Alphaparticleinduced bystander effects between zebrafish embryos in vivo - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Alphaparticleinduced bystander effects between zebrafish embryos in vivo

Description:

... on bystander effect in vivo in mice and in fish ... 0.5 Gy X-ray ... Communication of Radiation-induced Stress or Bystander Signals between Fish in Vivo. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:61
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: icnts200
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Alphaparticleinduced bystander effects between zebrafish embryos in vivo


1
Alpha-particle-induced bystander effects between
zebrafish embryos in vivo
  • E.H.W. Yum1, V.W.Y. Choi1, V.W.T. Li2, S.H.
    Cheng2, and K.N. Yu1
  • 1Department of Physics and Materials Science,
  • City University of Hong Kong
  • 2Department of Chemistry and Biology,
  • City University of Hong Kong

2
Introduction
  • Objectives
  • To study whether alpha-particles can induce in
    vivo bystander effects
  • Identifying the relationship between the
    alpha-particle absorbed dose and the bystander
    effect
  • Zebrafish embryos as the model

3
Introduction
  • Radiation-induced Bystander Effect
  • At cell level
  • Unirradiated cells respond as if they have been
    irradiated
  • When contact with irradiated cells
  • Or in medium previously holding irradiated cells

Yang, H., Asaad, N., Held, K.D., 2005.
Medium-mediated intercellular communication is
involved in bystander responses of X-ray-
irradiated normal human fibroblasts. Oncogene.
24, 2096-2103
4
Introduction
  • Bystander Effect

Responds as it has been irradiated
  • When they are put in contact or they share the
    same medium

Yang, H., Asaad, N., Held, K.D., 2005.
Medium-mediated intercellular communication is
involved in bystander responses of X-ray-
irradiated normal human fibroblasts. Oncogene.
24, 2096-2103
5
Introduction
  • Bystander effect in vivo are always questioned

Responds as it also receive radiation?????
Morgan, W.F., 2003. Non-targeted and delayed
effects of exposure to ionizing radiation II.
Radiation-induced genomic instability and
bystander effect in Vivo, clastogenic factors and
transgenerational effects. Radiation research
159, 581-595.
6
Introduction
  • Recent researches on bystander effects in vivo

0.5 Gy X-ray
  • This communication signals involved secretion of
    a chemical messenger into the water

Mothersill, C., Bucking, C., Smith, R.W.,
Agnihotri, N., ONeill, A., Kilemade, M.,
Seymour, C.B., 2006. Communication of
Radiation-induced Stress or Bystander Signals
between Fish in Vivo. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40,
6859-6864. Mothersill, C., Smith, R.W.,
Agnihotri, N., Seymour, C.B., 2007.
Characterization of a radiation-induced stress
response communicated in vivo between zebrafish.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 3382-3387.
7
Introduction
  • Zebrafish development stages

Embryo cell
Chorion
1.5 hours after fertilization
4 hours after fertilization
16 hours after fertilization
24 hours after fertilization
http//www.swarthmore.edu/NatSci/sgilber1/DB_lab/F
ish/fish_stage.html
8
Introduction
  • Why study alpha particles ?
  • An ionizing radiation with high linear energy
    transfer (LET)
  • Furthermore, alpha-particle emitters can be
    easily found in our environment.

9
Introduction
a particles
DNA damage
Apoptosis
?
?
10
Introduction
  • In this project
  • Irradiation 1.5 hours after fertilization
  • No repair mechanism at this stage ? can magnify
    our results for investigation
  • Apoptotic cell staining 24 hours after
    fertilization
  • Bladens group found it the best time to
    investigate the no. of apoptotic cell after
    trying different time stages

Walker, C., Streisinger, G., 1983. Induction of
mutations by gamma rays in pregonial germ cells
of zebrafish embryos. Genetics. 103, 125-136
Bladen, C.L., Lam, W.K., Dynan, W.S., Kozlowski,
D.J., 2005. DNA damage response and Ku80 function
in the vertebrate embryo. Nucleic Acids Research
33, 3002-3010.
11
Methodology
  • Dechorionation of zebrafish embryos
  • Alpha-particle irradiation
  • Bystander signal exposure
  • Apoptotic cell staining
  • Determining the absorbed dose

12
Methodology
  • Dechorionation of zebrafish embryos
  • Range of 5.5 MeV a-particles in water 42 µm
  • The chorion will absorb all the alpha-particle
    energies

220um
13
Methodology
Water
Agarose Layer
Zebrafish embryos with chorions
  • The chorions were removed by hands with forceps

14
Methodology
  • Alpha-particle irradiation

Alpha particles (passing through a large
and variable thickness of fluid)
water
  • To control the incident alpha-particle energy
  • ? alpha particles should pass through the
    substrate which
  • was in contact with the embryo cells

15
Methodology
  • Alpha-particle irradiation


16 µm PADC film
fluid
?-particles
16
Methodology
  • PADC films of 16 µm were used
  • polyallyldiglycol-carbonate
  • Repeating unit of PADC
  • Most importantly
  • It is biocompatible and can record the number of
    alpha particles hitting the embryo cells

17
Methodology
16 µm PADC films glued to holes
2mm diameter holes
18
Methodology
19
Methodology
Agarose
Shallow regions
20
Methodology
  • Bystander effect exposure (Part 1)
  • Aim to prove the existence of alpha-particle-induc
    ed bystander effects

21
Methodology
  • Bystander effect exposure (Part 1)
  • Aim at proving the existence of
    alpha-particle-induced bystander effects

Control experiment
22
Methodology
  • Bystander effect exposure (Part 2)
  • Aim at identifying the relationship between the
    alpha-particle absorbed dose and the bystander
    effect

23
Methodology
  • Bystander effect exposure (Part 2)

24
Methodology
25
Methodology
  • Apoptotic cell staining
  • At 24 hours post fertilization
  • Using acridine orange
  • Photos taking
  • No. of apoptotic cells were counted

26
Methodology
Signal of apoptotic cell
27
Methodology
  • Determining the absorbed dose

28
Methodology
  • Determining the absorbed dose

29
Methodology
  • Determining the absorbed dose

30
Methodology
  • Why counting? It is tedious and time consuming.
  • The size and shape of the cells varied
    significantly
  • The contact area of the cell with the PADC film
    varied significantly
  • Impractical to estimate the no. of
    alpha-particles striking the embryos cells using
    track density by assumed geometry

31
Results and Discussion
Average no. of apoptotic cells naive gt control
naive
N Average number of apoptotic cells n sample
size P p values obtained
32
Results and Discussion
The p values lt0.05
N Average number of apoptotic cells n sample
size P p values obtained
33
Results and Discussion
y ABx
34
Conclusions
  • Our results gave strong support to the existence
    of alpha-particle-induced bystander effects
    between zebrafish embryos in vivo
  • A general positive correlation between the
    apoptotic signals in the naive embryos and the
    alpha-particle dose absorbed by the irradiated
    embryos.
  • These supported the bystander factors involved
    chemical messengers secreted into the water
    medium.

35
Thank You!
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com