Run I Data Access Comments From Friendly Users - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Run I Data Access Comments From Friendly Users

Description:

For Each Situation, List Three Ways to Prevent This Case From Happening. Report Back to the Group ... Why Units Lapse and How to Prevent It ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:47
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: greglan
Category:
Tags: access | comments | data | fix | friendly | how | run | to | users

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Run I Data Access Comments From Friendly Users


1
Run I Data Access(Comments From Friendly Users)
  • Greg Landsberg
  • (DØ Collaboration Meeting 1/13/00)

2
Contents
  • History
  • Run I is Dead?
  • Steps to the Disaster
  • When CDF Sets a Good Example
  • Ways to Fix Things
  • Discussion

3
History
  • Run I 1992-1996 (A, B, and C)
  • Death to VMS! 1997
  • Decision to keep both sets of mDST online 1999
  • First Run I data access meeting Spring 1999
  • Massive disk exodus 1999
  • Grand finale (total collapse) December 1999
  • Open discussion - Today

4
Spring 1999 Meeting Highlights
  • FNALDØ/DØTNG will be reduced to a few boot nodes
    that will run indefinitely
  • Hence users will have possibility to run limited
    MC, TRIGSIM, and NOISY
  • PICK_EVENTS will run through the Run II data
    access model (SAM/ENSTORE) by the end of Summer
    1999
  • PIXIE will be ported to Unix (SGI)
  • Data will be moved to Unix disks (SGI)

5
Doom Reality
  • PICK_EVENTS was working intermittently due to
    continuous disk failures and data migration
  • No work on porting the PICK_EVENTS to the Run II
    framework has been done
  • PIXIE has not yet been ported to Unix
  • FNALDØ/DØTNG clusters were reduced to the very
    minimum we were told that the disk system will
    become read-only
  • Data is disappearing from the disks w/o any
    notice we are not notified about DØFS disk
    failures and the failed disks with the data are
    merely removed from the system
  • That resulted in 20 data loss as of mid-1999,
    which NO ONE WAS AWARE OF!

6
400 Physicists Failed to Login
  • By actively destroying Run I environment, DØ
    management has de facto discouraged anyone to do
    Run I analyses, even though Run I physics groups
    are the only physics groups within the
    collaboration, and Run I physics is the only
    physics we will be publishing for the next 2-2.5
    years
  • By jeopardizing Run I physics we make our
    experiment increasingly unattractive to new
    students and postdocs
  • Moreover, we will soon be loosing existing
    students and postdocs by depriving them from the
    data access
  • We are creating an artificial gap in our
    publications which is bad for everyone, including
    the people who are not currently involved in the
    analyses, or people who are 100 Run II
    taskforce
  • If we find something interesting in the first
    couple hundreds pb-1 of Run II data, we wont
    have an ability to go back and look at Run I data
    as an independent cross-check

7
In the Meantime, Across the Ring
  • CDF managed to preserve Run I data access
    capabilities virtually intact
  • To the best of my knowledge all major pieces
    (including MC, data access, event display, etc.)
    work fine
  • CDF has redirected a number of Run II graduate
    students to do Run I analyses for their theses
  • CDF has recently shown a dozen of new analyses in
    progress at the major conferences some of them
    on the very hot topics, such as search for extra
    dimensions

8
Missing Data
  • The full Run I mDST data set available on disk
    was far from being complete for the entire last
    year
  • Between 10 and 20 of the data was missing at
    any given time
  • Over the last half-a-year I recovered all missing
    data except for 20 partitions which are still
    being recovered (many thanks to David Fagan,
    Bruce Knuteson, Lee Lueking, and Rich Partridge)
  • The last 10 of missing data is currently sitting
    on a temporary disk, but is ready to be moved to
    the DØDATADST area
  • I was told that about 10 of the fixed mDST are
    still missing

9
Vital Tools
  • For anyone who has done a Run I analysis it
    should be obvious that the following tools are
    essential
  • Full minimal set of data on-line ? mDST
  • An ability to reprocess the entire data set fast
    ? DØDAD
  • An ability to pick events in maximal format ?
    PICK_EVENTS
  • An event display program ? PIXIE
  • Utility for integrated luminosity calculation ?
    PDB
  • Minimal set of MC possibilities ? GEANT
  • Not so vital, but essential tools
  • Data integrity verification tool ? FATMEN
  • Trigger simulation ? TRIGSIM
  • Noise overlap ? NOISY
  • Absence of the vital tools makes a usually
    friendly user very cranky!

10
How to Fix Things
  • The ultimate very short term steps
  • Fix the mDST access problems - days
  • Revive the DØDAD infrastructure (users can open
    existing DØDAD files) days
  • Revive the PICK_EVENTS utility on DØFS days
  • Longer terms necessary steps
  • Rebuild the DØDAD databases to reflect the
    current data sets 1 month
  • Port PICK_EVENTS into Run II framework few
    months
  • Port PDB or make it running on VMS indefinitely
    1 month
  • Poll universities to maintain a small MC farm for
    Run I MC (service job?) few months

11
How to Fix Things (contd)
  • Finish porting PIXIE to Unix few months
  • Ensure completeness of the fixed mDST data set
    1 month
  • The most important thing is to realize that the
    uninterrupted Run I data access is the only thing
    that distinguish us from a software company or an
    electronics sweatshop
  • We ARE physicists, and physics must be our
    highest priority if we cant maintain physics
    today, we already lost the game for tomorrow,
    before even joining it
  • The management has to find necessary resources to
    make sure that we have uninterrupted access to
    the Run I data for the next two years
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com