Design and Operation of Trust Funds for Marine Protected Areas PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 26
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Design and Operation of Trust Funds for Marine Protected Areas


1
  • Design and Operation of Trust Funds for Marine
    Protected Areas

Third International Tropical Marine Ecosystems
Management Symposium (ITMEMS-3) October 16-20th,
Cozumel, Q.Roo, Mexico
2
Context
  • The big picture
  • Too much in (pollution)
  • Too much out (living organisms and natural
    resources)
  • Big time degradation of the coastline (coastal
    ecosystems including coral reefs)

3
Outline
  • A. Background
  • B. The design process, a practical approach
  • C. Critical issues during the first years
  • D. Conditions for success
  • E. Examples of best practices
  • F. Conclusions
  • G. Documental and on-line resources
  • H. Exchange session

4
A. Background
KEY CONCEPTS
  • Protected Area
  • The Science of Marine Protected Areas
  • Trust Funds
  • Environmental Funds
  • International and national (México) stats

5
A. Background
Different areas have different funding needs
6
A. Background
1962 1000 PAs , 3 of the Planet (land) 2003
102,102 PAs, 11.5 of the Planet.
Growth of global PAs 1873-2004
Source The World Conservation Union. 2006
7
Growth of PAs in Mexico 1976- 2006
Source Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales
Protegidas. 2006
8
PAs in Mexico (2006)
Total 155 Areas
Source Gutiérrez Carbonell, David, Et.al. 2006
9
Regional networks of MPAs (Gulf of California and
the Mesoamerican Reef)
Source Fondo Mexicano para la Conservación de la
Naturaleza A.C.
10
A. Background
The PA financing gap (global)
Source The World Conservation Union. 2006
11
A. Background
Source Burke, Lauretta, et.al. 2004
12
A. Background
Source Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales
Protegidas.2006
Funding of PAs in Mexico 2001-2006
13
B. The design process, a practical approach
  • Legal structure
  • Governance
  • Operational issues (program strategy and
    focus)
  • Spending rules and project cycle
  • Structure and staffing
  • In-country partnerships
  • Building the capacity of grantees
  • Monitoring and evaluation
  • Designing and executing a resource mobilization
    strategy

14
C. Critical issues during the first years
  • Sufficient design and startup resources (angel
    donor)
  • A great Steering Committee
  • Participation and support of all potential
    stakeholders
  • Government recognition of need
  • Full support from government (clear priorities)
  • International endorsement
  • More resources

15
D. Conditions for success
  • Stable board and staff evolution
  • Strong leadership from Executive Director
  • Strong leadership from Chairman of the Board
  • Stable funding scheme during first years of
    operation
  • Capable recipients
  • Political stability
  • Clear division of roles between EF and government
  • FtF the model

16
Life cycle of a Trust Fund, resources input vs
impact over time
Birth
17
Birth
  • Abundant enthusiasm, incipient professionalism.
  • Diffuse institutional and organizational
    structure
  • Authority, responsibilities and job descriptions
    not clear
  • Insufficient training and capacity building.
  • Survives its first years from public relations,
    prestige, contacts and resources raised by the
    board of directors
  • Acts as a loner with limited linkage to the
    institutional landscape

18
Growth
  • Personal enthusiasm levels.
  • Professionalism increases.
  • Institutional and organizational structure are
    defined to some extent.
  • Administrative and operational procedures are
    more clearly defined and utilized
  • Staff members attend training as opportunity
    rises
  • Incipient financial sustainability is achieved
    through fundraising and income generating
    activities

19
Consolidation
  • Professional workforce at all levels
  • Organizational structure is well defined
  • Administrative and operative processes are
    systematized
  • Staff members are trained and work as teams
  • Financing sources still influence the design and
    the execution of the projects
  • The organization has prestige at a local level.
  • Strategic alliances are forged with key actors in
    the region

20
Maturity
  • Members are recognized professionals
  • Programs grow at a regional and/or international
    scale
  • Programs and projects respond to country or
    region needs and priorities
  • Impact is measured
  • Performance criteria are established
  • Training follows the needs of both staff and
    programs
  • Generates its own resources through endowment
    income, membership fees and direct fundraising
  • Prestige is national and/or international
  • Strategic agreements with other actors contribute
    to a shared sustainability vision at a regional
    and or ecosystem scale

21
E. Examples of best practices
  • Asset management (8 per year)
  • Principal and complementary funding scheme (5
    different sources)
  • Scale (local vs. regional) i.e. MAR-Fund
  • Permanence (the FANP program)
  • Innovation at all levels (BP for MPAs and Rares
    pride campaign)
  • R D for mainstreaming biodiversity conservation
    in landscapes and sectors
  • Contingency and emergency funds

22
F. Conclusions
  • Importance of Environmental Funds
  • Strengthen the environmental management of a
    country or region through public-private
    partnerships
  • In depth knowledge of local, national and
    regional needs and priorities
  • - Involvement of diverse actors through board of
    directors and advisory committees
  • - Permanence and institutional continuity
    between political cycles
  • Institutional strengthening of recipients (public
    and private)
  • Source of capacity building, networking and
    information exchange on technical and managerial
    topics

23
F. Conclusions (contd.)
  • The 21st century NGO (Trust Fund)

24
F. Conclusions (contd.)
  • The 21st century NGO (Trust Fund)

25
G. Documental and on-line resources
  • Conservation Finance Alliance (CFA)
  • Financial Model for Marine Protected Areas (WWF
    and MarFund)
  • Burke, Lauretta and Maidens, Jon. 2004. Reefs at
    Risk in the Caribbean. http//images.wri.org/chart
    _rrcarib_pie_mpas.gif
  • CONANP. VI Aniversario CONANP 2006.
  • Emerton, L. , Bishop, J. and Thomas, L. 2006.
    Sustainable Financing of Protected Areas. IUCN,
    Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, U.K 97 pages
  • Gutiérrez Carbonell, David Creel Bezaury, Juan.
    Notas para el capítulo Parte B. Segundo Estudio
    País. Capítulo 9. Áreas Naturales Protegidas.
  • http//www.conanp.gob.mx/anp/anp.php
  • Norris, Ruth (editor). 2000. The IPG Handbook on
    Environmental Funds. A resource book for the
    design and operation of environmental funds.
  • Oleas, Reyna and Barragán Lourdes. August 2003.
    Environmental Funds as a Mechanism for
    Conservation and Sustainable Development in Latin
    America and the Caribbean.
  • Partnership for Interdisciplinary Studies of
    Coastal Oceans. 2002.The Science of Marine
    Reserves. http//www.piscoweb.org. 22 pages

26
Thanks !
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com