Title: The Open Economy
1The Open Economy
- Part 1. Adding the Exchange Rate to the
3-EquationMacro Model
2Why are exchange rates important?
- In open economy, exchange rate is key component
of monetary transmission mechanism - Channel through which overseas developments may
affect domestic economy. Eg are flexible exchange
rates shock absorbers or additional sources of
volatility? - Real exchange rate affects terms on which
companies compete in international markets
3Real and nominal exchange rates
- ? price of foreign goods in domestic currency
price of domestic goods ?
Pe P - where P is foreign price level P is domestic
price level e units of domestic currency
one unit of foreign currencyor in logs
? e p - p - e? ? exchange rate depreciation
4Price setting in the open economy
- Two alternative pricing rules(1) Home-cost
pricing firms set export prices in same way as
goods sold at home, ie based on domestic
costs(2) World pricing firms set export prices
based on prices of similar products produced
abroad - Suppose increase in costs in UK but not abroad.
Under (1) price competitiveness deteriorates.
Under (2) non-price competitiveness deteriorates.
Both captured by RULC foreign unit labour
costs in domestic currency
domestic unit labour costs
ULCe ULC
5What determines exchange rate movements?
- Currency fluctuations should reflect
macroeconomic variables such as domestic and
foreign real interest rates, money supplies,
current accounts and relative domestic demand - But there is no well specified theoretical
exchange rate model that encompasses all the
relevant variables and performs well empirically - Nothing can systematically explain exchange rate
movements between major currencies
6Purchasing power parity (PPP)
- Law of one price (LOOP) implies common currency
price of a traded good is identical in different
countries. PPP is exchange rate that equalises
price levels expressed in domestic currency
between two countries (when LOOP holds for all
traded goods) - Assumed to hold in long run. In short run, real
exchange rate variability is almost perfect
reflection of nominal exchange rate variability - By definition?? ?e p p
- ?? 0 when PPP holds
7Uncovered interest parity (UIP)
- If UIP holds, risk averse investors are
indifferent between investing in domestic and
foreign assets -
If i rises by 1 relative to i for a year, e
would be expected to depreciate by 1 over the
next year To rule out arbitrage opportunities, e
must appreciate by 1 immediately
8Exchange rate as a random walk
- On a daily basis, changes in floating foreign
exchange rates are largely unpredictable - On a month to month basis, over 90 of exchange
rate movements are unexpected, and less than 10
are predictable - Empirically, it is hard to beat the following
model?e ex where ex is white noise - Bank of England MPC assumes ½UIP and ½RW when
producing its forecasts
9Dornbusch (1976) overshooting model
- Dornbusch developed a simple model that captured
two stylised facts of fx markets(i) high
exchange rate volatility(ii) high correlation
between nominal and real exchange rates - Dornbusch showed that with sluggish adjustment in
goods market and rapid adjustment in asset
markets, exchange rate volatility is needed to
equilibriate economy in response to monetary
shocks - Two relationships at heart of Dornbusch model(1)
UIP ?e i i(2) Money demand m p ?i
fy ?,fgt0
10Dornbusch model (continued)
- Need to combine equations (1) and (2) with three
assumptions(i) domestic price level does not
move instantaneously to unanticipated monetary
disturbances but adjusts slowly over time(ii)
output moves slowly in response to monetary
shocks(iii) money is neutral in long run, ie a
permanent fall in m leads to a proportionate fall
in e and p in long run - Suppose m falls. With p fixed in short run, (m-p)
falls. To equilibriate system, demand for real
balances must fall. With y fixed in short run,
(2) ? i must rise - From (1) when i rises, domestic currency expected
to depreciate. But how is this possible if
long-run effect of higher m is proportionate
appreciation of exchange rate?
11Exchange rate overshooting
- Only way of resolving conundrum is for initial
appreciation, on impact, to be larger than
long-run appreciation, ie exchange rate must
overshoot - Whole result driven by assumed rigidity of
domestic prices. No overshooting if all prices
perfectly flexible
12Weaknesses of Dornbusch model
- Considers flows of income etc but not potential
stock implications of these flows (subsequently
considered by portfolio balance models) - Ignores role of current account in exchange rate
determination (subsequently considered by
intertemporal approach) - Neither microfounded nor general equilibrium in
nature - Model has difficulty rationalising high
persistence of real exchange rate movements - Model not proved good at forecasting future
currency movements
13Fundamental equilibrium exchange rate (FEER)
- FEER is exchange rate consistent with internal
and external balance) - Wide range of estimates of equilibrium exchange
rate for /
Selected estimates of / nominal equilibrium
exchange rate
14Monetary policy under flexible exchange
ratesCase 1 PPP and UIP hold simultaneously
- When PPP and UIP hold simultaneously (in
long-run)PPP ?? ?e p p 0UIP ?e i
i - Note that irp and irp?? r r
- When PPP holds, r r
- When PPP and UIP hold simultaneously, no room for
independent real interest rate policy under
flexible exchange rates. Central bank cant deal
with demand shocks - But since irp, central bank can set nominal
interest rates to achieve inflation target
15New Keynesian open economy model
- IS curvey a ßr ?? eD
- Phillips curvep pT dy eS
- Assume companies price to market, so they leave
prices unchanged in local market even if nominal
exchange rate changes
16Monetary policy under flexible exchange
ratesCase 2 UIP holds but not PPP (short run)
- Minimise loss function L (p pT)2 ?y2
- ? y d eS
- d2?
- From IS curverOPT a 1 eD d eS
? ? ß ß ß(d2?) ß - Central bank responds to demand and supply shocks
as well as to the real exchange rate - Note real exchange rate is function of r (?? r
r)
17Approximation to UIP
- Assume real exchange rate adjusts to its long-run
level ? asymptotically?1 ? g(?-?) - Subtract ? from both sides?? (1-g)? -
(1-g)?? ? 1 ?? 1-g - Note that ???ep-p. Also ?ei-i. And irp??
(rp) (rp) p p r r? ? 1
(r r) 1-g - For simplicity, assume g0 and ?0? r r
18Case 2 continuedUIP holds but not PPP (short run)
- Assuming ? r-r
- rOPT a 1 eD d
eS ? r ß? ß?
(ß?)(d2 ?) ß? - Central bank responds to demand and supply shocks
as well as to the foreign real interest rate. But
interest rates respond less vigorously to shocks
than in closed economy case because of additional
exchange rate channel - Optimal response to shocks affecting demand side
(eD and r) does not depend on central banks
preferences ? - Reaction of central bank to supply shocks depends
on ?
19Open economy IS curve
- IS curvey a ßr ?? eDy a ßr
?(rr) eDy (a?r) (ß?)r eD - Open economy IS curve is flatter than closed
economy IS curve. - A cut in interest rates also leads to a
depreciation in the exchange rate. Both channels
stimulate demand - Can conduct same analysis of shocks as in closed
economy model
20Monetary policy under flexible exchange
ratesCase 3 Exchange rates as random walk
- When real exchange rate follows a random walk?
? eX - rOPT a 1 eD d eS ? eX
ß ß ß(d2?) ß - Random exchange rate movements constitute an
additional shock to which the central bank has to
respond with its interest rate policy - Real interest rates could become very volatile if
there are big random fluctuations in exchange
rates. Typically interest rates are smoother ?
sub-optimal response
21Monetary policy under fixed exchange rates
- Central bank loses ability to run domestically
oriented interest rate policy. Since ?e 0, UIP
condition simplifies to i i - Since r i p, we have r i p
- This can be transformed into a simple instrument
ruler (ipT) (-1)(ppT) 0.y - Taylor principle is no longer satisfied. Under
fixed exchange rates, real interest rates have to
fall when inflation rises. Economic system
threatens to become unstable
22Monetary policy response to an inflation shock
under fixed exchange rates
r
rs
A
IS
y
p
VPC
PC(pe2)
pT2
A
0
y
y
23Arguments for flexible exchange rates
- Exchange rate changes needed to compensate for
inflation differentials (PPP). Equilibrium value
of exchange rate is unknown. Fixing at wrong rate
could be damaging - Fixed exchange rates can only be adjusted
sporadically, leaving long periods of
misalignments. Expectation of realignments may
lead to speculative attacks - Exchange rate changes needed to cope with shocks
that alter external competitiveness eg changing
energy prices. With a fixed exchange rate regime,
either all prices have to adjust or exchange rate
must change. With wage and price rigidity, less
painful to change exchange rate
24Arguments for fixed exchange rates
- Flexible exchange rates fluctuate by far more
than can be explained by inflation differentials
or real disturbances - Overshooting implies that exchange rate tends to
move away from its equilibrium level - Volatility of exchange rates imparts additional
uncertainty and instability to the economy
25Dangers of an overvalued exchange rate
- All attempts by UK government to fix sterling
exchange rate have ended in failure. Two common
themes (1) Sterling fixed at uncompetitive
exchange rate. (2) Transitional costs
underestimated - Return to Gold Standard in 1925 Ended in forced
devaluation after six years of stagnant growth,
high unemployment and a national strike - Post-war fix vs US dollar in 1946 and rejection
of devaluation by incoming Labour government in
1964 Both episodes ended in forced devaluation 3
years later - ERM entry in 1990 Sterling was ejected from ERM
less than two years later
26Further reading
- Burda and Wyplosz, Macroeconomics, A European
Text, 4th edition, Chapters 7, 19, 20 - Carlin and Soskice, Macroeconomics, Chapters 2,
5, 9 - For a very readable introduction to the
Dornbusch model, seeRogoff, K (2002),
Dornbuschs overshooting model after twenty five
years, Second Annual IMF Research Conference
The Mundell-Fleming lecturehttp//www.imf.org/ext
ernal/np/speeches/2001/kr/112901.pdf -