Neural Networks in the Prediction of Avian Risk Status PowerPoint PPT Presentation

presentation player overlay
1 / 26
About This Presentation
Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Neural Networks in the Prediction of Avian Risk Status


1
Neural Networks in the Prediction of Avian Risk
Status
  • Cole Flohr
  • April 27, 2006

2
Problem
  • Develop a network to predict the degree of
    extinction risk for bird species based on life
    history data

3
IUCN Criteria
  • Rate of decline
  • Population size
  • Area of geographic distribution
  • Degree of population and distribution
    fragmentation
  • Extinct
  • Extinct in the Wild
  • Critically Endangered
  • Endangered
  • Vulnerable
  • Near Threatened
  • Least Concern
  • Data Deficient

4
Goals
  • Develop a risk prediction network that does not
    rely on measuring population declines
  • Habitat decline
  • Possible relationships to life histories
  • Investigate which factors seem to be most
    indicative of extinction risk

5
Network Design
  • Target Function
  • IUCN Red List Category
  • Least Concern or At Risk
  • Data North American Birds
  • 2,000 Birds, non-Hawaian
  • 600-700 available data sets
  • Nesting, Breeding, and Feeding Habits
  • Source Ehrlich, Dobkin, Wheye

6
Nesting Data
  • Nest Location
  • ( hight from ground)
  • Floating
  • Ground
  • Shrub
  • Tree
  • Cliff
  • Nest Type
  • Scraped
  • Cup
  • Platform
  • Pendant
  • Cavity
  • Burrow

7
Mating and Rearing Roles
  • Mating System
  • Monogamy
  • Polygyny (M F)
  • Polyandry (F M)
  • Promiscuity (indescriminate)
  • Polygamy (polygyny and polyandry)
  • Cooperative (Females rear broods together,
    non-breeding birds help parents)
  • Gender Roles
  • Nest Builder
  • Incubator
  • Tending Young

8
Development
  • Development at Hatching
  • Precocial
  • Independent, eyes open, downy
  • Semiprecocial
  • Dependant, eyes open, downy
  • Altricial
  • Helpless, blind, featherless
  • Development Rates
  • Incubation time
  • Hatching to Fledging (in Days)

9
Behavior and Diet
  • Primary Diet
  • Greens
  • Insects
  • Fish
  • Vertebrates
  • Fruits
  • Nectar
  • Nuts
  • Omnivore
  • Foraging Technique
  • Glean (Ground, Foliage, bark, hover)
  • Hawks
  • Probes
  • Aerial Foraging
  • Dabbles
  • Stalk and strike
  • Hover and Pounce
  • Surface Dives/Dips

10
Numerical Input
Unknowns substituted with average values for
similar species
11
Network Construction
  • SNNS (JavaNNS)
  • 15 input nodes
  • 8 or 15 hidden nodes in one layer
  • 6 or 2 output nodes

12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
(No Transcript)
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
(No Transcript)
19
Sample Results
  • 7.1
  • 10 0.1 1 3 12 16 0.1 3 23.5 11
  • 6.5 3 25 32 1
  • 0 1
  • 0.03706 0.96277
  • 10.1
  • 10 0.1 7 0 1 1 0.1 3 44 1
  • 60 3 4 6 22
  • 0 1
  • 0.09207 0.90872
  • 11.1
  • 15 15 4 3 1 1 0.1 3 50 0.1
  • 170 3 4 6 20
  • 1 0
  • 0.99881 0.00121
  • 12.1
  • 10 0.1 4 3 2 4 0.1 4 21 2
  • 28 3 6 5 34
  • 1 0
  • SNNS result file V1.4-3D
  • generated at Tue Apr 25 193104 2006
  • No. of input units 15
  • No. of output units 2
  • 1.1
  • 10 0.1 1 2 4 7 0.1 2 22.5 15
  • 42.5 3 25 6 31
  • 1 0
  • 0.99305 0.00692
  • 2.1
  • 10 0.1 1 2 4 7 0.1 2 27.5 15
  • 56.5 3 25 6 31
  • 1 0
  • 0.99312 0.00686
  • 3.1
  • 10 0.1 1 2 8 10 0.1 2 27.5 15
  • 61.5 2 6 32 32
  • 1 0
  • 0.97757 0.02237

20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
Analysis-New Examples
  • 32.1
  • 15 4 2 3 3 4 0.1 3 14 0.1
  • 13 3 5 21 1
  • 0 1
  • 0.09803 0.90208
  • 33.1
  • 10 0 2 2 4 5 0.1 2 10 0.1
  • 9.5 3 5 -1 2
  • 0 1
  • 0.86904 0.12982
  • 34.1
  • 10 0 2 2 4 5 0.1 4 11.5 0.1
  • 11 4 5 -1 2
  • 1 0
  • 0.88426 0.11459
  • 35.1
  • 20 15 8 2 4 5 0.1 4 13 0.1
  • 10 4 5 -1 2
  • 1 0
  • 0.80259 0.19548

23
Preliminary Conclusions
  • Network can learn risk status from life history
    data
  • Accuracy on training set gt 95
  • Accuracy on new examples
  • 50 percent for 6 output nodes
  • 70 percent for 2 output nodes

24
Ongoing work
  • Continue error analysis
  • Use the six-category target function with a
    single output node
  • Retrain networks with larger example set
  • Compare results from a Passeriformes only network
    to all families network
  • Investigate the contribution of certain categories

25
Questions?
26
Weights
  • Nest Location
  • Nest Height
  • Nest Type
  • Nest Builder
  • Clutch Min
  • Clutch Max
  • Mating System
  • Incubating Sex
  • Incubation Time
  • Dev. at Hatching
  • Time to Fledge
  • Tending Parent
  • Diet 1
  • Diet 2
  • Foraging Technique
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com