National Plant Germplasm Coordinating Committee - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

National Plant Germplasm Coordinating Committee

Description:

Peter Bretting, ARS-NPS. Dwayne Buxton, ARS-PWA. Candace Gardner, ARS-IA ... S-9; Georgia, Griffin. NC-7; Iowa State, Ames. W-6; Washington State, Pullman ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: lsom
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: National Plant Germplasm Coordinating Committee


1
National Plant Germplasm Coordinating Committee
  • Joint SAES-ARS-CSREES Committee

2
Committee Members
  • Lee Sommers, CO, chair
  • Ken Grafton, ND
  • Gerry Arkin, GA
  • Ann Marie Thro, CSREES
  • Ed Kaleikau, CSREES
  • P. S. Benepal, CSREES
  • Peter Bretting, ARS-NPS
  • Dwayne Buxton, ARS-PWA
  • Candace Gardner, ARS-IA
  • Tom Fretz, NE ED/ Eric Young, S ED

3
Vision for NPGCC
Promote a stronger, more efficient, widely
recognized and better utilized NPGS
4
Goals
  • To facilitate the coordination of ARS, CSREES and
    SAES planning and assessment mechanisms for NPGS
    policy, organization, operations and support
  • To promote awareness and understanding of the
    NPGS across ARS, CSREES, and SAES and more
    broadly to the scientific community
  • To serve as a vehicle for improving
    communications and discussions about issues
    impacting the NPGS with ARS, SAES, and CSREES

5
Objectives
  • Assess, develop and recommend to the SAES
    directors, ARS and CSREES strategies for improved
    coordination of NPGS activities
  • Develop and recommend to the SAES directors, ARS
    and CSREES a process for improved communication
    of the value of the NPGS
  • Initiate a strategic planning effort for the NPGS
    to better define and communicate the vision,
    mission and short- and long-term goals.
  • Evaluate the current funding models for the NPGS
    and report findings to the SAES directors, ARS
    and CSREES

6
ESS Request based on Tahoe Discussions
  • Evaluate options for funding the 4 regional plant
    germplasm programs
  • NE-9 Cornell, Geneva
  • S-9 Georgia, Griffin
  • NC-7 Iowa State, Ames
  • W-6 Washington State, Pullman
  • Current funding
  • 80 USDA-ARS
  • 20 SAES off the top regional funds

7
NRSP Contributing Projects
  • NRSP-5
  • Virus-free fruit germplasm
  • Washington State, Pullman
  • 50 national off the top
  • 50 contracts, grants, WSU
  • NRSP-6
  • Potato germplasm
  • University of Wisconsin, Sturgeon Bay
  • 20 national off the top
  • 80 USDA-ARS

8
Background Context
  • SAES scientists largest user of NPGS
  • About 40 of NPGS collections are held at the 4
    regional centers at LGUs
  • About 60 of germplasm distributed annually is
    from 4 regional centers
  • Regional off the top is lt20 of budget with ARS
    contributing gt80
  • Future ability to respond depends on access to
    plant germplasm

9
Distribution of Germplasm by NPGS
Note USComm US commercial ForNC Foreign
non commercial Other US non commercial,
Foreign commercial,
10
Funding Models Evaluated
  • Create a single NRSP for regional centers plus
    NRSP-5 and 6
  • Incorporation of NRSP-5 and NRSP-6 into off the
    top budgets for regional centers
  • Full funding of the 4 regional centers by
    USDA-ARS
  • Continue funding of regional centers by regional
    off the top

11
Recommendation to SAES
  • Continue regional off the top to fund regional
    NPGS centers
  • Allows regional flexibility
  • More potential problems than benefits with
    alternative funding approaches
  • No obvious easy way to incorporate NRPSs

12
Recommendation for NRSP-5 and NRSP-6
  • NRSP Oversight Committee supported in efforts to
    diversify funding
  • Important to NPGS and ongoing public funding
    required
  • Recommend to ESCOP that 2008 commitments to
    NRSP-5 and -6 be stabilized at FY06 level

13
Other Recommendations
  • Add a 4th SAES rep to the NPGCC one rep per
    region
  • NPGCC meet annually with the Plant Germplasm
    Operations Committee

14
Next Steps
  • Through Exec Director, each region will
    communicate support or concerns/suggestions to
    ESCOP
  • Ask ESCOP to share views of regional associations
    with NRSP Oversight Committee
  • NRSP funding recommendations will presented at
    regional summer and for a vote at the ESS fall
    meetings
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com