Cover Slide Title - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

Cover Slide Title

Description:

Oklahoma City Bombing. 10. Evidence Based Disaster Planning. Many pts not transported by EMS ... Oklahoma City Bombing (1995) n=587. Mallonee s et al. JAMA ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:87
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: chris931
Category:
Tags: cover | title

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Cover Slide Title


1
KEEPING PEOPLE SAFE DECONTAMINATION PROGRAM
ACCESS MANAGEMENT

Keith Frost Mark St. Marie           
  Robert Porter            
2
KEEPING PEOPLE SAFE
  • Overview
  • Planning for a Mass Causality Incident
  • Decontamination Program Strategies
  • Access Management Strategies
  • OSLE / VACO Initiatives

3
MCI Planning Response
  • The Old Paradigm
  • Clinically focused response
  • Trauma patient focus
  • Emergency Department involvement only

4
MCI Planning Response
  • The New Paradigm
  • All-Hazards Hospital-Based Response
  • Protect the Facility/Control Access
  • Isolate, Decontaminate, Treat
  • Anticipate large numbers of non-trauma cases
  • Maximize use of all available resources

5
Disaster Planning Response
  • Disaster planning is only as good as the
    assumptions on which it is based.
  • Those who ignore history are
  • doomed to repeat it.

6
Evidence Based Disaster Planning
  • Typical Assumptions
  • VAMCs are low priority for local planners
  • VAMCs will give Veterans priority
  • Dispatchers will send correct units to scene
  • Patients will be
  • triaged stabilized by EMS
  • decontaminated on scene if necessary
  • distributed equally to receiving hospitals

7
Evidence Based Disaster Planning
  • Reality
  • Atypical Dispatch
  • Unsolicited responders
  • Notified by news reports or scanners
  • Poor communication
  • Difficult to coordinate responders
  • Initial care from bystanders
  • Many pts not transported by EMS

8
Evidence Based Disaster Planning
  • Many pts not transported by EMS
  • Initial arrival mode - 29 US Disasters

Quarantelli, EL Delivery of Emergency Services in
Disasters Assumptions and Realities
9
Evidence Based Disaster Planning
  • Many pts not transported by EMS
  • Oklahoma City Bombing

10
Evidence Based Disaster Planning
  • Many pts not transported by EMS
  • Sarin Gas Attack (St. Luke Hosp, Tokyo)

11
Evidence Based Disaster Planning
  • Casualty Maldistribution
  • Study of 29 U.S. Disasters
  • 75 of disasters, gt1/2 casualties taken to
    closest hospital
  • 46 of disasters, gt3/4 casualties to closest
    hospital
  • Unused hospitals average vacancy 20

Quarantelli, EL Delivery of Emergency Services in
Disasters Assumptions and Realities
12
Disaster Casualty Severity
  • Minor injuries arrive first
  • Casualty flow begins within 30 minutes
  • Sheer number of patients can
  • overwhelm system
  • impair identification of critical patients
  • impair treatment of critical patients
  • Most casualties at hospitals within 1½ hrs
  • Second wave of more critical patients
  • (i.e. Second wave phenomenon)

13
Casualties Severity
  • Oklahoma City Bombing (1995)

n587
Mallonee s et al. JAMA 1996276382-7
14
Casualty Severity
  • WTC Bombing (2001)
  • n 790 Among 5 Hospitals closest to WTC

15
Evidence Based Disaster Planning
Hospital Mass Causality Incident (MCI)
Resource Available
16
Do I Really Need Decon?
  • YES...
  • The Care Imperative
  • WMD, Common events (transportation, industrial,
    lab)
  • The Regulatory Imperative
  • JC, OSHA
  • The Financial Imperative
  • VACO, State and Federal grants
  • The Publicity Imperative
  • VAMC in the News

17
The Care Imperative
  • THREATS
  • Weapons of mass destruction
  • Transportation accidents
  • Industrial accidents
  • Internal spills (lab, chemo, radioactives)

18
The Regulatory Imperative
  • Joint Commission (JC)
  • Health Care at the Crossroads, 2003
  • Emergency preparedness as key goal
  • Must have an appropriate decon capability
  • 2008 Environment of Care Standards
  • Protect employees, facility, patients
  • OSHA
  • First Receivers Best Practices

19
The Financial Imperative
  • Must Participate to Receive Funding
  • VACO Funding
  • Portable Decon Systems
  • Fixed Decon Facilities
  • PPE, Supplies
  • Federal and State Funding
  • HRSA
  • CDC (Focus D) money

20
The Publicity Imperative
  • Public drills look good
  • Working with the Community and other Hospitals
  • Doing something to protect facility
  • Visitors, Staff, Infrastructure
  • Doing something to avoid bad publicity
  • Public evasion looks bad

21
How Do I Get It Done?
Relevant
Road Map to a Successful
Regulatory
Realistic

Decon Access Management Program
22
VHA DECON PROGRAM
  • RELEVANT
  • Extension of the Medical Center
  • Clinical presence on decon team is a must!
  • Decon exists to protect visitors, staff and
    facility
  • Designated Job Assignments
  • Role Responsibilities well defined
  • ICS and EM Committee representation
  • All-Hazards Team Approach Incentive
  • Patient Evacuation Team
  • Alternate Care Surge Set-up

23
VHA DECON PROGRAM
  • REGULATORY
  • Awareness Operations Level Training
  • 1910.120 HAZWOPER
  • First Receiver Capabilities
  • OSHA First Receiver Best Practices
  • 50 Core Competencies
  • VHA Directive 0320
  • Facilities must have an appropriate Decon
    capability
  • Joint Commission
  • Expansion of EM standards

24
VHA DECON PROGRAM
  • REALISTIC
  • Hazard Vulnerability Analysis (HVA)
  • HVA should drive level of Decon capability
  • 24/7 Capability
  • Local Community Coordination
  • What are the expectations of VAMC?
  • Familiarize Staff with MMRS language
  • Exercise Frequency
  • Minimum 2 full operational exercises annually
  • More frequent focused drills strong team
  • Involve ER and VA Police

25
VHA DECON PROGRAM
One contaminated patient could close
your Emergency Department and/or Hospital
26
Office of Security
Law Enforcement
  • Perimeter Protection-Authorities
  • Secretary responsible for protecting life and
    property within the jurisdiction of the
    Department (38 USC 901)
  • Office of Security and Law Enforcement (OSLE) is
    the Department program office for VA Police
    activities
  • VA Police officers in VHA are the response and
    operational forces

27
Office of Security
Law Enforcement
  • Perimeter Protection-Operations
  • Law and regulation authorize Directors to close
    facilities to the public
  • Lock down procedures are dependent on the layout
    of the facility (single building large campus
    store-front, etc.)
  • VA Police policy is that VA needs take priority
    over the needs of the general public in an
    emergency
  • In a decon event, VA police will staff entry
    control points and triage locations.
  • Facility entry will generally be limited to VA
    staff and contractors.
  • VA police officers are the first line of response
    and defense in the event of a major incident or
    emergency.
  • However, the reality is that a panicked and upset
    population will seek care wherever they can,
    including VA and other Federal activities

28
Office of Security
Law Enforcement
  • Use of Force Issues
  • VA doctrine mirrors the U.S. Department of
    Justice Use of Deadly Force policy
  • VA Police officers may only use deadly force to
    protect themselves or others from imminent danger
    of death or serious bodily injury
  • These rules apply in both routine and emergency
    situations
  • VA officers are trained annually on use of force
    law and policy and rules.

29
Office of Security
Law Enforcement
  • Emergency and Decon Scenarios-Training and
    Preparation
  • Specific response actions, based on the National
    Threat System (color codes) are promulgated from
    OSLE
  • These actions are modified at field facilities to
    meet local needs
  • Threat response for Code Yellow to Code Red
    include increasing levels of identification
    checks package and appurtenance searches
    limiting vehicle and pedestrian traffic
  • VA police also participate in local facility
    emergency response planning and exercises

30
Office of Security
Law Enforcement
  • Emergency and Decon Scenarios-Training and
    Preparation
  • VA Chiefs of Police participate in local planning
    bodies and Joint Terrorism Task Forces (JTTF)
  • Facilities are required to maintain active
    sharing agreements and MOUs with state, local
    and Federal law enforcement.
  • OSLE, working with and through DEMPS can augment
    VA police resources at impacted facilities

31
Office of Security Law
Enforcement
  • Vulnerability Assessments
  • Required biennially
  • Comprehensive, all hazards approach
  • All Department-owned or operated facilities
  • Use to develop mitigation plans
  • Physical Security Surveys
  • Focused on protecting specific key activities
  • Used to develop and track mitigation plans
  • Part of the overall vulnerability assessment
    approach

32
OSLE Initiatives
  • OSLE is continuing development of a quick
    response team (key goal in FY 09)
  • 100 volunteer officers, arranged into 4
    25-officer teams with regional responsibilities
  • Training to include small team defense tactics
    PPE use physical security anti-terrorism/force
    protection
  • To be used for
  • Security and stabilization of seriously impacted
    facility (e.g. VAMC New Orleans)
  • Augment police forces with severe staffing issues
    or short term needs
  • FMS protection
  • ESF-13 assignments

33
OSLE Initiatives
  • Response time is 12-18 hours from initial
    deployment order
  • Team management includes OSLE Inspectors

34
VACO/LETC Initiatives
  • Personal Protective Equipment for VA Police
  • 3M Rapid Response Powered Air Purifying
    Respirators
  • Begin Deploying April 09
  • Vendor Training for VA Police
  • Enrollment in RP Programs
  • Reoccurring Officer Training

35
QUESTIONS?
KEEPING PEOPLE SAFE VHA DECONTAMINATION PROGRAM
ACCESS MANAGEMENT

Keith Frost Mark St. Marie           
  Robert Porter            
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com