurology
  • Truth and un-truth? an epistemology
  • How to live in uncertainty? a life praxis
  • An explanation of behaviours? a praxiology
  • Good and bad? an ethics
  • A rational framework for emotions and mysteries

66
Scientific Emotionality, evolutionary
spirituality.From Spinoza to Teilhard to Apostel
1/2
  • Feeling the world becoming ever more complex, and
    entropy decreasing
  • Profound satisfaction with the reality of
    progress and our place as the temporary endpoint
    of the evolution of living beings at the heart of
    the continuum between elementary particles and
    the universe
  • Wish to understand ever more about the cosmos,
    nature and ourselves
  • Feeling the presence of God
  • Feeling deep peace and harmony
  • A wish to come closer to God

67
A progressive evolutionary worldview
  • Provides
  • Not a road, but a roadmap
  • Not roots, but a GPS
  • Not a destination, but reference points
  • (you need lighthouses, but the last thing you
    want to do is head for them)

68
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com