Title: Criminology
1Criminology
- William S. Laufer
- Department of Legal Studies
- 2207 SH DH
- lauferw_at_wharton.upenn.edu
- 215.898.7693
2Course Requirements
- Text
- Adler, Mueller, Laufer, Criminology and the
Criminal Justice System (New York McGraw-Hill,
2001)
- Handouts
- Grades
- Mid-term and Final Examination
- Class Participation
3Criminology Sutherlands Definition--Modified
- Criminology is the body of knowledge regarding
crime and criminality as a social, psychological,
and biological phenomena.
- It includes within its scope the process of
making laws, of breaking laws, and of reacting
toward the breaking of laws.
- The objective of criminology is the development
of a body of knowledge regarding crime,
criminality, and its prevention.
4Assignment for September 11, 2001The Forgotten
Criminology of Genocide
- Why has the field of criminology neglected any
consideration of the crime of genocide?
- How could criminologists neglect an estimated
sixteen million deaths in crimes against humanity
since World War II?
- What has the field of criminology lost by its
neglect of the crime of genocide?
5Self-Report
- Take out a piece of paper and write down the 10
most deviant and/or illegal acts that you have
committed. Do not sign your name.
6Criminology
7 Terrorism
- FBI Definition
- The unlawful use of force or violence against
persons or property to intimidate or coerce a
government, the civilian population, or any
segment thereof, in furtherance of political or
social objectives.
8Terrorism Generating Publicity and
Fear
- Classifying Terrorism
- Revolutionary Terrorism Forcing governments to
respond to encourage a revolution, e.g., PLO
- State-Sponsored Terrorism
- Terrorist activities by governments against
their own citizens or other countries, e.g.,
Khmer Rouge
- Religious Terrorism
- Promoting a religious system or protect a
set of religious beliefs, e.g., use of Jihad or
holy war by Islamic fundamentalists
9Terrorism
- Punishment?
- Symbolic
- Retributive
- Desert
- Expressive
- Restorative
10Criminology Prof. Edwin H. Sutherlands
Definition--Modified
- Criminology is the body of knowledge regarding
crime and criminality as a social, psychological,
and biological phenomena.
-
- It includes within its scope the process of
making laws, of breaking laws, and of reacting
toward the breaking of laws.
- The objective of criminology is the development
of a body of general and verified principles and
of other types of knowledge regarding crime,
criminality, and its prevention.
Criminology is an interdisciplinary field of study
Criminology is concerned with the construction of
deviance,
deviance, and the reaction to deviance
Criminology is a social science
11The Criminological Enterprise
Boundary
- Criminal Statistics
- Gathering valid crime data devising new
research methods measuring crime patterns and
trends
- Psychology/Sociology of Law
- Exploring the intersection between the
disciplines of psychology, sociology, and law
- Theory Construction, Development, and Verification
- Criminal Behavior Systems
- Determining the nature and cause of
specific crime patterns the examination of
specific offense, e.g., white collar crime.
- Penology
- The correction and control of criminal
behavior
- Victimology
- The nature and cause of
victimization
- Crime Prevention
12Criminal StatisticsThe Death Penalty
- How many people have been executed since 1608?
- How many people have been executed this year?
- How many executions have taken place since the
death penalty was reinstated in 1976?
- How many jurisdictions have death penalty
statutes?
- Which states do not permit the death penalty?
- What percentage of defendants executed since 1976
were white?
- What percentage of defendants executed were
convicted of killing a white victim?
- Which two states can claim credit for more than
40 of all executions since 1976?
- Do states still execute inmates either by hanging
or with a firing squad?
13 Criminal Statistics Death Penalty
How many people have been executed since 1608?
(19,500) How many people have been executed this
year? (48) How many executions have taken place s
ince the death penalty was reinstated in 1976?
(731) How many states have death penalty statutes
? (38) Which states do not permit the death penal
ty? Alaska, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island,
Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and the
District of Columbia
What percentage of defendants executed since 1976
were white? (45) What percentage of defendants e
xecuted were convicted of killing a white victim?
(81) Which two states can claim credit for more
than 40 of all executions since 1976? (Texas and
Virginia) Do states still execute inmates either
by hanging or with a firing squad? Delaware,
Montana, and New Hampshire (H) Idaho, Oklahoma,
Utah (FS)
14Criminal StatisticsThe Death Penalty
- How many documented innocent people have been
executed this century?
- How many people have been released since 1972 as
a result of being wrongfully convicted?
- What percentage of Texas and California death row
populations are people of color?
- How many countries still execute people for
crimes committed as children?
- How many children have been sentenced to death in
the U.S. since 1973?
- The youngest person executed since WWII in the
United States was___?
- What is the youngest person ever to be executed
in the United States?
- How many people on death row today are known to
be retarded?
- How much evidence exists to prove or suggest that
the death penalty deters murder?
15Criminal StatisticsThe Death Penalty
- How many documented innocent people have been
executed this century? (23)
- How many people have been released since 1972 as
a result of being wrongfully convicted? (98)
- What percentage of Texas and California death row
populations are people of color? (60)
- How many countries still execute people for
crimes committed as children? (6) Nigeria,
Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Iran, and U.S.
- How many children have been sentenced to death in
the U.S. since 1973? (160)
- The youngest person executed since WWII in the
United States was___? (14)
- What is the youngest person ever to be executed
in the United States? (10)
- How many people on death row today are known to
be retarded? (300)
- How much evidence exists to prove or suggest that
the death penalty deters murder?
16Psychology/Sociology of Law
- Using psychology to explain objective
expectations of privacy in Fourth Amendment
cases
- Examining the reliance on formal versus informal
social controls in Japan
17Theory Construction, Development, and Validation
- Intuitive criminology
- poverty
-
- biological causes?
- genetic predispositions?
- social learning?
- control impulse, self and social?
- social structure?
- culture? subculture?
-
crime
18(No Transcript)
19(No Transcript)
20Criminal Behavior Systems
- Classifications
- Typologies
- Specific Offenses
21Penology
22Goals of Punishment
Retribution Deterrence Incapacitation Reh
abilitation
Proportional Penalty - Offense Determinative
Deserved Penalty - Harm Determinative
Expressive Penalty - Message Determinative
Crime Rates - Fear of Consequences
Power of Deterrence - Swift, Certain,
Sufficiently Severe, Laws Known to Public
Types General and Specific (or Special)
Collective Incapacitation Selective Incapacitatio
n
Individualized Sentences Offender Culpability - O
ffense
Offender Change - Intervention
Repairing the harm between Offender and victim
Restorative Justice
23(No Transcript)
24Victimology
- Violence between intimates
- Child abuse
- Genocide?
25The Forgotten Criminologyof Genocide
- Defend criminologys exclusion of genocide
26The Forgotten Criminologyof Genocide
- Genocide is a Political Act Reflecting the Will
of Sovereignty
- Genocide, it has been said, is a political
rather than criminal act most often employed to
enhance the solidarity and unification of
nation-states. Decisions to liquidate,
exterminate, and cleanse a minority population
are matters of political policy reflecting the
will and ideologies of sovereignty. Genocide
results from a modern, developed, state
bureaucratic apparatus that moves the conception
of systematic torture and killing from the
criminal to the political.
27The Forgotten Criminologyof Genocide
- Genocide as a Breach of International Norms and
International Law
- To understand the law of genocide, one must
appreciate its place in law as an international
crime.
28The Forgotten Criminologyof Genocide
- Genocide is Committed by the State
- Of all the many revelations over the last
fifty years, criminologists seem to have the most
difficulty with the notion that an organization
or entity, whether a corporation or nation state,
may commit a crime. When crimes are imputed from
an individual to an inanimate entity, the
intellectual challenge becomes Should an
individual be blamed as well?
29The Forgotten Criminologyof Genocide
- The Magnitude of Victimization in Genocide Defies
Belief
- Criminological research confirms intuitive
ratings of crime seriousness from multiple murder
to shoplifting. The differences in seriousness
ratings for virtually all offenses are highly
objective and quantifiable. The extent of
victimization and harm in genocide, however,
strains any assessment of seriousness. Who
appreciates differences in seriousness where the
offense is, for example, 100,000, 250,000, or
500,000 butchered Hutus or Tutsis?
30The Forgotten Criminologyof Genocide
- The Problems of Denying and Admitting Atrocity
- Two prominent themes that emerge from the
literature on genocide capture an ambivalence
hard felt by some survivors and refugees of
genocide. This ambivalence is captured in the
titles of two recently published books on the
HolocaustDeborah Lipstadts Denying the
Holocaust (1994) and Lawrence L. Langers
Admitting the Holocaust (1995).
31The Science of Criminology
- Police Productivity and Crime Rates
- Is violent crime increasing or decreasing?
- Childhood Maltreatment and Delinquency
- Are mistreated children more likely to engage
in delinquency?
- Specific Deterrence and White Collar Offenders
- Are white collar offenders specifically
deterred by prison?
32Criminology
33The Concept of Crime
- A person is not criminally culpable
(blameworthy) unless she acted
- voluntarily (or failed to act when required by
law to do so)
- with a guilty mind
- in such a way that her action and intention
coincided in time causing the harm
- in violation of the criminal law
- so as to produced harm and injury
34Simple Formula
- ACT
- INTENT
- CONCURRENCE CAUSATION INJURY HARM
PROHIBITED ACT Crime
35Criminal Act (actus reus)
- All crimes require an affirmative or negative
act.
- Affirmative acts (act of commission) require
conscious and volitional movement--a product of
the determination of the actor.
- Involuntary acts are insufficient.
- Negative acts (acts of omission) are failures to
act where there is a legal duty to act, and where
it was possible for the actor to act.
36Involuntary Acts
- Somnambulism
- Unconsciousness
- Seizure
- Involuntary Neurological Response
37Acts of Omission
- Legal Relationship, e.g., parent-child
- Contractual Obligation, e.g., lifeguard to
swimmer
- Statutory Obligation, e.g., taxes
- Creation of Peril
- Voluntary Assumption of care
38Criminal Intent (mens rea)
- Purposely - with conscious desire to cause a
certain result
- Knowingly - with awareness that something will
occur
- Recklessly - with a conscious disregard of a
substantial risk or injury
- Negligently - actions that the actor should have
known would cause harm
39Degrees of Mental Fault
Purposely
Knowingly
Crime-Tort Barrier
Recklessly
Negligently
40Gradations of Intention
- Purposely A desires to kill B by blowing up a
building in which he knows B is sleeping. He has
acted purposely with regard to the death of B.
- Knowingly A intends to blow up a building in
which he knows B is asleep on the top floor.
Even though does not desire Bs death, if B
dies, A has killed B knowingly because it is
practically certain the B will die.
41Gradations of Intention
- Recklessly A intends to blow up a building in
which he knows B is asleep. He calls C and asks
him to go to the building and wake up B. B knows
that C is not very responsible. If C fails to do
wake B, and B dies, A has killed B recklessly
because he consciously disregarded a significant
risk of injury to B.
42Gradations of Intention
- Negligently A desires to blow up a building.
Although it would be apparent to the average
person that B is in the building and will be
killed, A is totally unaware of that possibility.
If B dies, A has acted with criminal negligence
with regard to Bs death.
43Strict Liability Crimes
- Certain public welfare (e.g., hand gun
possession) and sexual offenses (e.g., statutory
rape, bigamy, and adultery) do not require proof
of mens rea. The act alone will suffice.
44Two Tests for Causation
- Factual Causation But for As act, the result
would not have occurred when and as it did.
- But for Bills act, Harry would not have been
injured in the way in which he was.
- Proximate Causation
- Bs injuries must have been the natural and
probable consequences of As act.
- Bs injuries must have been foreseeable,
without any intervening factors sufficient to
break the causal chain that would relieve A of
liability.
45DefensesExcuses and Justifications
- EXCUSES
- Defenses in which the law recognizes the
absence of mens rea or actus reus, and concludes
that no crime has been committed
- Insanity
- Infancy
- Intoxication
-
- JUSTIFICATIONS
- Defenses in which the law authorizes the
violation of another law where there is a
justification
- Self Defense
- Defense of Others
- Duress
- Necessity
46The Issue of Mental Disease is Raised Throughout
the Criminal Process
Execution of Sentence
Trial
Crime
Criminal Responsibility
Competence to be tried (fitness to proceed)
Competence to be executed
Understand the proceedings
Be able to assist in their defense
47 FBI Guidelines on Deadly Force
Publics Safety
- May not fire to disable vehicle
- May not fire warning shot
- Should not fire to wound
Officers Safety
MAY (NOT MUST) USEDEADLY FORCE WHEN
1. Imminent Danger a. Armed intent to us
e, or b. Armed moving to cover, or
c. Ability to incapacitate intent
to use AND
2. No safe alternative verbal
warning, if feasible
Exception Escape from scene of violent confront
ation
48The Law of Deadly Force
- Constitutional Law
- Tennessee v. Gardner
- Police may not use deadly force against a fleeing
unarmed felony suspect. Such force is an
unconstitutional seizure of the person and
violates the Fourth Amendment to the
Constitution. - State Statute
- Justification by law enforcement
- Departmental Policies
- Examples FBI Guidelines, PPD Directive 10
49 Forcibly subdued suspect using methods
other than hands, e.g., gun or baton
Forcibly subdued suspects with hands
Officer uses an arm/wrist lock,
takedown, block, punch, or kick
Slight force Officer uses strong directive la
nguage and/or minimal physical force to enco
urage compliance
No force Officer uses typical verbal commands
50New York Central Hudson River Railroad v. U.S.
(1909)
- Corporations conduct the great majority of
business transactions
- Interstate commerce is almost entirely in their
hands
- The notion that corporations are incapable of
committing crimes would virtually take away the
only means of effectively controlling business
transactions in interstate commerce - Corporations can commit crimes
51Corporate Criminal Liability The Federal Law
- A corporation may be held criminally liable for
acts committed by its employees if they were
acting within the scope of their authority, and
for the benefit of the corporation even if such
acts were against corporate policy or express
instructions. - This rule extends corporate criminal liability to
acts committed by
- officers and directors
- managers and supervisors
- subordinate employees
- independent contractors
52Vicarious Liability
Agents Criminal Intent
Agents Criminal Act
53The Corporate Compliance Movement
Corporate Compliance
- The likelihood of a criminal investigation,
indictment, aggressive prosecution, conviction,
and significant fine may be reduced significantly
by evidence of corporate compliance. - Vicarious liability might be defeated by active
corporate compliance efforts.
Liability
54Criminology
55What are the ingredients (elements) of all
crimes?
- ACT
- INTENT
- CONCURRENCE CAUSATION
- INJURY
- HARM PROHIBITED ACT Crime
Biological Persons Corporate Persons
56How can a corporation commit a crime?
- Who acts
- Who intends?
- Who causes injury?
- Who is punished?
57New York Central Hudson River Railroad v. U.S.
(1909)
- Corporations conduct the great majority of
business transactions
- Interstate commerce is almost entirely in their
hands
- The notion that corporations are incapable of
committing crimes would virtually take away the
only means of effectively controlling business
transactions in interstate commerce - Corporations can commit crimes
58Corporate Criminal Liability The Federal Law
- A corporation may be held criminally liable for
acts committed by its employees if they were
acting within the scope of their authority, and
for the benefit of the corporation even if such
acts were against corporate policy or express
instructions. - This rule extends corporate criminal liability to
acts committed by
- officers and directors
- managers and supervisors
- subordinate employees
- independent contractors
59Vicarious Liability
Agents Criminal Intent
Agents Criminal Act
60The Corporate Compliance Movement
Corporate Compliance
- The likelihood of a criminal investigation,
indictment, aggressive prosecution, conviction,
and significant fine may be reduced significantly
by evidence of corporate compliance. - Vicarious liability might be defeated by active
corporate compliance efforts.
Liability
61Minimum Requirements for an Effective Compliance
Program
- Standards and Procedures reasonably capable of
preventing criminal conduct
- Oversight of standards by high level personnel
- Care in the delegation of substantial managerial
authority to individuals
- Effective communication of standards and
procedures to employees
- Reasonable steps taken to achieve compliance
- Enforcement of disciplinary mechanisms
- Appropriate response after detection of an offense
62Key to Compliance
- Proactive Compliance
- Reactive Compliance
63Criminology
64You be the criminologist!
- What do we know?
- Test the conventional wisdom about crime in New
York
- Propose a study using international crime data
- Explain the drop in crime
65 What do we know?
- Crime rates are declining (p. 36-38)
- Most crimes are committed in large urban areas
(p.40)
- The safest place to be is in ones home (p. 40)
- Most crimes are committed at night (p. 40)
- Personal and household crimes are more likely to
be committed during the warmer months of the year
(p. 40)
- Crime decreases with age (p. 44)
- A small group of offenders commit a large
percentage of all crime (p. 45-46)
- Males commit more crimes than females (p. 47-48)
- Social class may (or may not) be associated with
crime (p. 49)
- People of color are represented
disproportionately in the criminal justice system
(p. 49-50)
66What is your hypothesis?
- Why are crime rates declining?
- Why are most crimes committed in large urban
areas?
- Why are most crimes committed at night?
- Why is it that personal and household crimes are
more likely to be committed during the warmer
months of the year?
- Why does crime decrease with age?
- Why is it that a small group of offenders commit
a large percentage of all crime?
- Why do males commit more crimes than females?
- Why is the crime-social class association less
than convincing?
- Why is it that people of color are represented
disproportionately in the criminal justice
system?
Why?
67What is your hypothesis?
- Crime rates are declining because of changing
demographics, better and more sophisticated
policing strategies, e.g., community-based
policing and quality of life arrests (broken
windows), and an increased commitment to crime
prevention strategies, e.g., target hardening. - Criminal behavior decreases with age for reasons
of social maturation.
- People of color are disproportionately
represented in the criminal justice system
because there remains an institutionalized racism
that touches each and every stage of the system
from arrest decisions to parole eligibility
determinations.
68Test the conventional wisdom about crime in New
York
- Eric H. Monkkonen, Murder in New York City
(2001)
- Cities are cauldrons of murder.
- The underlying social forces of mass society
cause deviance.
- Crowding leads to deviance and violence
- Poverty explains murder.
- A corrupt criminal justice system loosens morals
and leads to violence.
- We know what causes violence young men coming
home from war, trained to kill.
- Riots unleash violence.
69Propose a study using international crime
dataFrom Synnomie to Anomie
United States
Anomie (Normlessness)
Germany Great Britain Italy
Formation of Subcultures (Lower class are in conf
lict with dominant culture)
Crime Rate
Russia Saudi Arabia Switzerland Japan
Cultural Deviance (Social disorganization and val
ue conflict social controls absent in transitio
nal neighborhoods)
Failure in Social Control (Social institutions br
eak down movement away from family, school reli
gious commitment, etc.)
Nepal Costa Rica
Strain (disconnect between means and goals)
Synnomie (Norm Cohesion)
Social Development/Social Change
70Explain the drop in crime
- The decay of crack markets
- New police tactics
- Growing deterrence due to violence
- Rejection of crack by a new generation
- Strength of the economy
- Increased gun control, and
- Increased incarceration
71Explain the drop in crime last week in New York
City