Post Windsor

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Post Windsor

Description:

Post Windsor & Obergefell Tax & Financial Planning for LGBT Clients All audio is streamed through your computer speakers. There will be several attendance ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:10
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Devl5

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Post Windsor


1
Post Windsor Obergefell Tax Financial
Planning for LGBT Clients
  • All audio is streamed through your computer
    speakers.
  • There will be several attendance verification
    questions during the LIVE webinar that must be
    answered via the online quiz at the conclusion to
    qualify for CPE.
  • Todays webinar will begin at 200pm EDT
  • Please note You will not hear any sound until
    the webinar begins.

2
Post Windsor Obergefell Tax Financial
Planning for LGBT Clients
  • Rosalind W. Sutch, CPA, MT
  • Shareholder LGBT Tax Consulting Practice
    Leader
  • Drucker Scaccetti, P.C.

3
Learning Objectives
  • Upon completion of this course, you will be able
    to
  • Identify refund opportunities from prior state
    and federal non-recognition of same-sex marriage
    post Windsor and Obergefell 
  • Identify Tax and Economic issues specific to the
    LGBT Community (or any unmarried couples choosing
    to live together and share assets) 
  • Quantify the economic impact of marriage for
    same-sex couples 
  • Identify tax and economic issues specific to the
    LGBT community (or any unmarried couples choosing
    to live together and share assets) so
    participants can assist LGBT couples in
    quantifying the economic impact of marriage.

4
United States v. WindsorDecided June 26,2013
  • Background
  • Issue
  • Edie Windsor Thea Spyer
  • Married in Canada May 2007 after 40 yrs together
  • Resident state - NY
  • Thea passed away in 2009
  • IRS disallowed Edies marital deduction resulting
    in 363,053 of estate tax
  • Defense Of Marriage Act (DOMA) defined marriage
    for federal purposes as between a man and woman
  • Married couples enjoy an unlimited marital
    deduction for assets left to a surviving spouse

5
United States v. WindsorDecided June 26,2013
  • Ruling
  • Impact
  • Section 3 of DOMA found unconstitutional under
    principles of Equal Protection
  • If state law provides equal status, federal govt
    cannot treat differently
  • Federal recognition of legal same-sex marriages
  • Federal agencies review definition of marriage
  • 11 states with marriage equality swelled to 37
    and D.C. in 2 years

6
United States v. WindsorDecided June 26,2013
  • Federal Benefits
  • Federal Agencies
  • 1,138 Federal Benefits Granted to Married Couples
  • State of Celebration vs. State of
    Residence/Domicile
  • Statutory Definition of Marriage vs.
    Policy/Regulatory Definition

7
United States v. WindsorDecided June 26,2013
  • IRS
  • State Taxing Authorities
  • Revenue Ruling 2013-17
  • Issued August 19, 2013
  • Effective September 16, 2013
  • State of Celebration Rule
  • IRS Notice 2014-1
  • Cafeteria Plans
  • IRS Notice 2014-19
  • Retirement Plans
  • Guidance evolved over time
  • Marriage Equality States
  • Non Marriage Equality States

8
Obergefell v. HodgesDecided June 26,2015
  • Background
  • Issue
  • Consolidation of four cases from 6th Circuit
  • Obergefell v. Hodges (OH)
  • DeBoer v. Synder (MI)
  • Tanco v. Haslam (TN)
  • Bourke v. Beshear (KY)
  • Does the Constitution require states to perform
    same-sex marriage?
  • Does the Constitution require states to recognize
    same-sex marriages performed in other states and
    countries?

9
Obergefell v. HodgesDecided June 26,2015
  • Ruling
  • Impact
  • 14th Amendment requires states to license a
    marriage between two people of the same sex and
    to recognize a marriage between two people of the
    same sex when their marriage was lawfully
    licensed and performed out-of-State.
  • Law of the land
  • Uniformity
  • Things will simpler for married couples

10
Affect of Windsor on CouplesMarried before June
26, 2013
  • Federal Income Tax
  • Filing Status Change
  • Revenue Ruling 2013-17
  • Amended Prior Returns
  • SOL may be open for 2011 until 10/15/15 2012
  • Not mandatory
  • Imputed income on health benefits of spouse
  • Stops as of date of marriage
  • Income/(Loss) Offset
  • Phase Out Limitations
  • Spousal IRAs
  • NIIT Additional Medicare Tax
  • Contributions Limits
  • Hardship Withdraws
  • Property Transfers
  • Alimony

11
Affect of Windsor on CouplesMarried before June
26, 2013
  • Unanswered Questions - Federal Income Tax
  • Amended Returns
  • Need one or two amended returns?
  • If one spouse amends and files MFS, do both need
    to amend?
  • Will filing status be changed by virtue of
    examination?
  • Divorce
  • Alimony Do both parties need to amend?
  • Can a TP make a 1041 basis adjustment without
    amending?

12
Affect of Windsor on CouplesMarried before June
26, 2013
  • Payroll Taxes
  • Retirement Plans
  • Imputed income on health benefits of spouse
  • Employers v. Employees refund requests
  • Some employers continued to get this wrong after
    Windsor
  • Still applies to domestic partnerships and civil
    unions
  • W4 should be updated
  • Spousal consent
  • Survivor Benefits
  • QDRO

13
Affect of Windsor on CouplesMarried before June
26, 2013
  • Estate Tax
  • Gift Tax
  • Untangle previous planning
  • Full marital exclusion available
  • Portability of estate tax exemption
  • Full marital exclusion available
  • Gift splitting

14
Affect of Windsor on CouplesMarried before June
26, 2013
  • Unanswered Questions Estate Gift Tax
  • Portability available for late filed returns?
  • How to adjust for previously reported gifts made
    to spouse? (SOL issues)
  • How to adjust for previously reported gifts that
    could have been split with spouse? (SOL issues)

15
Affect of Obergefell on Married CouplesResiding
in Marriage Equality States
  • Financial / Economic
  • General
  • Simplify reporting for income from source income
    from non-marriage equality states.
  • Possible amended returns
  • Generally no change from post-Windsor
  • No longer a need for special documents when
    traveling to non-marriage equality states.

16
Affect of Obergefell on Married CouplesResiding
in Non-Marriage Equality States
  • Financial / Economic
  • General
  • Simplify reporting for state income taxes.
  • Possible amended returns
  • Spousal benefits now available
  • Social Security
  • Veterans
  • Retroactive benefits may be available
  • Re-titling of assets to tenancy by the entirety

17
Quantifying the Economic Impact of Marriage post
Windsor Obergefell
  • Financial Planning
  • Family Finances
  • Review Separate Joint Accounts
  • Shared resources
  • Agreements
  • Cohabitation
  • Pre-nuptial
  • Post-nuptial
  • Asset Titling
  • Beneficiary Designations
  • Retirement
  • Social Security Medicare
  • Prior Marriages
  • Survivor Benefits
  • Hardship Withdrawals

18
Quantifying the Economic Impact of Marriage post
Windsor Obergefell
  • Employer Benefits
  • Health Insurance
  • Health Savings Accounts
  • H S A, H R A or F S A
  • Annual limits
  • Dependent Care Accounts
  • Annual limits
  • Spousal Group Life Insurance
  • Hardship Distributions
  • Employer Discounts

19
Quantifying the Economic Impact of Marriage post
Windsor Obergefell
  • Income Taxes
  • Marriage Bonus/Penalty Calculation
  • Phase Out Limitations
  • NIIT Addtl Medicare Tax
  • Contributions Limits
  • Income Offsets
  • NOL, Cap Gain/(Loss)
  • Joint and Several Liability
  • Adoption Credit
  • Related Party Rules
  • Wash Sale Rules
  • Passive Activity Rules
  • Sec. 121 Exclusion

20
Quantifying the Economic Impact of Marriage post
Windsor Obergefell
  • Estate Planning
  • Untangle previous planning
  • Wills, Living Wills, POA, Trusts
  • Marital Deduction Portability
  • Splitting Gifts
  • Life Insurance

21
Quantifying the Economic Impact of Marriage post
Windsor Obergefell
  • Other
  • Need based benefits
  • SSI
  • Medicaid
  • Financial Aid
  • Student Loans
  • FMLA
  • SEC Disclosure Obligations
  • Attribution Rules
  • Community Property States
  • Bankruptcy

22
LGBT Specific Issues to Consider
  • Children
  • Transgender Clients
  • Conception
  • IVF
  • Surrogacy
  • Adoption
  • 2nd Parent Adoption
  • Adoption Credit
  • Dependency Exemptions
  • Name on tax returns should match SS Card
  • Expenses of transition considered medical
  • Cosmetic Surgery Ambiguity

23
The Choice to Not to Marry
  • Informal, Civil Unions,
  • Domestic Partnerships
  • Health benefits
  • Imputed Income
  • Employers may discontinue coverage
  • State filing status vs. federal
  • Sophisticated Tax Planning
  • Related party rules do not apply
  • Wash sale rules do not apply
  • Cohabitation Agreements

24
Questions?
25
Thank you for participating in this
webinar.Below is the link to the online survey
and CPE quiz
  • http//webinars.nsacct.org/postevent.php?id16313
    Use your password for this webinar that is in
    your email confirmation.
  • You must complete this survey and the quiz or
    final exam (for the recorded version) to qualify
    to receive CPE credit.
  • National Society of Accountants
  • 1010 North Fairfax Street
  • Alexandria, VA 22314-1574
  • Phone  (800) 966-6679
  • members_at_nsacct.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)