Title: Primer on Cash Flow Valuation
1Primer on Cash Flow Valuation
2The greater danger for most of us is not that our
aim is too high and we might miss it, but that it
is too low and we reach it. Michelangelo
3Cross-Border Transactions
4 Learning Objectives
- Primary learning objectives To provide students
with an understanding of - business valuation using discounted cash flow
valuation techniques and - the importance of understanding assumptions
underlying business valuations - Secondary learning objectives To provide
students with an understanding of - discount rates and risk as applied to business
valuation - how to analyze risk
- alternative definitions of cash flow and how and
when they are applied - the advantages and disadvantages of the most
commonly used discounted cash flow methodologies - the sensitivity of terminal values to changes in
assumptions and - Adjusting firm value for non-operating assets and
liabilities.
5Required Returns Cost of Equity (ke)
- Capital Asset Pricing Model (3-factor model)
- ke Rf ß(Rm Rf) FSP
- Where Rf risk free rate of return
- ß beta (systematic/non-dive
rsifiable risk) - Rm expected rate of return on
equities - Rm Rf 5.5 (i.e., equity risk
premium - historical
average since - 1963)
- FSP firm size premium
6Estimates of Size Premium
- Market Value (000,000)
- gt18,600
- 7,400 to 18,600
- 2,700 to 7,400
- 1,100 to 2,700.
- 450 to 1,100
- 200 to 450
- 100 to 200
- lt100 million
- Percentage Points Added to CAPM Estimate
- 0.0
- .6
- 1.0
- 1.5
- 2.3
- 2.7
- 5.8
- 9.2
-
Source Adapted from estimates provided by
Ibbotson Associates.
7Required Returns Cost of Capital
- Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)1,2
- WACC ke x E i (1-t) x D
kpr x __PR__ - (EDPR)
(EDPR) (EDPR) - Where E the market value of equity
- D the market value of debt
- PR the market value of preferred
stock - ke cost of equity
- kpr cost of preferred stock
- i the interest rate on debt
- t the firms marginal tax rate
1To estimate WACC, use firms target
debt-to-total capital ratio (TC). 2(D/E)/(1D/E)
(D/E)/(ED)/E (D/E)(E/(ED) D/(ED)
D/TC E/TC 1 D/TC.
8Analyzing Risk
- Risk consists of a non-systematic/diversifiable
and systematic/non-diversifiable component - Equity beta (ß) is a measure of non-diversifiable
risk - Equity beta quantifies a stocks volatility
relative to the overall market - Equity beta is impacted by the following factors
- Degree of industry cyclicality
- Operating leverage refers to the composition of a
firms cost structure (fixed plus variable costs) - Financial leverage refers to the composition of a
firms capital structure (debt equity) - Firms with high ratios of fixed to total costs
and debt to total capital tend to display high
volatility and betas
9How Operating Leverage Affects Financial
Returns?1
Case 1 Case 2 Revenue Increases by 25 Case 3 Revenue Decreases by 25
Revenue 100 125 75
Fixed Variable2 Total Cost of Sales 48 32 80 48 40 88 48 24 72
Earnings Before Taxes 20 37 3
Tax Liability _at_ 40 8 14.8 1.2
After-Tax Earnings 12 22.2 1.8
Firm Equity 100 100 100
Return on Equity () 12 22.2 1.8
1All figures are in millions of dollars unless otherwise noted. All cases have same fixed expenses and firm equity but differ by revenue. 2In Case 1, variable costs represent 32 of revenue. Assuming this relationship is maintained, variable costs in Cases 2 and 3 are estimated by multiplying total revenue by .32. 1All figures are in millions of dollars unless otherwise noted. All cases have same fixed expenses and firm equity but differ by revenue. 2In Case 1, variable costs represent 32 of revenue. Assuming this relationship is maintained, variable costs in Cases 2 and 3 are estimated by multiplying total revenue by .32. 1All figures are in millions of dollars unless otherwise noted. All cases have same fixed expenses and firm equity but differ by revenue. 2In Case 1, variable costs represent 32 of revenue. Assuming this relationship is maintained, variable costs in Cases 2 and 3 are estimated by multiplying total revenue by .32. 1All figures are in millions of dollars unless otherwise noted. All cases have same fixed expenses and firm equity but differ by revenue. 2In Case 1, variable costs represent 32 of revenue. Assuming this relationship is maintained, variable costs in Cases 2 and 3 are estimated by multiplying total revenue by .32.
Key Point High fixed to total cost
ratios magnify fluctuations in financial returns.
10How Financial Leverage Affects Financial Returns1
Case 1 No Debt Case 2 25 Debt to Total Capital Case 3 50 Debt to Total Capital
Equity 100 75 50
Debt 0 25 50
Total Capital 100 100 100
Earnings before Interest and Taxes 20 20 20
Interest _at_ 10 0 2.5 5
Income before Taxes 20 17.5 15
Less income Taxes _at_ 40 8 7 6
Net Income 12 10.5 9
After-Tax Return on Equity () 12 14 18
1All figures are in millions of dollars unless otherwise noted. Total capital and EBIT same in all cases. 1All figures are in millions of dollars unless otherwise noted. Total capital and EBIT same in all cases. 1All figures are in millions of dollars unless otherwise noted. Total capital and EBIT same in all cases. 1All figures are in millions of dollars unless otherwise noted. Total capital and EBIT same in all cases.
Key Point High debt to total capital
ratios magnify fluctuations in financial returns.
11Leveraged versus Unleveraged Equity Betas
- In the absence of debt, the equity ß is called
the unleveraged ßu, which is impacted by the
firms operating leverage and the cyclicality of
the industry in which the firm competes - In the presence of debt, the equity ß is called
the leveraged ßl - If a firms shareholders bear all the risk of
operating and financial leverage and interest is
tax deductible, leveraged and unleveraged betas
can be calculated as follows - ßl ßu (1 (1-t) (D/E)) and ßu ßl / (1
(1-t) (D/E)) - where t, D, and E are the tax rate, debt and
equity, respectively. - Implications
- --Increasing D/E raises firms breakeven and
increases shareholder risk that firm will be
unable to generate future cash flows sufficient
to pay their minimum required returns. - --Tax deductibility of interest reduces
shareholder risk by increasing after-tax cash
available for shareholders.
12Estimating a Firms Equity Beta
- Regress percent change in firms share price plus
dividends against percent change in a broadly
defined stock index plus dividends for last 3-5
years. - However, this assumes the historical relationship
between risk and return will hold in the future - Alternatively, use a sample of similar firms
- Step 1 Select sample of firms with similar
cyclicality and operating leverage (i.e., usually
in the same industry) - Step 2 Calculate average unlevered beta for
firms in the sample to eliminate the effects of
their current capital structures on their betas - Step 3 Relever average unlevered beta using D/E
ratio and marginal tax rate of firm whose beta
you are trying to estimate (i.e., target firm)
13Estimating Abbot Labs Equity Beta
Step 1 Select sample of firms having similar cyclicality and operating leverage Step 1 Select sample of firms having similar cyclicality and operating leverage Step 1 Select sample of firms having similar cyclicality and operating leverage Step 2 Compute average of firms unlevered betas Step 3 Relever average unlevered beta using targets debt/equity ratio
Firm Levered Equity Beta1 Debt / Equity1 Unlevered Equity Beta2 Abbot Labs Relevered Equity Beta3
Abbot Labs .2900 .2662 .2501 NA
Johnson Johnson .6000 .0762 .5738 NA
Merck .6600 .3204 .5536 NA
Pfizer .6800 .3044 .5750 NA
Average .4881 .4209
1Yahoo Finance (1/29/2011). Beta estimates are based on historical relationship between the firms share price and a broadly defined stock index. 2ßu ßl / (1 (1-t) (D/E)), where ßu and ßl are unlevered and levered betas marginal tax rate is .4. Abbot Labs (ßu ) .2900 / (1 (1 - .4).2662)) .2501 Johnson Johnson (ßu ) .6000 / (1 (1 - .4).0762)) ..5738 Merck (ßu) .6600 / (1 (1 - .4).3204)) .5536 Pfizer (ßu) .6800 / (1 (1 - .4).3044)) .5750 3ßl ßu (1 (1-t) (D/E)) using the target firms (Abbot Labs) debt/equity ratio and marginal tax rate. Abbot Labs relevered beta .4881 (1 (1 - .4).2662)) .4209 1Yahoo Finance (1/29/2011). Beta estimates are based on historical relationship between the firms share price and a broadly defined stock index. 2ßu ßl / (1 (1-t) (D/E)), where ßu and ßl are unlevered and levered betas marginal tax rate is .4. Abbot Labs (ßu ) .2900 / (1 (1 - .4).2662)) .2501 Johnson Johnson (ßu ) .6000 / (1 (1 - .4).0762)) ..5738 Merck (ßu) .6600 / (1 (1 - .4).3204)) .5536 Pfizer (ßu) .6800 / (1 (1 - .4).3044)) .5750 3ßl ßu (1 (1-t) (D/E)) using the target firms (Abbot Labs) debt/equity ratio and marginal tax rate. Abbot Labs relevered beta .4881 (1 (1 - .4).2662)) .4209 1Yahoo Finance (1/29/2011). Beta estimates are based on historical relationship between the firms share price and a broadly defined stock index. 2ßu ßl / (1 (1-t) (D/E)), where ßu and ßl are unlevered and levered betas marginal tax rate is .4. Abbot Labs (ßu ) .2900 / (1 (1 - .4).2662)) .2501 Johnson Johnson (ßu ) .6000 / (1 (1 - .4).0762)) ..5738 Merck (ßu) .6600 / (1 (1 - .4).3204)) .5536 Pfizer (ßu) .6800 / (1 (1 - .4).3044)) .5750 3ßl ßu (1 (1-t) (D/E)) using the target firms (Abbot Labs) debt/equity ratio and marginal tax rate. Abbot Labs relevered beta .4881 (1 (1 - .4).2662)) .4209 1Yahoo Finance (1/29/2011). Beta estimates are based on historical relationship between the firms share price and a broadly defined stock index. 2ßu ßl / (1 (1-t) (D/E)), where ßu and ßl are unlevered and levered betas marginal tax rate is .4. Abbot Labs (ßu ) .2900 / (1 (1 - .4).2662)) .2501 Johnson Johnson (ßu ) .6000 / (1 (1 - .4).0762)) ..5738 Merck (ßu) .6600 / (1 (1 - .4).3204)) .5536 Pfizer (ßu) .6800 / (1 (1 - .4).3044)) .5750 3ßl ßu (1 (1-t) (D/E)) using the target firms (Abbot Labs) debt/equity ratio and marginal tax rate. Abbot Labs relevered beta .4881 (1 (1 - .4).2662)) .4209 1Yahoo Finance (1/29/2011). Beta estimates are based on historical relationship between the firms share price and a broadly defined stock index. 2ßu ßl / (1 (1-t) (D/E)), where ßu and ßl are unlevered and levered betas marginal tax rate is .4. Abbot Labs (ßu ) .2900 / (1 (1 - .4).2662)) .2501 Johnson Johnson (ßu ) .6000 / (1 (1 - .4).0762)) ..5738 Merck (ßu) .6600 / (1 (1 - .4).3204)) .5536 Pfizer (ßu) .6800 / (1 (1 - .4).3044)) .5750 3ßl ßu (1 (1-t) (D/E)) using the target firms (Abbot Labs) debt/equity ratio and marginal tax rate. Abbot Labs relevered beta .4881 (1 (1 - .4).2662)) .4209
14Valuation Cash Flow
- Valuation cash flows represent actual cash flows
available to reward both shareholders and lenders - Cash flow statements include cash inflows and
outflows from - operating,
- investing, and
- financing activities
- GAAP cash flows are adjusted for non-cash inflows
and outflows to calculate valuation cash flow.
Examples include the following - Adding depreciation back to net income
- Deducting gains from and adding losses to net
income resulting from asset sales since such
gains or losses are changes in book values only
with the actual cash flows from the sale shown in
the cash flow statement as cash from investing
activities. - Valuation cash flows include free cash flows to
equity investors or equity cash flow and free
cash flows to the firm or enterprise cash flow
15Calculating Free Cash Flow to Equity Investors
or Equity Cash Flow (FCFE)
- FCFE (equity cash flow)1 represents cash flow
available for paying dividends or repurchasing
common equity, after taxes, debt repayments, new
issues, and all reinvestment requirements. - FCFE (Net Income Depreciation ? Net Working
Capital2)3 Gross Capital Expenditures4 (New
Preferred Equity Issues Preferred Dividends
New Debt Issues Principal Repayments)5 - 1PV of equity cash flows is the equity value of
the firm. - 2Excludes cash in excess of normal operating
requirements. - 3Cash from operating activities.
- 4Cash from investing activities.
- 5Cash from financing activities.
16Calculating Free Cash Flow to the Firm or
Enterprise Cash Flow (FCFF)
- FCFF (enterprise cash flow)1 is cash flow
available to repay lenders and/or pay common and
preferred dividends and repurchase equity, after
taxes and reinvestment requirements but before
debt repayments. - FCFF (Earnings before interest taxes (1-tax
rate) Depreciation ? Net Working Capital2)3
Gross Capital Expenditures4 - 1PV of enterprise cash flows is the enterprise
value of the firm - 2Excludes cash in excess of normal operating
requirements. - 3Cash from operating activities.
- 4Cash from investing activities.
17Comparing Free Cash Flow to the Firm and to
Equity
Free Cash Flow to the Firm Free Cash Flow to Equity
Cash from Operating Activities 40 40
Cash from Investing Activities (22) (22)
Cash from Financing Activities (10)
Total Cash Flow 18 8
18Discussion Questions
- How does the size of the firm affect its
perceived risk? Be specific? - How would you estimate the beta for a publicly
traded firm? For a private firm? - 3. Explain the difference between equity and
enterprise cash flow? - 4, What is the appropriate discount rate to use
with equity cash flow? Why? With enterprise cash
flow? Why?
19Commonly Used Discounted Cash Flow Valuation
Methods
- Zero Growth Model
- Constant Growth Model
- Variable Growth Model
20Zero Growth Model
- Free cash flow is constant in perpetuity.
- P0 FCFF0 / WACC, where FCFF0 is free cash
- flow to the firm and WACC is the weighted
- average the cost of capital
- P0 FCFE0 / ke where FCFE0 is free cash flow
- to equity investors and ke is the cost of
- equity
21Zero Growth Model Example
- What is the value of a firm, whose annual FCFF0
of 1 million is expected to remain constant in
perpetuity and whose weighted average cost of
capital is 12. - P0 1 / .12 8.3 million
22Constant Growth Model
- Cash flow next year (i.e., FCFF1, the first year
of the - forecast period) is expected to grow at a
constant rate. - FCFF1FCFF0(1g)
- P0 FCFF1 / (WACC-g), where g is the expected
rate of - growth of FCFF1.
- P0 FCFE1 / (ke g), where g is the expected
rate of - growth of FCFE1.
23Constant Growth Model Example
- Estimate the value of a firm (P0) whose cost of
equity is 15 and whose cash flow in the prior
year is projected to grow 20 in the current year
and then at a constant 10 annual rate
thereafter. Cash flow in the prior year is 2
million. - P0 (2 x 1.2)(1.1) / (.15 - .10) 52.8 million
24Variable Growth Model
- Cash flow exhibits both a high and a stable
growth period. - High growth period The firms growth rate
exceeds a rate that can be sustained long-term. - Stable growth period The firm is expected to
grow at a rate that can be sustained indefinitely
(e.g., industry average growth rate). - Discount rates Reflecting the slower growth rate
during the stable growth period, the discount
rate during the stable period should be lower
than doing the high growth period (e.g., industry
average discount rate).
25Variable Growth Model Contd.
n
P0,FCFF S FCFF0 x (1gt)t
Pn t1 (1
WACC)t (1WACC)n
Where Pn FCFFn x (1 gm)
(WACCm gm) FCFF0 free cash
flow to the firm in year 0 WACC
weighted average cost of capital through year n
WACCm Weighted average cost of capital
beyond year n (Note
WACC gt WACCm) Pn value of the firm at
the end of year n (terminal value) gt
growth rate through year n gm
stabilized or long-term industry average growth
rate beyond year n (Note gt gt
gm)
26Variable Growth Model Example
- Estimate the value of a firm (P0) whose cash flow
is projected to grow at a compound annual average
rate of 35 for the next five years and then
assume a more normal 5 annual growth rate. The
current years cash flow is 4 million. The
firms weighted average cost of capital during
the high growth period is 18 and then drops to
the industry average rate of 12 beyond the fifth
year.
27Variable Growth Model Example Solution
- PV1-5 4 x 1.35 4 x (1.35)2 4 x (1.35)3
- (1.18) (1.18)2
(1.18)3 - 4 x (1.35)4 4 x (1.35)5
- (1.18)4 (1.18)5
- 30.5
- PV5 ((4 x (1.35)5 x 1.05)) / (.12 - .05)
117.65 - (1.18)5
- P0 PV1-5 PV5 30.5 117.65 148.15
28Solving Variable Growth Model Example Using A
Growing Annuity
- P0,FCFF High Growth Period
Terminal Period - (Growth Annuity)
(Constant Growth Model) - P0,FCFF FCFF0(1 g) x 1 (1 g)/(1
WACC)n FCFFn x (1 g)/(WACC - g)
- (WACC g)
(1 WACC)n - 4.00 (1.35) x 1 (1.35/1.18)5
(4.00 x 1.355 x 1.05/(.12 - .05) - (.18 - .35)
1.185
- -.91.8 x -.96 117.65
- 30.50 117.65
- 148.15
29Determining Growth Rates
- Key premise A firms value can be approximated
by the sum of the high growth plus a stable
growth period. - Key risks Sensitivity of terminal values to
choice of assumptions about stable growth rate
and discount rates used in both the terminal and
annual cash flow periods. - Stable growth rate The firms growth rate that
is expected to last forever. Generally equal to
or less than the industry or overall economys
growth rate. For multinational firms, the growth
rate is the world economys rate of growth. - Length of the high growth period The greater the
current growth rate of a firms cash flow
relative to the stable growth rate, the longer
the high growth period.
30Choosing the Correct Tax Rate(Marginal or
Effective)
- Effective rates are those a firm is actually
paying after allowable deductions (e.g.,
investment tax credits) and deferrals (e.g.,
accelerated depreciation) - Marginal tax rates are those paid on the last
dollar of income earned - Zero and Constant Growth Models In calculating
valuation cash flows, use marginal tax rates1 - Variable Growth Model In calculating valuation
cash flows, - Use effective rates to calculate annual cash
flows when effective rates are less than marginal
rates and - Use marginal rates in calculating terminal period
cash flows.1 - 1The use of effective tax rates during the
terminal or an indefinite growth period implies
the firm will defer - the payment of taxes indefinitely.
31Practice Exercise
- Free cash flow to equity last year was 4
million. It is expected to grow by 20 in the
current year, at a 15 rate annually for the next
five years, and then assume a more normal 4
growth rate thereafter. The firms cost of
equity is 10 and weighted average cost of
capital is 8 during the high growth period and
then drop to 8 and 6, respectively, during the
normal growth period. What is the present value
of the firm to equity investors (equity value)?
If the market value of the firms debt is 10
million, what is the present value of the firm
(enterprise value)?
32Variable Growth Model Example Solution
- PV1-5 4 x 1.2 x 1.15 4 x 1.2 x (1.15)2 4
x 1.2 x (1.15)3 - (1.10)
(1.10)2 (1.10)3 - 4 x 1.2 x (1.15)4 4 x 1.2 x
(1.15)5 - (1.10)4
(1.10)5 - 27.47
- PV5 ((4 x 1.2 x (1.15)5 x 1.04)) / (.08 -
.04) 155.86 - (1.10)5
- P0 PV1-5 PV5 27.47 155.86
183.33 (equity value) - P0 183.33 10 193.33 (enterprise
value)1 - 1Recall that the enterprise value of a firm is
equal to the sum of the value of its equity and
debt.
33Adjusting Firm Value
- Generally, the value of the firms equity is the
sum of the present value of the firms operating
assets and liabilities plus terminal value (i.e.,
enterprise value) less market value of firms
long-term debt. - However, value may be under or overstated if not
adjusted for present value of non-operating
assets and liabilities assumed by the acquirer. - PVFCFE PVFCFF (incl. terminal value) PVD
PVNOA PVNOL - where PVFCFE PV of free cash flow to
equity investors - PVFCFF PV of free cash flow to
the firm (i.e., enterprise - value)
- PVD PV of debt
- PVNOA PV of non-operating
assets - PVNOL PV of non-operating
liabilities
34Adjusting Firm Value Example
- A target firm has the following characteristics
- An estimated enterprise value of 104 million
- Long-term debt whose market value is 15 million
- 3 million in excess cash balances
- Estimated PV of currently unused licenses of 4
million - Estimated PV of future litigation costs of 2.5
million - 2 million common shares outstanding
- What is the value of the target firm per common
share?
35Adjusting Firm Value Example Contd.
Enterprise Value 104
Plus Non-Operating Assets Excess Cash Balances PV of Licenses 3 4
Less Non-Operating Liabilities PV of Potential Litigation 2.5
Less Long-Term Debt 15
Equals Equity Value 93.5
Equity Value Per Share 46.75
36Things to Remember
- Zero growth model Cash flow is expected to
remain constant in perpetuity. - Constant growth model Cash flow is expected to
grow at a constant rate. - Variable growth model Cash flow exhibits both a
high and a stable growth period. - Total present value represents the sum of the
discounted value of the cash flows over both
periods. - The terminal value frequently accounts for most
of the total present value calculation and is
highly sensitive to the choice of growth and
discount rates.