Title: 1491 and beyond: of paradise, purgatory and hells
11491 and beyond of paradise, purgatory and
hells Main points
- 1. 1491 Americas paradise for some,
purgatory for manyeven at Machu Picchu, the
Incas paradise. - 2. 1492 Demographic disaster cannot be
explained by disease alone - 3. The virgin soil thesis (European diseases
were new to the Americas, causing catastrophic
mortality) may be correct for small populations,
but not for large ones Mexico, Peru - Caribbean first smallpox epidemic 1518, 26
years after demographic catastrophe - Mexico
- 2 of 3 major epidemics in 16th century Mexico
were native diseases - Smallpox struck only twice in 16th century 1520,
1538 - Peru
- Disaster began before virgin soil epidemics
struck - Smallpox first appeared in Peru in 1558, after
the demographic catastrophe - 4. Reflections
- Pre-1492 American populations were fragile, high
pressure demographic systems. - Post-1492 European diseases were deadly their
effects were heightened by - the catastrophes of conquest and colonization
- and the fact that natives did not know how to
protect against European diseases or care for the
ill.
2Demographic catastrophe and its causes
viruses, mistreatment and the social context of
epidemics
- Mexico Alonso de Zorita (1565) ...and
it is certain that from the day that D. Hernando
Cortes, the Marquis del Valle, entered this land
...the natives suffered many deaths, and many
terrible dealings, robberies and oppressions were
inflicted on them, taking advantage of their
persons and their lands, without order, weight
nor measure ...the people diminished in great
number, as much due to excessive taxes and
mistreatment, as to illness and smallpox, such
that now a very great and notable fraction of the
people are gone, and especially in the hot
country.
31491 and beyond of Paradise,Purgatory and Hells
- 1. Ancient America was no paradise
- slow rate of natural increase
- widespread paleo-pathologies
- diminishing height over millennia due to enormous
dependence on corn (2/3rds 3/4ths of diet) - 2. Demographic catastrophe of Christian conquest
and colonization - 3. Causes of catastrophe
- Virgin soil epidemics (European diseases,
smallpox)? - War?
- Exploitation?
41491 Pristine Paradise? (1491, C.C. Mann,
Knopf 2005)Followed by tragedy!
- 1. Ancient America was no paradise
- slow rate of natural increase
- widespread paleopathologies
- diminishing height
- 2. Demographic catastrophe of Christian conquest
and colonization - 3. Causes of catastrophe Virgin soil
epidemics? Exploitation? Care?
The Backbone of History Health and Nutrition in
the Western Hemisphere (Cambridge 2002pbk 2005)
5Basin of Mexico a long view
6Shovel shaped incisorsgenetictrait of Native
Americans
7Fertility (average no. of daughters) in Ancient
Americas Low fertility Foragers and Fishers
2.3-2.6Highest Villagers 2.6-2.8Lowest
Urban 2.2-2.5
8Hard Times in Ancient Mexico
- Epidemics happened (e.g., matlazahuatl, a severe
form of typhus?), but not European crowd diseases
like smallpox, measles, malaria, yellow fever, or
bubonic plague. - Epidemics in 1450, 1456, 1496, and 1507
(according to Anales de Cuahtitlan) - Theres hardly a person who walks who doesnt
complain of the bowels. - Skeletal archaeology shows porotic hyperostosis
as nearly universal (due to extreme dependence on
corn).
91rabbit(1454)agreathungerkilledmany of
the people
10Porotic Hyperostosis a physiological
adaptation to inadequate absorption of oxygen
- High frequency 1/3 1/12 of adults in these
communities show signs of extraordinary bone
remodeling. - Increase over time as the transition to
sedentary agriculture proceeded, physiological
conditions worsened. - No gendered difference A near complete absence
of sex differentials in pathologies is
surprising.
11Degenerative joint disease (DJD)
- One or two in five of adults of both sexes
suffered from degenerative joint disease. - From age 20, hard, repetitive work exacted severe
wear on both sexes, particularly of joints
required for mobility, manipulation of objects,
and carrying loads. - Sex differences the only statistically
significant gender difference in pathologies
discovered so far are in DJD and cranial
fractures.
12Degenerative joint disease (DJD), spinepicture
worsens
- Generally high levels ranging from 25 to 83 for
adults from the Mesoamerican sites leave little
doubt about the ubiquity of an affliction (DJD)
which is principally due to hard labor. - Where the means of carrying heavy burdens is
almost solely the human body as in Ancient
Americas, an enormous biological cost is exacted
from the organism.
13Stature, 3 features stand out
- 1. Males decline over time in mean height (1
cm. per thousand years)--due to worsening
nutrition? - 2. Female stature constant over time even from
pre-historic period. - 3. Decreasing male stature from north (164 cm)
to south (161 cm).
14Fertility (average no. of daughters) in Ancient,
Classic and Post-Columbian Americas Lowest
Early (4000 BC 800 AD) 2.1-2.3Higher
Classic (800-1500) 2.8-2.9Little change
Post-Columbian 2.8-3.0
15Machu-Picchu Paradise of the Incas, but
conditions were not ideal
- Dental disease (caries, abscesses) ubiquitous
and life threatening - Dental hypoplasia and cribra orbitalia
(nutritional stress) - Tuberculosis without a doubt
- Porotic hyperostosis common
- Skeletal fractures common
- Arthritis (hard work) not common!Machu Picchu
images
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24(No Transcript)
25(No Transcript)
26Background demography Ancient Americas
pre-1492, a high pressure demographic system
- Crude birth rate 50-60 per thousand
- Early, universal marriage (vs. Western Europe
with late marriage, and high celibate) - Total fertility rate 6-8 children (higher than
Europe, TFR of lt6 children) - Crude death rate 45-55 per thousand
27Precocious marriage among the Aztecs
- The Codex Mendoza (1540) shows the life stages of
boys and girls marriage is celebrated at age 15
(and not at 18, 20 or 25 as often stated by
historians)
28Marriage (at 15)
15
29Female age at marriage Italy (lower pressure)
vs. Mexico (higher pressure)
- Italy Florence Prato 1372 16.31427 17
.6 years 1427 17.6 1458 19.5 1480 20.8 147
0 21.1 - Mexico AztecsCodex Mendoza (urban, 1540) 15
yearsNahuatl censuses (rural, 1538) 12.8
30Thomas Robert Malthus, Essay on the Principle of
Population (1798)
- Two checks to population growth
- positive (1st ed.) famine, epidemics, war
- preventive (2nd ed., 1803) moral
restraint--delayed marriage, chastity - Malthus, the optimist with education, masses
would adopt middle class fertility - education --gt
- higher wages --gt
- taste for conveniences ---gt
- later marriage, smaller families
31Museo de Antropología, Mexico City Here is the
house of someone named...
and translated
...transcribed
32Household H-389 people, 3 generations
33Rules of household formation among rural
Aztecs.The head is
- 1. male (311 of 315 households)
- 2. married (97) or recently widowed (3).
- 3. the one who has the most sons resident (or who
has the oldest son resident).
34The Amerindian mode of reproduction
- 1. Precocious marriage a solution to high
mortality, a high pressure demographic regime
(paleolithic). - 2. Societies that did not learn to maximize their
reproduction, disappeared. - 3. Those that did, survived--and survived the
biological conquest of the Americas, the
greatest demographic catastrophe in human
history (Woodrow Borah).
351491 Pristine Paradise?Followed by tragedy!
- 1. Ancient America was no paradiseslow rate of
natural increasewidespread paleopathologiesdimin
ishing height - 2. Demographic catastrophe of Christian conquest
and colonization - 3. Causes of catastrophe Virgin soil
epidemics? Exploitation? Care?
36Demographic catastrophe in 16th century Mexico
50 decline
37First epidemic, 1520
- Large bumps spread on people, some were entirely
covered. They spread everywhere, on the face,
the head, the chest, etc. The disease brought
great desolation a great many died of it. - --Sahagun, General History
38Codice Santa Mariadarkened faces show
deathsmany due to cocoliztli, 1546
391491 Pristine Paradise?Followed by tragedy!
- 1. Ancient America was no paradiseslow rate of
natural increasewidespread paleopathologiesdimin
ishing height - 2. Demographic catastrophe of Christian conquest
and colonization - 3. Causes of catastrophe Virgin soil
epidemics? Exploitation? Lack of Care?
40Demographic catastrophe Due to virgin soil
epidemics?Or/and war, exploitation,
environmental disruption?
- Smallpox Epidemic of 1520 was devastating 1538
less so. Only 3 in 100 yrs. - More severe was native diseases cocoliztli of
1545-6 and matlazahuatl of 1577-79 - Most chroniclers list few epidemics of European
origin - Exploitation weakened native population
41Fr. Bernardino de Sahaguns General History
(Florentine Codex, 1576), native voices smallpox
epidemic of 1520 in Mexico
- Mexico, 1520
- ...Indeed many people died of them (pustules),
and many just died of hunger. There was death
from hunger there was no one to take care of
another there was no one to attend to another.
421157 BC Earliest recorded case of smallpox,
Egyptian Pharaoh Rameses V, died
Last case of smallpox, Oct. 26, 1977Ali Maow
Maalin (Somalia), survived
43Smallpox at day 9 and day 20
44Pox myths a. chronology
False
- ...on the very evening that the Aztecs drove the
conquistadors out of what is now Mexico City
June 30, 1520, killing many while routing the
rest, a smallpox epidemic began. --Oldstone,
Viruses, Plagues and History (Oxford, 1998
derived from McNeils Plagues and People)
same exaggeration in Tucker, Scourge (2001).
45First epidemic little effect on the outcome of
the conquest
- Chronology
- Spaniards defeated June 30, 1520
- Smallpox epidemic erupted in late Sept.
- Ended in December
- Siege of Mexico City began April, 1521.
- Mexico City fell August 14, 1521.
- Hugh Thomas, Conquest of Mexico (1993)
Extravagant the notion that the smallpox
epidemic had an effect on the outcome of the
conquest.
461520 Death of Montezumas successor, from
smallpox
he governed only 80 days
corpse enshrouded in glyphs for smallpox
47Rhetorical exaggeration vs. evidence
False
- Smallpox epidemic of 1520 raged across the
continent, but note how slowly it spread from
Veracruz to Mexico City, 300 miles, 4 to 5
months (May to September or October). - In Mexico, ever since 1520, the natives had
suffered from severe smallpox epidemics recurring
every seventeen or eighteen years. --Stearn and
Stearn, 42. - 1520-1740 of 17 great epidemics in Mexico only 3
due to smallpox (according to the chronicler
Cayetano Cabrera y Quintero).
False
True
48Of the three most devastating epidemic in the
16th century only smallpox was a virgin soil
disease
- 3 deadliest epidemics in 16th century Mexico
- Huey zahuatl (smallpox) 1520
- cocoliztli (Mexican typhus?) 1546-47
- matlazahuatl (hemorrhagic fever?) 1576-79
- Epidemics of lesser importance
- tepitonzahuatl (measles) 1531, 1563-4, 1590,
92, 95 - smallpox 1538
- mumps 1550, 1595
- famine 1558-59
- influenza 1559-60
- virgin soil epidemic
491538
- This year of seven rabbits of 1538 many people
died of smallpox.note pustules on arms and
legs.
50Genes or exploitation/care Why did natives
suffer so greatly from disease?
- Genes Stearn and Stearn (1945) ...even in the
nineteenth century when some immunity had already
been acquired by this race... - Exploitation, the social context of epidemics
Audiencia Judge Alonso de Zorita (1560) So the
Indian returns home from his toil for Spaniards
... famished, unhappy, distraught, and shattered
in health. For these reasons pestilence always
rages among the Indians.
51Genes Francis Jennings, The Invasion of
America (197522)
- ...the Europeans capacity to resist certain
diseases made them superior, in the pure
Darwinian sense, to the Indians who succumbed. - smallpox was smallpox...the Indians on the north
bank of the Rio Grande had as little biological
immunity to this epidemic scourge as the Aztecs
had. - Genetic vs. lifetime immunity. Did Europeans
have genetic immunity to smallpox? if so, why
is the USA stockpiling smallpox vaccine to
protect against bioterrorism?
52Science F. Black (1994) and Peter J. Bianchine
Thomas A. Russo (1995)
- Black Smallpox was clearly more virulent in
the Americas than in Europe but the causes for
this remain an open question. - Bianchine Russo given comparable care when
ill and knowledge regarding the potential for
surviving the illness, the death rates for
virgin-soil Indian populations and repeatedly
exposed Caucasian populations for measles were
similar.
53Peru The Death of Huayna Capac led to a War of
Succession, but the proof that he died of
smallpox is weak
54379 The mummy of Huayna Capac enroute to Cuzco
- Guaman Pomas illustrationno signs of pockmarks
- Yet, other GP illustrations often depict facial
features
55Peru first 16th century epidemic (1524?) was
bartonellosis not a virgin soil epidemic (such as
smallpox or leprosy)
Bartonellosis
Leprosy
Smallpox
56First medical photo in Peru Bartonellosis, 1857
57Bartonellosis an ancient disease in
Ecuador/Peru, still a medical problem
- Ancient Chimu pottery depicts symptoms of
bartonellosis - Early chroniclers vaguely ascribed Huayna Capacs
death as due to fever (smallpox?,
bartonellosis?) - Only in 17th century was bartonellosis recognized
by European medicine - In 1871, Bartonellosis killed 8,000 Peruvian
railroad workers - Today, bartonellosis is still a public health
problem in Ecuador and Peru, although mortality
is reduced by antibiotics
58Reflections Why Blame Smallpox for the
Demographic Destruction of Peru?
- Too many
- Contradictions and contingencies in the
chronicles - Silences in the historical record
- No mentions of pockmarked survivors
- No mention of smallpox in the earliest dictionary
- Improbables
- That the disease would leap ahead of the
Spaniardsthrough one of the most impenetrable
regions on the planet - That Huayna Capac would die, but not his
embalmers or his son Atahualpa who kept some of
his fathers flesh did not.
- There is a convincing, alternative explanation
for the destruction of Tawantinsuyu - decades of war, famine, wanton rapine
- The issue is the demographic catastrophe, not
Huayna Capac - Until there is more persuasive evidence (texts or
remains) - the smallpox/virgin soil hypothesis should be
discounted for the Andean regionbefore 1558
591532- Conquest1536 Manco Inca revolt1538
The Pizarros executed Diego de Almagro1541
Almagristas killed Fco. Pizarro1546 Gonzalo
Pizarro revolted, killing the viceroy1548
Gonzalo executed Hapsburg rule restored
Wars in Peru
60Reflections
61Summary
- 1491 Americas paradise for some, purgatory
for many. - 1492 Demographic disaster cannot be explained
by disease alone - The virgin soil thesis may be correct for small
populations, but not for large ones Mexico,
Peru - Mexico
- Two of three major epidemics were native diseases
- Smallpox struck only twice in 16th century 1520,
1538 - Peru
- Disaster began before virgin soil epidemics
struck - First smallpox epidemic in the Andes 1558, 25
years after conquest
62Demographic catastrophe and its causes
viruses, mistreatment and the social context of
epidemics
- Mexico Alonso de Zorita (1565) ...and
it is certain that from the day that D. Hernando
Cortes, the Marquis del Valle, entered this land
...the natives suffered many deaths, and many
terrible dealings, robberies and oppressions were
inflicted on them, taking advantage of their
persons and their lands, without order, weight
nor measure ...the people diminished in great
number, as much due to excessive taxes and
mistreatment, as to illness and smallpox, such
that now a very great and notable fraction of the
people are gone, and especially in the hot
country.
63END