Title: Most Industries
1Most Industries
Pure Competition
Monopoly
Market Structures
2100
50
Percent share of the market
0
Page Down to advance the presentation
3Monopolistic Competition
- Defining characteristics
- 1. A relatively large number of sellers
- 2. Easy entry to, and exit from, the industry
- 3. Product differentiation
- The first and second characteristics provide the
competitive aspect of monopolistic competition. - The third characteristic contributes the
monopolistic aspect.
4A Prevalent Market Structure
- From mattresses to mens suits, from book
publishing to paperboard boxes, and from
upholstered furniture to fur goods, all these
industries are monopolistically competitive. - So are the industries producing the several
hundred magazines on a newsstand rack and the
fifty or so competing brands of personal
computers.
5Other Industries
- Numerous brands of gasoline
- Several grocery stores in a neighborhood
competing on the basis of location and brand
name.
6Monopolistic Competition Versus Oligopoly
- Perhaps the best way to understand monopolistic
competition is to focus on the differences
between monopolistic competition and oligopoly on
the one hand and monopolistic competition and
perfect competition on the other hand. - There are three key differences between oligopoly
and monopolistic competition.
7Small Market Share
- First, a monopolistically competitive industry is
relatively unconcentrated. - Each firm in a monopolistically competitive
industry has a comparatively small percentage of
the total market so that each has limited control
over market price.
Page Down to advance the presentation
8In Contrast
- Market concentration in an oligopoly is
relatively high and so, too, is the oligopolists
price making power. - This is because there are only a small number of
firms in concentrated oligopoly so that each has
a relatively large share of the market.
Page Down to advance the presentation
9The Concentration Ratio
- The four-firm concentration ratio is defined as
the percent of total industry output accounted
for by the four largest firms.
Page Down to advance the presentation
10The Widget Industry
- Firm Output
- Firm 1 25
- Firm 2 20
- Firm 3 15
- Firm 4 10
- Firm 5 8
- Firm 6 7
- Firm 7 5
- Firm 8 5
- Firm 9 3
- Firm 10 2
- Concentration Ratios
- (Percent of industry output supplied by the
largest few firms) - c4
q1 q2 q3 q4 Q
Page Down to advance the presentation
11The Widget Industry
- Firm Output
- Firm 1 25
- Firm 2 20
- Firm 3 15
- Firm 4 10
- Firm 5 8
- Firm 6 7
- Firm 7 5
- Firm 8 5
- Firm 9 3
- Firm 10 2
- Concentration Ratios
- (Percent of industry output supplied by the
largest few firms) - c4
-
-
-
70
q1 q2 q3 q4 Q
25201510_ 100
Page Down to advance the presentation
12 Percentage of industry output produced by the
Industry four largest firms.
Chewing Gum 96 Household laundry
equipment 93 Cigarettes 92 Electric lamps
(bulbs) 91 Motor vehicles 90 Small arms
ammunition 88 Primary copper 87 Breakfast
cereals 87 Beer and malt beverages 87 Household
refrigerators 85 Greeting card publishing 85 Book
publishing 24 Upholstered furniture 24 Wood
furniture 20 Metal house furniture 18 Paperboard
boxes 16 Bolts, nuts, and rivets 16 Fur
goods 16 Womens and misses suits and
coats 13 Metal doors 13 Womens and misses
dresses 6
Page Down to advance the presentation
13 Percentage of industry output produced by the
Industry four largest firms.
Chewing Gum 96 Household laundry
equipment 93 Cigarettes 92 Electric lamps
(bulbs) 91 Motor vehicles 90 Small arms
ammunition 88 Primary copper 87 Breakfast
cereals 87 Beer and malt beverages 87 Household
refrigerators 85 Greeting card publishing 85 Book
publishing 24 Upholstered furniture 24 Wood
furniture 20 Metal house furniture 18 Paperboard
boxes 16 Bolts, nuts, and rivets 16 Fur
goods 16 Womens and misses suits and
coats 13 Metal doors 13 Womens and misses
dresses 6
An indicator of strategic interaction.
Page Down to advance the presentation
14Strategic Interaction
- Describes how each firms business strategy
depends on their rivals strategies. - As the number of firms in an industry shrinks and
industry concentration grows, each firm is more
likely to base pricing and output decisions on
how other firms in the industry are likely to
respond.
Page Down to advance the presentation
15Mutual Interdependence
- Each firm is more likely to want to collude with
the others when setting price and quantity, where
collusion may be defined as the concerted action
by firms to restrict output and fix price. - This observation leads to two additional
important distinctions between oligopoly and
monopolistic competition.
Page Down to advance the presentation
16Collusion
- Because of the small number of firms in an
oligopoly, collusion is possible. - However, the relatively large number of firms in
a monopolistically competitive industry ensures
that collusion is all but impossible.
Page Down to advance the presentation
17Independent Action
- At the same time, with numerous firms in the
industry, there is no feeling of mutual
interdependence among them. - Each firm determines its policies without
considering possible reactions of its rivals. - This a very reasonable way to act in a market in
which there are numerous rivals.
Page Down to advance the presentation
18For Example
- The 10 or 15 percent increase in sales which a
firm may realize by cutting prices will be spread
so thinly over its 20, 40, or 100 rivals that,
for all practical purposes, the impact on their
sales will be imperceptible. - Rivals reactions can be ignored because the
impact of one firms actions on each of its many
rivals is so small that these rivals will have no
reason to react. - This is certainly not the case with oligopoly.
Page Down to advance the presentation
19Monopolistic Competition Versus Perfect
Competition
- Now that we know some of the ways that oligopoly
and monopolistic competition differ, what can we
say about the difference between monopolistic
competition and perfect competition?
20Monopolistic Competition
- Resembles perfect competition in three ways
- there are numerous buyers and sellers
- entry and exit are easy
- and firms are price takers
- The big difference, however, is that with
monopolistic competition, there is product
differentiation.
Page Down to advance the presentation
21Price Competition
- Purely competitive firms produce a standardized
or homogeneous product. - This means that consumers will have no basis
other than price for preferring one firms
product over anothers and price competition is
the norm.
Page Down to advance the presentation
22Nonprice Competition
- Monopolistically competitive producers turn out
many variations of a particular product. - Because of such product differentiation,
consumers have reasons other than price to prefer
one product over another so that economic rivalry
typically takes the form of nonprice competition.
Page Down to advance the presentation
23Put Another Way
- Competition comes primarily in the way that firms
differentiate their products, and such
differentiation can be accomplished in many ways - From product quality and conditions of sale and
service to location and advertising and packaging.
Page Down to advance the presentation
241 Differences in Actual Quality
- Product differentiation may take the form of
differences in actual product quality due to
engineering, processing, or styling differences.
25- Personal computers differ in terms of hardware
capacity, software, graphics, and how user
friendly they are.
- Burgers differ on leanness of beef, size of bun,
and whether it is broiled or fried.
26- Plain old aspirin may be enhanced by buffered
compounds to prevent stomach aches or caffeine to
keep you awake.
- Detergents may be specially formulated for use in
cold or hard water. - Beer might have less alcohol or more malt.
27With Durable Goods
- Different brands can differ in hundreds if not
thousands of ways -- from styling and horsepower
to airbags, gas mileage, and stereo systems.
Page Down to advance the presentation
282 Conditions Of Sale And Service
- Beyond physical characteristics and product
quality, products may also be differentiated in
other ways such as the amount of service and the
conditions of sale.
Page Down to advance the presentation
29For Example
- One auto dealer might offer low interest
financing and free service while another might
feature multi-year warranties. - One grocery store may stress the helpfulness of
the clerks that bag your groceries while a
warehouse may leave the bagging and carrying to
you but offer lower prices. - And one pizza restaurant might tout its fast
delivery while another touts its fat mushrooms
and thick crust.
Page Down to advance the presentation
303 Location And Accessability
- Small mini-groceries or convenience stores
successfully compete with the big supermarkets
even though they offer much less choice and much
higher prices. - But they can do so because they are often closer
to customers and stay open for 24 hours.
- A gas stations proximity to a freeway or busy
intersection gives it a locational advantage
which may allow it to sell gas at a higher price
than could a gas station several miles away.
Page Down to advance the presentation
314 Advertising And Packaging
- While product quality, conditions of sale, and
location are all important sources of product
differentiation based on real differences between
products, such is not always the case with the
fourth major source of product differentiation
advertising and packaging and the use of brand
names and trademarks.
32- While there are many aspirin-type products,
promotion and advertising may convince headache
sufferers that Bayer or Anacin are superior and
worth a higher price than a generic substitute.
33- A celebritys name associated with jeans or
perfume may enhance those products while a
tobacco or auto company that associates their
product with greater sex appeal may get a leg up
on its competitors.
Page Down to advance the presentation
34Product Differentiation
S
p1
Price
D
q1
quantity
35Product Differentiation
S
p1
Price
q1
Page Down to advance the presentation
quantity
36Product Differentiation
S
Price
Demand curve facing seller of an undifferentiated
product
q1
Page Down to advance the presentation
quantity
37Strategic Opportunities
- Increased inelasticity increases the strategic
opportunities of the firm. - Rather than being a price taker, the
monopolistically competitive firm becomes a price
maker, albeit with less flexibility than a pure
monopolist. - Because the firm can now react to changing market
conditions by changing the traits of its product,
it can also engage in nonprice competition.
Page Down to advance the presentation
38Monopolistic Competition And Market Conduct
- So how, then, can we expect monopolistically
competitive firms to behave? - Lets first rule out the prospect of any
collusion among firms in the industry to fix
prices. - This is for two reasons.
39Why Collusion is Difficult
- First, by definition, there is a very large
number of firms in the industry so collusion is
very difficult. - Second, even if the large number of firms in an
industry were to successfully collude, they
wouldnt be able to stop a flood of new firms
from entering the market to take advantage of any
collusive monopoly pricing. - This is because, again by definition, with
monopolistic competition, entry is easy.
Page Down to advance the presentation
40Noncollusive olligopoly
- For these two reasons, monopolistic competition
is sometimes called noncollusive oligopoly. - Market conduct is very different in the presence
versus the absence of collusion.
41The Short Vs. Long Run
- In the short run, monopolistic competitors may
well earn monopoly profits under certain
circumstances. - In long run equilibrium, economic profits in the
industry will be driven to zero just as in
perfect competition.
Page Down to advance the presentation
42An Important Difference
- Nonetheless, there is an important difference
between perfect competition and monopolistic
competition in the long run and it is this
Under monopolistic competition, prices will be
above marginal cost, indicating a deadweight
efficiency loss.
Page Down to advance the presentation
43The Computer Industry
- And you may already know this story about two
American business heroes.
- Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak started off in their
garage making what turned out to be the Apple I
computer, and they grew fabulously wealthy doing
it.
44d
MC
Monopolistic competition before entry
G
P2
AC
Price
H
P1
B
d
MR
Q1
Q2
Quantity
- What is the price and quantity in this industry
and what are the economic profits? - a) Price is P1, quantity is Q1 and economic
profits are BHG. Price is set where MC
intersects dd. - b) Price is P2 , quantity is Q2 , and economic
profits are P1P2GB. Price is set where MR equals
MC. - c) If I had a computer, I could figure it out.
Page Down to advance the presentation
45d
MC
Monopolistic competition before entry
G
P2
AC
Price
H
P1
B
d
MR
Q1
Q2
Quantity
- What is the price and quantity in this industry
and why and what are the economic profits? - a) Price is P1, quantity is Q1 and economic
profits are BHG. Price is set where MC
intersects dd. - b) Price is P2 , quantity is Q2 , and economic
profits are P1P2GB. Price is set where MR equals
MC. - c) If I had a computer, I could figure it out.
Page Down to advance the presentation
46d
MC
Monopolistic competition after entry
AC
Price
G
d
MR
Quantity
- At what point will entry cease?
- a) Entry will cease when each seller has been
forced into a long-run, no-profit tangency such
as at G'. - b) Entry will cease where MC equals AC.
- c) Entry will cease when Bill Gates says it will.
Page Down to advance the presentation
47d
MC
Monopolistic competition after entry
AC
Price
G
d
MR
Quantity
- At what point will entry cease?
- a) Entry will cease when each seller has been
forced into a long-run, no-profit tangency such
as at G'. - b) Entry will cease where MC equals AC.
- c) Entry will cease when Bill Gates says it will.
Page Down to advance the presentation
48d
MC
Monopolistic competition after entry
AC
Price
G
P1
d
PMC
MR
Quantity
- Each producer is on the left-hand declining
branch of its long run average cost curve. - What do you think this means for market
performance.
Page Down to advance the presentation
49d
MC
Monopolistic competition after entry
AC
Price
G
Page Down to advance the presentation
P1
A
d
PMC
MR
Quantity
- In the long run, monopolistic competition is
neither allocatively or productively efficient. - An underallocation of resources occurs in the
industry because the product price exceeds
marginal cost. - Productive efficiency is not realized because
production occurs at point G' where the average
total cost exceeds the minimum attainable cost at
Point A.
50Nonprice Competition And Excessive Advertising
- The fact that that monopolistic competition is
both allocatively and productively inefficient
relative to the perfect competition result is not
the only problem with market performance. - At least some economists argue that monopolistic
competition leads to both excessive advertising
and needless brand proliferation.
Page Down to advance the presentation
51Increased Profits
- This possibility follows directly from the fact
that in the long run, economic profits are zero.
- Firms will engage in additional product
differentiation and development and rely upon
advertising to create real or perceived
differences in their product with consumers. - While it is true that these efforts will cost
money, they also increase demand and demand
inelasticity so that in some circumstances, a
firm can improve its profit position.
Page Down to advance the presentation
52Brand Proliferation
- Such market conduct is not always graded as a
plus by economists. - Economists usually have to point no further than
the cereal aisle at their local supermarket where
a dizzying array of brands proliferate.
53In Fact
- It is hard to argue that being able to choose
over 50 different ways to eat sugared grain adds
significantly to societal welfare.
- Or having a different brand of gasoline available
on every corner of an intersection .
54Diversity Can Be Good
- Reducing the number of monopolistic competitors,
while cutting costs, might well end up lowering
consumer welfare because it would reduce the
diversity of available goods and services.
55The Communist Example
- To bolster this argument, economists need point
no further than the globes centrally planned,
socialist and communist economies which have
tried to standardize output on a small number of
varieties and, in the process, left consumers
highly unsatisfied.
56In Conclusion
- Of course, we will not settle this debate here.
- Instead, I will simply end this lesson by asking
you to reflect on this economic food for thought.
57End Of Lesson
Lecturer Peter Navarro Multimedia Designer Ron
Kahr Female Voiceover Ashley West Leonard