Engaging Clinicians in Information Technology and Health Information Exchange - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Engaging Clinicians in Information Technology and Health Information Exchange

Description:

Baby steps or giant leaps is incremental adoption the best way to succeed? 20 ... You know that President Bush wants to have all clinicians using EHRs within 10 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:148
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: janetmar8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Engaging Clinicians in Information Technology and Health Information Exchange


1
Engaging Clinicians in Information Technology and
Health Information Exchange
  • Peter Basch, MD
  • Medical Director
  • MedStar eHealth Initiative

2
The Value of Information Technology
  • Improving quality
  • Embedded care guidelines
  • Disease management
  • Reducing inappropriate variability
  • Improving safety
  • CPOE
  • ePrescribing
  • Reducing costs
  • Reducing unnecessary duplicative testing
  • Reducing hospitalizations, office visits,
    sequellae of chronic disease

3
And health information exchange
  • Improving quality
  • Fewer patients treated on limited information
  • Improving safety
  • Medications prescribed in fuller context
  • Reducing costs
  • Reducing unnecessary duplicative testing

4
The stars have aligned
  • Strongly endorsed by Bush and Thompson
  • CMS demonstration projects
  • NHII
  • Medicare Modernization Act and eRx
  • Health IT coordinator
  • Multiple bills before Congress promoting IT

5
Clinician adoption of IT remains low
  • 3 of hospitals using CPOE
  • 5-20 of clinicians using EHR
  • 7-30 of clinicians using eRx
  • HIE used by lt1 of clinicians
  • 100 of clinicians use procedural / imaging
    technology

6
Why do clinicians need to be engaged with HIT?
  • Hardware, software and networking costs
  • Bandwidth issues
  • Usability
  • Technophobia
  • Lack of standards / interoperability
  • Cultural issues
  • Business case

7
What can make care better
Missing / relevant information
8
Can lead to unintended consequences
Care confusion
Missing / relevant information
Expanded duty / liability
Too much / irrelevant information
9
The consequences of having all information on all
patients all the time
  • Average generalist sees 20-30 patients/day gets
    labs on ½ of them
  • Takes 20-60 minutes a day to review, interpret,
    integrate, act on, communicate to patient
  • If all results pushed to all providers with
    relationship to patient
  • Could increase work 6-fold ( to 2-6 hours a day!)
    and if this is uncompensated, will either
    increase time in office or reduce billable time
    by 25-50 (enough to ruin most practices)

10
Expansion of duty / liability
  • Within the model of siloed care, duty is narrowly
    defined - only for what you do (or can be proved
    to have known, or should have known)
  • Once the information enters your record, you are
    responsible for it (even if you didnt order it,
    or understand it)
  • And what if the information is not in the record,
    but could easily have been put in it
    (reasonableness may be redefined if information
    is just a click away, or could have been
    auto-pushed to the chart, if the clinician had
    appropriately set the default in the
    interconnected EHR)?
  • In the midst of a nationwide liability crisis, is
    this a welcome change?

11
Does more information to more providers improve
care?
  • Meaningfulness of information to some providers
  • Does quality improve when multiple providers (who
    are informed, but unqualified) recommend a
    course of action?
  • Or when multiple informed (and qualified)
    providers chart reasonable, but different courses
    (unanticipated / unwanted second opinions)?

12
Despite challenges, change must occur
  • US leads the world in advanced procedures,
    imaging technology, and medication development
    yet lags significantly behind many countries in
    many parameters of quality and safety
  • Growing expectations of patients and doctors
  • Increasing numbers of carrots and sticks

13
Change will occur thru
  • Technologic advances
  • Policy / reimbursement changes
  • Clear understanding of duty / liability in an
    interconnected world
  • Clinicians helping to redesign workflow, such
    that connectivity better care

14
Panelists
  • Patricia Hale, PhD, MD, FACP
  • Brian Keaton, MD, FACEP
  • Judy Murphy, RN, BSN
  • Tom Sullivan, MD
  • Steve Waldren, MD

15
Why do clinicians need to be engaged with HIT?
  • Hardware, software and networking costs
  • Bandwidth issues
  • Usability
  • Lack of standards / interoperability
  • Technophobia
  • Cultural issues
  • Business case

16
Physician culture are there special
challenges?
17
Is the business case for IT the same for
all clinicians in all settings?
18
Success stories
19
Baby steps or giant leaps is
incremental adoption the best way to succeed?
20
Its all about workflow, or is it?When
do you adjust the application, When do you change
the workflow?
21
Health information exchange
  • Is it needed?
  • Aside from connectivity technology and data
    standards, what is needed to ensure that its use
    improves care?
  • Do clinicians need additional incentives to
    participate in health information exchanges?

22
Questions from the audience
23
Last words
  • David Brailer has taken a temporary leave of
    absence, post, finding Washington DC summers just
    too hot! You are being considered by Secretary
    Thompson as the interim IT czar. You know that
    President Bush wants to have all clinicians using
    EHRs within 10 years, and Thompson, being less
    patient, wants it done this year. In 30 seconds
    or less, what is the most important thing that
    can be done to realize this objective.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com