Learning About a Drug Use Problem - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 38
About This Presentation
Title:

Learning About a Drug Use Problem

Description:

drug supply or consumption data. morbidity and mortality reports. Record Systems. medical records ... Medical Stores. Clinical Treatment Areas & Medical Record ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 39
Provided by: amyta
Category:
Tags: drug | learning | problem | use

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Learning About a Drug Use Problem


1
Learning About a Drug Use Problem
2
Learning About a Drug Use Problem Objectives
  • Describe model for developing interventions
  • Identify and evaluate sources of quantitative
    data
  • Understand the importance of studying provider
    and patient motivations
  • Introduce qualitative research methods
  • Develop instruments for field visit

3
Components of the Drug Use System
4
An Overview of the Process of Changing Drug Use
5
Changing Drug Use Problems1. Examine
  • Identify drug use issue of interest
  • highest clinical risk?
  • widely used or expensive drugs?
  • easiest to correct?
  • Collect data to describe practices
  • in all subgroups or interest
  • most important prescribers?
  • high risk patients?

6
Changing Drug Use Problems2. Diagnose
  • Describe problem in detail
  • "gold standard" to assess quality?
  • specific problem behavior
  • define important providers or patients
  • Identify determinants of the problem
  • knowledge and beliefs
  • cultural factors or peer practices
  • patient demand and expectations
  • Identify constraints to change
  • economic constraints
  • drug supply
  • work environment

7
Changing Drug Use Problems3. Treat
  • Select target and design intervention
  • which behaviors can be changed?
  • feasible interventions?
  • cost-effectiveness?
  • personnel required?
  • Pilot test
  • acceptability
  • effectiveness
  • Implement in stages
  • collect process and outcome data
  • evaluate impacts

8
Changing Drug Use Problems4. Follow-up
  • Evaluate success in relation to intended outcomes
  • Was the intervention implemented as planned?
  • What changes occurred
  • Was the intervention cost effective?
    transferable?
  • Consider unintended negative outcomes
  • Feedback results
  • To managers and policymakers
  • To staff
  • To providers and consumers
  • Use results to plan future activities

9
Drug Use Encounter
  • Definition the interaction between a provider
    and a patient when decisions are made about which
    drugs to recommend or use
  • Sites of drug use encounters

Where the pill meets the patient
  • hospital
  • private practice
  • pharmacy
  • at home
  • health center
  • traditional healer
  • drug seller

10
Who is a Prescriber?Or Whose Behavior Do We
Change?
  • physicians
  • paramedics
  • pharmacists
  • injectionists
  • patients
  • clinical officers
  • clinic attendants
  • dispensers
  • drug sellers
  • relatives/friends

11
How to Collect Data
  • Quantitative Methods
  • counts
  • rates
  • classifications
  • What? or How Much?
  • Qualitative Methods
  • opinions
  • descriptions
  • observations
  • Why? or How Strong?

12
Selecting Methods to Study Drug Use
  • Depends on
  • nature of the problem
  • objectives of collecting data
  • resource availability
  • time available

13
Quantitative Methods
  • Routine Data
  • drug supply or consumption data
  • morbidity and mortality reports
  • Record Systems
  • medical records
  • pharmacy records
  • Sample Surveys
  • drug use encounters
  • provider interviews
  • patient community interviews

14
Types of Quantitative Data
  • When collected
  • retrospective
  • prospective
  • What level
  • aggregate
  • patient-specific
  • Diagnosis information
  • known
  • unknown
  • Drug data
  • detailed (name, dose, amount, duration)
  • non-detailed (name only, if injection, etc.)

15
Where Can We Find Useful Quantitative Data?
  • Administrative Offices, Medical Stores
  • Clinical Treatment Areas Medical Record
    Departments
  • Health Facility Pharmacies
  • Private Pharmacies and Retail Outlets
  • Households

16
Data Available at District Level
  • District Office
  • data from routine health MIS
  • morbidity and mortality reports
  • previous drug use surveys
  • drug supply orders
  • District Stores
  • drug supply orders
  • stock cards
  • shipping and delivery receipts

17
Data Available at Health Facilities
  • Retrospective
  • patient registers
  • treatment logs
  • pharmacy receipts
  • medical records
  • Prospective
  • observation of clinical encounters
  • patient exit surveys
  • inpatient surveys

18
Data From Drug Encounters
  • FACILITY
  • PATIENT
  • PROVIDER
  • INTERACTION
  • DRUGS
  • ID, characteristics, equipment, drugs available
  • ID, date, age, gender, symptoms knowledge,
    beliefs, attitudes
  • qualification, training, access to information,
    knowledge, beliefs, attitudes
  • exams, history, diagnosis, time spent,
    explanation about illness, explanation about
    drugs
  • brand, generic, strength, form, quantity,
    duration, if dispensed, how labeled, cost,
    patient charge

19
Activity One
Strengths and Weaknesses of Different Data Sources
20
Qualitative Methods
  • These methods answer the question why. They
    provide insights into the reasons for behaviors.
  • Types of Qualitative Methods
  • In-depth interviews
  • Focus Group Discussions
  • Structured Observations
  • Structured Questionnaires
  • Simulated Purchase Visits
  • Qualitative methods require skilled trained data
    collectors. Data analysis is more difficult than
    for quantitative data. But the results can be
    very useful.

21
In-Depth Interviews
  • Definition
  • an extended discussion between a respondent and
    an interviewer based on a brief interview guide
    that usually covers 10-30 topics

22
In-Depth Interview Key Points
  • open-ended topics explored in depth rather than
    fixed questions
  • can target key informants, opinion leaders, or
    others in special position
  • 5-10 interviews may be enough to get a feel for
    important issues
  • if target group is diverse, generally 5-10
    interviews are held with each important subgroup

23
In-Depth Interview Strengths and Weaknesses
  • Strengths
  • unexpected insights or new ideas
  • helps create trust between interviewer and
    respondent
  • less intrusive than questionnaire
  • useful with illiterate respondents
  • Weaknesses
  • time-consuming compared to structured
    questionnaire
  • data analysis can be difficult
  • bias toward socially acceptable or expected
    responses
  • requires well-trained interviewers

24
Focus Group Discussions
  • Definition
  • a short (1 1/2 - 2 hour) discussion led by a
    moderator in which a small group of respondents
    (6-10) talk in depth about a defined list of
    topics of interest

25
Focus Groups Key Points
  • Small
  • 5-11 people, promotes equal participation
  • Homogeneous
  • common characteristics shared viewpoint
  • Guided
  • led by moderator, topics kept in focus
  • Informal
  • free interaction, open sharing of ideas
  • Recorded
  • analysis at later time, notes kept by assistant

26
Focus Groups Strengths and Weaknesses
  • Strengths
  • good at eliciting the beliefs and opinions of a
    group
  • provides richness and depth
  • easy and inexpensive to organize
  • Weaknesses
  • need for skilled moderator
  • do beliefs and opinions represent true feelings?
  • potential bias in analysis

27
Structured Observations
  • Definition
  • systematic observations by trained observers of a
    series of encounters between health providers and
    patients

.
28
Observations Key Points
  • to prepare for study, observer should
  • introduce non-threatening explanation
  • spend enough time to "blend in"
  • data can be recorded as
  • coded indicators and scales
  • list of behaviors and events
  • diary of observer's impressions
  • observation studies vary in scope
  • to count frequency of behaviors, at least 30
    cases in each category
  • to understand typical features, a few cases in
    5-6 settings may be enough

29
Observations Strengths and Weaknesses
  • Strengths
  • best way to study the complex provider-patient
    interactions
  • can learn about provider behavior in its natural
    setting
  • best way to learn about patient demand, quality
    of communication
  • Weaknesses
  • behavior may not be natural because of observer's
    presence
  • requires skilled, patient observers
  • not useful for infrequent behaviors

30
Structured Questionnaires
  • Definition
  • a fixed set of items asked to a large sample of
    respondents selected according to strict rules to
    represent a larger population

?
?
?
?
?
?
?
31
Questionnaires Key Points
  • Nature of questions
  • useful for attitudes, opinions, and beliefs as
    well as facts
  • questions always asked in a standardized way
  • can have fixed or open-ended responses
  • Sample size
  • depends on target population, type of sampling,
    desired accuracy, and available resources
  • usually at least 50-75 respondents from each
    important subgroup

32
Questionnaires Strengths and Weaknesses
  • Strengths
  • best to study frequency of knowledge, attitudes,
    population characteristics
  • familiar to managers and respondents
  • required skills often locally available
  • Weaknesses
  • attitudes often difficult to quantify
  • respondents often answer a direct question even
    if they have no true opinion
  • results sensitive to which questions are asked
    and wording
  • large surveys can be expensive

33
Simulated Purchase Visits
  • Definition
  • a research assistant, prepared in advance to
    present a standard complaint, visit providers
    seeking treatment in order to determine their
    practices

34
Simulated Visits Key Points
  • usually sample 30 providers
  • collect data on many aspects of practice
  • history-taking
  • examination
  • treatment
  • advice
  • frequently used to examine practices in private
    pharmacies
  • scenario can be varied (e.g. watery vs. bloody
    diarrhea)

35
Simulated VisitsStrengths and Weaknesses
  • Strengths
  • can compare knowledge reported practice with
    actual practice
  • relatively quick easy to conduct
  • data are simple to analyze
  • Weaknesses
  • response may be specific to the scenario
    presented
  • research assistants can vary widely in
    reliability
  • ethical problem?

36
ConclusionWhich Method to Use?
  • Best method depends on
  • nature of the problem
  • objectives of collecting data
  • available resources and time
  • local capacity and experience
  • Use multiple methods
  • quantitative qualitative
  • "triangulate" findings
  • each method can look at different aspects of a
    problem

37
Activity 2
Designing Qualitative Instruments
38
Activity 3
Preparing for a Field Visit
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com