Title: Discounting of Delayed Rewards: Effects of Response Format
1Discounting of Delayed RewardsEffects of
Response Format Outcome Frame
- Laura Haynes
- Mike Aitken
- Trevor Robbins
- Behavioural Clinical Neurosciences Institute
- Dept. Experimental Psychology
- University of Cambridge
2Temporal Discounting of Monetary Rewards
Current subjective value of delayed monetary
outcomes
- Discount fn exponential/hyperbolic?
- Hyperbolic devaluation across delay
- Value 1 / (1 kDelay)
- Discount rate characterised by k
- Larger k steeper discounting
3Contrary to rational choice theories
- Descriptive Variance
- eg. framing effects
- eg. people require big bonuses to delay
collection, but are only willing to sacrifice
small sums to expedite it. - Procedural Variance
- eg. discount rates choice gtgt matching
480 now OR 100 in 1 week?
- AIM1 Under matching conditions, do discount
rates depend on whether response format is in
days or dollars? - How long would you wait to To delay collection
1 week, how - get an extra 20? much more would you want?
- AIM2 How does the effect of response format
combine with framing effects to influence
discount rates?
5The Present Study
- 2x2x3 within subjects design (N32)
- Outcome frame (delay, expedite)
- X
- Response Format (days, )
- X
- Reward Magnitude (S, M, L)
6Example Question
- Outcome Frame Delay
- Reponse Format
- You can collect a 80 cash prize now. If you
were to delay collection by 1 week, what is the
minimum cash bonus you would accept?
7Results 1
- Magnitude effect
- Discount rates under delay frame were higher than
under the expedite frame - Response format
- Discount rates were higher when responses were
in days than dollars
8Results 2
- No interaction between factors of interest
9Results 3 Conclusions
- Individual analyses showed that impulsivity on a
choice task predicted the size of both the
effects of frame and format. - Outcome frame, response format and reward
magnitude all exert strong but independent
influences on discount rates.