Subspecialty Update from the Residency Review Committee RRC - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Subspecialty Update from the Residency Review Committee RRC

Description:

... Care Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, Pediatric Emergency Medicine, ... Pediatric Hematology-Oncology. Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. Pediatric Rheumatology ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:78
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Map55
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Subspecialty Update from the Residency Review Committee RRC


1
Subspecialty Update from the Residency Review
Committee (RRC)
  • Jerry Vasilias, PhD, Executive Director
  • Caroline Fischer, Associate Executive Director

APPD 9/06
2
Setting the Stage
  • Overviews to ACGME and RRC
  • Citations
  • Whats Available on Website
  • New Changes
  • Requirements Updates
  • PIFs Updates
  • Staff Contact Information

3
ACGME
  • Five member organizations/four board members from
    each AAMC, ABMS, AHA, AMA, CMSS
  • Independent accrediting organization
  • Governed by statutes of incorporation
  • Approves program requirements
  • Accredit GME/residency programs
  • 28 review committees
  • 26 RRCs
  • TYRC
  • IRC

4
RRC Composition
  • 3 appointing organizations - AAP, ABP, AMA
  • 10 voting members
  • 3 from each appointing org 1 resident member
  • Committee approved to increase by three members
  • Members serve a term of 6 years -- except
    resident
  • Generalists and subspecialists
  • Critical Care Medicine, Hematology/Oncology,
    Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Gastroenterology,
    Neurology, Nephrology, Rheumatology
  • Geographic Distribution CA, CT, DC, GA, MI, MD,
    OH, PA, WA
  • Ex-officio members from each appointing
    organization (non-voting)

5
RRC Review of Programs
  • Peer Review
  • Reviewers use the following when they review a
    program to determine whether it is in compliance
    with the requirements
  • Program Information Forms (PIF) prepared by the
    program
  • The site visitors report
  • Program Directors this is an open book test
  • The questions in the PIF correspond to program
    requirements
  • Reviewers present program to Committee
  • Committee assigns accreditation status along with
    review cycle

6
Review Cycle of Subs
  • Historically Review cycle of sub was aligned
    with core.
  • If core has a three year cycle, the sub (s) will
    have a three cycle.
  • - The cycle of the sub did not exceed that of the
    core
  • Now ACGME has allowed RRC to un-couple subs
    cycle from that of the core.
  • Subs are still considered dependent on the core,
    but the cycle of the sub can exceed that of the
    core.
  • New subspecialty applications
  • No site visit
  • Maximum of a three year cycle

7
Citations
  • Citation the program has not documented/provided
    evidence of compliance with the requirements, or
    an area identified by the site visitor as
    non-compliant
  • Three Broad Categories of Citations
  • Dont Have
  • Dont Do
  • Didnt Bother

8
Citations Dont Have/Dont Do/Didnt Bother
  • Dont Have
  • Resources -- Patients ( types) Required
    faculty Required educational experience
    Facilities/equipment Time/Support Other program
    personnel
  • Dont Do
  • Research/Scholarly activity Formally structured
    curriculum
  • Development of goals and objectives
    Evaluations (fellow, faculty, program)
    Supervision Monitor/track fellows procedures
    Comply with duty hours.
  • Didnt Bother Doing
  • Proof/edit PIF Incomplete or contained
    inconsistent information Unclear from PIF that
    there is compliance with the requirements Did
    not fully describe/provide sufficient details.

9
Most Frequent Citations
  • Insufficient patient /types of patients
  • Lack of required experience/procedures
  • No evidence of productivity in research/scholarly
    activity
  • Faculty do not demonstrate commitment to
  • Residents research must begin in year 1 and
    continue protected time evidence
  • Inappropriate Goals and Objectives
  • rotation and level specific
  • Lack of formal evaluation mechanisms
  • Fellow written evaluation formally reviewed
    semi-annually final written evaluation verifying
    ability to practice competently and independently
  • Faculty annual participation by
    residents/fellows needs to be confidential
    formal feedback provided to faculty
  • Program regular, documented meeting to review G
    Oseffectiveness in achieving them written
    evaluation by residents are used annual meeting
    with at least one fellow representative

10
www.acgme.org
  • www.acgme.org
  • Staff contact information
  • ACGME Policies Procedures
  • Competencies/Outcomes Project
  • List of accredited programs
  • ADS
  • Duty hours Information/FAQ
  • Affiliation Agreements FAQ
  • General information on site visit process and
    your site visitor
  • Pediatrics Webpage
  • Resident complement increase
  • Application timeline
  • Frequent citations
  • Program Requirements
  • PIFs
  • Archive of RRC Updates/Email Communications

11
New Changes
  • E-mail status of programs on RRC agenda
  • Within two weeks of an RRC meeting programs on
    the agenda will receive an email notification
    with the accreditation status and review cycle.
  • Programs that received an adverse action/proposed
    adverse action will not get such an email
  • E-mail to notify you that your notification
    letter is posted on ADS.
  • Will no longer send notification letters via
    mail. You will receive email to check ADS for
    letter.
  • Inactive status has been eliminated
  • Programs that are without a resident or fellow
    for 4 years will be asked to voluntarily withdraw
    their accreditation

12
New General Subspecialty Requirements
  • Approved February, 2006 to go into effect January
    1, 2007
  • Competencies!
  • Collaboration between programs
  • - Documented semi-annual meetings b/w subs and
    core to address a departmental approach to common
    educational issues (core curriculum, competencies
    and evaluation practices).
  • Mentor fellows to develop clinical, educational,
    admin, and research skills
  • Greater specificity on scholarly activity for
    faculty and fellows
  • Faculty activities that are evidence of ongoing
    commitment to scholarly activity
  • Fellow ...must conduct a scholarly project in
    sub area with guidance of PD and mentor.
  • Program must identify a mentor and scholarship
    oversight committee to oversee fellows progress
    related to scholarly activities
  • Board Score Information
  • Deficient if over 6 yrs LT 75 eligible take, of
    those who take LT 75 pass it.
  • Exceptions will made for programs with small of
    fellows

13
New Administration Language
  • All three years fellowship programs must address
    the following areas of administration
  •  
  • 1. An awareness of regional and national access
    to care, resources, workforce, and financing
    appropriate to their specialty through guided
    reading and discussion.
  • 2. Organization and management of a subspecialty
    service within ones own delivery system by
    engaging fellows as active participants in
    discussions (e.g., through already scheduled
    division activities/meetings ) that involve
  •  
  • a) staffing a service or unit, including managing
    personnel and making and adhering to a schedule
  • b) drafting policies and procedures, leading
    interdisciplinary meetings and conferences,
    providing in-service teaching sessions
  • c) discussions/proposals for hospital and
    community resources including clinical,
    laboratory and research space, equipment and
    technology necessary for the program to provide
    state-of-the-art care while advancing knowledge
    in the field
  • d) business planning and practice management that
    includes billing and coding, personnel management
    policies and professional liability
  • e) division or program development, organization,
    and maintenance and
  • f) necessary collaborations within (e.g.,
    pathology, radiology, surgery) and beyond the
    institution (e.g., participation in national
    specialty societies, cooperative care groups,
    multi-center research collaboratives) as
    appropriate to their specialty.
  •  
  • This language is much more flexible than what had
    been vetted.

14
Updates to Subpecialty PIFs
  • So, the new General Requirements for the
    Subspecialties in Pediatrics go into effect
    January 1, 2007. Accordingly, all of the
    subspecialty PIFs have been modified to reflect
    the changes. All subspecialty programs with site
    visits after January 1, 2007 will need to use the
    new updated subspecialty PIFs. The PIFs now have
    three parts.
  • Part 1 Accreditation Data System (ADS) Section
    of PIF
  • Information that is entered in ADS as part of the
    annual update will need to printed and appended
    to PIF (e.g., information related to the PD,
    sponsor, participating institutions, residents,
    faculty roster, etc.).
  • Part 2 Common Subspecialties Section of PIF
  • This section will contain common questions that
    pertain to all subspecialties (e.g., questions on
    the competencies, research, duty hours,
    evaluation, etc..).
  • Part 3 Subspecialty Specific Section of PIF
  • This section will contain subspecialty specific
    questions.

15
Revised Subspecialty Requirements
  • The followings subspecialty requirements have
    been approved and have a July 1, 2007 effective
    date
  • Adolescent Medicine
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Pediatric Cardiology
  • Pediatric Hematology-Oncology
  • Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine
  • Pediatric Rheumatology
  • So, Part 3 of the PIF (subspecialty section) will
    be updated again for all of the aforementioned
    subspecialty PIFs to be in line with the new
    requirements.
  • This will be done in spring of 2007.
  • RRC has solicited input on the data collection
    section of the PIFs.
  • Common Requirements have gone out for review and
    comment -- yesterday

16
Questions and Answers
  • ?s about the PIF that are technical
  • Contact ACGME Help Desk helpdesk_at_acgme.org or
    312/755-7464
  • For Part I of PIF of WebADS rsmith_at_acgme.org
  • ?s about PIF content/program requirements
  • Call or email the RRC staff
  • For PIF questions dbraun_at_acgme.org or (312)
    755-5478
  • For Program Requirements questions
    jvasilias_at_acgme.org or (312) 755-7477
  • cfischer_at_acgme.org or (312) 755-5044
  • Look on Peds website/FAQ

17
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com