Title: Psychology Dept' Colloquium
1Psychology Dept. Colloquium
- Training and Research with Older Individuals at
the Alliance Senior Day Program - Dr. Linda LeBlanc
- This Friday, Feb. 15
- 330 pm
- 1710 Wood Hall
2Schedule/Announcements
- E4 is a week from today, Tuesday 2/19
- Thursday, 2/21
- Hand back E4
- Hand out ME1 study objectives
- Review session, ME1, answer questions
- ME1 is the following Tuesday, 2/26
- ME1 covers Units 1-4
- If you missed an exam, you must take ME1 or the
missing exam score turns into a zero - If you have taken all the exams to date, I will
replace your lowest exam score with the ME score - If you are satisfied with your exam scores to
date, you get both R 2/21 and T 2/26 off - There will be no ME for ME1
3U4 College Teaching and Teaching Technology
- Behavioral analysis of college teaching and
student study behavior - Direct Instruction used primarily in elementary
and secondary schools - Precision Teaching
- Headsprout web-based reading program for
children created by behavior analysts
4Unit 4 College Teaching
- Behavioral analysis of college teaching and
student studying behavior - Article by Dr. Jack Michael, helps explain
- Why PSY professors administer more exams and
require more assignments than professors in other
departments typically do - Why I structure PSY 4600 the way I do with study
objectives, frequent essay examinations and grade
sheets - Why, from a behavioral perspective, your study
behavior may differ in this class vs. other
classes - Why some (most of us) procrastinate - when
studying for exams, writing papers, preparing
conference presentations, etc.
5Introduction/Overview to the Michael article
- The teaching technology discussed in the article
is relevant for the typical college class with
a course enrollment of 35-40 or more and a clear
factual content. - It is not relevant for fine arts (dance,
sculpting, painting, writing) or other skill
training such as public speaking, mechanics, etc.
- While this technology can be used with small
classes (15 or fewer students), there are also
methods that can be equally effective - Most university classes at colleges and
universities are the type discussed in the article
6Overview of Michael article, cont.
- Begins by discussing student motivation to study.
That is, what types of factors motivate students
to study hard? - He discusses a number of factors that are often
mentioned by individuals (intrinsic interest in
the subject matter, approval/disapproval of
others in the study setting, short-term payoffs,
long-range payoffs of learning the material,
etc.) - He argues against each one, concluding that the
course grade is the only effective motivational
variable and the only one over which the
instructor has control.
7Overview, cont.
- However, even the grade will not be an effective
motivator if the grade is not important to the
student - He further states that if the grade is not
important to the student, then there is nothing
an instructor can do to motivate students to
study - Many say that grades should not be emphasized -
Michael disagrees with that perspective - the
grade is the only motivative factor that the
instructor has under his/her control and thus
should be emphasized
8Overview cont.
- Next, he describes how to structure a course so
that the course grade is an effective motivator - Three features that must be present in order for
students to study hard (SO 12, but stated
positively) - The grade must be important to the student
- Studying must be closely (and explicitly) linked
to the exam/assignment grades and - The exam/assignment grades must be closely (and
explicitly) linked to the course grade
(how many, assignment/quiz, have no idea how it
relates to final grade - 10, 20, maybe
checkmark how many I didnt study at all, aced
the test I studied very hard and didnt have a
clue? 2 exams - chapter 4 - graduate course -
didnt know passed/failed)
9SO 1 Creativity?
- This type of course structure is very
controversial and has been criticized for a
number of reasons - The first criticism This type of course does not
teach creativity or new knowledge, but only
teaches students how to parrot back old
knowledge. - Michaels response?
Creativity requires an extensive familiarity with
what is already known - an extensive knowledge
base about which one can be creative. For
example, If you dont understand reinforcement,
punishment, shaping, etc., you cannot create an
effective instructional system or develop an
effective training program for individuals with
developmental disabilities.
(need to know the basics so you have something to
be creative about)
10SO 2 What is the two for one rule? What
does it imply for getting an A or a B?
- In order to get a C in a course, students should
spend 2 hours outside class studying for every
hour in class. - 3 credit hour course 2 x 3 6 hours outside of
class studying (each and every week) to get a C - Full credit load of 12-15 credit hours, students
should be studying 36-45 hours per week for
C-level performance - MORE than 2 hours of study per credit hour should
required for an A or B. For example, 3 hours
outside per credit hour, 9-10 hours.
(most dont require that, this class - 6 hours
per unit)
11SO 3 What are two main problems with intrinsic
interest in the subject matter as a motivational
factor?
- While the subject matter may indeed be
interesting to students, it is usually not
sufficiently interesting to maintain the amount
of study required to master the material - A student may be passionate about behavior
analysis, love 4600, but that is not likely to
maintain 9-12 hours of studying each week - Competing activities that are not postponable
while studying is. You can always study
tomorrow - but sometimes tomorrow never comes - Friend drops by - lets go out
- Baby/child gets sick
- Football game/play isnt available at any other
time
(in general, second reason is main reason, be
sure to include - not postponable)
12SO 4 Why is it that short-term advantages from
the newly acquired material do not motivate
studying?
- 4A Many content courses, unlike automobile
mechanics, do not have many short-term advantages
to the student rather - 4B They are important for further learning
- You cant run before you can walk
- You cant master the material in 4600 unless you
have mastered the material in 3600 - You cant master algebra unless you master
arithmetic
13SO 5 Briefly describe the weakness of long-
range payoffs related to the details of the
study assignment.
Note the answer is not the delay or temporal
remoteness, even though that is a problem as well.
- It is easy to believe that you can contribute to
the human condition - that is, be a successful
behavior analyst - without understanding the
specific details of the study assignment - It is easy to believe that you can be an
effective human service worker, OBM practitioner,
clinical psychologist, etc. without knowing SOs
5, 14, 20 and 26 from Unit 4 in Dickinsons PSY
4600.
14SO 6 So why are grades the best motivational
factor to motivate student studying?
- It is the one motivational factor over which the
instructor has control - the only one (we cant
control intrinsic interest, we cant control
whether others in the environment support
scholarly performance, etc.) - It can be easily related to the details of the
study assignment (we can make SOs 5, 14, 20
from U4 important by relating them to the
exam/assignment) - It is a factor of considerable strength - that
is, it is important to most students as evidenced
by the intensity of study/work right before an
exam or right before an assignment is due
(Three points)
15SO 7 Vicious vs. Friendly Competition and
their relationship to norm-referenced
vs. criterion- referenced grading
practices.
- Many criticize emphasizing grades because it
generates competition and competition is bad. - Michael distinguishes between vicious and
friendly competition, and agrees that vicious
competition is, indeed, bad, but friendly
competition is not. - He then describes grading practices that produce
vicious competition and those that produce
friendly competition. - Norm-referenced grading practices produce vicious
competition and hence should not be adopted,
while criterion-referenced grading practices
produce friendly competition which is OK.
16SO 7A Norm-referenced grading produces vicious
competition
- Why? The grade you receive depends not only on
your grade but the grades of other students in
the class if one student does well, it decreases
the opportunity for another student to do well - Grading on a curve 10 of the students get As,
20 get Bs, 50 or so get Cs - If one student gets an A, it decreases the
opportunity for another student to get an A - This produces vicious competition between
students you may be happy when someone doesnt
get an A or a B you are not as likely to help
someone - if you do, that person may get an A,
which decreases the opportunity for you to get an
A - In fact, some students may actually engage in
behaviors that will harm anothers student chance
to get an A (steal relevant books from the
library)
(physio course, comp exams)
17SO 7BCriterion-referenced grading does not
produce vicious competition although
it may produce friendly competition
- Why? The grade you get depends only on your
grade, not on the grades other students get thus
when one student performs well it does not
decrease the opportunity for another student to
do well - Dickinsons PSY 4600 grading practices any
student who gets 92 of the points, gets an A. - Friendly competition Student wants to have the
highest point score in the class or a student
wants to beat out another student. - But this does not produce the type of competition
that makes a student rejoice in the misfortune of
other students or refuse to help another student
because it might decrease his/her own grade.
18SO 8 Study procrastination scallop
- Many people maintain that an exam or assignment
is an example of a FI schedule of reinforcement,
which produces the typical response scallop.
(not much behavior in the beginning of the
interval, more and more behavior as the interval
progresses and reinforcement gets close). - Not so! And the reasons are the same as the
reasons we examined last unit with respect to why
a paycheck is not an example of a FI schedule. - So how do we explain the scallop in
studying/working that occurs right before the
exam? - How is that scallop behavior related to the exam
grade and the course grade?
19SO 8 Continued Procrastination Scallop
- To understand this, it helps to know that the
analysis Michael presents is a molecular
analysis. - Underlying position that if a consequence follows
a behavior by more than 5 to 60 seconds, it is
not a direct-acting contingency that is, that
consequence cannot directly affect the behavior
as reinforcement, punishment, etc. - Rather the effect that the consequence has is due
to other variables, such as verbal behavior. - Michael is a molecular behavior analyst (as most
others in the department) and thus explains the
procrastination scallop using a molecular
analysis where the consequence of studying must
occur within 5 to 60 seconds after the behavior
of studying
20SO 8 Procrastination Scallop, A molecular
behavioral analysis
- 8A The relationship between two factors affects
studying (Note carefully, not just one or the
other!) - Task completion how much of the task the student
has completed - Time passage the time left before the exam or
assignment - 8B Task completion and time passage together
determine the aversiveness of the situation at
any point in time before the exam is taken or the
assignment is due
(be careful not to put this in your own words)
21SO 8 Procrastination Scallop, A molecular
behavioral analysis
- 8B Task completion and time passage together
determine the aversiveness of the situation at
any point in time before the exam is taken or the
assignment is due - To have completed most of the task and have a
good deal of time left is safe or nonaversive - But to have completed very little of the task and
have very little time left is a condition that is
dangerous or aversive - It is the aversiveness that generates escape
behavior
(note that the studying does not become aversive
the situation becomes aversive)
22SO 8B Continued
- Usually, the only relevant form of escape (that
is, the only way to reduce the aversiveness) is
to study (or work on the assignment) - The reinforcement for studying is the escape from
the aversiveness - the change in status to a less
dangerous condition - That is, the studying behavior decreases the
existing aversiveness - the decrease in the
aversiveness is an immediate negatively
reinforcing consequence
(I am going to first show you the diagram which
is 8C, then talk about why the scallop occurs)
23SO 8C The Diagram of the Behavioral Contingency
which is an Escape Contingency
- MO (aversiveness)R (studying)--gtSr- (decrease in
aversiveness) -
- Pre-existing aversiveness is an MO
- Studying is the escape behavior
- Reinforcement is the decrease in the pre-existing
- aversiveness which negatively reinforces
studying
Note that the term is aversive, not adversive
24SO 8B So, what produces the scallop? That is why
do (most) students study more and more as the
time interval passes?
- Because the aversiveness increases as the time
interval passes and students have not completed
the task/assignment - That is, the pre-existing aversiveness, the MO
becomes stronger and stronger the closer the exam
if students have not completed the assignment - Just like the colder you are, the more cold
terminating behaviors you are going to engage in
(or warmth generating)
(or the hungrier you are, or the more tired you
are)
25SO 8D Again, what reinforces studying?
- To repeat The reinforcement for studying is the
decrease in the pre-existing aversive condition
immediate negative reinforcement (escape) - As soon as you study, there is a decrease in the
aversiveness - The more you study, the greater the decrease
- The reinforcement for studying is NOT the
avoidance of a bad grade on the exam/assignment - The grade is too delayed, it does not occur
within 5 - 60 seconds after studying
(many students get this wrong last slide on this
topic)
26SO 9 End-of-Course Activity
- Why does an end-of-course activity (like a final
exam or paper worth 50-75 of the students
grade) weaken the relation between the exam
grades and the course grades?
Students can quite correctly believe that a low
score on an earlier exam or assignment can be
compensated for by a high score on the final exam
or paper. But what often happens? You run out of
time because all of your courses kick in at the
end. So no final exam in Dickinsons PSY 4600!!!
27SO 10 Reasons professors give for their
unwillingness to clearly specify what is going to
be on the exam
- Many professors are highly critical of study
objectives on the grounds that we are spoon
feeding students. - Professors often give two reasons for not wanting
to specify what is going to be on the exam - You will only learn what the professor tells you
to learn without specification you will learn
all of the other things you wouldnt learn if you
didnt know what was going to be on the exam - Dickinson says not so! If you are examined over
4-5 chapters, do you really learn everything in
those 4-5 chapters? - Part of the scholars repertoire consists of
bringing order out of chaos and dealing with the
instructors vague assignments is a good
opportunity to learn this skill - Not so again!!! (read material out of
interest)
28SO 11 In large enrollment classes what controls
attendance and what does NOT control attendance?
- What does control attendance?
- How essential the lecture material is for doing
well on the exam - (note material in red!) - What does NOT control attendance?
- How interesting or inspirational the lectures
are - Faculty do not have to do dog and pony shows
to get students to attend class. - Of course, all things being equal, interesting
is better than boring!
(shy)
29SO 12 The three conditions under which the
threat of a low grade will NOT motivate studying
- If the grade is not important to the student
- The relation between studying for the exam and
the grade on the exam is not clear - The relation between the exam grade and the
course grade is not clear
30SO 14 Exam frequency and motivation to study
Provide two reasons why exams that are given once
every three weeks (let alone two exams per
semester) will not have the same motivational
effect as exams that are given weekly.
- 1. The procrastination scallop most students
will wait to study until the week of the exam - If I require 6 or more hours of outside studying
for each exam (for a C), if I gave an exam every
three weeks instead of every 1 1/2 weeks, it
would require 12 or more hours of study. If I
gave just a mid-term and final, that would be
about 7 weeks or about 4.5 units, which would
require 27 hours or more of studying. - It is absurd to think that students will spend
27 hours studying for the exam during that one
week.
(one reason why professors use norm-referenced
grading - no one does well)
31SO 14 Second reason why exams that are
givenonce every three weeks (let alone twice a
semester)will not have the same motivational
effect as weekly exams.
- 2. I have 1 1/2 hours for the exam, regardless of
how often I give the exams. If I gave an exam
only once every three weeks, I could not sample
as much material from the study objectives - that
is I could not ask questions over as many of the
study objectives - Why and how does this affect student studying?
- Students know that I cannot test over all of the
study objectives, hence they will begin to try to
guess which ones I will ask and not study all of
the objectives. They will gamble about which
items I will have test questions over
(also less accurate assessment for me, but that
is not related to student studying, faculty Who
give out 70 or more SOs for the exam and then
only ask questions on very small Proportion)
32SO 15 Why learning cant be fun and easy
- Many argue that learning should be fun and easy.
Not so, says Michael. He says it cant be fun and
easy for two reasons. - Intensity there is too much to learn in too
little time - Assessment there is a chance that the student
will not get the grade he/she wants on the exams
and assignments - Note carefully, it is NOT simply that the exams
and assignments are given - if every student got
an A on every exam/assignment, then assessment
would not cause students a problem - (Learn each factor and be able to explain them.)
33Not for exam but why should grades be emphasized?
- Grades are the primary motivative variable,
which means that current standing in the class
and progress toward the final grade should always
be clear and frequently brought to the students
attention. - Hence, the grade sheet.
34Questions on the Michael article?
35Unit 4 Teaching Technology Introduction
In this part of the unit we are going to be
looking at three empirically-based instructional
technologies for primary and secondary schools
- Direct Instruction - Engelmann, Becker Carnine
- Precision Teaching - Lindsley
- Headsprout - a relatively new web-based reading
program developed by a team of behavior analysts
(2002) - Greg Stikeleather, Dept. alumni award
(empirically-based, proven through research to be
effective, Croyden schools?) Engelmann, BA in
education. Becker Carnine - behavioral
psychologists Oakland Academy - Foundation for
behavioral resources)
36Teaching Technology Intro continued
- Educational crisis in this country
- Our students rank about last in math/science of
all industrialized countries in the world - 40 of our 4th-graders read below basic levels
- Yet schools and educators have been very slow to
adopt empirically-validated instructional
technology in the schools - Probably the biggest disappointment of behavior
analysts - But, there is hope No Child Left Behind
- Carnine is an advisor to President Bush
(read some of the material in the course pack -
not behavior analysts)
37Direct Instruction Basics
- Task analysis is completed for all instructional
material - Material is presented in small steps so students
will be successful the first time - Material is sequenced so if students master the
prerequisite material they will be successful - Scripts are used to insure correct implementation
and student success - based on research - Students are placed in small groups of 5 - 10
- Students respond aloud on cue
- Immediate feedback, both reinforcement and
corrective is provided
38Precision Teaching Basics
- Often use DI material/lessons
- Adds a fluency component - accuracy plus speed of
responding is assessed ( corrects per minute).
Based on rate of response used in behavioral
research - Timed practice, graph results - only 30 of time
is spent on instruction, 70 on practice - Students work with each other during practice
sessions - Students do not progress to the next lesson until
fluency aims are met - all have the same aims
which are based on research - Often combined with a token economy system in
which students earn points for results and
appropriate instructional behaviors (feet on
floor, eye contact, etc.) - Often report cards are provided for parents daily
(before SO16, show you some results of DI, PT
SOs a little out of order)
39SO17 Introduction to Englemanns early study
(1970)
- Some maintain that 60-80 of intelligence is
genetic and only 20-40 is a function of
learning that is you have it or you dont and
if your parents and grandparents didnt have it,
you wont either (Bell Curve, Murray
Herrnstein) - They also maintain that a persons IQ cannot be
changed much after the first couple of years - Therefore, early educational programs (such as
Head Start) and social programs are a waste of
tax payer dollars.
(What is intelligence? What is measured by IQ
tests? Math, verbal, social situations and
sequences)
40SO17 Englemanns early study (1970)
- Participants were all 4 years old
- 15 disadvantaged children exposed to traditional
teaching methods - 15 disadvantaged children exposed to DI
- 15 middle class children exposed to DI
- Independent variable
- DI for language concept, arithmetic, and reading
- Three 20-min instructional sessions per day for
two years - Total of 96 instructional hours
- Dependent variable
- Stanford-Binet IQ test scores
- Experimental design
- Between-group experimental design
41SO17 Results of Engelmanns Study IQ Scores
42SO17 Summary of Results
- IQ scores after two years
- Disadvantaged four-year olds exposed to DI
increased their IQ scores by about 25 points
from 95.33 to 121.08 - Disadvantaged four-year olds exposed to
traditional education increased their IQ scores
by only about 5 points from 94.50 to 99.61 - Disadvantaged and advantaged four-year olds
exposed to DI had similar IQ scores 121.08 and
123.43, respectively
43SO17 Implications
- IQ scores can be affected by instruction and
changed after the very early stages of life
(argues against heredity) - DI can eliminate differences in the IQ scores of
disadvantaged and advantaged children,
differences that are not eliminated via
traditional educational methods
44Snyder Article Morningside Academy, Seattle, WA
- Morningside Academy
- Private school (tuition) Dr. Kent Johnson
- Combines Precision Teaching with Direct
Instruction - Dr. Johnson offers 2-4 week practicum
opportunities in the summer to graduate students
(web site address is in the SOs) - While usually restricted to graduate students,
our WMU undergraduates have been accepted,
depending upon letters of support from us - One of our undergrads attended the 4-week
practicum last summer - Scholarships, but students must fund their own
housing and meals
45Morningside Academy, cont.
- Money-back guarantee for tuition
- If a student does not gain at least two years or
more in all skill-deficit areas in one year,
Morningside refunds 100 of the tuition - Success rate years different than article
- In the 28 years of its operations, Morningside
has never refunded a students tuition - SO19 Serves primarily students diagnosed with
learning disability problems and ADHD who are
failing in the regular school system also has a
program for adults who are not literate.
SO 18, but not for the exam
(years different because the school started in
1980 and article was published in 1992)
46Morningside Academy, cont. again
- SO 20 Average gains in grade levels for reading,
language arts, and math for the last two years
reported in the article (89-90 and 90-91)?
3.07 per academic year!!
Note that these gains are primarily for at-risk
kids. Those diagnosed as learning disabled or
ADHD.
47Morningside Academys Adult Literacy Program(Not
for the Exam)
- Federally-funded literacy program through YMCA
- Pilot program for adults, Precision Teaching
- Did not know whether adults would like PT and
thus attend instructional sessions - Did not know how well PT would work with these
individuals, given their generally low skill
levels - 32 participants
- Some were homeless
- Some were in and out of jail
48Representative Results Morningside Adult
Literacy Pilot Program
1 month 20 hours of instruction
49What guarantee does Morningside make its adult
clients based on the results? (Again Not for the
Exam)
- Each adult learner will gain two years or more
per month in reading, writing and math skills if
those adults meet the requirement of attending
for two hours per day, four days a week. - Notice that is only 20 hours of instruction per
month!
(now back to SO 16)
50SO16 Three reasons why traditional educators
object to Direct Instruction Precision Teaching
If these methods are so good, why arent they
being taught in schools of education and why
dont teachers like them?
- They are not self-directed that is the methods
are too controlled by the teacher - They are not individualized every child/learner
is exposed to the same material in the same
sequence and must meet the same goals - They do not focus on affective outcomes - that
is, self-esteem or making students feel good
about themselves. - Teachers feel the scripted lessons take away from
their flexibility and creativity. Why did I go to
school and get a teaching degree if I am being
told exactly what to say and when to say it?
(not in study objectives - not required)
(philosophical reasons - educational philosophy
child centered learning development) 4th reason a
practical, not philosophical reason, Siefert
article teachers resent it because It is so
scripted but is it about me being happy or the
students learning?)
51SO21 What factors are often blamed for the
educational crisis?
- Traditional educators tend to blame Johnny or
Suzie, the culture at large, socio-economic
reasons - Johnny cant read because he comes from
a bad neighborhood or bad home. - Traditional educators often see the key(s) to be
a longer school year, higher pay for teachers,
right now no recess, etc. - DI PT advocates maintain that the key to
solving the educational crisis in this country is
better instructional material If Johnny or Suzie
is not learning the instructional material is the
blame, not Johnny, Suzie or their home
environment
(while I am going to get in trouble - the rat is
always right! Lab - lever) Neither they nor their
instruction is at fault part of their
student-centered philosophy.)
52SO 24 What is fluency?
- The rationale behind fluency first
- We usually measure only accuracy of performance -
100, 90, etc. - Rate of performance or fluency is also important
- If one child scores 100 on a math test and
completes it in one hour, but another scores 100
and completes it in one-half hour, is their
performance equal or is the second childs
performance better? - PT not only measures accuracy but also speed of
performance - Only 30 of classroom time is taken by the
delivery of instruction 70 is spent practicing
using work sheets. - Students take several 1-minute timings and chart
their performance on a graph for the timings - So, back to the question, what is fluency? (next
slide)
53SO24 Fluency
So, SO25A, what is fluency?
- Fluency is a measure of accuracy plus speed.
And, SO24B, how is fluency specifically measured?
The number of correct answers per minute and the
number of incorrect answers per minute during
timed practice.
54Not for the exam Fluency Aims (standards/goals)
Fluency aims are based on research to
- Insure retention/maintenance over time
- Enable the skill to generalize to settings other
than the one in which it was taught - If you teach basic math, you want kids to be able
to buy things and count correct change - Enable correct responding in spite of
distractions in the environment and in spite of
being tired.
Because aims are empirically developed to achieve
the above results, aims are not individualized.
Every child must meet the same aims before
proceeding to the next lesson/material.
55SO25 Rationale for scripted lessons
- In DI, every lesson is scripted and the teacher
is to follow the script exactly - Why?
The particular wording, examples and sequences
have been pre-tested to insure the success of the
students.
Not for the exam, but teachers do not have the
time, nor is it their job, to conduct research on
instructional material. They are practitioners
not researchers They already have a very
difficult, time-consuming job (and class sizes
are getting larger all the time).
56SOs 26-30 Introduction to Watkins article on
Project Follow-Through
- Largest study that has evaluated the
effectiveness of different instructional systems - Government-funded study
- Conducted over 30 years ago
- The study began in 1968 and we have had the
results since 1977
57SOs 26-30 Project Follow-Through, cont.
- Three major conceptual categories of educational
systems - Basic Skills
- Cognitive-Conceptual
- Affective-Cognitive
- Examined 20 different instructional methods that
fell into one of the three categories above in 15
different school districts
58SOs 2627 Primary areas of emphasis for each
major conceptual category and the category for DI
- Basic Skills (DI)
- Basic skills reading, arithmetic, spelling,
etc. - Cognitive-Conceptual
- Learning to learn
- Problem solving skills
- Affective-Cognitive
- Development of good self-concept and positive
attitudes toward learning - Learning to learn
(only need to learn the primary, although I have
also indicated secondary)
59SO28 Results I have asked you to learn
To be fair to each model, the researchers also
measured the childrens basic skills, cognitive
skills, and affect
- DI was the only model to produce gains in all
three areas measured basic skills, cognitive
skills, and affect - DI ranked first in basic skills, cognitive skills
and affect - Educational models, other than those that fell
into the Basic Skills category, (that is, all
those in the cognitive-conceptual and
affective-cognitive categories) had poorer
results than the traditional educational systems
currently being used
60SO29 DI PT ranked first and second in
affective skills even though neither targets or
emphasizes them
What theory of self-concept isnt supported by
these results?
In order to learn, you must first have a good
self-concept and a positive attitude toward
learning. That is, a good self-concept is a
prerequisite for learning. Suzie Johnny must
feel good about themselves before they can learn.
What theory of self-concept is supported by the
results?
Success in learning produces a good self
concept. Suzy Johnny will feel good about
themselves if they are successful in learning.
(pretty interesting given that the
affective-cognitive models targeted affect
directly. Also interesting because traditional
educators still object to DI PT on that ground)
61SO30 Behavioral diagram of the relation between
learning and a good self-concept
R ----gt Academic
activities
Sc Signs of success
CS
CR Good self-concept
(self-concept emotional response)
62Project Follow-Through Wrap Up (not for the exam)
- DI was shown to be the most effective
instructional system - In spite of that, the governmental agency
responsible for disseminating effective
instructional systems to school districts around
the country, endorsed 22 as effective and
packaged them for distribution - Among those disseminated were those that had
failed to improve academic achievement (out of
fairness) - Funding guidelines were changed so that the
programs that were the least successful were
given more funding than those that were the most
successful (on the grounds that would help the
least successful)
(problem is not just the teachers, school
districts)
63SOs 31-36 Headsprout, a web-based reading
program designed by behavioral psychologists
- Headsprout founders and team includes
- Dr. Kent Johnson, founder of Morningside
- Greg Stikeleather, BA in psychology from WMU
- Developed and ran Apple Computers first
usability testing laboratory - Started two software companies one was acquired
by Microsoft, one was acquired by Netscape - Dr. Joe Layng, Head of Morningsides Malcolm X
program - Dr. Janet Twyman, current President of ABA
- Kelly Hobbins, BA in psychology from WMU
- Melinda Sota, MA in psychology from WMU
- Put on the web in 2002
- Cost 6 million to develop the first 40 lessons
(the initial program put on the web)
(SOs are very straightforward, but I just wanted
to introduce you to this - its terrific, web
page)
64SOs 31 33 Why is Headsprout important?
- How many children have literacy problems in our
country? - 40
- Over what percentage of our nations fourth
graders score below basic reading levels? - 40
- What is the probability that a child will remain
a poor reader at the end of fourth grade if the
child is a poor reader at the end of first grade? - 90
- We need to get to children when they are young
and teach them the basics
65SO 32, NFE Headsprout stresses phonics - why?
- Research has shown that phonics is essential in
order to teach children to read. - Not for the exam, but notice that this is in
direct conflict with reading approaches based on
whole word teaching/learning. - Research has also shown that the absence of
explicit phonics instruction can cause learning
problems that put learners at a permanent
educational disadvantage unless corrected by the
end of third grade.
66About Headsprout Not for the exam
- Incorporates PT concepts of fluency and
charting/graphing performance of each component
skill - On the surface, the program appears to children
as - As in interactive cartoon
- Learn reading skills interacting with
cartoon-based episodes in Space World, Dinosaur
World, Undersea World, and Jungle World - They have the same type of refund program as
Morningside Academy - For school systems Full refund to schools for
the price of the product for each Kindergarten or
1st grade student who is not at or above grade
level upon completion - Full refund to individual parents who buy it as
well
67About Headsprout, cont.
- They first did lab testing - before they put the
program on the internet. (not for the exam) - Standard for most activities was that 90 of
learners would get 90 of the items correct the
first time - SO35A Once the developmental work in their lab
was completed, they tested it on the internet.
How many learners participated in the internet
testing? - Over 1,000
- SO35B What were the results of that testing?
- Over 90 of the learners got over 90 of the
items correct
68About Headsprout, cont. again(Not for the Exam)
- What is their goal for the entire 80-lesson
Headsprout Early Reading Program? - Learners who consistently score at or above grade
level, and - Kindergarten children with reading skills typical
of a mid-second grade learner - Standardized test outcome data from 16 initial
children who completed the program suggest they
have accomplished that goal (testing is on-going) - Individual parents can purchase the Headsprout
reading program for 99.00 (last time I checked
the price)
69Headsprout Web Site
70The End
- Questions?
- Instructional assistance hours Monday, 2/18
- 630-800 PM
- Issac is on tap this time
Dont forget the review study objectives!!