Title: HIGHLY LEVERAGED TRANSACTIONS: LBO Valuation and Modeling Basics
1HIGHLY LEVERAGED TRANSACTIONSLBO Valuation and
Modeling Basics
2A billion here and a billion there soon adds up
to real money.
Everett Dirksen
3(No Transcript)
4Learning Objectives
- Primary Learning Objective To provide students
with a knowledge of alternative approaches to
valuing leveraged buyouts and the basics of LBO
modeling techniques - Secondary Learning Objectives To provide
students with a knowledge of - Cost of capital approach to valuation
- Adjusted present value approach to valuation
- The advantages and disadvantages of each
valuation approach and - The underpinnings of LBO structuring and
valuation models
5Valuing LBOs
- A leveraged buyout can be evaluated from the
perspective of common equity investors or of all
investors and lenders - From common equity investors perspective,
- NPV PVFCFE IEQ 0
- Where NPV Net present value
- PVFCFE Present value of free cash
flows to common equity - investors
- IEQ The value of common equity
- From investors and lenders perspective,
- NPV PVFCFF ITC 0
- Where PVFCFF Present value of free cash
flows to the firm - ITC Total investment or the value
of total capital including - common and preferred stock
and all debt.
6Decision Rules
- LBOs make sense from viewpoint of investors and
lenders if PV of free cash flows to the firm is
to the total investment consisting of debt and
common and preferred equity - However, a LBO can make sense to common equity
investors but not to other investors and lenders.
The market value of debt and preferred stock
held before the transaction may decline due to a
perceived reduction in the firms ability to - Repay such debt as the firm assumes substantial
amounts of new debt and to - Pay interest and dividends on a timely basis.
7Valuing LBOs Cost of Capital Method1
- Adjusts for the varying level of risk as the
firms total debt is repaid. - Step 1 Project annual cash flows until
- target D/E achieved
- Step 2 Project debt-to-equity ratios
- Step 3 Calculate terminal value
- Step 4 Adjust discount rate to reflect
changing risk - Step 5 Determine if deal makes sense
- 1Also known as the variable risk method.
8Cost of Capital Method Step 1
- Project annual cash flows until target D/E ratio
achieved - Target D/E is the level of debt relative to
equity at which - The firm will have to resume payment of taxes and
- The amount of leverage is likely to be acceptable
to IPO investors or strategic buyers (often the
prevailing industry average)
9Cost of Capital Method Step 2
- Project annual debt-to-equity ratios
- The decline in D/E reflects
- The known debt repayment schedule and
- The projected growth in the market value of
shareholders equity (assumed to grow at the same
rate as net income)
10Cost of Capital Method Step 3
- Calculate terminal value of projected cash flow
to equity investors (TVE) at time t, (i.e., the
year in which the initial investors choose to
exit the business). - TVE represents PV of the dollar proceeds
available to the firm through an IPO or sale to a
strategic buyer at time t.
11Cost of Capital Method Step 4
- Adjust the discount rate to reflect changing
risk. - The firms cost of equity will decline over time
as debt is repaid and equity grows, thereby
reducing the leveraged ß. Estimate the firms ß
as follows - ßFL1 ßIUL1(1 (D/E)F1(1-tF))
- where ßFL1 Firms levered beta in
period 1 - ßIUL1 Industrys unlevered
beta in period 1 - ßIL1/(1(D/E)I1(1-
tI)) - ßIL1 Industrys levered
beta in period 1 - (D/E)I1 Industrys
debt-to-equity ratio in period 1 - tI Industrys
marginal tax rate in period 1 - (D/E)F1 Firms debt-to-equity
ratio in period 1 - tF Firms marginal tax
rate in period 1 - Recalculate each successive periods ß with the
D/E ratio for that period and, using that
periods ß, recalculate the firms cost of equity
for that period. -
12Cost of Capital Method Step 5
- Determine if deal makes sense
- Does the PV of free cash flows to equity
investors (including the terminal value) equal or
exceed the equity investment including
transaction-related fees?
13Evaluating the Cost of Capital Method
- Advantages
- Adjusts the discount rate to reflect diminishing
risk as the debt-to-total capital ratio declines - Takes into account that the deal may make sense
for common equity investors but not for lenders
or preferred shareholders - Disadvantage Calculations more burdensome than
Adjusted Present Value Method
14Cost of Capital Method An Illustration
Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC) Present Value of Equity Cash Flow Using the Cost of Capital Method (CC)
Assumptions Assumptions 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2017 2018 2019
Market Value of 12 PIK Preferred Equity ( Million) Market Value of 12 PIK Preferred Equity ( Million) 22 24.6 27.6 30.9 34.6 38.8 38.8 43.4 48.6
Market Value of Common Equity ( Million) Market Value of Common Equity ( Million) 3 2.3 3.3 4.0 5.0 5.4 5.4 5.7 6.0
Equity ( Million) Equity ( Million) 25 27.0 30.9 34.9 39.6 44.2 44.2 49.1 54.6
Debt ( Million) Debt ( Million) 47 39.5 31.5 23.8 19.2 14.3 14.3 8.8 2.7
Comparable Firm Comparable Firm
Price/Earnings Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio 6
Levered Beta (ß) Levered Beta (ß) 2.4
Debt/Equity Ratio Debt/Equity Ratio 0.3
Unlevered Beta Unlevered Beta 2.0
Marginal Tax Rate Marginal Tax Rate 0.4
10-Year Treasury Bond Rate 10-Year Treasury Bond Rate 0.05
Risk Premium on Stocks () Risk Premium on Stocks () 0.055
Terminal Period Growth Rate () Terminal Period Growth Rate () 0.045
Terminal Period Cost of Equity () Terminal Period Cost of Equity () 0.10
Year Debt/ Equity Leveraged Beta Cost of Equity Cumulative Discount Factor Cumulative Discount Factor Cumulative Discount Factor Cumulative Discount Factor Adjusted Equity Cash Flow Adjusted Equity Cash Flow PV of Adjusted Equity Cash Flow
2013 1.5 3.8 0.260 1/(1.26) 0.7937 1/(1.26) 0.7937 1/(1.26) 0.7937 1/(1.26) 0.7937 .3 .3 .3
2014 1.0 3.3 0.230 1/(1.26)(1.23) 0.6452 1/(1.26)(1.23) 0.6452 1/(1.26)(1.23) 0.6452 1/(1.26)(1.23) 0.6452 .2 .2 .1
2015 0.7 2.9 0.208 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208) 0.5341 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208) 0.5341 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208) 0.5341 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208) 0.5341 1.8 1.8 1.0
2016 0.5 2.6 0.194 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194) 0.4474 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194) 0.4474 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194) 0.4474 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194) 0.4474 7.4 7.4 3.3
2017 0.3 2.4 0.184 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) 0.3778 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) 0.3778 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) 0.3778 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) 0.3778 7.7 7.7 2.9
2018 0.2 2.3 0.174 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) (1.174) 0.3218 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) (1.174) 0.3218 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) (1.174) 0.3218 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) (1.174) 0.3218 8.1 8.1 2.6
2019 0.0 2.1 0.165 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) (1.174)(1.165) 0.2762 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) (1.174)(1.165) 0.2762 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) (1.174)(1.165) 0.2762 1/(1.26)(1.23)(1.208)(1.194)(1.184) (1.174)(1.165) 0.2762 8.5 8.5 2.4
PV(20132019) 12.5
Terminal Value 44.7
Total PV 57.2
15Valuing LBOs Adjusted Present Value Method (APV)
- Separates the value of the firm into (a) its
value as if it were debt free and (b) the value
of tax savings due to interest expense. - Step 1 Project annual free cash flows to equity
investors and interest tax savings. - Step 2 Value the target without the effects of
debt financing and discount projected free cash
flows at the firms estimated unlevered cost of
equity. - Step 3 Estimate the present value of the firms
tax savings discounted at the firms estimated
unlevered cost of equity. - Step 4 Add the present value of the firm without
debt and the present value of tax savings to
calculate the present value of the firm including
tax benefits. - Step 5 Determine if the deal makes sense.
16APV Method Step 1
- Project annual free cash flows to equity
investors and interest tax savings for the period
during which the firms capital structure is
changing. - Interest tax savings INT x t, where INT and t
are the firms annual interest expense on new
debt and the marginal tax rate, respectively - During the terminal period, the cash flows are
expected to grow at a constant rate and the
capital structure is expected to remain unchanged
17APV Method Step 2
- Value target without the effects of debt
financing and discount projected cash flows at
the firms unlevered cost of equity. - Apply the unlevered cost of equity for the period
during which the capital structure is changing. - Apply the weighted average cost of capital for
the terminal period using the proportions of debt
and equity that make up the firms capital
structure in the final year of the period during
which the structure is changing.
18APV Method Step 3
- Estimate the present value of the firms annual
interest tax savings. - Discount the tax savings at the firms unlevered
cost of equity - Calculate PV for annual forecast period only,
excluding a terminal value, since the firm is
sold and any subsequent tax savings accrue to the
new owners.
19APV Method Step 4
- Calculate the present value of the firm including
tax benefits - Add the present value of the firm without debt
and the PV of tax savings
20APV Method Step 5
- Determine if deal makes sense
- Does the PV of free cash flows to equity
investors plus tax benefits equal or exceed the
initial equity investment including
transaction-related fees?
21Evaluating the Adjusted Present Value Method
- Advantage Simplicity.
- Disadvantages
- Ignores the effect of changes in leverage on the
discount rate as debt is repaid, - Implicitly ignores the potential for bankruptcy
of excessively leveraged firms, and - Unclear whether true discount rate should be the
cost of debt, unlevered cost of equity, or
somewhere between the two.
22Adjusted Present Value Method An Illustration
Present Value of Equity Cash Flows Using the Adjusted Present Value Method Present Value of Equity Cash Flows Using the Adjusted Present Value Method Present Value of Equity Cash Flows Using the Adjusted Present Value Method Present Value of Equity Cash Flows Using the Adjusted Present Value Method Present Value of Equity Cash Flows Using the Adjusted Present Value Method Present Value of Equity Cash Flows Using the Adjusted Present Value Method Present Value of Equity Cash Flows Using the Adjusted Present Value Method Present Value of Equity Cash Flows Using the Adjusted Present Value Method
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Assumptions
Marginal Tax Rate (t) 0.4
Comparable Company Unlevered Beta 2
10-Year Treasury Bond Rate 0.05
Firms Credit Rating B
Expected Cost of Bankruptcy as of Firm Market Value (per Andrade and Kaplan, 1998, and Korteweg, 2010) 0.2500
Cumulative Probability of Default for a B-Rated Firm over 10 Years 0.3680
Risk Premium on Stocks 0.0550
Terminal Period Growth Rate 0.0450
20042010 Unlevered Cost of Equity 0.1700
Terminal Period WACC 0.1200
Adjusted Equity Cash Flow 0.3 0.2 1.8 7.4 7.7 8.1 8.5
Plus Tax Shield 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4
Plus Terminal Value 123.8
Equals Total Cash Flow 2.2 1.8 3.2 8.4 8.5 8.7 132.7
PV of 20132019 Cash Flows 61.07
Less PV Expected Cost of Bankruptcy 5.62
PV of Cash Flows Adjusted for Expected Cost of Bankruptcy 55.45
23Discussion Questions
- Compare and contrast the cost of capital and the
adjusted present value valuation methods? - Which do you think is a more appropriate
valuation method? Explain your answer.
24What is An LBO Model?
- An LBO model is used to determine what a firm is
worth in a highly leveraged transaction. - It is applied when there is the potential for a
financial buyer or sponsor to acquire the
business. - The model helps define the amount of debt a firm
can support given its assets and cash flows. - Investment bankers frequently employ such
analyses in addition to discounted cash flow and
relative valuation methods in valuing businesses
they are attempting to sell. - Financial buyers seek LBO opportunities offering
a financial return in excess of their desired
rate of return, while allowing the target firm to
meet potential future operating challenges.
25Key LBO Model Relationships
- Linking purchase price (enterprise value) to
industry multiples - PPTF (EV/EBITDA) EBITDATF
- Linking purchase price (enterprise value) to
target firms borrowing capacity and financial
sponsors equity contribution - PPTF (DTF ETF )
- where
- DTF net debt (i.e., total debt less cash
and marketable securities held by the - target firm)
- ETF financial sponsors equity
contribution to the target firms purchase price - PPTF estimated purchase price of the
target firm or enterprise value - EBITDATF target firm earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation, and - amortization
- EV/EBITDA recent comparable LBO
transaction enterprise value to EBITDA - multiple
26Building an LBO Model
- Step 1 Project a firms future cash flows.
- Step 2 Estimate the maximum borrowing capacity
of the firm. - Step 3 Determine the purchase price necessary to
buy out the target firms shareholders. - Step 4 Estimate the initial equity contribution
to be made by the financial sponsor.1 - Step 5 Calculate the IRR on the financial
sponsors initial and subsequent equity
investments.
1The required equity contribution equals the
difference between the estimated purchase price
(Step 3) and the amount of debt used in financing
the transaction, which is less than or equal to
the firms maximum borrowing capacity (Step 2).
27Things to Remember
- Tax savings from interest expense and
depreciation from writing up assets and the
potential for margin improvement enable LBO
investors to offer targets substantial premiums
over their current market value. - Post-LBO investors create value by providing
firms access to capital, increased monitoring,
margin improvement, tax savings not fully
reflected in pre-LBO purchase price premium, and
timing the exit from the target firm. - For an LBO to make sense, the PV of cash flows to
equity holders must equal or exceed the value of
the initial equity investment in the transaction,
including transaction-related costs.