Sem ttulo de diapositivo

1
ELABORATION OF THE NAP
BOTTOM-UP PROCESS
2
1ST PHASE - ELABORATION OF THE NAP
55 PUBLIC SESSIONS
2.200 PARTICIPANTS
NATIONAL COORDINATION COMMITTEE
Synthesis report
LANDOWNERS, NGOs, NATIONAL, REGIONAL and LOCAL
ADMINISTRATION, EXPERTS, PRESS, ACADEMY, SCHOOL
TEACHERS, STUDENTS
NAP
BOTTOM-UP PROCESS
3
2nd PHASE - IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NAP (I)
National Co-ordination Committee
Regional Commissions
RESULTS 0
4
2nd PHASE - IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NAP (II)
NATIONAL COORDINATION COMMITTEE
Regional Commissions
Pilot Pilot area area
Pilot Pilot

area area
5
ORGANISATION OF THE WORKSHOPS (European Awareness
Scenario Workshops)

• WITH CO-OPERATION OF EXPERT TEAMS
• SELECTING REPRESENTATIVE PARTICIPANTS

LANDOWNERS, NGOs, NATIONAL, REGIONAL and LOCAL
ADMINISTRATION, EXPERTS, PRESS, ACADEMY, SCHOOL
TEACHERS, STUDENTS
6
WORKSHOPS

• People instructed during lunch

• Participants in pairs selected because of
  differences
  
• Identification of signals
• Decision by vote 5 main signals

• Groups of participants selected for each
  subject
  
• Discussion of solutions
• Presentation of results to other groups
• Decision by vote 5 main solutions

IDENTIFICATION OF TYPES OF ACTIVITIES AND
SOLUTIONS
FOLLOW-UP GROUPS
7
CHALLENGES

• Correspond to the expectations of populations
  in the affected areas

• Break walls between departments

• Create links between the people in charge of
  different initiatives

• Look for possible synergies between Conventions

• Make the supporting programmes operational

8
DIFFICULTIES

• Very low flexibility of the financing
  programmes
  
• Highly fragmented institutional understanding of
  the problems

INITIATIVE CO-ORDINATION INCENTIVE
CRUCIAL
THE FOCAL POINT ROLE
9
11
Scientific Bodies
40
Focal Points Biodiversity
Climate Changes Desertific
ation
RC
NCC
3
.
Pilot Areas
170
15
11
250