Title: GAZPROM:
1- GAZPROM
- Can The Behemoth Fly?
- In Russian, Behemoth (of the Book of Job) is a
synonym of Hippopotamus
2Is the Market Too Good?
- The first years of the XXI century were the most
successful years of Gazprom - Average price of gas in Russia went up from
12/mcm in 1999 to over 43 in 2005 - Average price of gas exported to Europe increased
from 65/mcm in 1999 to 165 in early 2005 - Revenue increased from 13bn to an estimated
40bn - Profit from European exports went up from 2bn to
9bn (huge space for cost growth) - The market sends wrong signal to Gazprom Cost
management is of low importance
3No Reason for Cost Control
- Gazprom showed the record growth of costs among
Russian industrial sectors - The cost of fuel gas (gas burnt at compressor
stations) is a good indicator of the overall cost
performance of Gazprom - Fuel gas expense is reported at the delivery cost
of gas - Note that a part of the growth was caused by tax
increase - According to Gazprom, metallurgical price index
is 466 of the level of 1999 - Every year Gazprom applies for domestic gas price
increase - Monopoly has no reason for cost management
- Gazprom could have saved at least 0.8bn in 2004
965
465
280
4Questions for Shareholders Meeting
- Here are two good questions Gazprom shareholders
may want to ask at the annual meeting on June 24,
2005 - Does Gazprom need a broker to import 56 steel
pipe? - Why Gazprom is overpaying taxes?
- We estimate the combined cost of these two issues
at about 0.8bn in 2004 - In 2005, the loss is likely to exceed 1.0bn, if
no action is taken
5Pipe Broker
- Gazprom uses a broker to import 56 steel pipe
from Ukraine, Germany and other countries - There were just two buyers of 56 pipe Gazprom
and LUKoil - Unlike Gazprom, LUKoil imported 56 pipe from
Japan without a broker - In 2004, the broker imported about 100M worth of
56 pipe - Import volumes are expected to grow with the
start of Yamal development - Kickback rate in Russia is reported at 20 to 60
- The broker is a relatively small issue of 20M to
60M a year - Note that the broker would benefit from early
start of huge pipeline projects
6Tax Overpayment Background
- In January 2004, excise tax was replaced by
export duty - Excise tax 30 of revenue net of transit cost
out of Russia - Export duty 30 of revenue
- According to Q3-2004 financial report of Gazprom,
this change has caused tax growth of 550M - We estimate the full-year tax increase at 0.8bn
- Note that Gazprom pays transit fees in kind (by
gas) or by cash - Gazprom could have avoided the additional
taxation - We do understand that it is an extremely hard
time for tax optimization in Russia now - However, paying tax on transit cost is absolutely
wrong
Annual Report of 2004 Gazprom proudly reports a
daily tax contribution of one billion rubles
7Paying Tax on Transit Cost
- The illustration shows how it works with exports
to Waidhaus, Germany (sample numbers) - In 2003, the tax was defined as 30 x 120/mcm
36/mcm - The 2004 tax 30 x 150/mcm 45/mcm
- In both years Gazprom carried transit cost of
30/mcm - The solution is very obvious
- The point of sale should be moved to the Russian
border - In 2004, this solution could have saved Gazprom
about 0.8bn - In 2005 the overpayment will be closer to 1.0bn
8How to Save a Billion
- There are at least four simple ways to reduce the
export duty - Filing application for a change of definition of
taxation base - Customs Code of the Russian Federation allows the
use of alternative ways for calculation of
taxation base of export duty - Gazprom should have filed the application on the
first business day of January 2004 (it would have
made the overpayment refundable) - The regulation is very likely to be changed
because this is the best way for the state, but
Gazproms application is needed first - We assume that Gazprom does want to reduce tax
payment (which may not be true)
9How to Save a Billion 2
- Changing contract terms with all gas importers
- Moving the point of sale to the Russian border
and cutting the price by the cost of transit - Dividing payment gas volumes between the relevant
importers - Importers would pay transit costs either by gas
or cash - Creating a 100 daughter company
Gazexport-Ukraine - Selling all export gas at the Russian border to
Gazexport-Ukraine at the price reduced by the
cost of transit - Selling gas to all importers at the existing
terms - Showing no profit in Ukraine
- Setting a similar company in Poland
10The Way of Eural Trans Gas
- Setting up a private company that would buy all
export gas at the Russian border and sell it to
importers - Gazprom and the new company would split the saved
export duty (3 mill. per day in 2005) - In recent history of Gazprom, companies like
Itera and Eural Trans Gas have benefited from
helping Gazprom to reduce tax payment - Note that Gazprom benefited as well, though some
analysts do not recognize this fact - It is a nice way of making new legal
multi-millionaires or a billionaire - It would be a bigger and a way more transparent
business than Baikal Finance Group, that bought
Yugansk - This business would end with the change of tax
regulation, so Kremlins cooperation is a must
11A More Equal Shareholder
- The overpayment continues now at the rate of 3
million a day - One shareholder does benefit from tax overpayment
- The shareholders name is the Russian
Federation - For the state, taxes are a way more important
than dividends - The state also uses Gazprom in the
stick-and-carrot play with neighboring countries - Belarus has a better gas deal than any region of
Russia - Belarus pays the low Russian price of gas AND
gets transit payment on top of that - Reportedly, presidential fund of Belarus benefits
from the deal, while both Gazprom and Russia
suffer losses
13.0 bn
0.2 bn
12Why Is Gazprom Overpaying Tax?
- There are no legal obstacles to stopping the
overpayment - Managers will or shareholders pressure are
required - Gazprom is using third parties for tax reduction
for years - RosUkrEnergo and KazRosGaz buy C. Asian gas in
Kazakhstan and export it out of Russia - It saves Gazprom about 0.8bn a year of export
duty - Its hard to believe they do not see the
overpayment problem - Gazproms Charter still says the Companys goal
is to make profit - Since Jan-2004, lack of action has caused a loss
of about 1.3bn - Every day Gazprom loses 3 mill.
- Mr. Millers responsibilities became unclear
lately
13Side Effects of Tax Overpayment
- The missed opportunity to increase Gazproms cash
flow by 1.3bn has negative side effects - Gazprom had to take additional loans, which
resulted in additional financial costs - Market capitalization of Gazprom could have been
much higher - The price of shares sold in 2004-2005 was not
quite right - The 2004 profit could have been higher and
shareholders will get less dividends - It is not all positive for the state neither
- To fill the financial gap, Gazprom lobbies
increase of the domestic price of gas - It results in higher inflation in Russia
14Finally, Does Behemoth Fly or Not?
15Behemoth does fly!
Because anything can fly at 50 a barrel
16For how long and how high?