Title: Post Windsor
1Post Windsor Obergefell Tax Financial
Planning for LGBT Clients
- All audio is streamed through your computer
speakers. - There will be several attendance verification
questions during the LIVE webinar that must be
answered via the online quiz at the conclusion to
qualify for CPE. - Todays webinar will begin at 200pm EDT
- Please note You will not hear any sound until
the webinar begins.
2Post Windsor Obergefell Tax Financial
Planning for LGBT Clients
- Rosalind W. Sutch, CPA, MT
- Shareholder LGBT Tax Consulting Practice
Leader - Drucker Scaccetti, P.C.
3Learning Objectives
- Upon completion of this course, you will be able
to - Identify refund opportunities from prior state
and federal non-recognition of same-sex marriage
post Windsor and Obergefell - Identify Tax and Economic issues specific to the
LGBT Community (or any unmarried couples choosing
to live together and share assets) - Quantify the economic impact of marriage for
same-sex couples - Identify tax and economic issues specific to the
LGBT community (or any unmarried couples choosing
to live together and share assets) so
participants can assist LGBT couples in
quantifying the economic impact of marriage.
4United States v. WindsorDecided June 26,2013
- Edie Windsor Thea Spyer
- Married in Canada May 2007 after 40 yrs together
- Resident state - NY
- Thea passed away in 2009
- IRS disallowed Edies marital deduction resulting
in 363,053 of estate tax
- Defense Of Marriage Act (DOMA) defined marriage
for federal purposes as between a man and woman - Married couples enjoy an unlimited marital
deduction for assets left to a surviving spouse
5United States v. WindsorDecided June 26,2013
- Section 3 of DOMA found unconstitutional under
principles of Equal Protection - If state law provides equal status, federal govt
cannot treat differently
- Federal recognition of legal same-sex marriages
- Federal agencies review definition of marriage
- 11 states with marriage equality swelled to 37
and D.C. in 2 years
6United States v. WindsorDecided June 26,2013
- 1,138 Federal Benefits Granted to Married Couples
- State of Celebration vs. State of
Residence/Domicile - Statutory Definition of Marriage vs.
Policy/Regulatory Definition
7United States v. WindsorDecided June 26,2013
- Revenue Ruling 2013-17
- Issued August 19, 2013
- Effective September 16, 2013
- State of Celebration Rule
- IRS Notice 2014-1
- Cafeteria Plans
- IRS Notice 2014-19
- Retirement Plans
- Guidance evolved over time
- Marriage Equality States
- Non Marriage Equality States
8Obergefell v. HodgesDecided June 26,2015
- Consolidation of four cases from 6th Circuit
- Obergefell v. Hodges (OH)
- DeBoer v. Synder (MI)
- Tanco v. Haslam (TN)
- Bourke v. Beshear (KY)
- Does the Constitution require states to perform
same-sex marriage? - Does the Constitution require states to recognize
same-sex marriages performed in other states and
countries?
9Obergefell v. HodgesDecided June 26,2015
- 14th Amendment requires states to license a
marriage between two people of the same sex and
to recognize a marriage between two people of the
same sex when their marriage was lawfully
licensed and performed out-of-State.
- Law of the land
- Uniformity
- Things will simpler for married couples
10Affect of Windsor on CouplesMarried before June
26, 2013
- Revenue Ruling 2013-17
- Amended Prior Returns
- SOL may be open for 2011 until 10/15/15 2012
- Not mandatory
- Imputed income on health benefits of spouse
- Stops as of date of marriage
- Income/(Loss) Offset
- Phase Out Limitations
- Spousal IRAs
- NIIT Additional Medicare Tax
- Contributions Limits
- Hardship Withdraws
- Property Transfers
- Alimony
11Affect of Windsor on CouplesMarried before June
26, 2013
- Unanswered Questions - Federal Income Tax
- Amended Returns
- Need one or two amended returns?
- If one spouse amends and files MFS, do both need
to amend? - Will filing status be changed by virtue of
examination? - Divorce
- Alimony Do both parties need to amend?
- Can a TP make a 1041 basis adjustment without
amending?
12Affect of Windsor on CouplesMarried before June
26, 2013
- Imputed income on health benefits of spouse
- Employers v. Employees refund requests
- Some employers continued to get this wrong after
Windsor - Still applies to domestic partnerships and civil
unions - W4 should be updated
- Spousal consent
- Survivor Benefits
- QDRO
13Affect of Windsor on CouplesMarried before June
26, 2013
- Untangle previous planning
- Full marital exclusion available
- Portability of estate tax exemption
- Full marital exclusion available
- Gift splitting
14Affect of Windsor on CouplesMarried before June
26, 2013
- Unanswered Questions Estate Gift Tax
- Portability available for late filed returns?
- How to adjust for previously reported gifts made
to spouse? (SOL issues) - How to adjust for previously reported gifts that
could have been split with spouse? (SOL issues)
15Affect of Obergefell on Married CouplesResiding
in Marriage Equality States
- Simplify reporting for income from source income
from non-marriage equality states. - Possible amended returns
- Generally no change from post-Windsor
- No longer a need for special documents when
traveling to non-marriage equality states.
16Affect of Obergefell on Married CouplesResiding
in Non-Marriage Equality States
- Simplify reporting for state income taxes.
- Possible amended returns
- Spousal benefits now available
- Social Security
- Veterans
- Retroactive benefits may be available
- Re-titling of assets to tenancy by the entirety
17Quantifying the Economic Impact of Marriage post
Windsor Obergefell
- Family Finances
- Review Separate Joint Accounts
- Shared resources
- Agreements
- Cohabitation
- Pre-nuptial
- Post-nuptial
- Asset Titling
- Beneficiary Designations
- Retirement
- Social Security Medicare
- Prior Marriages
- Survivor Benefits
- Hardship Withdrawals
18Quantifying the Economic Impact of Marriage post
Windsor Obergefell
- Health Insurance
- Health Savings Accounts
- H S A, H R A or F S A
- Annual limits
- Dependent Care Accounts
- Annual limits
- Spousal Group Life Insurance
- Hardship Distributions
- Employer Discounts
19Quantifying the Economic Impact of Marriage post
Windsor Obergefell
- Marriage Bonus/Penalty Calculation
- Phase Out Limitations
- NIIT Addtl Medicare Tax
- Contributions Limits
- Income Offsets
- NOL, Cap Gain/(Loss)
- Joint and Several Liability
- Adoption Credit
- Related Party Rules
- Wash Sale Rules
- Passive Activity Rules
- Sec. 121 Exclusion
20Quantifying the Economic Impact of Marriage post
Windsor Obergefell
- Untangle previous planning
- Wills, Living Wills, POA, Trusts
- Marital Deduction Portability
- Splitting Gifts
- Life Insurance
21Quantifying the Economic Impact of Marriage post
Windsor Obergefell
- Need based benefits
- SSI
- Medicaid
- Financial Aid
- Student Loans
- FMLA
- SEC Disclosure Obligations
- Attribution Rules
- Community Property States
- Bankruptcy
22LGBT Specific Issues to Consider
- Conception
- IVF
- Surrogacy
- Adoption
- 2nd Parent Adoption
- Adoption Credit
- Dependency Exemptions
- Name on tax returns should match SS Card
- Expenses of transition considered medical
- Cosmetic Surgery Ambiguity
23The Choice to Not to Marry
- Health benefits
- Imputed Income
- Employers may discontinue coverage
- State filing status vs. federal
- Sophisticated Tax Planning
- Related party rules do not apply
- Wash sale rules do not apply
- Cohabitation Agreements
24Questions?
25Thank you for participating in this
webinar.Below is the link to the online survey
and CPE quiz
- http//webinars.nsacct.org/postevent.php?id16313
Use your password for this webinar that is in
your email confirmation. - You must complete this survey and the quiz or
final exam (for the recorded version) to qualify
to receive CPE credit. - National Society of Accountants
- 1010 North Fairfax Street
- Alexandria, VA 22314-1574
- Phone (800) 966-6679
- members_at_nsacct.org