AQUATIC ANIMAL PRODUCTION INDUSTRY EFFLUENT GUIDELINES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 42
About This Presentation
Title:

AQUATIC ANIMAL PRODUCTION INDUSTRY EFFLUENT GUIDELINES

Description:

EPA develops combination of numeric limitations and BMPs ... Mullet. 5. Mollusks. 1. Chinese Catfish. 5. Crawfish. 1. Lobster. 9. Ornamental. 2. Yellow Perch ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:72
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 43
Provided by: EPA264
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AQUATIC ANIMAL PRODUCTION INDUSTRY EFFLUENT GUIDELINES


1
AQUATIC ANIMAL PRODUCTION INDUSTRY EFFLUENT
GUIDELINES
  • January 27, 2002

2
Possible Rulemaking Outcomes
  • No Regulation or Regulation
  • Entire Industry Category
  • Certain Subcategories
  • Certain Size Facilities of a Given
    Subcategory(ies)
  • For No Regulation, options include
  • EPA issues guidance - BMPs (e.g. voluntary
    approaches, incentive programs)
  • EPA does not issue guidance

3
Possible Rulemaking Outcomes (Continued)
  • For regulation, options include
  • EPA establishes numeric limitations
  • EPA develops BMPs
  • EPA develops combination of numeric limitations
    and BMPs
  • Different levels of stringency by industry
    subcategories
  • levels of stringency are based on a number of
    factors (e.g., economic impacts, size, production
    systems, discharge levels, performance of control
    technology/practices) and can vary for each
    subcategory. For example
  • Subcategory A no regulation
  • Subcategory B least stringent option considered
  • Subcategory C more stringent option considered

4
Major Milestones
  • SBREFA
  • Management Selects Options Winter 2001/2002
  • Interagency Review Spring 2002
  • Proposed Rule June 2002
  • Notice of Data Availability Summer 2003
  • Interagency Review (Final Rule) Spring 2004
  • Final Rule June 2004

5
SBREFA
  • Outreach to Small Entity Representatives
    December 2001
  • Small Business Panel Convenes January 2002
  • Small Business Panel Concludes
  • March 2002

6
Proposed Rule
  • Administrator Signs Proposal June 30, 2002
  • Proposal Published in Federal Register July
    2002
  • Comment Period - Probably 60 days

7
Current Activities
  • Data Collection Activities
  • Subcategorization
  • Options under consideration
  • Pollutants
  • Costs and Loadings
  • Economic Impact Analyses

8
Screener Survey Results to Date
  • Summary of Response Rate
  • 5989 surveys have been mailed
  • 4856 surveys have been received
  • 130 Duplicates
  • 80 Returned blank
  • 500 Returned unopened
  • Re-mailings will be made to incorrect addresses
  • Follow-up actions for non-responses enforcement
    letter

9
Subcategorization Analysis Factors Being
Assessed
  • System type and water management strategy
  • Species
  • Facility age
  • Facility location
  • Facility size
  • Feed type and feeding rate
  • Non-water quality environmental impacts
  • Disproportionate economic impacts

10
Model Facility Approach
  • Facility-specific
  • Detailed process information for specific
    facilities
  • Model Facility
  • Reasonable representation of the industry
  • Reflect the different characteristics of the
    industry

11
Model Facility Approach Sources of Data
  • Site visits and sampling
  • Information from industry members and
    associations
  • Screener and detailed survey
  • Aquaculture census
  • Published information

12
Loadings Approach
Food
Oxygen
Water In
Biomass
  • Mass Balance on annual basis
  • Predict Effluent Quality
  • Determine relationship of feed input to effluent
    quality

13
Pollutants Of Interest
  • Total Suspended Solids
  • Nutrients
  • Nitrogen
  • Phosphorus
  • BOD
  • Microbiologicals
  • Drugs and Chemicals

14
Cost Methodology
  • Identify Candidate BMPs and Treatment
    Technologies Regulatory Options
  • Develop Cost Equations BMPs and Treatment
    Technologies
  • Develop Computer Models Compliance Costs and
    Loadings
  • Estimate Total Annualized Costs and Economic
    Impacts

15
Cost Methodology (continued)
  • Cost and financial estimates for each model
    facility
  • Industry-level costs calculated
  • Number of facilities
  • x
  • Model facility cost

16
Estimating the Number of Facilities
  • USDA Aquaculture Census
  • Screener Survey

17
Costs
  • Capital costs
  • Land Equipment
  • One-time non capital costs
  • Consulting Services
  • Annual operation and maintenance costs
  • Labor
  • Equipment

18
Frequency Factors
  • Used to adjust for BMPs and Treatment Technology
    options that already exist in the industry

19
Example of Frequency Factor Use
  • Catfish Farms practice water level management
    100 (based on information from site visits and
    JSA)
  • Therefore, no costs included for water level
    management

20
Options Being Considered
  • System Specific Options
  • Best Management Practices
  • Treatment Technologies
  • Risk Minimization Strategies

21
Status of Revisions
  • As we discuss the different aspects of the rule,
    we will indicate the changes that have occurred.
  • Changes have been made to reflect input from
    various sources and refinement of the options

22
Treatment Technologies and Best Management
Practices
  • Baseline- practices and technologies existing at
    most facilities and primary feature is solids
    removal
  • Option 1 considers the development of a BMP Plan
    (HACCP-like approach) to control conventional and
    nutrient pollutants also to address escapes,
    fish pathogens, and drugs and chemicals

23
Treatment Technologies and Best Management
Practices
  • Baseline- practices and technologies existing at
    most facilities and primary feature is solids
    removal
  • Option 1 considers the development of a BMP Plan
    (HACCP-like approach) to control conventional and
    nutrient pollutants also to address escapes,
    fish pathogens, and drugs and chemicals

24
Treatment Technologies and Best Management
Practices
  • Option 2 considers additional solids removal and
    establishes a numeric limit for TSS
  • Option 3 considers additional treatment for
    specific pollutants such as disinfection to
    control microorganisms and establish limits for
    total coliform

25
Treatment Technologies and Best Management
Practices
  • Option 2 considers additional solids removal and
    establishes a numeric limit for TSS
  • Option 3 considers additional treatment for
    specific pollutants such as disinfection to
    control microorganisms and establish limits for
    total coliform

26
Pond Systems
27
Pond Systems
28
Treatment Technologies and Best Management
Practices
  • Baseline
  • Ponds - Feed management, In-pond treatment, Water
    Management, Discharge Management
  • Flow through - Feed Management, Quiescent Zones,
    Sedimentation Basins
  • Recirculating- Feed Management, Sedimentation
    basins
  • Net Pens Feed Management

29
Treatment Technologies and Best Management
Practices
  • Option 1 - BMP Plan (referred to as PACCP)
  • Identifies ways to minimize or control aquatic
    animal pathogens, nonnative species, drug and
    chemical usage.
  • The BMP plan consists of same approach for all
    production systems

30
Treatment Technologies and Best Management
Practices
  • Option 2 Additional treatment of TSS
  • Ponds- Vegetated ditches, in-pond
    settling(holding water), settling basins
  • Flow through microscreen filters
  • Recirculating microscreen filters
  • Net Pens active monitoring

31
Treatment Technologies and Best Management
Practices
  • Option 3 Additional Treatment for Specific
    Pollutants
  • Ponds Constructed Wetlands (nutrients)
  • Flow-through Disinfection (bacteria associated
    with manure storage)
  • Recirculating Systems Disinfection (bacteria
    associated with manure storage)

32
NPDES Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production
Facility Definition
  • EPA considering revising the National Pollutant
    Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) definition
    of a Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production
    Facility (CAAPF).

33
NPDES Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production
Facility Definition
  • As part of the effluent guidelines rulemaking
    development, EPA is evaluating aquatic animal
    facilities as a whole to determine the
    applicability of the effluent guidelines.

34
NPDES Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production
Facility Definition
  • Should EPA determine that the effluent guidelines
    apply to facilities that are excluded from the
    current NPDES CAAPF definition, EPA may decide to
    change the NPDES definition.

35
Additional Considerations
  • For Land Application of Manure (similar to CAFOs)
  • Determine N P content
  • Record keeping requirements
  • Amount of manure disposed
  • Frequency of disposal
  • Person/entity receiving manure

36
Additional information
  • To obtain additional information on the
    development or progress of the aquaculture
    guidelines
  • http//www.epa.gov/OST/guide/aquaculture
  • http//ag.ansc.purdue.edu/aquanic/jsa/effluents/in
    dex.html

37
Additional information
  • For technical information
  • Marta Jordan (202) 260-0817
  • Jan Goodwin (202) 260-7152
  • For economic technical information
  • Kristen Strellec (202) 260-6036

38
Types of Systems VisitedTotal 74
39
Regional Distribution of Facilities
40
Species
41
Sampling Events
42
Sampling Analytes
  • Solids TSS, TDS, SS, TVS
  • Nitrogen NH3, NO2/NO3, TKN
  • Phosphorus TP, Dissolved P, Ortho P
  • Oil grease
  • BOD, TOC, COD
  • Metals
  • Organic compounds (volatile and semivolatile
    compounds)
  • Microbiologicals
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com