CLUSTER TECHNOLOGIES Foilene ble ogs presentert p NOTUR 2003 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

CLUSTER TECHNOLOGIES Foilene ble ogs presentert p NOTUR 2003

Description:

Cost-effective hardware since uses COTS (Commercial Of-The-shelf) parts. BUT: ... Poster by Torbj rn Vik et. al. Poster by Lars Ailo Bongo. Email: elster_at_computer.org ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: els3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CLUSTER TECHNOLOGIES Foilene ble ogs presentert p NOTUR 2003


1
CLUSTER TECHNOLOGIES(Foilene ble også
presentert på NOTUR 2003)
  • Anne C. Elster
  • Dept. of Computer Information Science (IDI)
  • Norwegian Univ. of Science Tech. (NTNU)
  • Trondheim, Norway

NFR 30. juni, 2003
2
Clusters (Networks of PCs/Workstation)
  • Are they suitable for HPC?
  • Advantage
  • Cost-effective hardware since uses COTS
    (Commercial Of-The-shelf) parts
  • BUT
  • Typically much slower processor interconectes
    than traditional HPC systems
  • What about usability?

NTNU IDIs 40-node AMD 1.46GHz cluster 2GB RAM,
40GB disk, Fast Ethernet
3
Cluster TechnologiesNOTUR Emerging Technology
projectCollaboration between NTNU Univ. of
Tromsø
  • Goal
  • Analyze Cluster technologies suitability for HPC
    by looking at some of the most interesting NOTUR
    applications
  • The results will provide a foundation for
    decisions regarding future HPC programs

4
Main Collaborators include
  • Anne C. Elster (IDI, NTNU) Project leader
  • Otto Anshus Tore Larsen (CS, U of Tromsø
  • Torbjørn Hallgren (IDI, NTNU)
  • Einar Rønquist (IMF, NTNU)
  • Master , Ph.D. Students Post Docs at NTNU and
    Univ. of Tromsø

5
General Issues to Consider
  • Why cluster vs. Powerful desktop vs. Large SMPs?
  • What are the total costs associated with clusters
    (harware, software, support, usability)
  • 32-bit vs. 64-bit architectures

6
Cluster Project ACTIVITIES
  • Profiling Tuning Selected Applications
  • Physics and Chemistry Codes
  • (Elster students, Dept. of Computer Science
    Dept., NTNU)
  • Profiling User-Analysis of Amber, Dalton
    Gaussian
  • (Tor Johansen staff, Comp. Center, U of
    Tromsø)
  • Optimization tool analysis of Dalton
  • (Anshus PostDoc/student, Dept. of Comp. Sci.,
    U of Tromsø)

7
Cluster Project ACTIVITIES continuted
  • Execution Monotoring
  • (Anshus, Tore Larsen students, CS, U of T)
  • Visualization servers, etc.
  • (Hallgren, Elster students, CS, NTNU)
  • Impact of future numerical algorithms
  • (Rønquist student, Dept. of Mathematics, NTNU
  • Interface with NOTUR ET Grid Project
  • (Elster, Harald Simonsen and colleagues, staff
    students associated with the NOTUR ET Cluster
    Grid projects)

8
Some cluster issues discovered
  • Performance of programs can individually vary on
    different machines
  • FORTRAN problems
  • Different FORTRAN implementations have
    non-stardard add-ons (e.g. FORTRAN 90)
  • Leads to great difficulty in porting code to a
    different platform with a different Fortran
    compiler (e.g. by a different vendor)

9
Some cluster issues discovered continued
  • Global operations have more severe impact on
    performance on clusters than traditional
    supercomputers since communication between
    processors take relatively more time of total
    execution time

10
The Ideal Cluster -- Hardware
  • High-bandwidth network
  • Low-latency network
  • Low Operating System overhead (tcp causes slow
    start)
  • Great floating-point performance (64-bit?)

11
The Ideal Cluster -- Software
  • Compiler that is
  • Portable
  • Optimizing
  • Do extra work to save communication
  • Self tuning /Load ballanced
  • Automatically choose best algorithm
  • One-sided communication support?
  • Optimized middleware

12
For more information
  • Poster session at NOTUR
  • Cluster Project stand
  • - several posters smoke simulation demo
  • Poster by Torbjørn Vik et. al.
  • Poster by Lars Ailo Bongo
  • Email elster_at_computer.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com