The Development of the Diagnostic Adaptive Behavior Scale - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

The Development of the Diagnostic Adaptive Behavior Scale

Description:

Dresses appropriately depending on the occasion. (occupational skills) ... Hank Bersani Jr., Professor of Special Education. Western Oregon University. 345 N. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:570
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: wehn
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Development of the Diagnostic Adaptive Behavior Scale


1
The Development of the Diagnostic Adaptive
Behavior Scale
  • A New Measure of Adaptive Behavior
  • Presented At
  • International Association for the Scientific
    Study of Intellectual Disability (IASSID).
  • Cape Town South Africa,
  • August 26, 2008

2
Authors This paper represnets the work of a
team.
  • H Bersani Jr., Western Oregon University (USA),
  • M J Tassé, University of South Florida (USA
    co-chairman),
  • R L Schalock, Hastings College (USA
    co-chairman),
  • G Balboni, University of Valle d'Aosta (IT),
  • S A Duffy, University of California at Riverside
    (USA),
  • J Scherba de Valenzuela, University of New Mexico
    (USA),
  • S Spreat, Woodland Center for Challenging
    Behaviors (USA),
  • D M Thissen, University of North Carolina at
    Chapel Hill (USA),
  • K F Widaman, University of California at Davis
    (USA), and
  • D Zhang, Texas AM University (USA)

3
Adaptive Behavior Definition
  • The definition of adaptive behavior can be
    summarized as
  • the individuals everyday behavior that he/she
    emits to respond to the demands of his/her
    cultural, social, and physical environment.

4
Why Is AB Measured in the Field of Intellectual
Disability
  • AB is measured to diagnose/rule-out ID
  • Significant limitations in adaptive behavior is
    one of the three criteria for a diagnosis of
    intellectual disability.
  • Adaptive behavior is also measured for other
    purposes
  • planning rehabilitation (ISP)
  • planning education interventions (IEP)
  • evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention
    program
  • indentifying adaptive behavior patterns specific
    to genetic syndromes

5
My own theory
  • The tool designed to perform many tasks does
    tone of them well

6
What Are Important Factors to Consider When
Assessing Adaptive Behavior
  • Adaptive behavior is multidimensional and
    consists conceptual, social, and practical
    skills.

7
What Are Important Factors to Consider When
Assessing Adaptive Behavior
  • Adaptive behavior is age-specific and increases
    in complexity with age and development and then
    plateaus.

8
What Are Important Factors to Consider When
Assessing Adaptive Behavior
  • Adaptive behavior is context specific and is
    dependent upon the individuals cultural group
    and the demands of particular situations and
    environments.

9
What Are Important Factors to Consider When
Assessing Adaptive Behavior
  • Adaptive behavior reflects the individuals
    present typical performance during daily
    routines.

10
For our purposes
  • The measurement of adaptive behavior is most
    critical for the group of people with tested
    general intellectual functioning of about 70 on a
    standardized intelligence test

11
Current Instruments
  • Based on these four factors of adaptive behavior
    gt scales of adaptive behavior generally consist
    of the following
  • interview a respondent who knows the individual
    very well, generally parent/caregiver
  • evaluation of the persons level of present
    typical performance in conceptual, social, and
    practical skills gt based on adapting to the
    environmental demands dependent upon age and
    cultural/ethnic group and in community setting

12
Current Instruments
  • Based on these four factors of adaptive behavior
    gt scales of adaptive behavior generally consist
    of the following
  • inference of the developmental level of adaptive
    behavior transforming the raw scores obtained in
    the adaptive behavior scale into normative scores
    that have been obtained from general population
  • use of clinical judgment for taking into account
    the role of several factors that may have
    influenced the individuals opportunity to learn
    or express adaptive behavior skills such as
    setting / environmental demands, cultural/ethnic
    group, physical limitations unrelated to the
    presence of ID

13
Available AB Instruments
  • The exist approximately 200 adaptive behavior
    scales (Schalock, 1999).
  • There are really only FIVE Adaptive Behavior
    scales according to Luckasson et al. (2002) and
    Schalock et al. (2008) that have strong
    reliability, established validity, and that are
    normed on the general population (with and
    without disabilities).

14
Available AB Instruments
  • Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-II
  • (Sparrow, Balla, Cicchetti, 2005).
  • Adaptive Behavior Assessment System-II
  • (Harrison Oakland, 2003).
  • AAMR Adaptive Behavior ScaleSchool Edition
    (Lambert, Nihira, Leland, 1993).
  • Scales of Independent Behavior-Revised
  • (Bruininks, Woodcock, Weatherman, Hill, 1996).
  • Comprehensive Test of Adaptive Behavior- Revised
  • (Adams, 2000).

15
Factors in Developing a Valid AB Scale to
Diagnose ID
  • Use items that discriminate clearly at the upper
    end of the IQ/AB criteria.
  • Do not use the same scale for multiple purposes
    (e.g., diagnoses and planning intervention).
  • Measure social vulnerability.
  • Include repertories of cultural/ethnic practice
    and environment demands.
  • Use multiple respondents

16
Purpose
  • To develop DABS, a third-party standardized AB
    scale to use for the diagnoses of ID with 4 to 21
    years old individuals
  • DABS must
  • contains items that maximally differentiate
    between AB of individuals with and without ID
  • measures all the AB aspects based on current AB
    factor analytic investigations (e.g., Thompson,
    McGrew, Bruininks, 1999 Widaman McGrew,
    1996) and theoretical reviews (e.g., Schalock,
    1999)
  • and allows the interviewer to scoring taking
    into account factors like presence of physical
    impairments, environment demands, or repertories
    of cultural practice, that may influence the
    opportunity of expression of individuals
    behaviors (e.g., Luckasson et al., 2002)

17
Defining Features of the DABS
  • Exclusively diagnostic focus on cut-off
  • Short-precise assessment instrument
  • Tailored to the AAIDD tri-partite definition of
    adaptive behavior gt

18
(No Transcript)
19
Diagnostic Adaptive Behavior Scale
  • Social skills
  • interpersonal skills, responsibility,
    self-esteem, wariness/naïveté, follow rules,
    etiquette, social problem solving.
  • Practical skills
  • activities of daily living, occupational skills,
    safety, healthcare, travel.
  • Conceptual skills
  • language, functional academics, self-direction,
    money management, time concepts.

20
Item Selection
  • Listing items from existing AB scales and
    literature N items 2,871
  • Classification of items (using N-Vivo) and
    reduction, deletion or addition of new items to
    allow the measurement of all AB areas (included
    social vulnerability, problem solving, and
    technology-based skills, that are not currently
    measured by published AB scales) N 1,180
  • Investigation of content validity of items asking
    to
  • international experts of AB and ID (N 20) to
    assign items to their respective AB domains
    conceptual, social, and practical skills.
    Preservation of the items that were specific just
    to one AB domain.
  • experts of AB and ID of four different United
    States minority groups African American (N 4),
    Asian American (N 4), Hispanic American (N
    2), and Native American (N 5) to judge if
    items are culturally/ethnically sensitive/biased
    with respect to individuals living in the United
    States. Preservation of items that were no
    biased.
  • Selection of items typically for 4 to 21 years
    old individual. Rewriting items in clear, concise
    and easy to observe ways.

21
(No Transcript)
22
Diagnostic Adaptive Behavior Scale
  • Age 4 21 years old
  • Administration
  • Semi-structured interview
  • Face-to-face Interviewer ? Respondent

23
DABS Sample Items
  • CONCEPTUAL SKILLS
  • (communication)
  • Follows verbal directions.
  • Communicates ideas through oral, sign, or written
    language (includes assistive technology).
  • (money concepts)
  • Plans how his/her money will be spent.
  • (time)
  • Uses clock or other timepiece to determine when
    it is time to do something (e.g., go to
    school/work, eat, or be home).

24
DABS Sample Items
  • SOCIAL SKILLS
  • (inter-personal)
  • Stays on the topic in group conversations.
  • Introduces self to others.
  • (gullibility)
  • Questions others when he/she is told something
    that may not be true.
  • Recognizes signs that someone is trying to
    exploit him/ her.

25
DABS Sample Items
  • PRACTICAL SKILLS
  • (activities of daily living)
  • Uses the restroom.
  • Dresses appropriately depending on the occasion.
  • (occupational skills)
  • Completes work assignments.
  • (maintains safe environment/safety)
  • Properly stores dangerous household cleaning
    products.
  • Shows safety awareness when crossing streets
    (e.g., checks for traffic before crossing
    streets).

26
Standardization of DABS
  • Norms - 4 to 21 years old typically developing
  • US Census
  • Race/ethnicity
  • Education levels
  • Geographic representation

27
  • Interview multiple respondents that know the
    individual being evaluated very well and that
    have had the opportunity to observe her/his
    typical behavior in different settings
  • Based on respondents, evaluate the persons level
    of present typical performance in adapting to the
    environmental demands typical for the
    individuals age cultural/ethnic group

28
  • Pilot administration of DABS with 15 individuals
    with ID for the
  • 1. identification of items that are missing,
    potentially problematic or need to be rewording
  • 2. investigation of the clarity/adequacy of the
    DABS administration instructions and rating
    system
  • ? Arrangement of DABS standardization form

29
  • Standardization with approximately 1,300
    individuals with typical development and 500
    individuals with ID, with 4 to 21 years old, and
    representative of the general United States
    population
  • Assess DABS psychometric qualities
  • Arrangement a Computerized Adaptive Test (CAT
    e.g., Thissen Wainer, 2001) DABS format based
    on Item Response Theory

30
  • Contains item that maximally differentiate
    between AB of individuals with and without ID
  • Measures all the AB aspects that are not
    currently measured social vulnerability, social
    processes, and technology-based skills
  • Uses multiple respondents and is based on
    interviewers clinical judgment for the scoring
    taking into account factors that may influence
    the opportunity to express individuals
    behaviors presence of physical impairments,
    environment demands or repertories of cultural
    practice
  • Uses Item Response Theory to reliably measure
    individual levels of performance around the
    cutoff point for determining significant
    limitations in AB

31
So where are we now?
  • And Would you like to participate?

32
(No Transcript)
33
Diagnostic Adaptive Behavior ScaleClosing Remarks
  • Consistent with AAIDD Diagnostic Manual
  • Diagnosis
  • Brief but precise
  • Recent norms based on general population
  • Standardized measure of adaptive behavior (4 to
    21 years old)
  • Based on most current research and psychometric
    science
  • Reduce the number of culturally/geographically-bia
    sed items.

34
References
  • Luckasson, R., et al. (2002). Mental retardation
    Definition, classification, and systems of
    supports (10th ed.). Washington, DC AAMR.
  • Schalock, R.L. (1999). The merging of adaptive
    behavior and intelligence Implications for the
    field of mental retardation. In R. L. Schalock
    (Ed.), Adaptive behavior and its measurement (pp.
    43-59). Washington, DC American Association on
    Mental Retardation.
  • Thissen, D. Wainer, H. (2001). Test scoring.
    Mahwah (NJ) Lawrence Erlbaum a
  • Thompson, J. R., McGrew, K. S., Bruininks, R.
    H. (1999). Adaptive and maladaptive behavior
    Functional and structural characteristics. In R.
    L. Schalock (Ed.), Adaptive behavior and its
    measurement (pp. 15-42). Washington, DC AAMR.
  • Widaman, K. F. McGrew, K. S. (1996). The
    structure of adaptive behavior. In J. W. Jacobson
    J. A. Mulick (Eds.), Manual of diagnosis and
    professional practice in mental retardation (pp.
    97-110). Washington, DC APA.

35
Contact Information
  • Hank Bersani Jr., Professor of Special
    EducationWestern Oregon University345 N.
    Monmouth AveMonmouth OR 97361503-838-8687bersan
    h_at_wou.eduwww.wou.edu/bersanh
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com