Metadata for Resource Discovery in Learning Repositories - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Metadata for Resource Discovery in Learning Repositories

Description:

The broader terms of the word 'crane' would resolve this issue. As the broader terms to crane could be 'building material' or 'bird' as the case ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: value73
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Metadata for Resource Discovery in Learning Repositories


1
Metadata for Resource Discovery in Learning
Repositories
A.R.D. Prasad, Devika P. Madalli DRTC, Indian
Statistical Institute Bangalore, India ard,
devika_at_drtc.isibang.ac.in T4E Conference,
IIIT-B, 06/08/09
2
E- LearningInstructor Centric to Learner Centric
  • In traditional learning scenario, the instructor
    plays the intermediate role between the learner
    and the learning material
  • But In an e-learning environment
  • Instructors no longer control the delivery of
    material and learners have a possibility to
    combine learning material in courses on their
    own.
  • User does not require packaged bundles of
    lessons.

3
  • E-learning projects have mostly concentrated on
    putting high quality material in the form of
    lectures, lessons, presentations and also media
    files on disk.
  • Regardless of the time or expense put into
    creating advanced training material the content
    is useless, unless it can be searched and
    accessed easily.

4
An Ideal e-learning System
  • Learner centric approach
  • Flexibility (time space independent)
  • Customized and/ or personalized paths
  • Non-linear content
  • Interactive Learning
  • Dynamic content
  • Systematic Learning
  • Distributed Content

5
Issues in e-learning Environment
  • Lack of group and personalized learning spaces
  • Presentation of the entire learning material as
    continuous text or media, instead of only the
    relevant information that is actually sought by a
    learner.
  • Learning sequence not same for every user
  • Re-usability issues
  • - Ljiljana Stojanovic, Steffen Staab and Rudi
    Studer, 2007

6
Issues in e-learning environment
  • Resource discovery issues and lack of semantic
    interoperability
  • Quality assurance
  • Ranking and relevance indicators
  • Personalized paths and services

7
Content, Context Structure
  • content identifies what the learning material is
    about,
  • context identifies in which form this topic is
    presented,
  • structure is to comprehend the arrangement of the
    learning materials in a learning course

8
ContentContextStructure
  • High risk in defining the semantically same
    concept/ topic by two different authors
  • Keyword based querying does not really work
    unless they are well defined
  • Problems of synonym, antonym, homonym,
    abbreviation, etc.
  • Contextual information is missing
  • Incapable of meeting the individual skill gaps
  • Incapable of delivering content as per
  • individual needs

C O N T E N T
Context
Structure
9
A Look at NPTEL
10
(No Transcript)
11
NPTEL
  • Multidisciplinary, rich in collection and
    variety.
  • Search and Browse Interface-
  • by subject (drop-down list of topics/ subject
    enlisting about 8 disciplines)
  • by material types (i.e. by Web or by Video),
  • by Institutes (7 IITs and IISc),
  • by course name,
  • by coordinator.

12
(No Transcript)
13
Issues access and retrieval
  • Assumption - users would know 'what exactly they
    need'
  • How many would really be able term their
    information requirement in formal domain language
    in a search box?
  • Semantic gaps between perceived information need
    and expressed information need

14
What more NPTEL can offer?
  • Intuitive search and resource discovery features
    enabled through deployment of adequate metadata
    for content description,
  • Domain hierarchies in lightweight directory
    structure.
  • Support for stemming, parts of names, spelling
    variations through controlled vocabulary.
  • Unscrambling the concepts/ disambiguation
  • User profile based services

15
Two approaches of resource description
  • Metadata based description (using standards like
    LOM)
  • Domain driven approach (through domain ontologies)

These two approaches are not exclusive rather
compliment each other for better organization and
retrieval
16
Metadata
  • It is the Internet-age term for cataloging
    information that librarians traditionally have
    used to provide 'access points' to items in
    collections.
  • A metadata standard advocates use of common set
    of tags that can be applied to describe any
    resource with an aim to facilitate its retrieval
    from a collection
  • Metadata ensures interoperability and helps in
    reuse of resources and artifacts

17
Metadata in e-learning
  • Learner centric educational architecture
  • Domain based knowledge retrieval
  • Semantic interoperability, (instructor-learner
    learner-learner peer- learner
    instructor-instructor)
  • Re-usability

18
Improved semantics
  • Identify works by Ranganathan instead of
    retrieving just everything about/by Ranganathan?
  • Relations between pieces of tagged information
  • Machine/agent processable information extraction
    is possible
  • Interoperability needs to be ensured. (through
    crosswalks, standardization, etc.)

19
Domain ontology driven approach
  • Semantic Metadata
  • Metadata basically describes the context and
    often not the content of the resource.
  • The content should be expressed in a formalized
    representation- ontology.
  • Such an holistic approach to resource description
    can be termed as 'Semantic Metadata.

20
Ontology?
  • An Ontology is an explicit specification of a
    conceptualization - Gruber
  • Ontological categories define the concepts that
    exist in the domain, as well as relationships
    between these concepts.

21
Domain ontology for CS
22
  • An LMS based on domain ontology makes it
    relatively easier for the learner to find objects
    using the implicit embedded relations between
    concepts.
  • The benefits of using domain ontology for LMS can
    be explained in following scenario

23
Benefits of Ontology Based LMSScenario 1 Issue
of Synonyms
  • User need- Learning objects on the topic Local
    Area Network.
  • Key word used - LAN
  • Results Only Includes the objects indexed with
    the key-word LAN , not possible to retrieve
    those with Local Area Network.
  • Reason- System is incapable to establish
    relation between LAN and Local Area Network.
  • In Ontology Based LMS
  • the relations between abbreviated words and
    abbreviation will be hard-coded
  • hence easily retrieves documents indexed with
    either of the forms

24
Benefits of Ontology Based LMSScenario 2 Issue
of Homographs
  • User need- Learning objects on the topic cranes
    in the context of Civil engineering.
  • Key word used - Cranes
  • Results Retrieves all the objects indexed with
    the keyword cranes which includes the bird
    crane also.
  • Reason- System is incapable to distinguish
    between Bird- crane and The machine- crane.
  • In Ontology Based LMS
  • The broader terms of the word 'crane' would
    resolve this issue.
  • As the broader terms to crane could be 'building
    material' or 'bird' as the case maybe. (dealing
    with polyhierarchies)

25
  • In brief, a system driven by domain ontology
    driven would be capable of handling different
    forms of a concept, e.g. synonyms, homonyms,
    homographs, etc.
  • Such an Ontology and domain driven implementation
    should be in compliance with the W3C standards on
    ontology representation

26
Proposal-LOM supported Learning Management System
  • OAI-compliant LOM supported repository
  • Metadata based search as well as faceted browsing
  • Enhanced support for intuitive search

27
Architecture for LOM supported Learning
Management System
28
Ontology and its components
  • Knowledge space
  • Domain ontology (SKOS (Simple Knowledge
    Organization System))
  • Content specific (OWL-DL)
  • Learners ontology (OWL-DL)
  • Rules
  • Protégé for building ontology

29
  • In an ideal learning situation system would
    provide a material which is the best quality one
    and best suited to the individual learners
    considering their background knowledge, style of
    learning, their educational level, technical
    facilities, etc.
  • Software agents must be able to automatically
    find, discover appropriate service on behalf of
    us
  • They must be able to determine automatically how
    to invoke or execute the service
  • They must be able to select and combine the
    required information and deliver it

30
In a Nutshell
  • Essentially components of e-learning system for
    resource description using
  • LOM metadata standard and
  • An domain ontology based content representation.
  • Such an international standard compliant system
    helps to
  • achieve interoperability,
  • updating
  • versioning
  • personalization
  • migration and
  • reuse of the content

31
Thank You
ard_at_drtc.isibang.ac.in devika_at_drtc.isibang.ac.in
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com