Bay Sediment Budgets: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

Bay Sediment Budgets:

Description:

Assume Krone Central Bay deposition is ocean sand. Revised 1955-1990 annual budget ... Golden Gate sand supply, 1.2-2.9 MMT/yr (Central Bay bathymetric change) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:77
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: megginli
Category:
Tags: bay | budgets | sand | sediment

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Bay Sediment Budgets:


1
Bay Sediment Budgets Sediment Accounting 101
David Schoellhamer Megan Lionberger Bruce
Jaffe Neil Ganju Scott Wright Greg Shellenbarger
U.S. Geological Survey
NASA
2
A sediment budget describes the quantity of
sediment
  • Entering the Bay
  • Leaving the Bay
  • Depositing in or eroding from the Bay

3
Who cares?
  • Dredgers disposal of deposition in ports and
    channels
  • Regulators and dischargers sediment associated
    contaminants and TMDLs
  • Restoration managers deposition needed for
    restoration without eroding existing habitat

4
Accounting rules
  • Where SF Bay from Mallard Island to Golden Gate
  • When Water years 1955-1990, 1995-2002, and a
    normal water year 1995-2002
  • Lifeline Conservation of mass
    inflow-outflowchange in storage
  • Uncertainty varies by term,
    Not THE answer Steve Ritchie

5
Odgen Beeman and Krone 1955-1990
6
New information for 1955-1990
7
Revised 1955-1990 annual budget
Units are mass in millions of metric tons per
year (1.5 Mcy)
8
Revised 1955-1990 annual budget
Assume Krone Central Bay deposition is ocean
sand
9
Revised 1955-1990 annual budget
Suspended sediment outflow from conservation of
mass (lifeline)
10
Revised 1955-1990 annual budget
Sand mining is a very rough estimate
11
1995-2002 annual budget

12
1995-2002 annual budget
Box model used to get change in storage and
outflow
13
1995-2002 annual budget
Assume no change in supply of ocean sand
14
1995-2002 was all wet
15
Normal 1995-2002 annual budget
Remove water years 1995 and 1998 where possible
16
1955-1990
1995-2002
17
1955-1990
1995-2002
18
1955-1990
1995-2002
19
1955-1990
1995-2002
20
1955-1990
1995-2002
21
1955-1990
1995-2002
22
Implications
  • Sediments disposed of in the ocean may be needed
    to maintain and restore Bay habitats
  • The Bay bottom will continue to erode and supply
    legacy contaminants
  • Restoration sites will be depositional and may
    increase erosion elsewhere
  • Dredging, restoration, and water quality are
    connected by the sediment budget

23
Most important and most uncertain terms
  • Golden Gate fine suspended sediment outflow
    (model because difficult to measure)
  • Golden Gate sand supply, 1.2-2.9 MMT/yr (Central
    Bay bathymetric change)
  • Eroded mass (new surveys, measure bed density)
  • Sediment supply from watershed (25)

24
Acknowledgements
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
  • SF Regional Water Quality Control Board
  • California State Coastal Conservancy
  • USGS Priority Ecosystem Science Program
  • USGS Federal/State Cooperative Program
  • Lester McKee
  • Patricia Chambers and Linda Wanczyk
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com