CCM PR LFA Relationships Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iran, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, Morocco

1
CCM PR LFA Relationships(Afghanistan,
Pakistan, Iran, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, Morocco)

• Group one

2
How does the relationship work throughout the
process , from proposal development to
implementation?

• Afghanistan due to several delays in receiving
  fund some members of CCM have lost interest.
  

3
How does the relationship work throughout the
process , from proposal development to
implementation?

• Good and Functional relationship between CCM, PR
  and LFA is existing in Morocco.

4

• Pakistan At the beginning the PR was not clear
  about the CCM, LFA, ME and their roles.
  
• By passing the time now all stakeholders know
  their roles.
  
• Criteria for selection of the CCM members
  defined.
  
• Un clarity about the roles and relationships of
  different stakeholders in all countries except
  Morocco in the beginning, gradually the roles and
  responsibilities are becoming clear.
• The GF guidelines are Not available to everybody
  or well understood due lack of clarity and
  language problems.
  
• The messages on PR selection are not clear
  between GF and IRAN and Sudan.
  
• LFA is identified but not showing up in IRAN.
• HIV/AIDS issues in IRAN and Sudan should not be
  considered politically is pure Health problem in
  these countries.
  
• GF position of the LFA role for some countries
  were not clear especially in term of monitoring
  body for SRs.

5
Lines of Communication, i.e. information sharing,
etc

• As long as roles and responsibilities are well
  defined there is no problem.
  
• The CCM can change the PR in consultation of GF
  and LFA should verify the case.
  

6
Highlight challenges faced by PR and LFA through
the different assessment, disbursement,
implementation, etc.
7
(No Transcript)