THE NEED FOR HIGH EFFICIENCY PHOTONNUMBER RESOLVING DETECTORS IN LINEAR OPTICS QUANTUM COMPUTING - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

THE NEED FOR HIGH EFFICIENCY PHOTONNUMBER RESOLVING DETECTORS IN LINEAR OPTICS QUANTUM COMPUTING

Description:

Knill, LaFlamme and Milburn (KLM), Nature 409, 46 (2001) U. Post-selection & Feed-forward ... See: KLM, Koashi et.al, Ralph et.al, Pittman et.al ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: djv8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: THE NEED FOR HIGH EFFICIENCY PHOTONNUMBER RESOLVING DETECTORS IN LINEAR OPTICS QUANTUM COMPUTING


1
THE NEED FOR HIGH EFFICIENCY PHOTON-NUMBER
RESOLVING DETECTORS IN LINEAR OPTICS QUANTUM
COMPUTING
  • T.B. Pittman, M.M. Donegan, M.J. Fitch, B.C.
    Jacobs, J.D. Franson
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • Applied Physics Laboratory

2
DETECTOR NEEDS FOR LINEAR OPTICS QUANTUM
COMPUTATION (LOQC)
  • Motivation Brief overview of LOQC
  • Three specific examples
  • Non-deterministic controlled-NOT logic gate
  • Heralded two-photon entanglement (entanglement
    resource)
  • Single-Photons on Pseudo-Demand (photon resource)

3
MOTIVATIONOptical Approach to Quantum Computing
  • Advantages
  • Photon qubits
  • Single-qubit operations
  • Modular approach
  • Biggest Problem
  • Two-qubit operations (Logic gates)
  • Nonlinear interactions
  • New Development LOQC KLM, Nature 409, 46
    (2001)
  • Non-Deterministic logic gates
  • No direct photon-photon interactions
  • Nonlinearity from photo-detection and state
    reduction

4
OVERVIEW LINEAR-OPTICS QUANTUM GATES
Knill, LaFlamme and Milburn (KLM), Nature 409, 46
(2001)
entangled ancilla photons
.
1
N
2
  • CNOTs using only
  • Linear optics
  • N ancilla photons
  • Single-Photon detection
  • Error probability scales as
  • 1/N or 1/N2 (lim. large N)
  • Example requirements
  • For 90 success rateN 40, h 99.86
  • Glancy et.al PRA (2002)

control qubit
output
X
Z
target qubit
.
U
U
U
D1
D2
DN
Post-selection Feed-forward
5
EXAMPLE 1 Basic non-deterministic two-qubit CNOT
gate
See KLM, Koashi et.al, Ralph et.al, Pittman
et.al Zou et.al, Hoffman et.al, Sanaka et.al,
etc. (2001-2002)
6
BASIC LINEAR-OPTICS CNOT GATE
U
control photon
  • Polarization encoded qubits
  • H0, V1
  • Polarizing beam splitters
  • Corresponds to case of N2
  • Prob. of success ¼
  • needs 1 vs. 2 photon high-h detectors

PBS-1
entangled ancilla (photon pair)
PBS-2
target photon
U
7
SIMPLIFIED CNOT EXPERIMENTAL DEMO
single ancilla photon
control photon
U
control photon
U
entangled ancilla (photon pair)
U
target photon
target photon
U
U
(b)
(a)
  • Two major modifications
  • Entangled pair replaced by single ancilla
  • Coincidence basis operation

8
EXPERIMENTAL CNOT SINGLE ANCILLA
9
EXPERIMENTAL CNOT SINGLE ANCILLA
10
EXPERIMENTAL CNOT RESULTS
(a) basis state CNOT truth table
(b) superposition state coherence
entanglement production
11
REQUIREMENTS FOR FULL CNOT DEMO
control photon
U
  • Non-coincidence-basis operation
  • Requires 2 vs. 1 detectors
  • Heralded entangled pairs
  • Requires 2 vs. 1 detectors

entangled ancilla (photon pair)
target photon
U
12
EXAMPLE 2 Heralded two-photon entanglement
13
OVERVIEW HERALDED ENTANGLED PAIRS
  • Pulsed parametric down-conversion
  • Random entangled pairs (eg. Kwiat et.al. 95)
  • Standard entanglement swapping
  • Doesnt work (Kok Braunstein 01)
  • CNOT-based entanglement swapping
  • Does work (in principle)
  • Requires photon-number resolving Dets

U
U
CNOT
U
U
14
CNOT-BASED ENTANGLEMENT SWAPPING
CNOT
Start with
1
2
U
A
4
3
U
B
After CNOT
15
CNOT-BASED ENTANGLEMENT SWAPPING USE OF
NON-DETERMINISTIC CNOT
CNOT
  • 6 Photons involved
  • Detection of 4 heralds presence of remaining
    (entangled) pair
  • Key ingredient Photon-number resolving detectors
  • Elliminate false-heralding signals
  • See also SliwaBanaszek (2002)

U
1
2
U
A
C
4
3
U
B
U
16
EXAMPLE 3 Single-photons on pseudo-demand (ancilla
resource)
17
PARAMETRIC DOWN-CONVERSION APPROACH
Spontaneously Emitted Photon Pair
PDC
Excitation Pulse Train
Detection of one signals the other (well defined
emission direction)
  • Problem Random emission time
  • Cant specify desired excitation pulse
  • Solutions
  • Storage loop Pseudo-Demand (APL)
  • Multiplexing (Alan Migdall at NIST)
  • Hybrid approach?

18
SINGLE-PHOTONS ON PSEUDO-DEMAND
Storage loop
switch
U
PDC
  • Pulse-train and loop synchd with cycle time of
    quant. Computer
  • Photon-number resolving detector needed
  • increase pump power to decrease (lossy) storage
    time
  • elliminate possibility of two photons in storage
    loop

19
EXPERIMENT PSEUDO-DEMAND SOURCEPrinciple of
Operation
Reflects V, Transmits H
Switch In/Out (Flips between H and V)
20
EXPERIMENTAL DEMONSTRATIONSingle-Photons on
Pseudo-Demand
  • High-speed Pockels cell for real-time EO
    switching
  • 4 meter free-space storage loop
  • Single-photons switched out on command
  • Original experiment is cw, current work is pulsed

21
MAIN RESULT ACTIVE SWITCHING DEMOStored single
photons switched out on command
2 round trips
3 round trips
4 round trips
5 round trips
22
SUMMARYHigh-efficiency photon-number resolving
detectors needed for LOQC
  • LOQC is a promising approach
  • (OKish) single-photon sources, interferences,
    feed-forward
  • (??) Ideal single-photon detectors
  • Three specific examples
  • Non-deterministic cnot gate
  • Heralded entangled photon pairs
  • Single-photon source

U
U
Storage loop
U
PDC
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com