Gains from trade in classical Today - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Gains from trade in classical Today

Description:

The point of the exercise it to show that there are two distinct sources ... Gain from consumption a country can consume outside its ... bears ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: laura3
Category:
Tags: classical | gains | today | trade

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gains from trade in classical Today


1
Gains from trade in classicalTodays class
  • Todays class will demonstrate the benefits of
    trading using comparative advantage
  • without specialization in production
  • with specialization in production
  • Then you will work through an example in groups,
    if we have time.

2
Gains from trade
  • The point of the exercise it to show that there
    are two distinct sources of gains from trade
  • Gain from consumption a country can consume
    outside its production possibility frontier even
    if it doesnt change its production
  • Gain from specialization of production a
    country and the world can gain from
    specialization that leads to greater world output.

3
Example
  • In the example, we will have 2 countries A, and
    B.
  • Each country will have a certain amount of labour
    available to it.
  • A has 9,000 hours of labour
  • B has 16,000 hours of labour
  • Each country can make two goods cloth and wine

4
Example
  • In the first table, we show how many hours each
    country chooses to put into the production of
    each good.
  • This determines both
  • the total output of the good for each country
  • the total consumption of the good for each
    country.

5
Example
  • In the first table, we also show the price ratios
    that prevail in each country for the two goods,
    as well as the price ratio that could prevail if
    the countries traded.
  • Here is Table 1

6
C - A Example
7
Example with trade
  • In table 2, we show the situation for each
    country WITH trade.
  • There is a twist however, when comparing this
    table to what we did last week

8
Example with trade
  • In this table, we first look at the situation if
    the countries did NOT specialize, but traded with
    each other.
  • This situation could occur if factors of
    production were completely immobile, so that all
    workers who made cloth could only make cloth, and
    all workers who made wine could only make wine.
  • It could also happen if the government simply
    decreed that people could not change professions.

9
Example with trade
  • The case without specialization shows that there
    is a potential to gain from trade only through a
    change in consumption pattern.
  • The second part of the table shows the extra gain
    from specialization in production and trade.

10
C- A Example p. 2
11
Gains from Trade Graphical Analysis
  • Next we show the gains from trade graphically.
  • The first set of graphs were drawn by me, by hand.

12
Gains from Trade Graphical Analysis
  • The first graph shows the production possibility
    frontier (ppf) for country A.
  • Assuming complete mobility of workers, the ppf is
    a straight line.
  • If all 9,000 hours produced cloth, the country
    could produce 9,000 cloth,
  • If all 9,000 hours produced wine, the country
    could produce 3,000 wine.
  • Given perfect mobility of labour, the country can
    produce anywhere along the straight line joining
    these two points (or anywhere inside the triangle.

13
Gains from Trade Graphical Analysis
  • The consumption for the country without trade
    MUST be a point along the production possibility
    frontier.
  • In this example, the country happens to choose
    the point (W,C) ( 1,000 , 6,000) (this is an
    assumption for the purpose of the example)
  • In the graph, there is a point off to the right.
  • It is the consumption point with trade but no
    specialization. (the next graph shows how its
    found.)

14
Comparative Advantage Graphs
  • Country A
  • can produce 9000 cloth
  • or 3,000 wine,
  • or any linear combination in between
  • with no trade, produces and consumes at A
  • with trade, country produces at A, consumes at C1

15
Gains from trade continued
  • In the second graph, I draw the line that shows
    trade between the two countries with no change in
    production.
  • because there is no change in production, the
    line must touch the PPF at the same production
    point as the case in autarky.
  • however, because people can purchase goods at a
    different price, then they can buy more wine than
    they did before and sell more cloth.
  • This leads to a change in consumption. This
    change represents a gain because the country
    could not produce this consumption bundle itself
    (it is outside the countrys ppf)

16
Gains from trade continued
  • This last point bears repeating
  • The change in consumption represents a gain
    because the country could not produce this
    consumption bundle itself (it is outside the
    countrys ppf)
  • When a country doesnt trade, its maximum
    consumption (consumption possibility frontier
    (cpf) is the countrys ppf
  • When a country trades, it can consume anywhere
    along the trade line. This trade line determines
    the countrys consumption possibility frontier.
  • In this example the ppf has slope 13 the trade
    line has slope 1 2.5.

17
Comparative Advantage Graphs
  • Without trade, ppf slope equals cpf slope 1W3C
    (slope 3)
  • With trade ppf unchanged, cpf slope is 1W2.5C
    (slope2.5)
  • cpf extends from production point to consumption
    point, also called trade line

18
Recap
  • The preceding graph is important because we will
    use similar analysis for neoclassical trade
    theory.
  • REMEMBER
  • when a country is not trading, it is consuming
    along its ppf.
  • when a country trades, it produces at a point ON
    its ppf, and consumes at a point ON the trade
    line. This is because it can sell one good to the
    other country in exchange for another.

19
Example continued
  • The next graph adds the consumption point with
    specialization to the previous graph. (point C2A
    )
  • It does not yet show how we get to that point.

20
Comparative Advantage Graphs
  • With specialisation and trade country can consume
    4000C and 2000 wine - point C2
  • (produce 9000C sell 5000 to buy 2000W)

21
Complete specialization for country A
  • The final graph shows that country A can
    completely specialize in cloth, trade 2.5 cloth
    for 1 wine, and consume at point C2A.
  • Recall, country A has 9,000 hours.
  • The consumption point C2A would require 10,000
    hours for A to produce at home.

22
Comparative Advantage Graphs
  • CPF with complete specialization extends from
    production point (W,C) (0, 9000) to consumption
    point
  • (W,C)(2000,4000)

23
Country B
  • Country B gains from trade in a similar way to
    country A.
  • In country B,
  • in autarky, 8000 cloth can be produced,
  • (16,000 hrs / 2)
  • or 4000 wine
  • (16,000 hrs /4)
  • or any combination of the above. (Linear ppf)

24
Country B
  • In country B, we assume an initial production
    point of (W,C) (2500 , 3000)
  • Without trade, it can consume (2500, 3000), if it
    wanted to change output, it could consume and
    produce anywhere along ppf
  • RECALL without trade,
  • production consumption

25
Country B
  • With trade but no specialization,
  • country still produces (W, C) (2500 , 3000)
  • But, it can trade at price Pw/Pc 2.5.
  • With trade AND specialization,
  • country produces (W, C) (0, 4000)
  • It can still trade at price Pw/Pc 2.5
  • It can consume along this price line CFB2 by
    buying cloth and selling wine to country A.

26
C A Example Country B
  • For country B, we have all three lines combined
    in one graph.

27
Questions?
  • You have an example to do next

28
You Do
  • Assume there are 2 countries A and B.
  • A has 15,000 hours of labour that it could use to
    make paper or scissors.
  • It takes 3 hours to make paper, 5 hours to make
    scissors.
  • (It takes B 14 hours to make paper, and 6 hours
    to make scissors)

29
You Do
  • In which good does A have a comparative
    advantage?
  • Which good will A specialize in if A chose to
    specialize?

30
You Do
  • Now, concentrating on A.
  • Draw a graph with As ppf.
  • What is the price ratio, Pp/Ps in A ?
  • Assume A consumes at point
  • (P, S) (2000, 1800)
  • Now let A trade with B. We will assume the trade
    price is Pp/ Ps 4/3.

31
You do continued
  • With a world trade price of 4/3, draw the cpf1
    for country A.
  • If A chose to sell 500 paper for scissors, how
    much of each good would it consume?
  • How many hours would it take A to produce the
    same consumption bundle on its own?
  • If A chose to specialize in paper production and
    consumed the same amount of paper as in A, how
    many scissors could it consume?
  • How many hours would it take A to produce the
    same consumption bundle on its own?
  • Draw the cpf1 for country A on the same graph,
    showing the new consumption point with
    specialization and trade.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com