ITAR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

ITAR

Description:

The license/agreement MUST tell the whole story. There are no exemptions for: ... Don't include them in the license/agreement and they cannot have access ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1589
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: davidhayes
Category:
Tags: itar | license

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: ITAR


1
ITAR The Real World
  • What Goes Wrong?

2
Opportunities Challenges!
  • The unregistered US supplier
  • The undisclosed sub-licensee
  • Outsourced IT admin, etc
  • Foreign and dual-nationals
  • Poor draftsmanship of agreements
  • Ignorance (as ever, no excuse in law)
  • The Self Imposed Penalty Scheme

3
Supplier Selection - Registration
  • Not all US suppliers understand ITAR
  • This does not help you when things go wrong
  • Supplier selection for US suppliers involving
    ITAR controlled goods/tech data/services MUST
    include a check that the supplier is DDTC
    registered iaw ITAR 121.1

4
The Consequences
  • UK exporter sends UKML parts to US supplier, who
    is not registered with DDTC
  • Supplier cannot begin work until registered (6-8
    weeks and cannot work register in parallel)
  • UK exporter has brainwave send the goods back
    and we can re-source youve spotted this one
    how can an unregistered party obtain a US export
    license?
  • US supplier registers but requires technical
    exchanges to understand work scope needs a TAA
    (6 months). NaĂŻve applicant is likely to suffer
    RWA of license and agreement without expert
    support

5
Sub-Licensing
  • Whole country sub-licensing no longer permitted
  • Must specify all sub-licensees, which tech data
    to which s/l and why
  • Think chain of custody who will have access
    to ITAR goods/data and why
  • Effective communication with US applicant is
    obligatory
  • The license/agreement MUST tell the whole story
  • There are no exemptions for
  • Government(s)
  • EU Member States
  • The MDs blood pressure passing 200/95 and still
    rising

6
Outsourcing
  • Think chain of custody
  • Ousourced
  • IT admin
  • Reprographics
  • Testing and inspection
  • Agency staff (worse under DoC)
  • Dont include them in the license/agreement and
    they cannot have access
  • Tell the US applicant everything you need to do
    with their goods/data DO NOT expect them to
    know/guess
  • There are always at least two parties to a
    license/agreement a bad agreement is usually
    the fault of both parties

7
Foreign and Dual-Nationals
  • An area fraught with problems and legal conflicts
  • US and UK/EU laws in this area are currently
    irreconcilable and government intervention is
    required
  • There is increasing uncertainty in this area at
    the moment and a trend towards greater
    bureaucracy and tighter restriction in some areas
  • It is a commercial decision how to balance the
    competing legal risks but this should be at Board
    level because of directors fiduciary duties and
    the potential risks

8
Agreements
  • Think chain of custody
  • Tell the story in words which both lay and
    technical assessors can understand
  • Dont use jargon
  • Dont assume knowledge of facts not in evidence
    they know only what you tell them, so make sure
    you tell them everything relevant
  • Become the goods/data if necessary and walk
    through the plant taking the planned route

9
Agreements (2)
  • Think about your supply chain do they know
    exactly what they need to supply without access
    to any ITAR data OR do they need access?
  • Think about sub-licensees who, what, why? (I
    know supply chain are sub-licensees I just wish
    everyone did!)
  • Think upstream think downstream
  • Engage with the US applicant as early as possible
    you dont need a TAA to talk about a TAA
    (provided you do not exchange controlled data or
    defense services)
  • An effective, one sided agreement does not exist
    dialogue not monologue

10
The Self Imposed Penalty Scheme
  • Imagine the headline
  • STATE DEPARTMENT OUTSOURCES DDTC ENFORCEMENT TO
    UK DEFENCE COMPANIES.
  • This is not as ludicrous as it seems.
  • Companies who mismanage US controls often impose
    very real financial and reputational penalties
    upon themselves, without waiting for DDTC to come
    along and do so.
  • These are, in effect, Self-Imposed Penalty
    Schemes

11
The Self Imposed Penalty Scheme (2)
12
The Self Imposed Penalty Scheme (3)
  • Delays cost money directly and indirectly
  • In either case shown assume that, in addition to
    the disruption of relations with your customer,
    LDs kick in at week 12
  • In one case, because of good procedures and
    practices, youre home and dry
  • In the other, youre under pressure to get Badco
    to ship ASAP but read 127.3 first!

13
Questions??
www.davidhayesexportcontrols.com
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com