2006 Legislative Strategy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

2006 Legislative Strategy

Description:

2006 Legislative Strategy or 'You Can't Always Get What You Want' ... Mick Jagger, Rolling Stones, 'Can't. always get what you want' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: eweb
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 2006 Legislative Strategy


1
2006 Legislative Strategy
or You Cant Always Get What You Want
  • Eric Webster
  • Director, Office of Legislative Affairs
  • November 30, 2005

2
Overview
  • Developing Legislation
  • within the Administration
  • on the Hill
  • The Legislative Process and Strategy for 2006
  • NOAA Priorities, Congress Priorities
  • Strategy for FY07 Budget
  • Lessons
  • Suggestions

3
Legislative Lessons from Unconventional Teachers
  • Mick Jagger, Rolling Stones, Cant always get
    what you want
  • You can't always get what you want
  • But if you try sometimes, well you just might
    find
  • You get what you need
  • 2004 World Champion Boston Red Sox
  • Good base-running can get you further than only
    trying for homeruns
  • 2004 World Champion New England Patriots
  • Focus on the basics blocking and tackling

4
Developing Legislation at NOAA
  • Why hasnt NOAA received much support for
    legislation it has drafted?
  • NOAA Organic Act
  • Acquaculture
  • Magnuson-Stevens Fisheries Act (not introduced)
  • No enough buy in from outside community
  • why should they, what is in it for them?
  • we cant share language but can discuss
    priorities/themes/ideas
  • What role do each of you see yourself playing to
    help NOAA succeed in this legislative process?

5
How to Affect the Congressional Legislative
Process
  • Overall goal is to get a seat at the final table
    (where backroom deals are cut)
  • If you cant get a seat at the table, can you get
    into the room?
  • If you cant get in the room, who can, and do
    they share our priorities?

6
How to Affect the Congressional Legislative
Process (contd.)
  • What tools do we have to ensure NOAAs priorities
    are included in bills moving through Congress?
  • Administration drafted legislation
  • Technical Drafting Assistance (informal and
    formal)
  • Hearing Witnesses/Meetings with Staff
  • Views letters
  • Statements of Administration Positions (SAPS)
  • Veto
  • Finding Interest Groups with similar needs/wants

  • Reaching out early and often
  • What do they want? What do we want? Is there
    middle ground?
  • Do they have a seat at the table, are they in the
    room?

7
The NOAA FY06 Legislative Strategy
  • Priorities for the Administration and Congress
  • Magnuson Stevens Act Reauthorization. (Senate
    Commerce priority)
  • Endangered Species Act Reauthorization. (House
    Resources Priority)
  • NOAA Organic Act (House Science priority)
  • Ocean Observations (Community priority)
  • Tsunami bills (House Science and Senate
    Commerce)
  • Aquaculture (anyones priority?)
  • NOAA Corps (NOAA priority)
  • Maybe National Weather Service Authorization
    (Senate Commerce)
  • Overall NOAA Authorization (havent had one since
    1992 what does that mean?)
  • What does NOAA really want (or need) out of each
    of these bills?
  • What role do each of you see yourself playing to
    help NOAA succeed in this legislative process?

8
What are the Critical Drivers for 2006
  • Authorization levels, budget constraints
  • Many of the bills have been acted upon
    (Committee, floor)
  • Ocean Action Plan (brings support of White
    House)
  • GEOSS (top priority for NOAA)
  • Hurricanes/Tsuanmis unknown events
  • And (oh yeah), Elections
  • What does NOAA really want (or need) out of each
    of these bills?
  • What role do each of you see yourself playing to
    help NOAA succeed in this legislative process

9
The NOAA FY06 Legislative and FY07 Budget
Strategy(BUDGET LESSONS LEARNED)
  • FY06 Appropriations cycle taught us
  • NOAA needs to build House Champions
  • Reliance on Senate was an overly optimistic
    assumption
  • We are in a new era for NOAAoutside pressures
    (the deficit) will force the need for better
    justifications.
  • Need to explain why programs are important, core
    capabilities (a.k.a., programsthe second P in
    PPBES)
  • Need to have clear and accurate impact
    statements.
  • When FY06 was on House floor we lost 50MCan it
    happen again? How can we stop it?
  • How can NOAA Legislative Affairs and the Budget
    Office pool their talents to fight for the
    President's request? What is the role of the
    line offices in this process? And what about
    those champions we just talked about?

WHAT ROLE DO EACH OF YOU SEE YOURSELF PLAYING
TO HELP NOAA ACHIEVE ITS FY07 LEGISLATIVE and
BUDGET STRATEGY?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com