... Resources HCENR in Sudan and Stockholm Environment In - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

... Resources HCENR in Sudan and Stockholm Environment In

Description:

... Resources (HCENR) in Sudan and Stockholm Environment Institute ... Sudan AF14: ... drought-prone Bara Province (Gireigikh ), North Kordofan, Western Sudan ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:138
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: biologica
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ... Resources HCENR in Sudan and Stockholm Environment In


1
Strategies for Increasing Human Resilience in
Sudan Lessons for Climate Change Adaptation In
the Sahelian Africa
Sudan AIACC-AF14
Dr. Sumaya Ahmed Zaki-Eldeen -Institute of Envi
ronmental Studies Khartoum University -zakield
s_at_yahoo.com
2
Sudan AF14 Overview
http//sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/aiacc
  • One of the 24 regional studies of AIACC Global
    Assessment of Impacts and Adaptation to Climate
    Change in multiple regions and sectors
  • AIACC sponsor by GEF, with collateral funding
    from USAID,CIDA, and the WB And implemented by
    UNEP and executed by START and TWAS
  • Partners Higher Council for Environment and
    Natural Resources (HCENR) in Sudan and Stockholm
    Environment Institute Boston Center (SEI-Boston)

3
Sudan AF14 Major Objectives
  • To prove that certain SL/EM measures increase the
    resilience of communities to climate related
    shocks
  • establish that these measures are effective and
    should be considered as climate change adaptation
    options that could be included in the planning of
    national adaptation strategies.
  • to explore what enables them to be effective
    i.e. what factors (participatory implementation,
    local governance, macro-economic policies, etc.)
    made it possible for the measures to be successful
  • Enhance and expand regional collaboration in the
    areas of EM, disaster mitigation and climate
    change adaptation

4
AF14 case studies
  • Three case studies of successful SL projects in
    drought-prone communities

5
Community-Based Rangeland Rehabilitation
(CBRR) Project
Villages in the drought-prone Bara Province
(Gireigikh ), North Kordofan, Western Sudan
6
Two main development objectives
  • Create locally sustainable NRM system to
    rehabilitate overexploited lands.
  • Reduce the risk of production failure by
    increasing the number of livelihood alternatives
    leading to greater local stability

- Carbon Sequestration
7
Major intervention of CBRRP
The villages undertook a package of SL measures.
These included
  • Institution Building
  • Training and capacity building
  • Community Development
  • Water development, Rural energy management,
  • Introduction of revolving credit,
  • Drought contingency planning
  • Rangeland Rehabilitation
  • Replanting, Stabilization of sand dunes,
  • Creation of windbreaks,
  • Livestock restocking and management

8
Methods for assessing adaptive capacity,
adaptation options and uncertainties
  • Sustainable Livelihoods Framework and its concept
    of the five capitals (Natural, human, financial,
    physical and social) has been used.
  • These capitals were assessed based on three main
    dimensions productivity, equity and
    sustainability. Risk dimension was also considered

9
Cont.
  • A number of indicators have been identified with
    the community for three dimensions for the five
    capitals
  • An assessment sheet was used to compare the
    situation before and after the intervention of
    the CBRRP
  • Word picture

10
Results ProductivityNatural capital
11
Financial Capital
12
Human Capital
13
Physical Capital
14
Social Capital
15
Sustainability Natural Capital
16
Financial Capital
17
Human Capital
18
Physical Capital
19
Social Capital
20
Equity
  • Chances of marginalized groups (women, poor,
    kawahla tribe) increased significantly
    particularly with regard to
  • access to grazing land
  • access to credit
  • access to social services
  • access to training
  • participation in decision-making.

21
Overall change in the resilience of the five
capitals
70
22
Factors that are most responsible for
uncertainties (risk) about adaptive capacity and
the effectiveness of adaptation options
  • Government policies
  • lack of finance
  • Migration of trained people
  • Immigration (settlement of other tribes)
  • Conflict over resources

23
Conclusions
  • Adaptations to current climate risks are
    generally consistent with adapting to future
    climate change
  • Adaptive capacity can improve where people have
    better access to resource, market, technology,
    information, social service, high level of
    awareness, skills, security , strong institutions
    and effective organizations
  • Immediate actions on AC building and enhancement
    of current coping capacity are necessary to
    reduce vulnerability to current climate-related
    risks and climate change.
  • National policy processes and SD planning need
    to integrate AC building and adaptation
    strategies at the community level

24
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com