1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

1

Description:

Boiling/Treating Drinking Water, Non-Poor & Poor, by National (top-left) ... Policy implication: In targeting drinking water provision, consider factors ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:59
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: BAM
Category:
Tags: drinking

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: 1


1
PEN Cambodia Presentation of Findings
  • Sub-Regional Conference
  • Vientiane, Laos
  • 21-22 June 2006

2
Structure of Presentation
  • Natural Resource Dependence
  • Drinking Water Sources ( Boiling)
  • Sanitation
  • Natural Disasters
  • Mine/UXO Contamination
  • Summary and Policy Implications

3
Overview of Key Indicators
Estimated from CSES 2004. Estimated from a
combination of CSES 2004 and the National Level 1
survey of minefields. This is simply the
percentage of non-poor and poor living in urban
areas, and therefore potentially affected by
urban environmental issues such as outdoor air
pollution.
4
Poverty Natural Resource Dependence
Households Engaged in Natural Resource-Dependent
Activities (left) By Household Consumption
Quintile in Rural Areas (right), 2004
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
5
Poverty Natural Resource Dependence
Percentage of Communes within a Province
Reporting Decreases in Natural Resources
Natural Resource Decline and Rural Poverty
Incidence by Zone
SourceEstimated from CSES 2004 and Seila and
Danida 2005.
6
Poverty Natural Resource Dependence
Households Engaged in Natural Resource-Dependent
Activities in Communes Reporting Resource
Decline, By Household Consumption Quintile
Source Estimated from CSES 2004 and Seila and
Danida 2005.
7
Poverty Drinking Water Sources
Drinking Water Sources, Dry and Wet Season, 2004
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
8
Poverty Drinking Water Sources
Unsafe Drinking Water Sources, by Household
Consumption Quintiles, 2004
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
9
Poverty Drinking Water Sources
Boiling/Treating Drinking Water, Non-Poor Poor,
by National (top-left), Household Consumption
Quintile (top-right), Rural (bottom-left) and
Urban (bottom-right), 2004
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
10
Poverty Drinking Water Sources
Boiling/Treating Drinking Water by Source,
Non-Poor and Poor, 2004
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
11
Poverty Sanitation
Access to Basic Sanitation, 2004
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
12
Poverty Sanitation
Sanitation by Household Consumption Quintile,
2004
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
13
Poverty Sanitation
Sanitation, Rural and Urban, Non-Poor and Poor,
2004
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
14
Natural Disasters - Floods
Households Affected by Floods in Three or More
Years, 1999 to 2003, by Household Consumption
Quintile
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
15
Natural Disasters - Droughts
Households Affected by Droughts in Three or More
Years, 1999 to 2003, by Household Consumption
Quintile
Source Estimated from CSES 2004.
16
Poverty Mine/UXO Contamination
Households Affected by Mines Mines/Cluster
Bombs, by Household Consumption Quintile
Source Estimated from CSES 2004 and National
Level 1 Survey 2002.
17
Poverty Mine/UXO Contamination
Households Affected by Mine Contaminaiton that
Severely Affects Access to Agricultural Land, by
Household Consumption Quintile
Source Estimated from CSES 2004 and National
Level 1 Survey 2002.
18
Summary Implications Natural Resource
Dependence
  • Poor are disproportionately dependent on natural
    resources
  • And this holds true in areas reporting declines
    in the resource base
  • Poverty resource decline most pronounced in
    plateau/mountain region.
  • Policy implication Target support of local
    resource management, land use planning, and
    agricultural and off-farm assistance in poor
    communes reporting resource declines
  • Natural resources provide an important safety net
    for the poor, but not often a pathway out of
    poverty
  • Policy implication Focus management regimes on
    maintaining resources and providing access for
    poor/vulnerable, not on industrial-level
    extraction
  • Consider targeting interventions where rapid
    resource extraction is either beginning, and/or
    the resource base is not yet highly degraded
  • Encourage both sustainable management and
    investment of extraction earnings in agricultural
    and off-farm opportunities (rather than even more
    extraction)

19
Summary Implications Natural Resource
Dependence
  • Neither restrictive nor open access management
    appears to be pro-poor
  • Restricting access to natural resources (via
    concessions) takes away productive resources that
    the poor disproportionately depend on
  • Open access tends to benefit non-poor more than
    poor
  • Poor lack the capital means (equipment,
    transportation) to take advantage of open access
    exploitation as profitably as non-poor
  • Open access (management vacuum) is often not
    fully open, but rather involves paying informal
    fees for accessa disproportionate burden for the
    poor
  • Where open access results in resource decline,
    poor experience greater impacts as they are more
    dependent on resources and have fewer livelihood
    alternatives
  • Policy implication Reform concessions to allow
    appropriate access for local communities.
    Address current management vacuum with greater
    support for conducting natural resource
    assessments, setting management priorities, and
    developing locally appropriate and enforceable
    management regimes.

20
Summary Implications Drinking Water Sources
  • Poor are disproportionately dependent on unsafe
    water sources
  • Policy implication In targeting drinking water
    provision, consider factors associated with use
    of unsafe sources, including poverty, no
    schooling, coastal and plateau/mountain regions,
    rural areas far from district/provincial
    capitals, and lack of all-weather roads.
  • Households accessing unsafe water sources are the
    least likely to be boiling their water
  • Policy implication Promote education and
    awareness programs to encourage boiling drinking
    water, targeted to households using unsafe
    sources.

21
Summary Implications Sanitation, Natural
Disasters, Mine/UXO Contamination
  • Access to basic sanitation is lacking across all
    rural areas
  • Policy implication Make provision of basic
    sanitation in rural areas a higher national
    policy priority
  • Both droughts and floods show a statistically
    significant relationship to poverty. But whereas
    droughts are associated with poverty, floods are
    associated with not being poor.
  • Policy implication Make development of
    appropriate disaster responses to drought
    problems a higher national priority
  • Mine and clusterbomb contamination show a strong
    relationship with poverty
  • Policy implication Consider village poverty
    rates as an additional element of targeting
    criteria for demining

22
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com