S.Mahendra Dev - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

S.Mahendra Dev

Description:

How to improve the delivery system under PDS? Should states take over the responsibility of PDS? ... How to improve the quality of the foodgrains? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: CESS
Category:
Tags: dev | how | improve | mahendra | to

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: S.Mahendra Dev


1
PROCUREMENT, DISTRIBUTION AND PUBLIC WORKS PDS,
FFW, EGS
  • S.Mahendra Dev
  • Director, CESS, Hyderabad

2
Objective of the paper
  • To examine the market reforms needed for
    achieving efficient, cost effective and,
    Sustainable food management system
  • Issues in this context
  • Procurement, Distribution, Public works
  • Methodologies for the proposed study

3
PROCUREMENT
  • Problem of Accumulation of foodgrains
  • Food Management not satisfactory (60 to 70 mt of
    foodgrains with 260 million poor)
  • Increasing Procurement Prices
  • - Discouraged Private Trade
  • - Exports Uncompetitive
  • - Reduced Consumption due to lower
  • Purchasing Power
  • - Decline in Off-take

4
PROCUREMENT(Contd.)
  • Long Term Factors Changing Consumption Patterns
  • Food Subsidy has Increased Significantly
  • Producer Subsidy Increased While Consumer Subsidy
    Declined

5
What are the needed reforms?
  • The policies have adversely affected private
    trade
  • It has become expensive and unsustainable
  • How to make the existing system economically
    efficient, more targeted and financially
    sustainable?
  • Reduce the role of FCI and increase private trade

6
Procurement Policy Suggestions
  • Freeze MSP for a few years
  • Farmers income yieldPrices
  • Decentralise Procurement (centralised Vs
    Decentralised)
  • MSP scheme to modify to change cropping pattern
  • Income Policy is suggested. But not viable
  • Restrict role of FCI to price stabilisation and
    buffer stock maintainance, leaving PDS to States

7
Procurement Policy Suggestions
  • Cost of Procurement Vis-à-vis Private Sector
  • The questioning of scale economies in
    procurement
  • The question of direct purchase from the farmers

8
Storage and Marketing Reforms
  • 17 million tons of average stocks (for PDS and
    buffer) ERC suggestion
  • Involving private sector in storage and handling
    the grain
  • Formulation and adoption of price band rules
    that allow efficient private sector participation
    supported by strengthened market information
    system

9
Storage and Marketing Reforms (Contd.)
  • Phasing out rice levy over the medium term
  • Development of Negotiable warehouse receipt
    systems
  • Formulating a competition policy to ensure fair
    trading practices by private traders
  • Improving the efficiency anf effectiveness of FCI

10
Methodologies
  • Theoretical
  • Impact of procurement on average price received
    by farmers is sought to be analysed in a partial
    equillibrium framework(Schiff, 1993)
  • Impact of food procurement and rationing schemes
    on the welfare of different individuals is
    analysed in a simple analytical model (Raj Sah
    and Srinivasan)

11
Methodologies (Contd.)
  • Many empirical srudies Relationship between
    procurement and wholesale prices (Raj Krishna and
    Roychoudhuri, Gulati, Sharma etc.)

12
In the Proposed Study
  • Simulations The impact of prices on demand for
    foodgrains
  • What happened to private stocks during the
    accumalation period? Estimate the private stocks
    through some indirect methods
  • Public Vs. Private costs. How costly are FCI
    operations?

13
In the Proposed Study
  • Income Policy Is it feasible in a country with
    100 million holdings?
  • How viable is decentralised procurement? Impact
    on food subsidy
  • Policy induced Inefficiencies in the private
    sector Storage, milling, transport, external
    trade, market support services
  • Basically to suggest a sustainable cost effective
    procurement and policy

14
Public Distribution System-Issues
  • Inspite of high food subsidy (Rs. 21000 Crores)
    it is not reaching the poor
  • The overall impact of PDS on the poor seems to be
    less
  • There has been significant diversion of PDS
    commodities
  • Poor states have not benefited. Relationship
    between poverty and PDS off-take is weak
  • TPDS has problems

15
Options
  • Method to reduce costs of distribution
  • Geographical Targetting
  • Food Cupons
  • Food-for-work programmes, Nutrition Programmes

16
Questions to be addressed
  • How to improve targeting of the PDS through
    innovative methods?
  • What are the measures needed to reduce the
    diversion of commodities from TDPS?
  • How to improve the delivery system under PDS?
  • Should states take over the responsibility of
    PDS?
  • Does Involvement of Panchayats improve the
    performance?

17
Questions to be addressed (Contd.)
  • How to improve the quality of the foodgrains? Or
    should one give low quality or inferior goods
    under PDS?
  • Should we introduce food coupon/food credit card
    system to improve the performance of PDS?
  • What are the international best practices in
    targeting food subsidies to the poor?

18
Methodologies
  • There are a number of studies on the
    effectiveness of PDS in India (Kirit Parikh,
    Radhakrishna et al, Shikha and many others)
  • A number of committees or working of groups also
    examined the issue of PDS ( Expenditure Reforms
    Commission, Working group on 10th Plan, High
    powered committee on grain policy etc.)
  • Some studies have examined the welfare gains to
    the poor due to operation of the PDS

19
Methodologies (Contd.)
  • Parikh(1994) estimated the income accruing to the
    bottom 20 of the households
  • Radhakrishna et al estimated the gains and costs
    of PDS and compared it with other similar
    programmes

20
Source Radhakrishna et al
21
Source Radhakrishna et al
22
(No Transcript)
23
Methodology on subsidy Transfer
  • Difference between the exp. that the hh would
    have incurred in the absence of PDS and the
    actual expenditure under PDS
  • Income gain to the household Y is defined as Y
    qR( pM- pR), where pM and pR open market and
    subsidised prices and qR is quantity purchased
    from PDS. The open and subsidised prices are
    estimated form the PDS survey data as pm eM/qm
    and pr er/qr

24
Methodologies (Contd.)
  • Three types of analysis a) Extent of income
    transfers through PDS and consequent reduction in
    poverty b) the nutritional impact of PDS on the
    poor c) Cost per rupee income transferred to the
    poor

25
Methodologies- Targeting errors
  • Inclusion (Type I) and Exclusion (Type II)
  • Inclusion error PDS Non-poor/ total
    beneficiaries
  • Exclusion error PDS poor/total poor
  • There were a number of studies using this
    methodologies (Cornia and Stewart used for a
    number of countries)

26
Methodologies
  • In the proposed study, some of the above
    methodologies will be used
  • In addition, mechanisms will be ecplored to link
    PDS with EGS/food-for-work and ICDS programmes
  • Also, field study will be conducted on food
    coupoun system in AP depending on the time

27
Food for work Programme/CFW and ICDS
  • Public works important instruments for
    alleviating poverty and hunger in Southe Asia
    (EGS, JRY, EAS, SGRY, Bangladesh FFW)

28
Issues
  • Merit is self targeting
  • Direct benefits (employment and income)
  • Indirect benefits (stabilisation, insurance,
    asset creation, upward pressure on agril. Wages)
  • Work fare schemes vs. untargeted transfers
  • Wage rate and targetting
  • Cash vs Kind
  • Social opportunity cost of funds
  • Opportunity cost for the individuals
  • Conflicts between the relief and asset creation

29
Evaluation (Cost Effectiveness) of Public Works
Programmes
  • Net income gain to poor workers
  • Decomposition into the following five variables
  • I. The budget leverage (G C)/G, G is
    Government spending and C is private
    Co-financing
  • II. The labour intensity (WL)/(GC), W is the
    wage rate paid to poor and L is leakage to the
    non-poor

30
Evaluation (Cost Effectiveness) of Public Works
Programmes
  • III. The targeting performance W/(WL_
  • IV. The net Wage gain NW/W is the gross share
    of wage received by participants
  • V. Indirect Benefit IB/NW where IB are
    indirect benefits to the poor
  • The net gain to poor
  • B/G (G C)/G (WL)/(GC) W /(WL)
    NW/W(1IB/NW)

31
  • It is useful also to decompose the last ratio as

  • IB/NW IB/SB(SB/(GC))/(NW/(GC))
  • Which gives IB/NW as the product of further
    three ratios
  • VI. Poors share of social benefits (IB/SB)
  • VII. The inverse of the share of net wage gains
    to total cost.

32
Cost effectiveness of Workfare Programs
33
India EGS Vs. PDS
34
  • One issue is how to link PDS with food for work
    programme. With accumulation of foodgrains it
    makes sense
  • ICDS Recent evaluations by NIN show that
  • Most of the ICDS beneficiaries come from very
    deprived socio-economic groups
  • Coverage of immunisation is also better in ICDS
    areas

35
Issues
  • Shortcommings Irregular food supply coverage of
    below 3 years under SNP has been relatively low.
    There is little community participation in
    running ICDS the Aws do not have adequate
    buildings interdepartmental coordination is poor
  • NCAER also did evaluation of ICDS in India

36
To Sum Up
  • The study examines the market reforms needed for
    efficient, cost effective sustainable food
    management system in order to have food security
    for the poor. The issues and methodologies
    mentioned will be used in the proposed study
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com