Title: High-redshift 21cm and redshift distortions
1High-redshift 21cm and redshift distortions
- Antony Lewis
- Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
- http//cosmologist.info/
Work with
Anthony Challinor (IoA, DAMTP)
astro-ph/0702600Richard Shaw (IoA),
arXiv0808.1724
Following work by Scott, Rees, Zaldarriaga, Loeb,
Barkana, Bharadwaj, Naoz, Scoccimarro many more
2Evolution of the universe
Opaque
Easy
Transparent
Dark ages
Hard
30ltzlt1000
Hu White, Sci. Am., 290 44 (2004)
3CMB temperature
4Why the CMB temperature (and polarization) is
great
- Probes scalar, vector and tensor mode
perturbations - The earliest possible observation (bar future
neutrino anisotropy surveys etc)- Includes
super-horizon scales, probing the largest
observable perturbations- Observable now
Why it is bad
- Only one sky, so cosmic variance limited on
large scales - Diffusion damping and
line-of-sight averaging all information on
small scales destroyed! (lgt2500)- Only a 2D
surface (reionization), no 3D information
5If only we could observe the CDM perturbations
- not erased by diffusion damping (if cold)
power on all scales - full 3D distribution of
perturbations
What about the baryons?
- fall into CDM potential wells also power on
small scales - full 3D distribution
- but baryon pressure non-zero very small scales
still erased
How does the information content compare with the
CMB?
CMB temperature, 1ltllt2000 - about 106 modes
- can measure Pk to about 0.1 at l2000 (k Mpc
0.1) Dark age baryons at one redshift, 1lt l lt
106 - about 1012 modes - measure Pk to about
0.0001 at l106 (k Mpc 100)
6What about different redshifts?
- About 104 independent redshift shells at l106
- - total of 1016 modes - measure Pk to an
error of 10-8 at 0.05 Mpc scales
e.g. running of spectral index If ns 0.96
maybe expect running (1-ns)2 10-3Expected
change in Pk 10-3 per log k - measure
running to 5 significant figures!?
So worth thinking about can we observe the
baryons somehow?
7- How can light interact with the baryons (mostly
neutral H He)?
- after recombination, Hydrogen atoms in ground
state and CMB photons have h? ltlt Lyman-alpha
frequency high-frequency tail of CMB
spectrum exponentially suppressed
essentially no Lyman-alpha interactions
atoms in ground state no higher level
transitions either
- Need transition at much lower energy
Essentially only candidate for hydrogen is the
hyperfine spin-flip transition
triplet
singlet
Credit Sigurdson
Define spin temperature Ts
8What can we observe?
Spontaneous emission n1 A10 photons per unit
volume per unit proper time
1
h v E21
Rate A10 2.869x10-15 /s
0
Stimulated emission net photons (n1 B10 n0
B01)Iv
Total net number of photons
In terms of spin temperature
Net emission or absorption if levels not in
equilibrium with photon distribution - observe
baryons in 21cm emission or absorption if Ts ltgt
TCMB
9What determines the spin temperature?
- Interaction with CMB photons drives Ts towards
TCMB - Collisions between atoms drives Ts towards gas
temperature Tg
TCMB 2.726K/a
At recombination, Compton scattering makes
TgTCMBLater, once few free electrons, gas
cools Tg mv2/kB 1/a2
Spin temperature driven below TCMB by
collisions - atoms have net absorption of 21cm
CMB photons
- (Interaction with Lyman-alpha photons - not
important during dark ages)
10(No Transcript)
11Whats the power spectrum?
Use Boltzmann equation for change in CMB due to
21cm absorption
Background
Perturbation
l gt1 anisotropies in TCMB
Fluctuation in density of H atoms, fluctuations
in spin temperature
Doppler shiftto gas rest frame
CMB dipole seen by H atomsmore absorption in
direction of gas motion relative to CMB
reionization re-scattering terms
12Solve Boltzmann equation in Newtonian gauge
Redshift distortions
Main monopolesource
Effect of localCMB anisotropy
Sachs-Wolfe, Doppler and ISW change to redshift
Tiny Reionization sources
For k gtgt aH good approximation is
(re-scattering effects)
1321cm does indeed track baryons when Ts lt TCMB
z50
Kleban et al. hep-th/0703215
So can indirectly observe baryon power spectrum
at 30lt z lt 100-1000 via 21cm
14Observable angular power spectrum
Integrate over window in frequency
Small scales
1/vN suppressionwithin window
White noisefrom smaller scales
Baryonpressuresupport
baryon oscillations
z50
15What about large scales (Ha gt k)?
Narrow redshift window
lt 1 effect at llt50
Extra terms largely negligible
16New large scaleinformation?- potentials
etccorrelated with CMB
Dark ages2500Mpc
l 10
14 000 Mpc
z30
Opaque ages 300Mpc
Comoving distance
z1000
17Non-linear evolution
Small scales see build up of power from many
larger scale modes - important
But probably accurately modelled by 3rd order
perturbation theory
On small scales non-linear effects many percent
even at z 50
redshift distortions, see later.
18Also lensing
Modified Bessel function
Unlensed
Lensed
Wigner functions
Lensing potential power spectrum
Lewis, Challinor astro-ph/0601594
c.f. Madel Zaldarriaga astro-ph/0512218
19like convolution with deflection angle power
spectrumgenerally small effect as 21cm spectrum
quite smooth
Cl(z50,z52)
Cl(z50,z50)
Lots of information in 3-D (Zahn Zaldarriaga
2006)
20Observational prospects
- (1z)21cm wavelengths 10 meters for z50-
atmosphere opaque for zgt 70 go to the moon?-
fluctuations in ionosphere phase errors go to
moon?- interferences with terrestrial radio
far side of the moon?- foregrounds large! use
signal decorrelation with frequency
But large wavelength -gt crude reflectors OK
See e.g. Carilli et al astro-ph/0702070,
Peterson et al astro-ph/0606104
Current 21cm
LOFAR, PAST, MWA study reionization at z
lt20SKA still being planned, zlt 25
21(No Transcript)
22Things you could do with precision dark age 21cm
- High-precision on small-scale primordial power
spectrum(ns, running, features wide range of
k, etc.)e.g. Loeb Zaldarriaga
astro-ph/0312134, Kleban et al. hep-th/0703215 - Varying alpha A10 a13 (21cm frequency
changed different background and
perturbations)Khatri Wandelt astro-ph/0701752 - Isocurvature modes(direct signature of baryons
distinguish CDM/baryon isocurvature)Barkana
Loeb astro-ph/0502083 - CDM particle decays and annihilations(changes
temperature evolution)Shchekinov Vasiliev
astro-ph/0604231, Valdes et al astro-ph/0701301 - Primordial non-Gaussianity(measure bispectrum
etc of 21cm limited by non-linear
evolution)Cooray astro-ph/0610257, Pillepich et
al astro-ph/0611126 - Lots of other things e.g. cosmic strings, warm
dark matter, neutrino masses, early dark
energy/modified gravity.
23Back to reality after the dark ages?
- First stars and other objects form
- Lyman-alpha and ionizing radiation
presentWouthuysen-Field (WF) effect -
Lyman-alpha couples Ts to Tg - Photoheating
makes gas hot at late times so signal in
emissionIonizing radiation - ionized regions
have little hydrogen regions with no 21cm
signal Both highly non-linear very complicated
physics - Lower redshift, so less long wavelengths- much
easier to observe! GMRT (zlt10), MWA, LOFAR
(zlt20), SKA (zlt25). - Discrete sources lensing, galaxy counts (109 in
SKA), etc.
24How do we get cosmology from this mess?
Would like to measure dark-matter power on
nearly-linear scales. Want to observe potentials
not baryons
1. Do gravitational lensing measure source
shears - probes line-of-sight transverse
potential gradients (independently of what
the sources are)
2. Measure the velocities induced by falling into
potentials - probe line-of-sight velocity,
depends on line-of-sight potential gradients
Redshift distortions
25A closer look at redshift distortions
Real space
Redshift space
y(z)
y
x
x
26Density perturbed too. In redshift-space see
Both linear (higher) effects same order of
magnitude. Note correlated.
More power in line-of-sight direction -gt
distinguish velocity effect
27n
Linear-theory
Redshift-space distance
Actual distance
Define 3D redshift-space co-ordinate
Transform using Jacobian Redshift-space
perturbation
Fourier transformed
28Linear power spectrum
Messy astrophysics
Depends only on velocities -gt potentials
(n.k)4 component can be used for cosmology
Barkana Loeb astro-ph/0409572
29Is linear-theory good enough?
RMS velocity 10-4-10-3
Radial displacement 0.1-1 MPc
Megaparsec scale
Redshift space
Real Space
Looks like big non-linear effect!
M(x dx) ? M(x) M(x) dx
BUT bulk displacements unobservable. Need more
detailed calculation.
30Non-linear redshift distortions
Shaw Lewis, 2008 also Scoccimarro 2004
Assume all fields Gaussian.
Power spectrum from
Exact non-linear result (for Gaussian fields on
flat sky)
31Significant effectDepending on angle
Small scale power boosted by superposition of
lots oflarge-scale modes
z10
32More important at lower redshift.Not negligible
even at high z.
Comparable to non-linear evolution
z10
33Similar effect on angular power spectrum
(A velocity covariance), u (x-z,y-z)
(sharp zz window, z10)
34What does this mean for component separation?
Angular dependence now more complicated all µ
powers, and not clean.
Assuming
gives wrong answer
z10
Need more sophisticated separation methods to
measure small scales.
35Also complicates non-Gaussianity
detectionRedshift-distortion bispectrum
- Mapping redshift space -gt real space nonlinear,
so non-Gaussian
Linear-theory source
Just lots of Gaussian integrals (approximating
sources as Gaussian)..
Zero if all k orthogonal to line of sight.
Can do exactly, or leading terms are
Also Scoccimarro et al 1998, Hivon et al 1995
Not attempted numerics as yet
36Conclusions
- Huge amount of information in dark age
perturbation spectrum- could constrain early
universe parameters to many significant figures - Dark age baryon perturbations in principle
observable at 30ltzlt 500 up to llt107 via
observations of CMB at (1z)21cm wavelengths. - Dark ages very challenging to observe (e.g. far
side of the moon) - Easier to observe at lower z, but complicated
astrophysics - Redshift-distortions probe matter density
ideally measure cosmology separately from
astrophysics by using angular dependence - BUT non-linear effects important on small
scales - more sophisticated non-linear
separation methods may be required
37Correlation function
z10