Implicit Memory - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Implicit Memory

Description:

When Claparede would meet his patients in the morning he ... The next morning she didn't want to shake his hand. ... Therefore test people under anesthesia ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:60
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: kristofe
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Implicit Memory


1
Implicit Memory
2
Claparede described a amnesic patient. She could
add and spell but did not recognize her doctors
or nurses. When Claparede would meet his
patients in the morning he would shake their
hands. One day he hid a small pin in his hand.
The amnesic patient got a small prick that
morning. The next morning she didnt want to
shake his hand. She said, Sometimes people hide
things in their hands.
3
Dissociation
  • There seems to be a difference in long term
    memory
  • We may know how to ride a bike but it is very
    difficult to explain how you do so
  • Thus we distinguish between explicit memory
    (knowing information about a bike) and implicit
    memory (knowing the physical process of riding
    the bike)
  • Implicit memory often characterizes acquisition
    of motor skills, conditioning, and habituation

4
The Study of Implicit Memory
  • Topics of study
  • Childrens Language Acquisition
  • Learning Artificial Grammar
  • Redundant Sequence Learning
  • Priming
  • Skill Acquisition

5
Learning Grammar
  • Example of children learning language
  • There are explicit rules to which certain
    sequences of grammatical forms are permissible
  • Children are able to use their native grammar
    very well before being taught the rules
  • Children are unable to describe the underlying
    grammatical rules
  • Implicit learning?

6
Learning Artificial Grammar
  • Reber (1967) used an Artificial Grammar defined
    by a series of rules about how letters may be
    related to one another
  • One group learned sequences of letters generated
    by the grammar and the other group learned random
    letter sequences
  • Both groups were shown letter strings, half
    grammatical and half random letters
  • Subjects who learned grammatical sequences
    recognized 79 of the new grammatical sequences

7
Redundant Sequence Learning
  • Bullemer (1987) used the idea of repeated
    sequences to test implicit learning
  • Subjects performed a button press task that
    corresponded to spatial locations on a computer
    screen
  • One group performed under random conditions and
    the other under redundant conditions
  • The redundant group speeded up in their RxN times
  • Implicit Learning?

8
Redundant Sequence Learning
  • Though some subjects performed faster on the test
    some could describe the pattern explicitly and
    some could not
  • How sure are we that the second class of people
    did not really have explicit access to the
    knowledge?
  • During testing of the unaware group the
    experimenter stopped and asked for a prediction
    of next location. Performed at chance

9
Lets Believe in Implicit Learning
  • If we believe in Implicit Learning then it seems
    that people are unconsciously acquiring rules
    that they can use but not articulate
  • Are rules really being learned?
  • When an individual learns an artificial grammar
    or improves performance after repeated
    presentations, do they acquire abstract rules
    implicitly or do they memorize specific exemplars
    that are accessible to explicit memory?

10
Implicit Evidence (Transfer)
  • Reber (1969) - Two phases of grammar learning.
    Study phase learners acquired a string
    discrimination based on an artificial grammar.
    Testing phase one aspect of the learning task
    was changed (rules or letters)
  • Both changes caused problems, but there was a
    larger problem for the rules condition
  • Thus learners acquired and transferred implicit
    knowledge of rules

11
Explicit Evidence
  • Individual Exemplars - accepts the transfer
    findings, accounts for them by assuming that
    learners compare test strings in terms of their
    structural similarity. This is kind of like rule
    learning, however this process occurs during
    testing, not during study (explicit)

12
The Non-Believers
  • Subjects may know something about the task they
    are acquiring, however, whether it is enough to
    give an explicit explanation is a different
    matter
  • Though explicit information is available, it may
    lack the merit for description

13
The Criteria
  • The subject must not be aware of the association
    at time of learning
  • Information Criterion - must show that the
    information sought in the awareness test is
    really responsible for performance change
  • Sensitivity Criterion - must have a measure of
    unconscious learning that has the appropriate
    sensitivity to the learning

14
How Do We Address These Issues?
  • Example
  • Testing awareness during learning is rather
    difficult
  • Therefore test people under anesthesia
  • Theoretically awareness is manipulated by the
    experimenter
  • Does some to be some evidence for learning under
    these conditions, but it is not conclusive

15
Priming
  • Considered strong evidence for Implicit Learning
  • Refers to the influence a stimulus has on
    subsequent performance (positive or negative)
  • Can be on the visual, spatial, phonological, or
    semantic level
  • A number of paradigms have been developed
  • Perceptual Identification, Word Stem Completion,
    Word Fragment Completion, Degraded Word Naming,
    Anagram Solving,

16
Priming Example
  • Word Completion Task
  • Subjects inspect a list of words without being
    asked to memorize them
  • During testing, people receive word stems such as
    riv__ or e_e_an_
  • Lexical Decision Task
  • Identify Words and Non-words (i.e. grobse...)
  • RxN time for repeated Non-words will decrease if
    it has been repeated

17
Priming Characteristics
  • Roediger (1993) Priming effects tend to be
    modality-specific
  • Sensitive to physical features, with some
    exceptions (i.e. visual modality)
  • Does not seem to be sensitive to issues relating
    to Levels of Processing
  • The implicit memory aspect of priming is much
    more durable over time compared to explicit
    memory
  • Relatively Insensitive to drug manipulations

18
Priming and Amnesiacs
  • Perhaps the most experiment is testing amnesic
    patents with priming paradigms
  • Example - Graf (1984) required amnesic and
    control subjects to learn a word list. They were
    then given a stem-completion task and a recall
    task. There was a clear difference between the
    groups on the recall task but no difference on
    the stem-completion task

19
Skill Acquisition and Amnesiacs
  • H. M. - was able to acquire motor skills with
    relative ease
  • Milner (1962) showed that H. M. improved daily on
    a mirror tracking task
  • Nissen (1987) showed that amnesiacs performed the
    same as normals on redundant learning tasks
  • Knowlton (1992) amnesiacs could learn artificial
    grammars

20
Conditioning and Amnesiacs
  • Amnesic patients can be conditioned just as a
    normal subject
  • Amnesic patients could be conditioned for
    eye-blinking. However, they were unable to
    describe the function of the air nozzle
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com