Title: Risk Stratification In Patients With Chronic Myocardial Ischemia
1Risk Stratification In Patients With Chronic
Myocardial Ischemia
2Available methods for risk stratification in CAD
patients
- Clinical parameters
- ECG
- Chest x-ray
- Noninvasive testing
- Resting LV function
- Exercise test
- Stress imaging
- Coronary angiography
Gibbons RJ et al. www.acc.org.
3High-risk criteria
gt3 annual mortality rate
- Severe resting LV dysfunction (LVEF lt35)
- High-risk treadmill score (-11)
- Severe exercise LV dysfunction (LVEF lt35)
- Stress-induced large perfusion defect (esp
anterior) - Multiple, moderate-sized perfusion defects
- Large, fixed perfusion defect with LV dilation or
increased lung uptake (thallium-201) - Stress-induced moderate perfusion defect with LV
dilation or increased lung uptake (thallium-201) - Echocardiographic wall motion abnormality (gt2
segments) at low dobutamine dose (10 mg/kg per
min) or low HR (lt102 bpm) - Stress echocardiographic evidence of extensive
ischemia
Gibbons RJ et al. www.acc.org.
4Intermediate-risk criteria
1-3 annual mortality rate
- Mild/moderate resting LV dysfunction (LVEF
35-49) - Intermediate-risk treadmill score (-11 lt score lt
5) - Stress-induced moderate perfusion defect without
LV dilation or increased lung intake
(thallium-201) - Limited stress echocardiographic ischemia with a
wall motion abnormality only at higher doses of
dobutamine involving 2 segments
Gibbons RJ et al. www.acc.org.
5Low-risk criteria
lt1 annual mortality rate
- Low-risk treadmill score (5)
- Normal or small myocardial perfusion defect at
rest or with stress - Normal stress echocardiographic wall motion or no
change of limited resting wall motion
abnormalities during stress
Gibbons RJ et al. www.acc.org.
6Comparison of 3 different risk scores
N 460 consecutive patients with NSTE-ACS
PURSUIT risk score
GRACE risk score
TIMI risk score
30
30
30
25
25
25
20
20
20
Deathor MI()
15
15
15
10
10
10
5
5
5
0
0
0
lt96
96-112
113-133
gt133
lt10
10-12
13-14
gt14
0-2
3-4
5-7
30 days 1 year
Death/MI
de Araújo Gonçalves P et al. Eur Heart J.
200526865-72.
7Summary
- Chronic IHD continues to impose a high
socioeconomic burden - Mechanistic understanding has undergone a
paradigm shift - Traditional focus Determinants of myocardial O2
supply/demand - Contemporary focus Changes in Na and Ca2
currents during ischemia - Contemporary management
- Aggressive treatment of multiple risk factors
- Multifactorial treatment of symptoms
- Renewed interest in the role of optimal medical
therapy vs PCI