MANAGING U'S' UNIVERSITY RESEARCH WITHIN OMB RATES - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 8
About This Presentation
Title:

MANAGING U'S' UNIVERSITY RESEARCH WITHIN OMB RATES

Description:

MANAGING U'S' UNIVERSITY RESEARCH WITHIN OMB RATES – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:35
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 9
Provided by: weldon8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: MANAGING U'S' UNIVERSITY RESEARCH WITHIN OMB RATES


1
MANAGING U.S. UNIVERSITY RESEARCH WITHIN OMB RATES
  • Weldon Ihrig
  • University of Washington
  • July, 2008

2
UW Current FA Rates(effective July 1, 2007
June 30, 2009)
  • Organized Research Rates
  • On-campus 56
  • Off-campus 26
  • South Lake Union 66
  • Regional Primate Center A (44) and AB (75)
  • Applied Physics Laboratory 17
  • Vessels 25 (salary base)
  • Instruction Rates
  • On-campus 58
  • Off-campus 26

3
UW On-campus FA Rate Components
4
FA costs source of revenue
  • For FY 2006-2007, awarded grant and contracts
    exceeded 1 billion(US).
  • For FY 2006-2007, FA recovery was 189
    million(US)
  • 48 distributed to pay facilities costs
  • 31 distributed to fund departmental RCR
  • 20 used for other general administrative and
    library costs
  • (from Office of Research Facilities and
    Administrative Rate Primer http//www.washington.e
    du/research/4researchers/fa.php)

5
UW negotiated vs calculated FA rates
  • Negotiated on-campus rate 56
  • Calculated on-campus rate 61
    (administrative costs calculated 31 versus 26
    cap)
  • If 61 rate applied in FY 2007, recovery
    estimated to have increased by almost 19
    million(US)

6
What works for universities?
  • Competitive awards without politics
  • Single Federal indirect cost rate applied to all
    agencies
  • Rate based upon demonstrated prior indirect cost
    expenditures by the universities
  • Research opportunities enhances graduate
    undergraduate student experiences

7
Areas for Improvement
  • Remove 26 cap on administrative costs rate
  • Prohibit attempts by Federal agencies to cap
    indirect costs they will pay
  • Consistent interpretations of A-21 rules among
    regions reduce complexities
  • Exclude university cost sharing in calculating
    rate
  • Negotiations based upon cost components data, not
    bottom line target

8
Cautions for universities
  • Indirect costs recovered are for expenditures
    incurred, not free money
  • Risk of over investment in facilities assuming
    growth in research
  • Universities must comply with the A-21 rules to
    avoid political interventions
  • Growth in research requires investment in support
    services modernization of facilities
  • Fully loaded charge-out rate option for private
    foundations/businesses
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com