Title: 1
1PEN Cambodia Presentation of Findings
- Sub-Regional Conference
- Vientiane, Laos
- 21-22 June 2006
2Structure of Presentation
- Natural Resource Dependence
- Drinking Water Sources ( Boiling)
- Sanitation
- Natural Disasters
- Mine/UXO Contamination
- Summary and Policy Implications
3Overview of Key Indicators
Estimated from CSES 2004. Estimated from a
combination of CSES 2004 and the National Level 1
survey of minefields. This is simply the
percentage of non-poor and poor living in urban
areas, and therefore potentially affected by
urban environmental issues such as outdoor air
pollution.
4Poverty Natural Resource Dependence
Households Engaged in Natural Resource-Dependent
Activities (left) By Household Consumption
Quintile in Rural Areas (right), 2004
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
5Poverty Natural Resource Dependence
Percentage of Communes within a Province
Reporting Decreases in Natural Resources
Natural Resource Decline and Rural Poverty
Incidence by Zone
SourceEstimated from CSES 2004 and Seila and
Danida 2005.
6Poverty Natural Resource Dependence
Households Engaged in Natural Resource-Dependent
Activities in Communes Reporting Resource
Decline, By Household Consumption Quintile
Source Estimated from CSES 2004 and Seila and
Danida 2005.
7Poverty Drinking Water Sources
Drinking Water Sources, Dry and Wet Season, 2004
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
8Poverty Drinking Water Sources
Unsafe Drinking Water Sources, by Household
Consumption Quintiles, 2004
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
9Poverty Drinking Water Sources
Boiling/Treating Drinking Water, Non-Poor Poor,
by National (top-left), Household Consumption
Quintile (top-right), Rural (bottom-left) and
Urban (bottom-right), 2004
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
10Poverty Drinking Water Sources
Boiling/Treating Drinking Water by Source,
Non-Poor and Poor, 2004
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
11Poverty Sanitation
Access to Basic Sanitation, 2004
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
12Poverty Sanitation
Sanitation by Household Consumption Quintile,
2004
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
13Poverty Sanitation
Sanitation, Rural and Urban, Non-Poor and Poor,
2004
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
14Natural Disasters - Floods
Households Affected by Floods in Three or More
Years, 1999 to 2003, by Household Consumption
Quintile
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
15Natural Disasters - Droughts
Households Affected by Droughts in Three or More
Years, 1999 to 2003, by Household Consumption
Quintile
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
16Poverty Mine/UXO Contamination
Households Affected by Mines Mines/Cluster
Bombs, by Household Consumption Quintile
Source Estimated from CSES 2004 and National
Level 1 Survey 2002.
17Poverty Mine/UXO Contamination
Households Affected by Mine Contaminaiton that
Severely Affects Access to Agricultural Land, by
Household Consumption Quintile
Source Estimated from CSES 2004 and National
Level 1 Survey 2002.
18Summary Implications Natural Resource
Dependence
- Poor are disproportionately dependent on natural
resources - And this holds true in areas reporting declines
in the resource base - Poverty resource decline most pronounced in
plateau/mountain region. - Policy implication Target support of local
resource management, land use planning, and
agricultural and off-farm assistance in poor
communes reporting resource declines - Natural resources provide an important safety net
for the poor, but not often a pathway out of
poverty - Policy implication Focus management regimes on
maintaining resources and providing access for
poor/vulnerable, not on industrial-level
extraction - Consider targeting interventions where rapid
resource extraction is either beginning, and/or
the resource base is not yet highly degraded - Encourage both sustainable management and
investment of extraction earnings in agricultural
and off-farm opportunities (rather than even more
extraction)
19Summary Implications Natural Resource
Dependence
- Neither restrictive nor open access management
appears to be pro-poor - Restricting access to natural resources (via
concessions) takes away productive resources that
the poor disproportionately depend on - Open access tends to benefit non-poor more than
poor - Poor lack the capital means (equipment,
transportation) to take advantage of open access
exploitation as profitably as non-poor - Open access (management vacuum) is often not
fully open, but rather involves paying informal
fees for accessa disproportionate burden for the
poor - Where open access results in resource decline,
poor experience greater impacts as they are more
dependent on resources and have fewer livelihood
alternatives - Policy implication Reform concessions to allow
appropriate access for local communities.
Address current management vacuum with greater
support for conducting natural resource
assessments, setting management priorities, and
developing locally appropriate and enforceable
management regimes.
20Summary Implications Drinking Water Sources
- Poor are disproportionately dependent on unsafe
water sources - Policy implication In targeting drinking water
provision, consider factors associated with use
of unsafe sources, including poverty, no
schooling, coastal and plateau/mountain regions,
rural areas far from district/provincial
capitals, and lack of all-weather roads. - Households accessing unsafe water sources are the
least likely to be boiling their water - Policy implication Promote education and
awareness programs to encourage boiling drinking
water, targeted to households using unsafe
sources.
21Summary Implications Sanitation, Natural
Disasters, Mine/UXO Contamination
- Access to basic sanitation is lacking across all
rural areas - Policy implication Make provision of basic
sanitation in rural areas a higher national
policy priority - Both droughts and floods show a statistically
significant relationship to poverty. But whereas
droughts are associated with poverty, floods are
associated with not being poor. - Policy implication Make development of
appropriate disaster responses to drought
problems a higher national priority - Mine and clusterbomb contamination show a strong
relationship with poverty - Policy implication Consider village poverty
rates as an additional element of targeting
criteria for demining
22Thank You