Title: PERCEPTION OF MUSIC BY PATIENTS WITH COCHLEAR IMPLANTS
1PERCEPTION OF MUSIC BY PATIENTS WITH COCHLEAR
IMPLANTS
- Jaan Ross (Tartu and Tallinn)
- Inna V. Koroleva and Jelena A. Ogorodnikova (St.
Petersburg)
2Cochlear implantation (1)
- Cochlear implantation is one of the most
perspective directions in the rehabilitation of
patients with significant hearing losses - Cochlear implant is a surgically implantable
device that provides hearing sensation to
individuals with severe-to-profound hearing loss
who do not benefit from hearing aids - People with hearing losses in such range have
absent or malfunctioning sensory cells in the
cochlea
3Cochlear implantation (2)
- In a normal ear, sound energy is converted to
mechanical energy by the middle ear, which is
then converted to mechanical fluid motion in the
cochlea. Within the cochlea, the sensory cells
(the inner and outer hair cells) are sensitive
transducers that convert that mechanical fluid
motion into electrical impulses in the auditory
nerve.
4Cochlear implantation (3)
Cochlear implants are designed to substitute for
the function of the middle ear, cochlear
mechanical motion, and sensory cells,
transforming sound energy into electrical energy
that will initiate impulses in the auditory nerve
Implant systems consist of both internal and
external components
5Cochlear implantation (4)
The external components (over or next to the ear)
include (1) a microphone, which converts sound
into an electrical signal, (2) a speech
processor, which manipulates and converts the
signal into a special code and (3) a transmitter,
which sends the coded electrical signal to the
internal components
The surgically implanted components include (A) a
receiver, which decodes the signal from the
speech processor, and (B) an electrode array,
which stimulates the cochlea with electrical
current
The systems are powered by batteries located in
the speech processor
6Rehabilitation (1)
- Rehabilitation is the very important
post-surgical stage of cochlear implantation - It is a complex and long process which
essentially depends on individual characteristics
of the patient (auditory experience, general
abilities and the absence of mental defects) - It is accepted to distinguish between the two
groups of patients with cochlear implants - pre-lingual - the hearing loss occurred before
the patient has learned to speak (in general,
before the second year of life) and - post-lingual - when the hearing loss occurred in
the age of four years or later (after the patient
has learned to speak)
7Rehabilitation (2)
- The main task of rehabilitation
- for post-lingual patients - the regeneration of
the ability to perceive and to understand spoken
language (the forming of connections between the
distorted auditory information and previous
internal patterns of speech and other sounds) - for pre-lingual patients - the development of
the foundations of auditory perception from the
beginning (includes the basic elementary
operations - detection and discrimination of
sounds) and building up the whole system of
spoken language - So for all listeners with cochlea implants a
primary rehabilitation problem is the creation or
correction of new auditory patterns
8Rehabilitation and music
- cochlear implants have been designed primarily to
enhance speech perception - many implant recipients anticipate enjoying music
following the implantation - in fact, up to 38 per cent of implant recipients
report they do not enjoy listening to music with
their device - up to 86 per cent of post-lingual recipients
report lower scores of listening habits after
implantation - musically oriented rehabilitation programs should
be used in order to narrow the gap between
pre-surgical expectancies of the implant
recipients and their post-surgical experiences
9Hypothesis
- pitch has been reported to be recognized with
more difficulty than rhythm or timbre by implant
recipients (because frequency encoding is robust
with an implant), therefore temporal and timbral
aspects of music are expected to be perceived
better than pitch
10Method
- about 150 cochlear implant receivers in St.
Petersburg area by 2005 - they are interviewed in order to study their
post-surgical adaptation to listening music - interviews are conducted at the Institute of
Otolaryngology in St. Petersburg as a part of
general rehabilitation program - selected interviews are videotaped
11Training system for rehabilitation program
- The system has been developed in collaboration
between the Pavlov Institute of Physiology, and
the Institute of Otolaryngology in St. Petersburg
where the surgery and post-surgical
rehabilitation of the patients is carried out - In practice, the system consists of the laptop,
two loudspeakers, and a console for patients
under school age - The software for the computerized training and
rehabilitation system includes standardized
available components as well as original modules
developed for the tasks to be fulfilled in the
framework of the project
12Interview
- Did you listen to speech, music, or noise?
- If this was music, was it singing or playing an
instrument? - If this was singing, was there just one performer
or many of them? Were the singers male or female? - If this was playing an instrument, was there just
one instrument or many? String, wind, or
percussion? - Was this music joyful or sad? Fast or slow?
Pleasant or not? Simple or complicated? - Did this music sound in high, medium or low
register?
13Choice of music for the interview
- Four excerpts from world music, with different
sound characteristics - Japanese bamboo flute shakuhachi one voice, long
notes, timing plays little role - Saami jojk (Mari Boine) female singing, one
voice, heterogeneous rhythm - Lithuanian sutartine polyphonic female singing
(facilitates harmonic dissonances), repetitive
rhythm - Tuvan overtone singing (xöömij) a low
fundamental of special timbre, with higher
overtones made audible one-by-one
14Long-term spectra of (1) Japanese bamboo flute
shakuhachi (top left), (2) Saami jojk (top
right), (3) Lithuanian dissonant polyphony
(bottom left), and (4) Tuvan overtone singing
(bottom right)
15Excerpts from an interview (1)
- - a post-lingual patient
- - has used the implant for 4 years
- - recognizes Lithuanian polyphonic and Tuvan
overtone singing - - confuses shakuhachi sound with Saami jojk
- - claims to prefer the jojk to other excerpts
16Excerpts from an interview (2)
- a post-lingual patient
- has used the implant for a couple of weeks
- describes Tuvan overtone singing as sound of a
Jewish harp - describes shakuhachi sound as singing
- confuses Saami jojk with Lithuanian polyphony
- noticeable progress during the interview
- admits using extramusical features (sound volume)
to solve the task
17Interview results for 10 CI-recipients (age 10 to
55 years, post-surgical experience from 2 weeks
to 4 years)
- flute jojk sutartine xöömij
- music 10 10 10 7
- singing 2 10 10 6
- female singing 1 7 7 2
- joyful 0 0 8 1
- fast 0 0 8 0
- pleasant 8 8 8 0
- low pitch 2 3 1 8
- medium pitch 3 1 1 4
- high pitch 2 0 6 1
18Listening preference score for ten CI-recipients
19General conclusion
- Post-lingual patients with cochlear implants are
strongly motivated to attend music even when its
perceived acoustical characteristics only
remotely resemble the patterns they are familiar
with from the period preceding their hearing
loss. This may be explained by an ecologically
important function music fulfills in peoples
everyday life.
20A related study of intonation
- statements and questions may be distinguished
from each other on the basis of intonation - statements tend to have falling intonation while
questions tend to have rising intonation
21Thanks to
- Elvira I. Stoljarova of the Pavlov Institute of
Physiology, St. Petersburg, for video recording
of the interviews - Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin for providing me
with a three-month Mellon scholarship