The Argument for a New Federation of Democracies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

The Argument for a New Federation of Democracies

Description:

Prosecution of crimes against humanity and operation of war crimes tribunals. ... of tyrants and warlords, and the punishment of crimes against humanity; ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: ford4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Argument for a New Federation of Democracies


1
The Argument for a New Federation of Democracies
  • John Davenport
  • Department of Philosophy
  • April 24, 2006.

2
Step One How do we justify creating a higher
level of government?
  • Using the Federalist Papers as a model, we find
    the following three kinds of argument
  • There are crucial public goods that are not
    attainable by market mechanisms, and that can
    only be secured by law and/or collective action
    at a level higher than the present system of
    sovereign states.
  • A present system of sovereign states is unable to
    coordinate effectively to solve problems
    concerning these public goods. Because of
    various collective action problems, bilateral or
    multilateral treaties and cannot provide these
    goods.
  • A higher level of government that could address
    these problems ought to be directly answerable to
    the people of all its member states.

3
American Examples
  • Alexander Hamilton,
  • co-author of the Federalist Papers

4
Problems of the Second Continental Congress
operating under the Articles of Confederation
  • Could not effectively coordinate resistance to
    the British could not pay veterans after the
    war could not provide sufficiently for common
    defense
  • Had difficulty coordinating a common foreign
    policy with states making their own foreign trade
    pacts
  • Had trouble introducing a national currency,
    resulting in economic inefficiencies from
    conversions
  • Lacked sufficient centralized power to coordinate
    national economic policies and fund major
    infrastructure development
  • The Big One could not control the spread of
    slavery, which undermined the moral legitimacy of
    the new democratic form of government.

5
Similar Problems in 20th Century Europe
  • Needed to form a common market to produce
    economic growth after World War II
  • Needed to pool strength to resist the USSR
  • Needed to form a shared foreign policy, including
    the ability to negotiate trade pacts as a bloc
  • Eventually needed to establish a common currency
    to prevent competitive currency pricing
    practices
  • Eventually needed to encourage greater cultural
    solidarity social exchange and common law.

6
Jürgen Habermas German Philosopher who defends
Transnational Democracy
7
Habermass Deliberative Conception of Democratic
Legitimacy
  • What distinguishes legislation by majority
    rule from mere tyranny of the majority?
  • The rights of individual citizens when society is
    organized through a system of law
  • Law is an outcome not of an aggregation of
    private interests, but rather of collective
    reasoning about the common good (ideally, it is
    acceptable as reasonable by all interlocutors)
  • Loyalty to a democratic constitution including
    both civil rights and popular sovereignty, rather
    than to a particular ethnic or cultural heritage,
    is the social glue
  • Thus legitimate democracy is not limited to
    nation-states in the classical sense of
    territories unified by their shared ethnic or
    cultural heritage it can exist at the
    transnational level.

8
Step Two The Global Public Goods
  • Fundamental Human Rights and Basic Needs
  • Definition of a code of basic human rights to
    which all nations must adhere, and perceived
    violations of which can be appealed to a world
    court.
  • Proactive response teams to prevent genocidal
    aggression before it happens.
  • Unification of democratic nations in resistance
    against totalitarian regimes
  • 1. A framework for imposing binding sanctions
    and isolating unjust regimes
  • 2. A world army to provide a unified,
    nonpartisan, immediate and credible deterrence
    against outlaw regimes.
  • Prosecution of crimes against humanity and
    operation of war crimes tribunals.
  • Unified and reliable responses to disease,
    famine, refuge problems, and disaster situations
    long-term development plans to reduce poverty and
    childhood disease.
  • 500 Skulls in One Rwandan Site

9
Global Public Goods continued
  • World Environment Natural Resources
  • Preservation of resources in which the whole
    world has a stake, e.g. clean oceans, clean air,
    fresh water, arable soil, natural wonders,
    Antarctica, etc.
  • Containment of ozone-destroying pollution and
    response to global warming.
  • Controlling use and distribution of limited vital
    resources, such as fossil fuels.
  • Maintenance of endangered animals and their
    threatened habitats, such as rainforests,
    wetlands, and coral reefs
  • A regime through which the whole world can
    cooperate in sharing the costs of preserving the
    environment for future generations, e.g.
    compensating impoverished nations for the
    sacrifices imposed on them for preservation.

10
Global Public Goods continued
  • Management of a global economy for sustainable
    growth with fairness
  • Maintaining stability in relations among
    currencies and banking systems, and ultimately,
    determining interest rates and monetary policy
    for a world currency.
  • Responding to regional crises and providing
    healthy environment for investment and stable
    growth to avoid triggering worldwide
    cascade-effect recessions.
  • Assuring fairness in relations of immigration and
    movement of seasonal labor across existing
    national borders.
  • Providing a framework to open markets to imports
    and exports and resolve trade disputes with
    binding authority (currently the function of the
    World Trade Organization).
  • Laying the basis for a regime of international
    labor law, e.g. to help trade unions to
    internationalize their organizations in response
    to the emergence of multinational corporate
    giant' companies with vast holdings and
    influence.
  • Control of arms sales and transfers of dangerous
    technologies, including powerful weapons.
  • Elimination of tax havens, international tax
    fraud, and linkage of tax regimes across nations.
  • Providing minimal industry standards for fair
    labor and safe work conditions.

11
Global Public Goods continued
  • Transnational Crime Control
  • Unified systems for containing the growth of drug
    trafficking and attacking international narcotics
    rings.
  • Investigation of international monetary fraud and
    elimination of safe havens for the leadership
    of global crime rings.
  • Combined world efforts to eliminate black
    markets for illegal arms, trafficking in human
    beings, etc.
  • Global Science and Communications
  • Promoting academic exchanges and expansion of
    educational opportunities for talented students
    from poor nations.
  • Pursuit of scientific projects in which the whole
    of humanity has a stake, and which can be done
    most efficiently by avoiding duplication, e.g.
    particle accelerators, space stations and space
    exploration, genetic databases, etc.
  • Managing the system of international
    telecommunications, from the function and
    placement of satellites to the Internet and the
    free flow of information.

12
Step Three A world government capable of
securing the global public goods?
  • At present, there seem to be two main
    alternatives for global governance
  • American Unilateralism
  • The US is the de facto leader in world system of
    nation-states, and directs responses to crises
    through NATO
  • 2. The United Nations system
  • The UN Security Council is the legitimate source
    of international law U.N. agencies such as the
    World Bank, World Health Organization, and U.N.
    Commission for Human Rights coordinate global
    responses to problems.

13
Which Alternative? Neither
  • Lets focus on just one public good the
    enforcement of basic human rights
  • The United States is not democratically
    authorized by the worlds peoples to act as
    global policeman
  • Without assistance of a large network of powerful
    allies, our resources are also grossly unequal to
    the job (our armed forces are maxed out, and our
    government is 1.1 trillion in debt, including
    what it owes to the Social Security Trust Fund).
  • However, the U.N. system, which was the best
    achieveable after WW II, is now broken. The U.N.
    has failed to stop atrocities in Yugloslavia,
    East Timor, Rwanda, Congo, Sudan, and elsewhere,
    let bring tyrants, warlords, and dictators down
    and develop legitimate democratic regimes. Yet
    tyranny is the single biggest cause of poverty in
    the world.

14
The U.N.s flaws
  • The U.N. is not directly elected by citizens of
    its member-states it is a mere treaty
    organization, like the Continental Congress (and
    thus weak).
  • The U.N. is not democratic the Security
    Councils permanent members with veto include
    China, and its rotating members frequently
    include dictatorships, theocracies, and
    monarchies that systematically deny rights.
  • The U.N. is out of date in 1946, power was
    equally divided in the world today, the worlds
    democracies collectively hold the balance of
    power.
  • Its Charter cannot be amended without the
    approval of all five permanent members of the
    Security Council, which prevents the needed
    reforms.

15
A New Alternative A Federation of the Worlds
Democratic Nations
  • A permanently binding alliance of the worlds
    democracies would be both more legitimate and
    more powerful than the U.N. security council, and
    could provide the coordination necessary to
    secure key global public goods. Its governing
    council would be directly elected by citizens of
    the member states, and its enumerated powers
    would include
  • Maintaining a standing armed forces, raised from
    all member states proportionate to population, to
    intervene swiftly under joint DF command when
    necessary to prevent genocide, ethnic cleaning,
    and similar atrocities.
  • Providing a new, firmer foundation for
    international law and the operation of
    international courts, to ensure the legitimacy of
    entities like the World Court, the ICC, the Hague
    Tribunal, and to make their judgments
    enforceable.
  • The general enforcement of human rights,
    including (when possible) the removal and
    prosecution of tyrants and warlords, and the
    punishment of crimes against humanity
  • The defeat of international terrorist
    organizations and international crime rings, and
    the monitoring of all nuclear weapons and
    weapons-material available on the planet.
  • The commonly undertaken and collectively funded
    defense of all democratic member states from
    hostile incursion or attack by outlaw states or
    terrorists
  • The exertion of unified diplomatic pressure on
    non-democratic regimes to democratize.
  • The nation-building activities necessary to
    assure all peoples on Earth a stable democratic
    nation-state of their own, with a working legal
    system free from corruption of the authorities, a
    liberal educational system free from
    fundamentalist indoctrination, and a decent
    standard of living in whatever economic system
    they choose.
  • The adoption of new member-states according to
    collectively accepted criteria.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com