Title: Metadata for Resource Discovery in Learning Repositories
1Metadata for Resource Discovery in Learning
Repositories
A.R.D. Prasad, Devika P. Madalli DRTC, Indian
Statistical Institute Bangalore, India ard,
devika_at_drtc.isibang.ac.in T4E Conference,
IIIT-B, 06/08/09
2E- LearningInstructor Centric to Learner Centric
- In traditional learning scenario, the instructor
plays the intermediate role between the learner
and the learning material - But In an e-learning environment
- Instructors no longer control the delivery of
material and learners have a possibility to
combine learning material in courses on their
own. - User does not require packaged bundles of
lessons.
3- E-learning projects have mostly concentrated on
putting high quality material in the form of
lectures, lessons, presentations and also media
files on disk. - Regardless of the time or expense put into
creating advanced training material the content
is useless, unless it can be searched and
accessed easily.
4An Ideal e-learning System
- Learner centric approach
- Flexibility (time space independent)
- Customized and/ or personalized paths
- Non-linear content
- Interactive Learning
- Dynamic content
- Systematic Learning
- Distributed Content
5Issues in e-learning Environment
- Lack of group and personalized learning spaces
- Presentation of the entire learning material as
continuous text or media, instead of only the
relevant information that is actually sought by a
learner. - Learning sequence not same for every user
- Re-usability issues
- - Ljiljana Stojanovic, Steffen Staab and Rudi
Studer, 2007
6Issues in e-learning environment
- Resource discovery issues and lack of semantic
interoperability - Quality assurance
- Ranking and relevance indicators
- Personalized paths and services
7Content, Context Structure
- content identifies what the learning material is
about, - context identifies in which form this topic is
presented, - structure is to comprehend the arrangement of the
learning materials in a learning course
8ContentContextStructure
- High risk in defining the semantically same
concept/ topic by two different authors - Keyword based querying does not really work
unless they are well defined - Problems of synonym, antonym, homonym,
abbreviation, etc. - Contextual information is missing
- Incapable of meeting the individual skill gaps
- Incapable of delivering content as per
- individual needs
-
C O N T E N T
Context
Structure
9A Look at NPTEL
10(No Transcript)
11NPTEL
- Multidisciplinary, rich in collection and
variety. - Search and Browse Interface-
- by subject (drop-down list of topics/ subject
enlisting about 8 disciplines) - by material types (i.e. by Web or by Video),
- by Institutes (7 IITs and IISc),
- by course name,
- by coordinator.
12(No Transcript)
13Issues access and retrieval
- Assumption - users would know 'what exactly they
need' - How many would really be able term their
information requirement in formal domain language
in a search box? - Semantic gaps between perceived information need
and expressed information need
14What more NPTEL can offer?
- Intuitive search and resource discovery features
enabled through deployment of adequate metadata
for content description, - Domain hierarchies in lightweight directory
structure. - Support for stemming, parts of names, spelling
variations through controlled vocabulary. - Unscrambling the concepts/ disambiguation
- User profile based services
15Two approaches of resource description
- Metadata based description (using standards like
LOM) - Domain driven approach (through domain ontologies)
These two approaches are not exclusive rather
compliment each other for better organization and
retrieval
16Metadata
- It is the Internet-age term for cataloging
information that librarians traditionally have
used to provide 'access points' to items in
collections. - A metadata standard advocates use of common set
of tags that can be applied to describe any
resource with an aim to facilitate its retrieval
from a collection - Metadata ensures interoperability and helps in
reuse of resources and artifacts
17Metadata in e-learning
- Learner centric educational architecture
- Domain based knowledge retrieval
- Semantic interoperability, (instructor-learner
learner-learner peer- learner
instructor-instructor) - Re-usability
18Improved semantics
- Identify works by Ranganathan instead of
retrieving just everything about/by Ranganathan? - Relations between pieces of tagged information
- Machine/agent processable information extraction
is possible - Interoperability needs to be ensured. (through
crosswalks, standardization, etc.)
19Domain ontology driven approach
- Semantic Metadata
- Metadata basically describes the context and
often not the content of the resource. - The content should be expressed in a formalized
representation- ontology. - Such an holistic approach to resource description
can be termed as 'Semantic Metadata.
20Ontology?
- An Ontology is an explicit specification of a
conceptualization - Gruber - Ontological categories define the concepts that
exist in the domain, as well as relationships
between these concepts.
21Domain ontology for CS
22- An LMS based on domain ontology makes it
relatively easier for the learner to find objects
using the implicit embedded relations between
concepts. - The benefits of using domain ontology for LMS can
be explained in following scenario
23Benefits of Ontology Based LMSScenario 1 Issue
of Synonyms
- User need- Learning objects on the topic Local
Area Network. - Key word used - LAN
- Results Only Includes the objects indexed with
the key-word LAN , not possible to retrieve
those with Local Area Network. - Reason- System is incapable to establish
relation between LAN and Local Area Network. - In Ontology Based LMS
- the relations between abbreviated words and
abbreviation will be hard-coded - hence easily retrieves documents indexed with
either of the forms
24Benefits of Ontology Based LMSScenario 2 Issue
of Homographs
- User need- Learning objects on the topic cranes
in the context of Civil engineering. - Key word used - Cranes
- Results Retrieves all the objects indexed with
the keyword cranes which includes the bird
crane also. - Reason- System is incapable to distinguish
between Bird- crane and The machine- crane. - In Ontology Based LMS
- The broader terms of the word 'crane' would
resolve this issue. - As the broader terms to crane could be 'building
material' or 'bird' as the case maybe. (dealing
with polyhierarchies)
25- In brief, a system driven by domain ontology
driven would be capable of handling different
forms of a concept, e.g. synonyms, homonyms,
homographs, etc. - Such an Ontology and domain driven implementation
should be in compliance with the W3C standards on
ontology representation
26Proposal-LOM supported Learning Management System
- OAI-compliant LOM supported repository
- Metadata based search as well as faceted browsing
- Enhanced support for intuitive search
-
27Architecture for LOM supported Learning
Management System
28Ontology and its components
- Knowledge space
- Domain ontology (SKOS (Simple Knowledge
Organization System)) - Content specific (OWL-DL)
- Learners ontology (OWL-DL)
- Rules
- Protégé for building ontology
29- In an ideal learning situation system would
provide a material which is the best quality one
and best suited to the individual learners
considering their background knowledge, style of
learning, their educational level, technical
facilities, etc.
- Software agents must be able to automatically
find, discover appropriate service on behalf of
us - They must be able to determine automatically how
to invoke or execute the service - They must be able to select and combine the
required information and deliver it
30In a Nutshell
- Essentially components of e-learning system for
resource description using - LOM metadata standard and
- An domain ontology based content representation.
- Such an international standard compliant system
helps to - achieve interoperability,
- updating
- versioning
- personalization
- migration and
- reuse of the content
31Thank You
ard_at_drtc.isibang.ac.in devika_at_drtc.isibang.ac.in