Assessment - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Assessment

Description:

American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. 49(6):309-313 (1988) ... Ethidium tested positive in the FETAX assay, a test system using toad embryos. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:823
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: efa8
Category:
Tags: assessment

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Assessment


1
Assessment Control of Hazards in the
Workplace Reproductive Risks
Ellen C. Faria, Ph.D., DABT Principal
Occupational Toxicologist JJ Pharmaceutical
Research Development NJAIHA 16 October 2008
2
Objectives
  • General understanding of occupational toxicology
  • Hazard assessments (PBOELs)?
  • Controls (OELs)?
  • How OT, IH OccHealth Teams collaborate
  • Reproductive developmental risk management
    program/tools

3
Minimizing Risk in the Workplace
Workplace Evaluation (Risk)?
4
Occupational Toxicology 101
All substances are poisons, there is none which
is not a poison. The right dose differentiates a
poison and a remedy. Paracelsus (1493-1541)?
Response
Dose
  • ALL chemicals have the ability to be toxic in
    high enough amounts.
  • Hazard (toxicity) - the inherent ability for a
    chemical to produce adverse effects in a
    biological system.
  • Risk - the probability that a substance will
    produce harm under certain conditions of
    use/exposure.

5
Occupational Toxicology 101
  • Active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) are
    different from other typical laboratory chemicals
  • Designed to produce an effect (receptors,
    enzymes) at very low concentrations
  • Goal
  • Identify health hazards
  • Prevent adverse effects in employees
  • Identify the workplace exposure level which
    minimizes risk to the employees
  • Prevent over-exposure

Sedation
Pain relief
100
response ()?
50
0
Dose
NOELs
6
Performance-based occupational exposure limit
(PBOEL) categories
  • A classification system used to assign materials
    into one of several health hazard categories of
    increasing severity based upon their inherent
    pharmacological and toxicological properties.
  • These categories correspond to predefined
    strategies or control philosophies known to
    provide the necessary degree of control to
    protect employees and the environment. (open ? ?
    closed handling)?

Therefore The more severe the
hazard. the more stringent the containment
to achieve acceptable level of risk.
  • Naumann, et. al. Performance-Based Exposure
    Control Limits for Active Pharmaceutical
    Ingredients. American Industrial Hygiene
    Association Journal. 5733-42 (1996).

7
PBOEL Category General Criteria
8
Containment philosophies
Closed Systems
Typical PBOEL Clinical Dose
Isolation/Barrier/ Administrative controls
4 3A/B 2 1
lt 0.01 mg/day
Isolation/Barrier
Directional Laminar Flow Laminar Flow
Local Exhaust General Exhaust
gt100 mg/day
Open Systems
9
Control bands
  • Typical airborne levels allowed (target low
    end of band)?
  • Category 1 100 - 3000 ?g/m3
  • Category 2 20 - 100 ?g/m3
  • Category 3A 5 - 20 ?g/m3
  • Category 3B 500 ng/m3 - 5 ?g/m3
  • Category 4 lt 500 ng/m3

Unstudied compounds Default PBOEL Category
3A With the exception of several therapeutic
classes (PBOEL Category 4 anti-neoplastics,
anti-arrhythmics)?
10
Drug Development Process
Years
Years
6 months- 2/3 years
OEL- Occupational Exposure Limit PBOEL-
Performance-based occupational exposure
limit ASL- Accepted surface limit (wipe
limit)? API- Active pharmaceutical
ingredient IPI- Isolated Process intermediates
11
Occupational Exposure Limits (OELs)
ADI (?g/day) NOEL or LOEL (?g/kg/day) x BW
(kg)?
S x UF x ?
Lowest clinically active dose (?g/day)?
S x UF x ? OEL (?g/m3)   ADI
(?g/day)? V (m3/day)?
ADI Allowable daily intake via any
route NOEL No-Observed-Effect-Level BW
Average human body weight (50 kg)? S
Pharmacokinetics (half-life and
accumulation)? UF Uncertainty
Factors ? Used to adjust the
absorption of a compound such that it equals 100
via inhalation. OEL Airborne conc.
which will not result in adverse effects in most
healthy workers (8 hrs X 40 yrs)? V
Volume of air breathed in an 8-hour workday
(10 m3)?
  • Sargent, Edward V. and G. David Kirk
    "Establishing Airborne Control Limits in the
    Pharmaceutical Industry. American Industrial
    Hygiene Association Journal. 49(6)309-313
    (1988).

12
Occupational Exposure Limits (OELs)?
  • Data Considered
  • Therapeutic class pharmacological potency
  • Toxicity/safety clinical data
  • Peer-review approval
  • Approved by consensus
  • Benchmark with industry experts
  • Documented OEL Monograph (scientific document)?
  • Uncertainties accounted for
  • Susceptibilities/differences between individuals
  • Differences between species (animal to human)?
  • Short-term long-term exposures
  • LOEL to NOEL extrapolation
  • Route to route extrapolation
  • Modifying Factors
  • Severity of toxicity (i.e. irreversible effects)?
  • Database incompleteness

13
Notations
  • Repro notation (RReproductive Effector)?
  • highlights the potential for an agent to cause
    damage to the reproductive system of males and
    females and damage to an unborn child.
  • SKIN notation
  • highlights the potential that an agent has for
    significant absorption via the skin (dermal
    absorption).
  • DSEN notation
  • highlights the potential for an agent to cause
    delayed allergic skin reactions.
  • RSEN notation
  • highlights the potential for an agent to be a
    respiratory sensitizer (i.e. occupational
    asthma).

14
Risk Assessment Management
Signs/symptoms, Surveillance Medical history
Hazard identification
Occupational Toxicology
Occupational Health
RA
Exposure Assessment
Industrial Hygiene
15
Hazard Risk Assessments in Practice
Reproductive/Developmental Assessments
16
Why such a concern?
Pregnancy Outcomes- U.S. (2005)?
Adverse Effects
  • post-implantation loss
  • major birth defects (birth)?
  • major birth defects (gt1 yr)?
  • minor birth defects
  • low birth weight
  • infant mortality
  • abn. neurological function

31 4 7 14 7 2 17
lt 50 normal infant 65 unknown etiology
17
Why such a concern?
  • Birth defects leading cause of infant mortality
    (US)?
  • 17 US children developmental disorders
  • Infertility gt 2 million couples (US)?
  • Decreasing sperm counts
  • Susceptibility
  • Cell Division - Mitosis Meiosis
  • Integrated physiological function
  • Multiple targets, some more sensitive than others
    at different times.

18
Male Reproductive Toxicology (M)?
  • Targets
  • Neuroendocrine system
  • Accessory sex glands
  • Spermatogenesis
  • Sexual function

19
Male Reproductive Toxicology (M)?
  • Moral, ethical and legal issues collection of
    information poor
  • experimental assays are limited (sperm output,
    fertility measurement of hormone levels)?
  • Not examined in routine autopsies
  • Chemicals detected by semen analysis does not
    indicate toxicity
  • Damage to the testis can cause recessive
    mutations in germ cells that may accumulate and
    go undetected for generations
  • Unlike the ovaries, cell division in the testis
    is continuous
  • Testicular cancer not rare among young adult men
    (US) rate ?

20
Female Reproductive Toxicology (F)?
  • Targets
  • Post-ovarian Structures Processes
  • Neuroendocrine system
  • Ovarian Function
  • Fertilization/Implantation

21
Female Reproductive Toxicology (F)?
  • Contraceptives difficult to assess reproductive
    toxins in human females
  • Targets each has a specialized function under
    influence of the neuroendocrine system
  • Ovaries are especially sensitive to insult have
    dual functions produce oocytes and secrete
    steroid hormones
  • Oogenesis (egg production) starts before birth
    (first trimester)?
  • Large number of dividing germ cells
  • viable eggs is limited
  • Birth- 2 million eggs
  • Puberty- 30 to 40 thousand
  • Post-maturation- 400
  • Damaged oocytes cannot be replaced causing
    sterility
  • If chemical or radiation injury causes
    chromosomal damage, the damage lasts a lifetime

22
Developmental Toxicology (D)?
  • Manifestations
  • growth retardation
  • functional impairment
  • structural malformations
  • embryo lethality
  • Factors critical to toxicity
  • Nature/inherent properties of toxin
  • Level of exposure
  • TIMING of exposure (organogenesis)?
  • Numerous radiation, infections, maternal
    imbalances, drugs and chemicals

23
Developmental Toxicology (D)?
  • Damaged ovarian germ cells mutations that can
    lead to developmental disorders or cancer
  • Embryonal/fetal damage ? can produce various
    deformities that appear later rather than sooner
  • Pregnancy stage determines the outcome
  • Various organs have different periods of
    development and sensitivity

24
Lactation (L)?
  • Quality production of breast milk
  • Lipid soluble compounds accumulate in breast
    tissue and may be expressed in breast milk
  • Nursing infants may be exposed to xenobiotics
  • Methylene chloride, ETOH, heavy metals, KI, etc.
  • Cannot tell if toxic to nursing infant
  • Can only tell if it is present in breast milk

25
Occupational Reproductive/Developmental Health
Hazard Program
Employee
26
Occupational Reproductive/Developmental Health
Hazard Program
  • Professionals (IH, Occ Tox Occ Health)?
  • Implement programs regulations
  • Assess reproductive risks in timely manner
  • Amount, route, timing, duration, and frequency of
    exposure
  • Recommend risk management steps
  • Communicate
  • Employee
  • Understand and participate in Corp programs
    adhere to regulations
  • Understand benefits
  • Adhere to recommendations
  • Communicate

27
Occupational Reproductive/Developmental Health
Hazard Program
  • Management
  • Assure recommendations are implemented
  • Cooperate with employee professionals
  • Communicate
  • Human Resources
  • Ensure job security
  • Ease implementation of recommendations
  • Implement procedures for conflict resolution
  • Understand the RA process
  • Assure appropriate documentation
  • Communicate

28
Occupational Toxicology
  • Priority to determine hazards
  • Work with Occupational Health IH
  • Utilize sound (peer-reviewed) data from reliable
    resources
  • Relevance to human toxicity
  • Dose-response
  • Identify classify toxicants to be easily
    understood
  • Put potential risk into appropriate perspective

29
Resources
  • Reprotox, Shepards, Reprotext
  • National Library of Medicine Databases (NIH)?
  • Developmental Repro. Tox (DART)?
  • Environ. Teratology Info. Center Backfile
    (ETICBACK)?
  • Hazardous Substance Databank (HSDB)?
  • Reg. of Tox Effects Chem. Sub. (RTECS)?
  • PubMed journals
  • LactMed
  • Books (Lewis, Shepard, Schardein)?

30
Professional Judgment
  • Methanol
  • Pregnant rats exposed to 20,000 ppm methanol in
    air during gestation experienced a significant
    increase in skeletal, urinary, and cardiovascular
    defects in the fetuses when compared to unexposed
    controls (Nelson et al, 1985).
  • Ethidium bromide
  • This agent intercalates DNA strands and was
    mutagenic in a number of test systems (1,2). It
    is possible that nucleic acid alterations induced
    by ethidium make cells more susceptible to the
    effects of other cytotoxicants. Such an effect of
    ethidium has been demonstrated with respect to
    bleomycin (3), but not with respect to x ray (4).
    There are few studies on the potential
    embryotoxicity of ethidium. This agent is capable
    of arresting growth and development in early sea
    urchin embryos (5). Ethidium tested positive in
    the FETAX assay, a test system using toad
    embryos. The concentration of ethidium resulting
    in death of half the embryos was 0.05 mg/mL and
    the concentration resulting in malformation of
    half the embryos was 0.035 mg/mL (6). Neither the
    mutagenicity data nor the FETAX assay can be
    considered predictive of human response. We have
    not located any data on human reproductive or
    lactation effects of ethidium.
  • Thalidomide
  • Human teratogen, but a weak teratogen in
    animals.
  • Aspirin
  • Strong rodent teratogen, but no such effect on
    humans.

31
Tool Identifying Potential Toxicants
32
Criteria for classification 1
  • Existing data indicates that this agent has the
    potential to cause
  • fetal harm (D1)?
  • adverse reproductive effects in females (F1)?
  • adverse reproductive effects in males (M1)?
  • At dose levels lt potential workplace exposures
  • Therefore exposure should eliminate

33
Criteria for classification 2
  • Existing data indicates that this agent has the
    potential to cause
  • fetal harm (D2)?
  • adverse reproductive effects in females (F2)?
  • adverse reproductive effects in males (M2)?
  • At dose levels gtgtgt potential workplace exposures
  • Therefore exposure minimized

34
Criteria for classification 3
  • Existing data indicates that this agent does not
    have the potential to cause
  • fetal harm (D3)?
  • adverse reproductive effects in females (F3)?
  • adverse reproductive effects in males (M3)?
  • At dose levels potential workplace exposures
  • Therefore exposure safe chemical handling
    procedures

35
Criteria for classification 4
  • No data exists on the potential for this agent to
    cause
  • fetal harm (D4)?
  • adverse reproductive effects in females (F4)?
  • adverse reproductive effects in males (M4)?
  • Safe workplace exposures are unknown
  • Therefore exposure minimized (PBOEL system)?

36
Challenges
  • Hazard risk assessment programs
  • Lack of SMEs (interpret information ?)?
  • Workers taking unnecessary risks
  • Particular susceptibility- repro organs
    developmental
  • Existing historical taboo about early pregnancy
  • Unreliable resources of information used for
    hazard ID
  • No team approach to assessments recommendations
    (integration of disciplines)?
  • Lack of communication understanding between
    groups
  • Lack of clarity of responsibilities
  • Resistance to make decisions alone

37
Summary
  • Develop internal policies/programs
  • Document hazard risk assessments
  • Dynamic process
  • Team approach in risk assessment management
  • Training (hazards, risks, confidentiality,
    programs, benefits, etc.)?
  • Timing of evaluations
  • Reliable resources
  • Communication is Key !!!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com