Title: Aging and Other Life History Characters
1Aging and Other Life History Characters
2What is life history?
- Life histories describe
- Age at maturity (age of 1st reproduction) (early
or late) - Reproductive patterns (reproduce once or many
times) - Number of offspring (many or few)
- Size of offspring (large or small)
- Life span (short or long)
- Life history is a description of the way in which
organisms realize their fitness - Life history components are fitness components
3Life histories and trade-offs
- Because the amount of energy than an organism can
harvest is finite, life histories inevitably
involve trade-offs - many small vs. few large offspring
- rapid reproduction and shorter life span vs.
slower reproduction and longer life span - Natural selection should attempt to adjust the
allocation of energy between growth, metabolism,
repair, and reproduction in such a way as to
maximize total lifetime reproduction ( fitness)
4The life history of a hypothetical female
Virginia opossum (Austad 1988, 1993) (fig. 12.2)
5Life history theory attempts to answer questions
such as the following
- Why do we age (senesce)?
- Why do some species reproduce only once while
other reproduce repeatedly? - Why do some species have many small offspring
while others have only a few relatively large
ones? - Why do some take a long time to reach
reproductive maturity, others only a short time?
6Aging and life spanwhat is aging?
- Mortality senescence
- Decrease in the probability of survival, per unit
time, as age increases - Reproductive senescence
- Decrease in reproduction with increasing age
7Survivorship Patterns
- px is the probability of surviving from age x to
x1
8Survivorship Patterns
- px is the probability of surviving from age x to
x1
9Survivorship Patterns
- px is the probability of surviving from age x to
x1
10Mortality Patterns
- qx is the probability of dying in the age
interval x to x1 ( 1 - px)
11Aging in collared flycatchers natural population
(Gustafsson Part 1990) (Fig. 12.4 a)
12Aging in red deer natural population
(Clutton-Brock et al. 1988) (Fig. 12.4 b)
13Aging in D. melanogaster laboratory population
(Rose 1984) (Fig. 12.4 c)
14Rate-of-living theory of aginglive fast, die
young
- Aging is caused by accumulation of irreparable
damage to cells and tissues - Damage is caused by errors in replication,
transcription and translation and by toxic
metabolic by-products (oxidative damage, etc.) - All organisms have been selected to resist and
repair cell and tissue damage to the maximum
extent physiologically possible. They lack the
genetic variation that would enable them to
evolve more effective repair mechanisms than they
already have.
15Predictions of the rate-of-living theory of aging
- Because cell and tissue damage is caused in part
by the by-products of metabolism, the aging rate
should be correlated with the metabolic rate, or,
equivalently, different species (within broad
taxonomic groups) should have similar per gram
total lifetime energy expenditures - Because organisms have been selected to resist
and repair damage to the maximum extent possible,
species should not be able to evolve longer life
spans
16The data suggest that prediction (1) is not
upheld (Austad Fischer 1991) (Fig. 12.5)
- Bats, in particular, live almost 3 times longer
than other mammals of similar size and metabolic
rate - Marsupials have significantly lower metabolic
rates than other mammals of the same size, but
also have significantly shorter life spans
17Experiments show that prediction (2) is not
upheld (Luckinbill et al. 1984) (Fig. 12.6)
Life span of D. melanogaster is easily increased
by selection in the laboratory. This means that
there is heritable genetic variation for life
span.
18The telomere theory of aging
- Telomeres are tandemly repeated nucleotide
sequences that are placed on the ends of
eukaryotic chromosomes by the enzyme telomerase
(TTAGGG in humans) - Telomeres are necessary because linear
chromosomes shorten with each round of
replication. Without them, chromosomes would
erode away - Telomerase is not expressed in most somatic cells
- This means that somatic cells can undergo a
limited number of mitotic divisions - Under this theory, individuals age because they
can no longer replace damaged and worn-out cells
19A prediction based on the telomere theory of
aging
- If life span is limited by the number of cell
divisions, and different species have similar
numbers of cell divisions before telomeres are
eroded away, then the life spans of whole
organisms should be correlated with the life
spans of their constituent cells
20Life span of cells and whole organisms (Rhome
1981) (Fig. 12.7)
21The paradox of aging 1
- The rate-of-aging and telomerase theories address
the physiological, cellular and molecular causes
of aging whether correct or not, they leave an
important question unanswered - If laboratory fruit fly populations can evolve
longer life spans, and bats have evolved longer
life spans than other mammals of similar size and
metabolic rate, and genetic engineers can
increase the number of times cells can divide by
artificially increasing telomerase expression,
why has natural selection not produced longer
life spans in all species?
22The paradox of aging 2
- All other things being equal, longer life span
and high levels of reproduction into late age
will equal greater fitness. Given that aging
(senescence) reduces individual fitness and given
that there is genetic variance for life span, why
doesnt natural selection reduce or eliminate
aging? - To answer this question, we need an evolutionary
theory of senescence
23The evolutionary theory of senescence
- Senescence occurs because the force of
selection declines with advancing age. - W. D. Hamilton 1966. The moulding of
senescence by natural selection. J. Theoret.
Biol. 1212-45
24A verbal argument
- Death before reproduction zero fitness
- Death after reproduction begins greater than
zero fitness - Therefore natural selection will work most
effectively against lethal mutations that kill
before reproduction begins, but less effectively
against lethals that act later in life. - If harmful genetic effects are expressed late
enough in life, selection against them will be
negligible because most individuals carrying the
harmful alleles will already have died from other
causes (predation, accident, etc.)
25A hypothetical non-senescent life history
(constant survivorship, constant reproduction for
ages 3, all individuals die before age 16)
(Fig. 12.9 a)
26A hypothetical non-senescent life history
(constant survivorship, constant reproduction for
ages 3, all individuals die before age 14)
(Fig. 12.9 b)
27A hypothetical non-senescent life history
(constant survivorship, constant reproduction for
ages 2, all individuals die before age 10)
(Fig. 12.9 c)
28Evolutionary genetic mechanisms
- Mutation accumulation
- Peter Medawar (1952) senescence due to
deleterious alleles with effects confined to late
ages senescence evolves because natural
selection is powerless to prevent it - Antagonistic pleiotropy (trade-offs)
- George Williams (1957) senescence due to
alleles with beneficial effects early in life but
deleterious pleiotropic effects late in life
senescence is selectively advantageous
29An implication of the evolutionary analysis
- The rate of senescence of an organism should
evolve by natural selection in response to
environmental changes that alter the schedule of
survivorship and fecundity e.g., if the
environmental force of mortality declines so that
survivorship to later ages is increased, then
selection should favor reduced rates of
senescence (and vice versa).
30Experimental evolution of life span in D.
melanogaster
Wild population (S. Amherst, MA)
Laboratory population (IV) (B. Charlesworth, 1975)
B selection 5 replicate populations (B1 B5) 2
-wk discrete generations
O selection 5 replicate populations (O1 O5) 10
12 wk discrete generations
(M. Rose, 1984)
31Evolution of life span in laboratory populations
of D. melanogaster (Service, Michieli, and
McGill. 1998. Evolution 521844-1850). B
populations are maintained on a 2-wk generation
time and O populations are maintined on 10 12
wk generation times, which selects for longer
life span. The b parameter describes the rate
of increase in mortality rate with age higher
values equal more rapid mortality senescence.
One-way ANOVA (df 1, 7) was used to test for
differences between selection regimes. Life
span F 207.36, P lt 0.0001 b F 94.82, P lt
0.0001 Population Cohort Life
span b size (days) Short-generation
B1 231 26.3 0.280 B2 167 26.2 0.318 B3 231 22.4
0.309 B4 196 24.8 0.274 B5 235 27.4 0.243 B
mean 25.4 0.285 Long-generation
O2 263 53.6 0.072 O3 289 65.2 0.062 O4 409 60.9
0.101 O5 307 63.7 0.128 O mean 60.9 0.091
32Mortality rate vs. age in fly populations that
have evolved different life spans
- B flies are selected on short generation times
O flies are selected on long generation times - (Service, Michieli, and McGill. 1998. Evolution
521844-1850)
33Female egg laying vs. age in fly populations that
have evolved different life spans - evidence for
antagonistic pleiotropy between early age
reproduction and life span
- B flies (solid squares) are selected on short
generation times O flies (open squares) are
selected on long generation times - (Service, Michieli, and McGill. 1998. Evolution
521844-1850)
34Laboratory evolution of life span in D.
melanogaster (Luckinbill et al. 1984) (Fig. 12.6)
35Increase in inbreeding depression with age is
consistent with the mutation accumulation
mechanism of senescence (Hughes et al. 2002)
(Fig. 12.10)
36Decrease in life span in houseflies when adults
live 4 days is consistent with mutation
accumulation (Reed and Bryant 2000) (Fig. 12.11)
37Antagonistic pleiotropy in the age-1 gene of C.
elegans (Walker et al. 2000) (Fig. 12.12)
- Frequency of life-extending hx546 allele with no
food shortage - Frequency of hx546 allele when environment is
degraded
38A phenotypic trade-off between early age and
later age reproduction in collared flycatchers
(Gustafsson Part 1990) (Fig. 12.13)
- Females that reproduce at age 1, have fewer
offspring later in life - Females given extra offspring to raise at age 1,
lay fewer eggs in subsequent years
39How many offspring should an individual produce
in a given year?
- Clutch size in birds and Lacks hypothesis (David
Lack 1947) - Clutch size should be such that it maximizes the
number of surviving offspring
40A mathematical treatment of Lacks hypothesis
(Fig. 12.16)
- Given the relationship between clutch size and
the probability of survival of individual
offspring, the clutch size that maximizes the
number of surviving offspring is 5
41Most birds lay smaller clutches than predicted by
Lacks hypothesis
Clutch size and number of young per clutch in
great tits (Boyce and Perrins 1987) (Fig. 12.17)
42Reasons why birds may not behave according to
Lacks hypothesis
- Lacks hypothesis assumes that there is no
trade-off between reproduction in one year and
the next - Lacks hypothesis assumes that the only effect of
clutch size on the offspring is through their
survivorship
Clutch size of mothers affects clutch size of
daughters in collared flycatchers (Schluter
Gustafsson 1993) (Fig. 12.18)