Planning the future of Historic Structures use it, lose it or what - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Planning the future of Historic Structures use it, lose it or what

Description:

low priority. High API = Asset of. high priority. High Priority Asset in. Bad Condition ... 4 Case Studies -- National Park Service. A tale of three hangers Denver ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: Flana5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Planning the future of Historic Structures use it, lose it or what


1
Planning the future of Historic Structures use
it, lose it or what? APA Federal Planning
Division Workshop San Antonio, Texas Thursday,
April 20, 2006, 315-4pm
2
Presenters Erin Flanagan, Community Planner,
National Park Service Carla McConnell, Project
Manager, National Park Service Kathleen Brooker,
President, Historic Denver
3
Presentation Outline
  • AGENDA
  • Overview of historic structures in the NP system
  • Scope of the management challenges
  • Constraints for management actions in parks
  • 4 Case Studies from the National Park Service
  • 2 Case Studies from Air Force and Municipal
    aviation facilities.

4
Historic Structures in the NPS
  • All historic areas in the National Park System
  • Over 2,300 National Historic Landmarks
  • The NPS has more historic structures than any
    other agency.

5
Management Challenges
  • Policy/statutory
  • National Historic Preservation Act of 1966
  • E.O. Preserve America (2003)
  • Fiscal and resource constraints
  • Maintenance backlog
  • Stakeholder Involvement
  • A key component of the decision making process

6
Policy/ Statutory Requirements
  • National Historic Preservation Act of 1966
  • All federal agencies must
  • Assume responsibility for the preservation of
    cultural resources owned or controlled by the
    agency
  • Identify, evaluate, and nominate cultural
    resources to the National Register of Historic
    Places
  • Adaptively reuse the available cultural resources
    to the maximum extent feasible
  • Minimize the harm any Federal action may have on
    National Historic Landmarks

7
National Historic Preservation Act
  • Section 110
  • Provides guidance for the evaluation of and
    determination of eligibility for listing on the
    National Register of Historic Places
  • Section106
  • Provides guidance for the analysis of effects and
    treatment of resources that are eligible to be
    listed or are listed on the National Register

8
Fiscal and Resource Constraints
  • NPS budget not getting any bigger
  • Responsible for a growing number of resources.
  • Have developed a priority setting tool to help
    manage the maintenance backlog.
  • How do historic structures fit into this picture?

9
Asset Management
10
Stakeholder Involvement
  • Stakeholders residents, visitors, gateway
    communities, not-for-profits etc.
  • Management actions in parks are of interest to
    the public

11
Where do we go from here?
  • Ignoring the issues is not an option they only
    get more expensive and they do not go away
  • 4 Case Studies -- National Park Service
  • A tale of three hangers Denver
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com