The Physics of the LHC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 57
About This Presentation
Title:

The Physics of the LHC

Description:

The Physics of the LHC – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:167
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 58
Provided by: dang5
Category:
Tags: lhc | physics

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Physics of the LHC


1
The Physics of the LHC
  • The CMS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron
    Collider
  • Dan Green
  • Fermilab
  • US CMS Program Manager
  • Nov. 12, 2003

2
Outline
  • Why do we go to the energy frontier?
  • What is the CMS collaboration?
  • What is the Standard Model? How do we detect the
    fundamental particles contained in the SM?
  • The Higgs boson is the missing object in the SM
    periodic table. What is the CMS strategy to
    discover it?
  • What might we find at CMS in addition to the
    Higgs?

3
What and Where is CERN, LHC, CMS?
European Center for Nuclear Research (CERN)
Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS)
4
Progress in HEP Depends on Advancing the Energy
Frontier
5
CMS Detector Subsystems
Basic decision was to have a large (4T) magnetic
field
6
Yoke and Vacuum Tank
7
CMS Plans a Working Detector in 2007
US CMS is 80 completed. Do commissioning above
ground from now until late 2005 when underground
installation starts.
8
The CMS Collaboration
9
The US CMS Collaboration
10
Particle Physics in the 20th Century
  • The e- was discovered by Thompson 1900. The
    nucleus was discovered by Rutherford in 1920.
    The e, the first antiparticle, was found in
    1930. The m , indicating a second generation,
    was discovered in 1936.
  • There was an explosion of baryons and mesons
    discovered in the 1950s and 1960s. They were
    classified in a "periodic table" using the SU(3)
    symmetry group, whose physical realization was
    point like, strongly interacting, fractionally
    charged "quarks". Direct evidence for quarks and
    gluons came in the early 1970s.
  • The exposition of the 3 generations of quarks and
    leptons is only just, 1996, completed with the
    top quark discovery and the observation of the
    neutrino associated with the tau lepton in 2002
    at Fermilab. In the mid 1980s the unification of
    the weak and electromagnetic force was confirmed
    by the W and Z discoveries at CERN.
  • The LHC, starting in 2007, will be THE tool to
    explore the origin of the breaking of the
    electroweak symmetry (Higgs field?) and the
    origin of mass itself. The Higgs boson is
    postulated to be responsible for the mass of all
    the known elementary particles.

11
The Standard Model of Elementary Particle Physics
  • Matter consists of half integral spin fermions.
    The strongly interacting fermions are called
    quarks. The fermions with electroweak
    interactions are called leptons. The uncharged
    leptons are called neutrinos.
  • The forces are carried by integral spin bosons.
    The strong force is carried by 8 gluons (g), the
    electromagnetic force by the photon (?), and the
    weak interaction by the W Zo and W-. The g and ?
    are massless, while the W and Z have 80, 91 GeV
    mass.

J 1
g,?, W,Zo,W-
Force Carriers
u d
c s
t b
2/3 -1/3
Quarks
J 1/2
Q/e
e ?e
? ???
? ??
1 0
Leptons
12
Electro - Weak Unification
  • The weak interactions are responsible for nuclear
    beta decay. The observed rates are slow,
    indicating weak effective coupling. The decays
    are parametrized as an effective 4 fermion
    interaction with coupling, G 10-5 GeV-2, Gm
    G2Mm5.
  • The weak SU(2) gauge bosons, W Zo W- , acquire a
    mass by interacting with the "Higgs boson vacuum
    expectation value" of the field, while the U(1)
    photon, g , remains massless. MW gWltfgt
  • The SU(2) and U(1) couplings are "unified" in
    that e gWsin(qW). The parameter qW can be
    measured by studying the scattering of n p,
    since this is a purely weak interaction process.
  • The coupling gW can be connected to G by noting
    that the 4 fermion Feynman diagram can be related
    to the effective 4 fermion interaction by the
    Feynman "propagator", G gW2/MW2. Thus, from G
    and sin(qW) one can predict MW. The result, MW
    80 GeV was confirmed at CERN in the pp collider.
    The vacuum Higgs field has ltfgt 250 GeV.

13
CMS in the Collision Hall
Tracker ECAL HCAL Magnet Muon
14
Detection of Fundamental Particles
q, g ?
15
Dijet Events at the Tevatron
  • The scattering of quarks inside the proton leads
    to a "jet" of particles traveling in the
    direction of, and taking the momentum of, the
    parent quark. Since there is no initial state Pt,
    the 2 quarks in the final state are "back to
    back" in azimuth.

ET
y
x
16
W --gt e ? at the Tevatron
  • The W gauge bosons can decay into
    quark-antiquarks, e.g. , or into
    lepton pairs, e ne, m nm, t nt.

17
Z --gt e e and ? ? Events at the Tevatron
  • The e appear in the EM and not the HAD
    compartment of the calorimetry, while the m
    penetrate thick material.

18
A FNAL Collider (D0) Event
  • This event has jets, a muon, an electron and
    missing energy , n.

m
r
z
e
jets
19
A FNAL Collider (CDF) Event
Zoom in to see heavy quark decays (c,b)
20
The Generation of Mass by the Higgs Mechanism
  • The vacuum expectation value of the Higgs field,
    ltfgt, gives mass to the W and Z gauge bosons, MW
    gWltfgt. Thus the Higgs field acts somewhat like
    the "ether". Similarly the fermions gain a mass
    by Yukawa interactions with the Higgs field, mf
    gfltfgt. Although the couplings are not predicted,
    the Higgs field gives us a compact mechanism to
    generate all the masses in the Universe.
  • G(H-gtff)
    g2(mf/MW)2MH
  • G(H-gtWW)
    g2(MH/MW)2MH
  • G MH3 or G/MH
    MH2 gt G/MH 1 _at_ MH 1 TeV

f, W, Z f, W, Z
g
H
21
Higgs Cross section
CDF and D0 successfully found the top quark,
which has a cross section 10-10 the total cross
section. A 500 GeV Higgs has a cross section
ratio of 10-11, which requires great
rejection power against backgrounds and a high
luminosity.
22
CMS Tracker All Si
The Higgs is weakly coupled to ordinary matter,
as square of u, d quark mass, with no direct
coupling to gluons. Thus, high interaction rates
are required. The CMS pixel Si system has 100
million elements so as to accommodate the
resulting track densities.
23
US CMS - FPIX
Pixel Detectors Plaquettes













1x5 ROCs
1x5 VHDI
Measured noise 200e-
1x1 Sensor
1x2 Sensor
HDI (PC Board)
VHDI
2x2 Sensor
Test setups are at Rutgers, Purdue, FNAL, EU
D\cmsmeet\sidet-oct03\plaquetters2.ppt
24
US CMS - TOB
25
ECAL - PbWO4 Crystals
26
Use H --gt ZZ --gt 4e
Fully active crystals are the best resolution
possible -needed for 2 photon decays of the
Higgs.
Z
Z
27
The Hadron Calorimeter
  • HCAL detects jets from quarks and gluons.
    Neutrinos are inferred from missing Et.

Scintillator WLS gives hermetic readout for
neutrinos
28
US CMS - HCAL
Back-flange 18 Brackets 3 Layers of absorber
29
US CMS - Endcap Muon Chambers
30
Higgs Decay, H -gt ZZ -gt4?
31
CMS DAQ and Trigger System
  • Event size 1MB from 700 front-end electronics
    modules
  • Level-1 decision time 3?s 1?s actual
    processing(the rest in transmission delays)
  • DAQ designed to accept Level-1 rate of 100kHz
  • Modular DAQ 8 x 12.5kHz units
  • HLT designed to output O(102)Hz rejection of
    1000
  • 1000 processor units
  • Choose 1 event in 10 million .

32
LEP,CDF D0 Data Indicate Light Higgs
b
W t W
W
W H W
33
Higgs Discovery Limits
The main final state is ZZ --gt 4l. At high masses
larger branching ratios are needed. At lower
masses the ZZ, qqWW and ??? final states are
used. LEP II has set a limit 113 GeV. CMS will
cover the full range from LEPII to 1 TeV.
34
Higgs Mass - Upper Limit
In quantum field theories the constants are
altered in high order processed (e.g. loops).
Asking that the Higgs mass be well behaved up to
a high mass scale (no new Physics) implies a low
mass Higgs. Is a high scale plausible?
H
H H H
35
12 Unresolved Fundamental Questions in HEP
  • How do the Z and W acquire mass and not the
    photon?
  • What is MH and how do we measure it?
  • Why are there 3 and only 3 light generations?
  • What explains the pattern of quark and lepton
    masses and mixing?
  • Why are the known mass scales so different? ?QCD
    0.2 GeV ltlt EW lt?gt 246 GeV ltlt MGUT 1016 GeV
    ltlt MPL 1019 GeV
  • Why is charge quantized?
  • Why do neutrinos have such small masses
  • Why is matter (protons) stable?
  • Why is the Universe made of matter?
  • What is dark matter made of?
  • Why is the cosmological constant small?
  • How does gravity fit in with the strong,
    electromagnetic and weak forces?

36
Grand Unified Theories
  • Perhaps the strong and electroweak forces are
    related. In that case leptons and quarks would
    make transitions and p would be unstable. The
    unification mass scale of a GUT must be large
    enough so that the decay rate for p is lt the rate
    limit set by experiment.
  • The coupling constants "run" in quantum field
    theories due to vacuum fluctuations. For example,
    in EM the e charge is shielded by virtual ?
    fluctuations into ee- pairs on a distance scale
    set by, 1/me. Thus a increases as M
    increases (logarithmically), a(0) 1/137, a(MZ)
    1/128.

37
Why is Matter (protons) Stable?
  • There is no gauge motivated conservation law
    making protons stable.
  • Indeed, SU(5) relates quarks and leptons and
    possesses leptoquarks with masses the GUT
    mass scale.
  • Thus we expect protons (uud) to decay via uu --gt
    ed , ud --gt d?. Thus p --gt e??o
    or ??
  • Looking at the GUT extrapolation, we find 1/?
    40 at a GUT mass of 1014 GeV.
  • One dimensional grounds, the proton lifetime
    should be, ?p 1/?p ?GUT2(Mp/MGUT)4Mp or
    ?p 4 x 1031 yr.
  • The current experimental limit is 1032 yr. The
    limit is in disagreement with a careful estimate
    of the p decay lifetime in simple SU(5) GUT
    models. Thus we need to look a bit harder at the
    grand unification scheme.

38
Why is Charge Quantized?
  • There appears to be approximate unification of
    the couplings at a mass scale MGUT 1014 GeV.
  • Then we combine quarks and leptons into GUT
    multiplets - the simplest possibility being
    SU(5).
  • dR dB dG e ? 3(-1/3 ) 1 0 0
  • Since the sum of the projections of a group
    generator in a group multiplet is 0 (e.g. the
    angular momentum sum of m), then charge must be
    quantized in units of the electron charge.
  • In addition, we see that quarks must have 1/3
    fractional charge because there are 3 colors of
    quarks - SU(3).

39
GUT Predicts ??W
  • A GUT has a single gauge coupling constant. Thus,
    ? and ?W must be related. The SU(5) prediction is
    that sin(?W) e/g ??3/8. Before we had to rely
    on measurements no prediction.
  • This prediction applies at MGUT
  • Running back down to the Z mass, the prediction
    becomes ?3/81 - 109 ?/18?(ln(MGUT/MZ))1/2
  • This prediction is in agreement with the
    measurement of ?W from the W and Z masses, but
    not exactly (SUSY).

40
Why is the Universe Made of Matter?
  • The present state of the Universe is very
    matter-antimatter asymmetric.
  • The necessary conditions for such an asymmetry
    are that CP is violated, that Baryon number is
    not conserved, and that the Universe went through
    a phase out of thermal equilibrium.
  • The existence of 3 generations allows for CP
    violation and it has been observed in decays of K
    and B mesons.
  • The GUT has, of necessity, baryon non-conserving
    reactions due to lepto-quarks.
  • Thus the possibility to explain the asymmetry
    exists in GUTs, although agreement with the data,
    NB/N? 10-9, and calculation may not be
    plausible.

41
SUSY and Evolution of ??
It is impossible to maintain the big gap between
the Higgs mass scale and the GUT mass scale in
the presence of quantum radiative corrections.
One way to restore the gap is to postulate a
relationship between fermions and bosons. Each SM
particle has a supersymmetric (SUSY) partner with
spin 1/2 difference. If the mass of the SUSY
partners is 1 TeV, then the GUT unification is
good - at 1016 GeV
1/?
M
42
Dark Matter
The rise of v with r is observed, but no falloff
( expect 1/?r as in Keplers Laws) is observed
out to gt 30 kpc, well beyond the luminous region
of typical galaxies. There must be a new dark
matter. SUSY provides a candidate - neutralino
Galactic Rotation Curves
43
SUSY - Discovery
backgrounds
SUSY 600 GeV squark
Dramatic event signatures (LSP) and large cross
section mean we will discover SUSY quickly, if it
exists.
44
SUSY Mass Reach
1 year at 1/10 design luminosity
WMAP
45
Gravity and SM Forces
We expect fundamental issues with quantum gravity
as it defines the geometry of space-time. It
appears that point particles are not possible,
but rather strings existing in many dimensions,
with those gt 4 curled up or compactified to
dimensions 1/M.
A completely naïve extrapolation of gravity comes
close to the GUT mass scale. Note that ?G M2
46
Summary for CMS Physics
  • CMS will explore the full (100 - 1000 GeV)
    allowed region of Higgs masses. Precision data
    indicates that the Higgs is light.
  • The generational regularities in mass and CKM
    matrix elements will probably not be informed by
    data taken at CMS.
  • There appears to be a GUT scale which indicates
    new dynamics. The GUT explains charge
    quantization and perhaps the matter dominance of
    the Universe along with the small values of the
    neutrino masses (M? Mq2/MGUT). However it fails
    in p decay, the precise prediction of ??W and the
    quadratic radiative corrections to Higgs mass
    scales.
  • Preserving the scales, (hierarchy problem) can
    be accomplished in SUSY. SUSY raises the GUT
    scale, making the p quasi-stable. The SUSY LSP
    provides a candidate to explain the observation
    of galactic dark matter. A local SUSY GUT
    naturally incorporates gravity. A common GUT
    coupling, precise ??W prediction and preservation
    of loop cancellations requires SUSY mass lt 1 TeV.
    The cosmological constant ( )
    is still big. CMS will fully explore this SUSY
    mass range either proving or disproving this
    attractive hypothesis.

47
What will we find at the LHC?
  • There is a single fundamental Higgs scalar field.
    This appears to be incomplete and unsatisfying.
  • Another layer of the cosmic onion is uncovered.
    Quarks and/or leptons are composites of some new
    point like entity. This is historically plausible
    atoms ? nuclei ? nucleons ? quarks.
  • There is a deep connection between Lorentz
    generators and spin generators. Each known SM
    particle has a super partner differing by ½
    unit in spin. An extended set of Higgs particles
    exists and a whole new SUSY spectroscopy exists
    for us to explore.
  • The weak interactions become strong. Resonances
    appear in WW and WZ scattering as in ? ? ? ?. A
    new force manifests itself, leading to a new
    spectroscopy.
  • There are extra dimensions at the 1 TeV mass
    scale, so there is no hierarchy problem. Gravity
    is weak because it exists in the complete
    space-time geometry, while SM forces are only in
    4 - d.
  • There are more things in heaven and earth than
    are dreamt of

48
High Energy Physics-Natural Units
  • Dimensions are taken to be energy in HEP.
    Momentum and mass are given the dimensions of
    energy, pc, mc2. The basic energy unit is the
    electron Volt, the energy gained when an electron
    falls through a potential of 1 Volt 1.6 x 10
    -19 Joule.
  • The connection between energy and time, position
    and momentum is supplied by Planck's constant,
    , where 1 fm 10-13
    cm. Thus, inverse length and inverse time have
    the units of energy. The Heisenberg uncertainty
    relation is
  • Charge and spin are "quantized" they only take
    discrete values, e or . Fermions have spin
    1/2, 3/2 ..., while bosons have spin 0,1,. The
    statistics obeyed by fermions and bosons differs
    profoundly. Bosons can occupy the same quantum
    state - e.g. superconductors, laser. Fermions
    cannot (Pauli Exclusion Principle) - e.g. the
    shell structure of atoms.

49
HB Assembly in SX5
18 October 2001)
50
The CMS Muon System
  • The Higgs decay into ZZ to 4? is preferred for
    Higgs masses gt 160 GeV. Coverage to ? lt 2.5 is
    required (? gt 6 degrees)

Z
Z
51
The CMS Detector
CALORIMETERS



ECAL

HCAL



IRON YOKE
TRACKER
Basic Choices Strong, large B field All Si
tracking Best possible ECAL dE/E Robust Muon -
yoke
MUON ENDCAPS

MUON BARREL






52
ME. CSC Production
Chamber with on-board electronics
PNPI
US
IHEP
Dubna
53
CMS Tracking System
  • The Higgs is weakly coupled to ordinary matter,
    as square of u, d quark mass, with no direct
    coupling to gluons. Thus, high interaction rates
    are required. The CMS pixel Si system has 100
    million elements so as to accommodate the
    resulting track densities.

Si pixels Si Strips - an all Si detector is
demanded by the high luminosity required to do
the Physics of the LHC
54
Size and the Energy of the Probe Particle
  • In order to "see" an object of size r one must
    use "light" with a wavelength l lt r. Thus,
    visible light with l 3000 A ( 1 A 10-8 cm,
    size of an atom) can resolve bacteria. Visible
    light comes from atomic transitions with eV
    energies ( ).
  • To resolve a virus, the electron microscope with
    keV energies was developed, leading to an
    increase of 1000 in resolving power.
  • To resolve the nucleus, 105 time smaller than the
    atom one needs probes in the GeV (109 eV) range.
    The size of a proton is 1 fm 10-13 cm . (
    )
  • The large Hadron Collider (LHC) at the CERN will
    explore Nature at the TeV scale or down to
    distances 0.0002 fm.

55
US CMS - HB Completed
56
CMS Trigger and DAQ System
1 GHz interactions 40 MHz crossing rate lt 100 kHz
L1 rate lt10 kHz L2 rate lt 100 Hz L3 rate to
storage medium
The telecomm technology is moving very rapidly. A
L2 and L3 in software using the full event is
possible
57
CMS SUSY Reach
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com