HIGHLY LEVERAGED TRANSACTIONS: LBO Valuation and Modeling Basics

About This Presentation
Title:

HIGHLY LEVERAGED TRANSACTIONS: LBO Valuation and Modeling Basics

Description:

Title: Leveraged Buyout Structures and Valuation Author: Donald M. DePamphilis Last modified by: Don Created Date: 7/17/2003 1:53:27 AM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:11
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HIGHLY LEVERAGED TRANSACTIONS: LBO Valuation and Modeling Basics


1
HIGHLY LEVERAGED TRANSACTIONSLBO Valuation and
Modeling Basics
2
A billion here and a billion there soon adds up
to real money.

Everett Dirksen
3
(No Transcript)
4
Learning Objectives
  • Primary Learning Objective To provide students
    with a knowledge of alternative approaches to
    valuing leveraged buyouts and the basics of LBO
    modeling techniques
  • Secondary Learning Objectives To provide
    students with a knowledge of
  • Cost of capital approach to valuation
  • Adjusted present value approach to valuation
  • The advantages and disadvantages of each
    valuation approach and
  • The underpinnings of LBO structuring and
    valuation models

5
Valuing LBOs
  • A leveraged buyout can be evaluated from the
    perspective of common equity investors or of all
    investors and lenders
  • From common equity investors perspective,
  • NPV PVFCFE IEQ 0
  • Where NPV Net present value
  • PVFCFE Present value of free cash
    flows to common equity
  • investors
  • IEQ The value of common equity
  • From investors and lenders perspective,
  • NPV PVFCFF ITC 0
  • Where PVFCFF Present value of free cash
    flows to the firm
  • ITC Total investment or the value
    of total capital including
  • common and preferred stock
    and all debt.

6
Decision Rules
  • LBOs make sense from viewpoint of investors and
    lenders if PV of free cash flows to the firm is
    to the total investment consisting of debt and
    common and preferred equity
  • However, a LBO can make sense to common equity
    investors but not to other investors and lenders.
    The market value of debt and preferred stock
    held before the transaction may decline due to a
    perceived reduction in the firms ability to
  • Repay such debt as the firm assumes substantial
    amounts of new debt and to
  • Pay interest and dividends on a timely basis.

7
Valuing LBOs Cost of Capital Method1
  • Adjusts for the varying level of risk as the
    firms total debt is repaid.
  • Step 1 Project annual cash flows until
  • target D/E achieved
  • Step 2 Project debt-to-equity ratios
  • Step 3 Calculate terminal value
  • Step 4 Adjust discount rate to reflect
    changing risk
  • Step 5 Determine if deal makes sense
  • 1Also known as the variable risk method.

8
Cost of Capital Method Step 1
  • Project annual cash flows until target D/E ratio
    achieved
  • Target D/E is the level of debt relative to
    equity at which
  • The firm will have to resume payment of taxes and
  • The amount of leverage is likely to be acceptable
    to IPO investors or strategic buyers (often the
    prevailing industry average)

9
Cost of Capital Method Step 2
  • Project annual debt-to-equity ratios
  • The decline in D/E reflects
  • The known debt repayment schedule and
  • The projected growth in the market value of
    shareholders equity (assumed to grow at the same
    rate as net income)

10
Cost of Capital Method Step 3
  • Calculate terminal value of projected cash flow
    to equity investors (TVE) at time t, (i.e., the
    year in which the initial investors choose to
    exit the business).
  • TVE represents PV of the dollar proceeds
    available to the firm through an IPO or sale to a
    strategic buyer at time t.

11
Cost of Capital Method Step 4
  • Adjust the discount rate to reflect changing
    risk.
  • The firms cost of equity will decline over time
    as debt is repaid and equity grows, thereby
    reducing the leveraged ß. Estimate the firms ß
    as follows
  • ßFL1 ßIUL1(1 (D/E)F1(1-tF))
  • where ßFL1 Firms levered beta in
    period 1
  • ßIUL1 Industrys unlevered
    beta in period 1
  • ßIL1/(1(D/E)I1(1-
    tI))
  • ßIL1 Industrys levered
    beta in period 1
  • (D/E)I1 Industrys
    debt-to-equity ratio in period 1
  • tI Industrys
    marginal tax rate in period 1
  • (D/E)F1 Firms debt-to-equity
    ratio in period 1
  • tF Firms marginal tax
    rate in period 1
  • Recalculate each successive periods ß with the
    D/E ratio for that period and, using that
    periods ß, recalculate the firms cost of equity
    for that period.

12
Cost of Capital Method Step 5
  • Determine if deal makes sense
  • Does the PV of free cash flows to equity
    investors (including the terminal value) equal or
    exceed the equity investment including
    transaction-related fees?

13
Evaluating the Cost of Capital Method
  • Advantages
  • Adjusts the discount rate to reflect diminishing
    risk as the debt-to-total capital ratio declines
  • Takes into account that the deal may make sense
    for common equity investors but not for lenders
    or preferred shareholders
  • Disadvantage Calculations more burdensome than
    Adjusted Present Value Method

14
Cost of Capital Method An Illustration
Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC)
Assumptions Assumptions 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 2018 2019
Market Value of 12 PIK Preferred Equity ( Million) Market Value of 12 PIK Preferred Equity ( Million) 22 24.6 27.6 30.9 34.6 38.8 38.8 43.4 48.6
Market Value of Common Equity ( Million) Market Value of Common Equity ( Million) 3 2.3 3.3 4.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 5.7 6.0
Equity ( Million) Equity ( Million) 25 27.0 30.9 34.9 39.6 44.2 44.2 49.1 54.6
Debt ( Million) Debt ( Million) 47 39.5 31.5 23.8 19.2 14.3 14.3 8.8 2.7
Comparable Firm Comparable Firm                  
Price/Earnings Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio 6                
Levered Beta (ß) Levered Beta (ß) 2.4                
Debt/Equity Ratio Debt/Equity Ratio 0.3                
Unlevered Beta Unlevered Beta 2.0                
Marginal Tax Rate Marginal Tax Rate 0.4                
10-Year Treasury Bond Rate 10-Year Treasury Bond Rate 0.05                
Risk Premium on Stocks () Risk Premium on Stocks () 0.055                
Terminal Period Growth Rate () Terminal Period Growth Rate () 0.045                
Terminal Period Cost of Equity () Terminal Period Cost of Equity () 0.10                
Year Debt/ Equity Leveraged Beta Cost of Equity Cumulative Discount Factor Cumulative Discount Factor Cumulative Discount Factor Cumulative Discount Factor Adjusted Equity Cash Flow Adjusted Equity Cash Flow PV of Adjusted Equity Cash Flow
2013 1.5 3.8 0.260 1/(1.26) 0.7937 1/(1.26) 0.7937 1/(1.26) 0.7937 1/(1.26) 0.7937 .3 .3 .3
2014 1.0 3.3 0.230 1/(1.26)(1.23) 0.6452 1/(1.26)(1.23) 0.6452 1/(1.26)(1.23) 0.6452 1/(1.26)(1.23) 0.6452 .2 .2 .1
2015 0.7 2.9 0.208 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208) 0.5341 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208) 0.5341 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208) 0.5341 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208) 0.5341 1.8 1.8 1.0
2016 0.5 2.6 0.194 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194) 0.4474 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194) 0.4474 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194) 0.4474 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194) 0.4474 7.4 7.4 3.3
2017 0.3 2.4 0.184 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) 0.3778 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) 0.3778 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) 0.3778 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) 0.3778 7.7 7.7 2.9
2018 0.2 2.3 0.174 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) (1.174) 0.3218 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) (1.174) 0.3218 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) (1.174) 0.3218 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) (1.174) 0.3218 8.1 8.1 2.6
2019 0.0 2.1 0.165 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) (1.174)(1.165) 0.2762 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) (1.174)(1.165) 0.2762 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) (1.174)(1.165) 0.2762 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) (1.174)(1.165) 0.2762 8.5 8.5 2.4
PV(20132019)                   12.5
Terminal Value                   44.7
Total PV                   57.2
15
Valuing LBOs Adjusted Present Value Method (APV)
  • Separates the value of the firm into (a) its
    value as if it were debt free and (b) the value
    of tax savings due to interest expense.
  • Step 1 Project annual free cash flows to equity
    investors and interest tax savings.
  • Step 2 Value the target without the effects of
    debt financing and discount projected free cash
    flows at the firms estimated unlevered cost of
    equity.
  • Step 3 Estimate the present value of the firms
    tax savings discounted at the firms estimated
    unlevered cost of equity.
  • Step 4 Add the present value of the firm without
    debt and the present value of tax savings to
    calculate the present value of the firm including
    tax benefits.
  • Step 5 Determine if the deal makes sense.

16
APV Method Step 1
  • Project annual free cash flows to equity
    investors and interest tax savings for the period
    during which the firms capital structure is
    changing.
  • Interest tax savings INT x t, where INT and t
    are the firms annual interest expense on new
    debt and the marginal tax rate, respectively
  • During the terminal period, the cash flows are
    expected to grow at a constant rate and the
    capital structure is expected to remain unchanged

17
APV Method Step 2
  • Value target without the effects of debt
    financing and discount projected cash flows at
    the firms unlevered cost of equity.
  • Apply the unlevered cost of equity for the period
    during which the capital structure is changing.
  • Apply the weighted average cost of capital for
    the terminal period using the proportions of debt
    and equity that make up the firms capital
    structure in the final year of the period during
    which the structure is changing.

18
APV Method Step 3
  • Estimate the present value of the firms annual
    interest tax savings.
  • Discount the tax savings at the firms unlevered
    cost of equity
  • Calculate PV for annual forecast period only,
    excluding a terminal value, since the firm is
    sold and any subsequent tax savings accrue to the
    new owners.

19
APV Method Step 4
  • Calculate the present value of the firm including
    tax benefits
  • Add the present value of the firm without debt
    and the PV of tax savings

20
APV Method Step 5
  • Determine if deal makes sense
  • Does the PV of free cash flows to equity
    investors plus tax benefits equal or exceed the
    initial equity investment including
    transaction-related fees?

21
Evaluating the Adjusted Present Value Method
  • Advantage Simplicity.
  • Disadvantages
  • Ignores the effect of changes in leverage on the
    discount rate as debt is repaid,
  • Implicitly ignores the potential for bankruptcy
    of excessively leveraged firms, and
  • Unclear whether true discount rate should be the
    cost of debt, unlevered cost of equity, or
    somewhere between the two.

22
Adjusted Present Value Method An Illustration
Present Value of Equity Cash Flows Using the Adjusted Present Value Method Present Value of Equity Cash Flows Using the Adjusted Present Value Method Present Value of Equity Cash Flows Using the Adjusted Present Value Method Present Value of Equity Cash Flows Using the Adjusted Present Value Method Present Value of Equity Cash Flows Using the Adjusted Present Value Method Present Value of Equity Cash Flows Using the Adjusted Present Value Method Present Value of Equity Cash Flows Using the Adjusted Present Value Method Present Value of Equity Cash Flows Using the Adjusted Present Value Method
  2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Assumptions              
Marginal Tax Rate (t) 0.4            
Comparable Company Unlevered Beta 2            
10-Year Treasury Bond Rate 0.05            
Firms Credit Rating B            
Expected Cost of Bankruptcy as of Firm Market Value (per Andrade and Kaplan, 1998, and Korteweg, 2010) 0.2500            
Cumulative Probability of Default for a B-Rated Firm over 10 Years 0.3680            
Risk Premium on Stocks 0.0550            
Terminal Period Growth Rate 0.0450            
20042010 Unlevered Cost of Equity 0.1700            
Terminal Period WACC 0.1200            
Adjusted Equity Cash Flow 0.3 0.2 1.8 7.4 7.7 8.1 8.5
Plus Tax Shield 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4
Plus Terminal Value             123.8
Equals Total Cash Flow 2.2 1.8 3.2 8.4 8.5 8.7 132.7
PV of 20132019 Cash Flows             61.07
Less PV Expected Cost of Bankruptcy             5.62
PV of Cash Flows Adjusted for Expected Cost of Bankruptcy             55.45
23
Discussion Questions
  1. Compare and contrast the cost of capital and the
    adjusted present value valuation methods?
  2. Which do you think is a more appropriate
    valuation method? Explain your answer.

24
What is An LBO Model?
  • An LBO model is used to determine what a firm is
    worth in a highly leveraged transaction.
  • It is applied when there is the potential for a
    financial buyer or sponsor to acquire the
    business.
  • The model helps define the amount of debt a firm
    can support given its assets and cash flows.
  • Investment bankers frequently employ such
    analyses in addition to discounted cash flow and
    relative valuation methods in valuing businesses
    they are attempting to sell.
  • Financial buyers seek LBO opportunities offering
    a financial return in excess of their desired
    rate of return, while allowing the target firm to
    meet potential future operating challenges.

25
Key LBO Model Relationships
  • Linking purchase price (enterprise value) to
    industry multiples
  • PPTF (EV/EBITDA) EBITDATF
  • Linking purchase price (enterprise value) to
    target firms borrowing capacity and financial
    sponsors equity contribution
  • PPTF (DTF ETF )
  • where
  • DTF net debt (i.e., total debt less cash
    and marketable securities held by the
  • target firm)
  • ETF financial sponsors equity
    contribution to the target firms purchase price
  • PPTF estimated purchase price of the
    target firm or enterprise value
  • EBITDATF target firm earnings before
    interest, taxes, depreciation, and
  • amortization
  • EV/EBITDA recent comparable LBO
    transaction enterprise value to EBITDA
  • multiple

26
Building an LBO Model
  • Step 1 Project a firms future cash flows.
  • Step 2 Estimate the maximum borrowing capacity
    of the firm.
  • Step 3 Determine the purchase price necessary to
    buy out the target firms shareholders.
  • Step 4 Estimate the initial equity contribution
    to be made by the financial sponsor.1
  • Step 5 Calculate the IRR on the financial
    sponsors initial and subsequent equity
    investments.

1The required equity contribution equals the
difference between the estimated purchase price
(Step 3) and the amount of debt used in financing
the transaction, which is less than or equal to
the firms maximum borrowing capacity (Step 2).
27
Things to Remember
  • Tax savings from interest expense and
    depreciation from writing up assets and the
    potential for margin improvement enable LBO
    investors to offer targets substantial premiums
    over their current market value.
  • Post-LBO investors create value by providing
    firms access to capital, increased monitoring,
    margin improvement, tax savings not fully
    reflected in pre-LBO purchase price premium, and
    timing the exit from the target firm.
  • For an LBO to make sense, the PV of cash flows to
    equity holders must equal or exceed the value of
    the initial equity investment in the transaction,
    including transaction-related costs.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)