Title: Smap a new soil database for New Zealand
1S-map a new soil database for New Zealand
Landcare Research, New Zealand
2The situation
- Increased demand for soil information to underpin
sustainable developmentand environmental
management - But current data is patchy
3- Soil maps
- and reports
- Patchy distribution
- Varying age / quality
- Limited soil attributes
4Vision for S-map efficient access to relevant
soil information
- Consistent soil map coverage of NZ
- Key soil attributes mapped
- Data transformed into useful information for all
soils - Ease of linkage to management packages
- Web access
5Vision for S-map efficient access to relevant
soil information
- Centralised curation and quality assurance
- Ease of integration of soil with other data sets
- (e-Government/ e-Science)
- Ease of regional and national scale analyses
- Achieved through cooperation
6Principles and design
- Building on best of the old filling gaps
- Consistent national coverage new data
- All digital escape the constraints of paper
- Incorporates a database (data information)
- National soil correlation
- Base for efficient modelling
- Expression of uncertainty
- Base for good public access to soil information
- Scale 150 000 or better
7Uses the NZSCto group similar soil series into
soil families
NZSC Parent Mat. Rock class Texture
group Permeability
A
Soil Family
Siblings
1
2
3
4
5
Depth Drainage Texture Stones Misc.
8Functional horizons
T3
T9
Horizons Based on Soil physical functions
S13
S6
9Base Properties Example
1st Functional horizon Thickness (cm)
1st Functional horizon Stones ()
12
25
20
40
25
Probability distribution functions to expression
variability and uncertainty
10Uncertainty in S-map
- Knowledge of soil variability and uncertainty
recorded where possible - How reliable is this?
- What else might it be?
- What is the likely range of soil property values?
(and how confident are we of this range) - How good (or bad) are the models?
11Map scale
- The map scale 150 000
- But better resolution than 150 000 scale paper
maps. - Growing desire for finer scale farm maps
- growing interest in precision agriculture
- Finer scale farm mapping will be supported by the
S-map, by - Identifying probable soils
- Indicating the fine scale pattern of soil
variation
12Mapping procedure
- Mixture of conventional soil survey and modelling
- to new S-map standard
- Correlating to NZ legend
- New mapping to fill in the gaps
- Lowlands conventional soil survey techniques
- Uplands model the landscape using a DEM
13Uplands
Lowlands
14Modelling in hilly mountainous land
- Within land systems - use a DEM to divide a
landscape into land elements - Use field work and expert knowledge to develop
soil-landscape models to predict soils within the
land elements - Models mainly in the form of rules that relate
land elements to soil classes and attributes.
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17Apply soil-landscape model
18(No Transcript)
19 Derived data
201. Correlation
3. Derived
2. Base
21Fact sheetsfor easy access to information
- Southland fact sheets as document files
http//map.es.govt.nz/Departments/LandSustainabili
ty/soilmaps.aspx - Otago fact sheets as reports from a soil
information database (ORC) - Linked to digital soil maps
- Customised fact sheets as on-the-fly reports
- Fact sheets automatically updated with growth of
database
22Fact sheets
23Current work
- FRST
- Database design Linda Lilburne and Co
- Eastern dry greywacke mountains Ian Lynn
- Canterbury Plains - Trevor Webb
- Motueka catchment Allan Hewitt,
- Wairarapa Hugh Wilde, Murray Jessen
- Northland Malcolm Mcleod
- Masters at Lincoln Sam Carrick
- ORC and FRST
- Otago regional soil information system fact
sheets
24An S-map cooperative?
- We cannot do this alone
- We can do it if we cooperate
- Regional Councils, District councils
- Other CRIs
- Farm servicing agencies
- Universities
- Room for consultancies to do farm mapping linked
to S-map - Make S-map a national effort
25Land Evaluationsystems to assist decision making
in land use managementAllan Hewitt
26What is Land Evaluation All About ?
- Inappropriate land use can lead to
- inefficiency and degradation
- and social and economic problems
27The goal good marriages between use and land
capability
28Land evaluation
- Exploring productive opportunities
- What will grow well?
- Identify the management constraints
- No surprises development
- Evaluate the environmental risks
- will it harm the environment?
- Future research
291. Exploring productive opportunities
- Land use suitability
- Crop matching
- Plantgro crop-matching software
30Land Evaluation PLANTGRO
31Dry Beans(Phaseolus vulgaris)
- 15C at sowing
- Frost free growing season
- lt 35C during flowering
- 650 GDD (base 10)
- 120 days sowing to harvest
- Stone free soil
- Free draining silt loam
- Irrigation essential
Currently grown in Marlborough Will they grow in
North Canterbury ?
32(No Transcript)
33Ginseng suitability Tairei Plains (Plantgro)
342. Identify the management constraints No
surprises development
- Advance warning of constraints
- such as
- Wet areas
- Stony areas
- Shallow hard pan
- Acidity
- Water holding capacity
- Natural nutrients
35No surprises - NZLRI
36No surprises Irrigation Suitability
classification
373. Evaluate the Environmental risks
- E.g.
- Nitrate leaching risk
- Structural decline risk
- Water logging risk
- Erosion risk
- Risk is higher under intensive land use
- If you know the risk you can avoid it
38Output National scale N leaching risk map
39Potential N leaching index
40Land use pressure
41N Leaching Risk
423. Environmental risk
Risk of nitrate leaching to ground-water
433. Environmental risk
Risk of soil pugging under heavy stock
44New researchdeveloping a framework to design
use to match capability of the land
- Consider
- Functions of the soil
- (e.g. toxin absorbance, water storage)
-
- Productive opportunities
-
- Soil ecosystem services
- Integrate and develop a range of land use
scenarios - Consider risks associated with each scenario
- Provide scenario visualising tools
- to help communities of interest to make choices